The X-59 has officially flown at supersonic speeds for the first time, marking a major step forward on the path to quieting the sonic boom. Even faster and quieter flights are coming soon.

—Lockheed Martin

Mission Briefing

NASA’s X-59 QueSST just cracked the sound barrier for the very first time, diving headlong into the world of supersonic flight. Picture it: a sleek machine slicing through the sky, rewriting what we thought was possible.

The Quiet Boom Takes Flight

For this pivotal test flight, NASA’s X-59 QueSST (Quiet SuperSonic Technology) was in the hands of ace test pilot Jim “Clue” Less. He lifted off from the storied runway at Edwards Air Force Base under a late-morning California sky, the clock ticking 11:08 a.m. PDT. Eighty-one minutes later, Less brought the futuristic bird home, armed with a treasure trove of fresh data from both subsonic and supersonic realms.

Tagging along for the ride, a NASA F-15 played the role of the faithful chase plane, keeping a sharp eye on the X-59 as it pushed the boundaries.

But here’s the interesting twist: the F-15’s thunderous sonic booms drowned out whatever sound the X-59 made a deliberate design feature, since the X-59 is built to swap boom for a gentle, barely-there thump when it breaks the sound barrier. Supersonic, but subtle.

NASA’s press release teased even bigger milestones on the horizon, promising that the next crucial flight (labeled a “mission conditions” run) would see the X-59 hit Mach 1.4 (that’s 925 mph) and soar to 55,000 feet.

This is more than just a speed trial; it’s a rehearsal for real-world missions, where the X-59 will streak over actual communities. Why? To let residents experience that signature quiet thump, not a window-rattling boom, and help NASA collect the data regulators need to rethink the rules for supersonic travel over land.

Since its maiden voyage back in October 2025, the X-59 has been methodically stretching its wings, testing different speeds and altitudes in a careful expansion of its flight envelope. This first phase is all about mapping the aircraft’s limits.

Once that’s wrapped, the focus will shift to acoustic validation: making sure that whisper-quiet supersonic flight is more than just a theory, aiming for completion by the end of 2026.

Meanwhile, NASA’s engineers are keeping tabs on everything from how the aircraft handles and absorbs stress to how its innovative systems—like the eXternal Vision System, which replaces a traditional cockpit window with high-tech cameras—perform in the heat of action.

The stakes are sky-high, but so is the promise of a new era in aviation.

NASA’s X-59 QueSST: The Jet Built to Silence the Sonic Boom

Meet the X-59 QueSST, a marvel of modern engineering and a head-turner straight out of NASA’s playbook, crafted at the legendary Skunk Works. This isn’t just another supersonic jet; it’s the flagship for NASA’s Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator project, a bold mission to bring back supersonic commercial travel without the ear-splitting booms that once grounded it.

The X-59 is all about quiet power, designed not just to break the sound barrier, but to do it gently enough to convince regulators it’s time to lift that 1973 ban on overland supersonic flight.

What sets this bird apart? It’s all in the hush. The X-59’s sonic boom promises to be a whisper compared to the thunder of the old Concorde. NASA says less than 75 perceived decibels on the ground, a third quieter than the Concorde’s infamous 100-110 dB rumbles.

The secret weapon? That impossibly long, slender nose; nearly a third of the plane’s total length. It’s meticulously shaped to shatter shockwaves before they can merge and create a boom, turning a sonic wallop into a polite thump.

But the nose isn’t just for show. It pushes the cockpit so far back there’s no room for a classic windshield up front. Instead, NASA’s engineers cooked up the eXternal Vision System, a cutting-edge array of high-res cameras streaming a crystal-clear 4K feed right to a monitor in the cockpit. It’s high-tech, it’s innovative, and it’s the future.

Under the hood, the X-59 packs a punch with its F414-GE-100 engine—22,000 pounds of thrust, borrowed and tuned from the F/A-18 Super Hornet. The engine sits up top, smoothing out the plane’s belly, which helps keep those pesky shockwaves in check and the sound down low.

Safety’s never an afterthought. The X-59 comes loaded with life support systems to keep the pilot sharp and safe (from oxygen delivery to G-suit power) plus an ejection seat and canopy adapted from the trusty T-38 trainer, complete with first aid, radio, and water.

Because in this next chapter of supersonic flight, it’s all about flying fast, flying quiet, and flying smart.

The Quiet Boom That Could Reopen the Supersonic Sky

For the U.S. and its friends in the sky, NASA’s X-59 QueSST breaking the sound barrier isn’t just another notch in aviation history. It’s a message, a ripple through policy, industry, and strategy alike.

The X-59 nudges past Mach 1.1, its first real taste of supersonic flight. NASA’s chase F-15 thundered alongside, its own boom stealing the sonic spotlight for now, but the world was watching.

Why does it matter? Because this bird is out to prove that speed can make a comeback. Sans the uproar that once grounded supersonic dreams over land. QueSST’s mission is all about listening to the ground: gathering real-world reactions to those gentler “thumps” instead of window-rattling booms, then handing over the findings to U.S. and global regulators.

The hope? Rewrite the rulebook on noise, and open the door for new, faster air routes connecting continents (think New York to London, Tokyo to LA) quicker and quieter than ever before.

There’s a lesson for defense, too. The X-59 isn’t a fighter jet, but its sleek shape, sensors, and whisper-smooth design send a clear signal: in aerospace, survival, stealth, and speed still reign.

Right now, supersonic flight over land is off-limits for civil aircraft, unless the FAA says otherwise. That’s why this data could become the key, linking today’s experiments to tomorrow’s regulations.

If the X-59 can turn the dreaded sonic boom into little more than a polite knock, then the next great aviation race won’t just be about velocity. It’ll be about who can win hearts, win over the rule-makers, and bring this breakthrough to allies worldwide.

So keep your eyes on those noise tests, policy shifts, and whether the industry can turn NASA’s hard-won data into jets that let you cross an ocean before your coffee gets cold.

This Week in Aviation History

On 24 June 1948, the Soviets slammed the gates shut, cutting off every rail, road, and waterway into Allied-held Berlin. Refusing to let the city starve, American and British pilots took to the skies, turning their planes into lifelines as they flew in food and fuel from the west. After months of high-stakes flights and tense standoffs, the blockade finally cracked on 24 May 1949, and the roads to Berlin reopened.

When the Sky Became Berlin’s Lifeline

When the dust settled after World War II, Germany was a shattered country, and nowhere felt it more than Berlin.

With about 2.5 million people scraping by among the ruins, the city’s daily life was a struggle. Food was scarce, shelter even scarcer, and the only real economy was whatever you could find in the black market. To chart a path out of the rubble, the Allies carved Germany into zones, dividing Berlin right down the middle: the Soviets taking the east, the Americans, British, and French splitting the west.

For a while, uneasy cooperation kept things moving, but by 1948, the cracks in the alliance had split wide open. The Soviets were meeting with their former partners to hammer out how to run the place, but when they caught wind that the U.S., Britain, and France were planning to fuse their zones into a new West German state, the gloves came off.

Tensions flared even hotter when the Allies rolled out the Deutschmark. It is a brand-new currency for their zones, including West Berlin. It was a bold move meant to reboot the economy, crush the black market, and channel Marshall Plan aid into the city. But the Soviets weren’t invited to the party and saw their grip on Berlin slipping away.

Here’s the kicker: Berlin itself sat deep inside Soviet-controlled East Germany, a Western outpost surrounded by rival forces. Sensing an opportunity, the Soviets made their move.

On 24 June 1948, they slammed shut every road, rail line, and waterway leading into Allied-controlled Berlin, hoping to starve the city into submission. With Allied troop numbers a fraction of the Soviet garrison, there was no chance of breaking the blockade by force.

The Soviets may have controlled the ground, but they couldn’t seal off the sky. So, the Americans and British fired up their engines and launched Operation Vittles, known to history as the Berlin Airlift.

Starting June 26, wave after wave of cargo planes threaded the air corridors, dropping in food, coal, and hope. It was the largest aerial supply mission the world had ever seen. Meanwhile, the Allies hit back with their own economic squeeze, cutting off trade with the East. The Cold War’s first major standoff had begun, and it was playing out above the clouds of Berlin.

Operation Vittles: The Sky’s Greatest Supply Mission

At first, the Berlin Airlift looked like a mission straight out of an aviator’s nightmare—over two million Berliners counting on you for every meal, every drop of fuel, every life-saving dose of medicine. But as weeks turned into months, the operation found its rhythm.

The skies above Tempelhof became a well-oiled ballet of engines and wings, with planes touching down every 45 seconds at the height of the effort. On Easter Sunday, April 1949, the airlift’s pilots pulled off a feat for the history books: 13,000 tons of cargo (enough to fill 600 railcars with coal) delivered in just one day.

For the Soviets, the story was unraveling. Ten months in, the Allies had shown they could keep the lifeline going as long as it took, and the blockade was backfiring, painting the Russians as the heavy-handed villains.

Worse still, the Allied counter-blockade was squeezing supplies in the Soviet sectors, stirring unrest on the other side of the wall. Finally, the Soviets blinked, lifting the blockade on 11 May 1949. Still, the Allies kept the airlift running until September 30, just in case Moscow thought about slamming the door shut again.

By the end, American and British crews had flown over 278,000 missions, delivering a staggering 2.3 million tons of supplies over nearly 92 million miles.

The Berlin Airlift became a living testament to American ingenuity, grit, and the power of allied teamwork; proof that some burdens are too great to shoulder alone. Though the blockade ended without a shot, the Iron Curtain was only beginning to fall.

NATO formed in its wake, and Berlin split in two, each half a symbol: democracy and freedom in the West, communism in the East.

The Berlin Airlift: The Legacy That Kept Freedom Flying

The story of the Berlin Airlift isn’t just measured in cargo manifests or tally sheets of coal and flour. Its true legacy soars somewhere higher, in the moment when airpower stopped being just about force and became a lifeline, a promise stitched across the clouds.

When the Soviets slammed the gates on West Berlin in 1948, the world held its breath. The answer wasn’t gunfire or retreat, but a steady, determined parade of aircraft. C-47s, C-54s, and allied transports threading the needle through narrow corridors, turning the sky into a living bridge. Every landing wasn’t just a delivery; it was hope with wings.

This cinematic chapter rewrote the script for what military aviation could mean. Suddenly, logistics weren’t background details. They were acts of defiance. Aircrews defended a city not with bombs, but with bread, milk, and medicine.

The airlift became a symbol: that unity could fly, and that freedom could be kept alive from above. Berliners looked up and saw more than machines. They saw proof they weren’t alone.

The doctrine born over Berlin was simple and bold: when roads close and diplomacy stalls, air mobility can still break through. The echo of those engines still resonates wherever planes carry relief into places cut off by conflict or disaster.

From the crowded corridors of 1948 to today’s global air missions, the lesson lands the same way, when liberty is on the ropes, sometimes the sky itself becomes the story’s hero.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

Afterburners are only used on fighter planes and the supersonic airliner, Concorde. The Concorde turns the afterburners off once it gets into cruise. Otherwise, it would run out of fuel before reaching Europe. Afterburners offer a mechanically simple way to augment thrust and are used on both turbojets and turbofans.

—NASA

Read more

The first phase of flight testing for the KC-46’s Remote Vision System 2.0 upgrade is complete, validating systems and confirming the performance of upgraded camera, control, and processing hardware aboard the KC-46 in real refueling conditions.

—Boeing Defense

Mission Briefing

Boeing just wrapped up the first round of trials on the KC-46’s RVS 2.0, putting those tough, high-def cameras and slick controls through their paces. The real adventure kicks off in 2027, when these upgrades go fleet-wide and the sky gets a little sharper for every pilot.

Boeing Advances KC-46A Remote Vision Upgrade

In the world of high-flying innovation and nail-biting test flights, the KC-46A Pegasus just marked a turning point in its turbulent journey.

On June 3rd, 2026, Boeing announced with a mix of relief and pride that it had wrapped up the first phase of flight tests for the much-debated Remote Vision System 2.0. It is a tech marvel that’s been both a lifeline and a headache for the Pegasus team.

For years, the RVS, essential for guiding the telescopic refueling boom, was plagued by blurry video feeds and light sensitivity that could turn refueling into a white-knuckle gamble.

But with this initial round of tests in the books, the stage is set for a full-force upgrade across the Air Force fleet, penciled in for 2027.

Boeing’s cinematic test footage showed the KC-46A’s refueling boom linking up midair with everything from a fellow Pegasus and a hulking C-17 Globemaster III to the nimble T-38 Talon, all under the watchful eye of the new ruggedized cameras.

Boeing’s press team didn’t hold back, touting the RVS 2.0’s ground-breaking optics: 4K Ultra HD, 3D immersive visuals, and hardware tough enough for whatever the skies throw at it.

The aim: give Airmen a crystal-clear, real-world view while they pull off the delicate ballet of midair refueling. This leap follows months of lab work and hands-on tinkering, not to mention crafting a next-level Aerial Refueling Operator Station.

Testing kicked off at Boeing’s Seattle home base and soon had the 418th Flight Test Squadron at Edwards Air Force Base joining in, especially for those challenging flights over the Mugu Sea Test Range, where sunlight plays tricks on even the best tech. The saga of the Pegasus and its new eyes in the sky is just getting started, and the next chapter promises to be dramatic.

The Tanker Bird’s RVS and Other Issues

The saga of the KC-46A Pegasus continues to unfold as the U.S. Air Force, Boeing, and the Joint Program Office set their sights on a service-wide retrofit for the much-anticipated Remote Vision System 2.0 in 2027, just after it clears certification.

This is no small feat. The KC-46A is slated to take over from the iconic KC-135 Stratotanker, a workhorse of the skies for generations, with about 370 still flying missions. The Pegasus is destined to become the backbone of America’s aerial refueling fleet for decades to come, a futuristic torchbearer on the high-altitude highways.

By mid-May, the mood at Boeing and the Air Force was all hands on deck. The program, which had been fighting an uphill battle, launched a full-scale rescue mission. The goals were clear: get RVS 2.0 certified and retrofitted on schedule, reassign the earliest Pegasus builds to support the fleet right away, and roll out a temporary, performance-based logistics plan laser-focused on the refueling system and anything else that kept these birds grounded.

As of February 2026, Boeing had delivered 103 Pegasus jets to the Air Force, even as it wrestled with a laundry list of technical setbacks. At the very heart of the storm was the Remote Vision System: a technological leap that swapped the classic rear-facing window for a cutting-edge camera suite, letting boom operators refuel planes through video feeds rather than direct line of sight.

But the first versions of this system struggled with visibility and depth perception, especially in tricky lighting—night flights, dazzling sun, you name it. Image washout and visual distortions made refueling a tense, high-stakes affair, as the operators grappled with the risk of accidental strikes.

To bridge the gap, the Air Force fielded interim KC-46As with what’s been dubbed the RVS 1.5: a modest upgrade, but still not the leap forward everyone hoped for. The RVS 2.0, meanwhile, brings in a total of six cameras (two long-wave infrared, four visible spectrum) for an all-weather, all-lighting solution.

But even this upgrade ran the gauntlet of technical reviews and certification headaches, as Boeing tried to adapt commercial off-the-shelf hardware for military missions.

And the Pegasus’s challenges didn’t stop there. The refueling boom itself faced teething troubles, from actuator stiffness that made it tough to plug into certain jets, to nozzle-binding issues that sometimes left the boom stuck fast: costly headaches for crews and taxpayers alike.

Then, in February 2025, a new setback: deliveries halted after structural cracks were found in two KC-46As. Through it all, the vision remains. It is a new chapter for aerial refueling, with the Pegasus leading the charge, one upgrade at a time.

Eyes on the Boom: KC-46’s Quiet Fight for Allied Reach

The milestone reached with the KC-46A Pegasus’s Remote Vision System 2.0 is more than just a technical victory. It’s a pivotal chapter in the story of American and allied airpower.

While fighter jets, bombers, and sleek surveillance birds grab the headlines, it’s the tankers, like silent shepherds in the clouds, that really set the boundaries for how far our aircraft can roam and how fast they can answer the call.

With Boeing wrapping up the first phase of RVS 2.0 flight tests, one of the Pegasus program’s most glaring weak spots is finally getting patched.

Unlike the old-school tanker crews who peered through rear windows, today’s boom operators are glued to screens, guiding the refueling boom with the help of high-tech cameras. If those cameras can’t handle glare or depth, it’s not just a technical snag. It’s a question of safety and mission speed.

This matters now more than ever. As distances in the Pacific and elsewhere become strategic hurdles, a robust, reliable tanker fleet is the quiet force-multiplier. For America’s allies, it means smoother joint missions and the kind of coalition staying power that matters in a crisis. Japan’s already flying the Pegasus, and NATO partners lean on U.S. refueling know-how during tense patrols and exercises.

The real takeaway? Air dominance isn’t just about stealth or firepower. It’s about the unsung machines that keep everyone else in the fight. With RVS 2.0 on the rise, the Pegasus story is pivoting from problem child to unsung hero of the skies.

This Week in Aviation History

The GRAB II satellite tells a chapter from the dawn of space-age espionage, standing as one of America’s earliest forays into signals intelligence from orbit. Its predecessor, the first GRAB, rocketed skyward on 22 June 1960—just weeks after the drama of Gary Powers’ U-2 spy plane being shot down. In those tense days, the race for secrets had shifted from high-altitude wings to silent sentinels circling above the clouds.

GRAB I, First Operational Intelligence Satellite

For nearly four decades, the story of the Galactic Radiation and Background (GRAB) satellite remained locked away in the vaults of military secrecy, only to be revealed by the Navy in 1998.

The program, originally dubbed “Tattletale,” earned its cryptic new name after its existence went public.

It all started when NRL scientist Reid Mayo, fresh off his breakthrough with radar detectors on submarine periscopes, pitched the bold idea that his periscope antenna could be just as effective in orbit.

Mayo took this vision to Howard Lorenzen, the mastermind behind the Navy’s countermeasures, who saw its promise and championed it up the chain in 1958.

The concept sprang to life in the tense days after a U.S. reconnaissance plane was shot down over the Soviet Union in June 1960. GRAB I hitched a ride atop a Navy Transit IIA satellite, slipping quietly into orbit.

From its perch 500 miles above Earth, GRAB I darted through the invisible webs of Soviet radar, picking up pulses and beaming the data down to hidden collection huts scattered across the globe.

Operators would carefully record the satellite’s transmissions onto magnetic tape, then rush the precious reels to the Naval Research Lab for evaluation. There, the data was copied and sent off to the NSA and Strategic Air Command for deep analysis and strategic insight.

GRAB I’s secret haul of Soviet air defense intelligence—impossible to gather by aircraft—became a game changer. By the time GRAB II launched in June 1961, the program was hitting its stride, delivering a torrent of invaluable radar intercepts.

The sheer volume of signals prompted the NSA to roll out new automated systems just to keep pace. Meanwhile, the Navy’s space wizards kept pushing the boundaries, laying the groundwork for tracking satellites and mastering the silent battles above the clouds.

How GRAB Turned Space Into an Intelligence Frontier

The GRAB project was a game-changer, proving satellites could scoop up electronic intelligence on a scale that matched or even outclassed the ships, planes, and ground crews below; without risking a single life and at a fraction of the cost.

As GRAB quietly rewrote the rulebook, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) was formed in 1961 to corral all satellite and overflight spy missions, and by 1962, it had absorbed the Naval Research Lab’s pioneering ELINT satellite work.

Never content to rest on their laurels, the team at NRL took the momentum from GRAB and launched POPPY. It is the next-gen ELINT satellites designed to sniff out radar emissions on land and keep a stealthy eye on ocean traffic. POPPY ran as a key player in NRO’s signals intelligence arsenal, operating in the silent heights from 1962 to 1977.

Even today, the GRAB program’s spirit lives on at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, fueling fresh innovation and inspiring new generations of space engineers. As Chris Dwyer, head of the NRL Space Systems Division, says, the lab’s legacy in space science is a tapestry of firsts. GRAB is just one iconic thread in the Navy’s storied journey above the clouds.

The Satellite That Taught the Cold War to Listen

GRAB’s legacy kicks off with a quiet but seismic shift. It is a satellite proving, for the first time, that outer space could be a front-row seat for intelligence gathering. Launched in 1960, just as the world reeled from the U-2 incident, the Galactic Radiation and

Background satellite wore a public face of science, but its real mission was shrouded in secrecy. From hundreds of miles above, GRAB tuned in to Soviet radar signals and beamed that vital intel home, giving American analysts a way to study enemy air defenses without risking pilots over hostile skies.

But GRAB’s true breakthrough wasn’t just in hardware. It rewrote the playbook for reconnaissance itself. Until then, intelligence meant sending brave crews into danger zones by plane, ship, or on the ground.

GRAB showed that a compact spacecraft could quietly scan vast territories, lowering the risk for personnel and raising the bar for strategic insight.

This little satellite didn’t just collect secrets. It laid the groundwork for the next wave of U.S. space reconnaissance. Its success spun off into programs like POPPY and helped forge lasting ties among the Navy, NSA, CIA, Strategic Air Command, and the newly minted National Reconnaissance Office.

The information GRAB gathered lifted the veil on Soviet radar, deepened America’s electronic warfare playbook, and shaped preparations for future threats from the sky.

In the end, GRAB was more than just a satellite. It was the moment the Cold War learned to listen from above. Every modern spy satellite and space-based radar system still echoes that first, silent sentinel’s legacy.

In Case You Missed It

The ES-3A Shadow’s career was cut short:

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

US officials have signalled openness to talks that would potentially allow more countries to host its dual-capable aircraft, which are able to deliver nuclear strikes.

—Financial Times

Mission Briefing

According to the Financial Times, word is swirling that the U.S. is deep in talks with NATO buddies—especially Poland and those plucky Baltic states—about beefing up the Air Force’s nuclear presence in Europe. Picture tense briefings, maps sprawled across tables, and the hum of strategy in the air. It’s the kind of high-stakes negotiation that would feel right at home in a Cold War thriller, but with a modern, cockpit-casual twist.

Nuclear Wings over Europe

Let me take you up to 30,000 feet and give you a bird’s-eye view of the nuclear chessboard in Europe, a landscape that’s as cinematic as it is high-stakes. Right now, there’s an exclusive club of host nations. Think Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the UK, each playing host to U.S. nuclear bombs.

Under the broader NATO war plan, these weapons can be delivered not only by American pilots but, in some cases, by specially trained local crews. The UK, for its part, made a dramatic return to this club when it welcomed nuclear weapons back to RAF Lakenheath, ending a hiatus that started in 2008. Picture the scene: hardened bunkers, the quiet thrum of security systems, and a sense of history circling overhead.

But the script is changing. With Russia’s war on Ukraine rewriting the security calculus, NATO’s eastern flank. Poland and the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia are stepping into the spotlight.

For them, proximity to the Russian border isn’t just a line on a map; it’s a daily reality, with the distant rumble of artillery never far from mind. Now, according to reports, they’re considering joining the nuclear sharing initiative, a move that would see U.S. bombs stationed on territory that, not so long ago, was firmly behind the Iron Curtain.

For Poland, in particular, the prospect is tangible. They fly both F-16s and the cutting-edge F-35, making them prime candidates for joining the elite group of nations cleared to deliver American nukes.

If this expansion were to happen, it’d be historic. A first for U.S. nuclear weapons to take up residence in former Warsaw Pact countries. Imagine: the very same B61 bombs, first fielded in the 1960s, potentially deployed to bases that, decades ago, would have been targets on old Cold War maps.

Of course, don’t expect a Hollywood-style arrival overnight. Even in the UK, where the infrastructure was already in place, years passed between the initial talks and the actual return of the weapons. For Poland or the Baltics, vaults (armored, tech-laden, and bristling with security systems) would have to be built from scratch before a single bomb touched down.

And there’s another wrinkle in the plot. Poland, along with other NATO partners, has signed on to France’s vision of a beefed-up French nuclear force. This could mean Rafale jets, armed with French nukes, rotating through other countries and more invitations to join France’s high-drama nuclear exercises. In the ever-shifting theater of European security, the cast keeps growing, and the stakes are higher than ever.

Major Reason Behind Expansion

Soaring above the shifting landscape of U.S. military strategy, you can see the tension playing out like a scene from a geopolitical thriller. The Trump administration has made it clear: the U.S. wants to pull some of its forces out of Europe, a move that’s got allies glancing nervously at their maps.

But here’s the twist. While boots on the ground may be on the way out, the Pentagon is weighing the cinematic option of deploying more nuclear weapons to keep the strategic balance. Unlike conventional forces, these nukes require fewer personnel, letting Washington trim its military footprint while still reassuring European partners that the cavalry (or at least the bombers) are never too far away.

As NATO allies brace themselves for the official word on troop withdrawals, the numbers are making headlines. Germany alone could lose up to 5,000 U.S. personnel, cutting deep into the American presence there.

Over in Poland, a planned rotation of 4,000 troops was suddenly called off, stirring up political drama from Warsaw to Washington. The decision was eventually reversed, with President Trump personally greenlighting a new deployment, but the whiplash left allies wary of the unpredictable winds blowing from D.C.

The repercussions ripple far beyond Europe. When the U.S. dragged its feet on a visa waiver for Bulgarians, Prime Minister Rumen Radev threatened to send U.S. forces packing, including the aircrews at Sofia International who support Operation Epic Fury. Europe isn’t just a backdrop; it’s a vital launchpad for missions stretching into the Middle East.

If countries start closing their doors, the U.S. Air Force—already hustling to keep its vast airlift fleet moving—could find its options for refueling and stopovers narrowing fast. In this high-altitude chess match, every move counts, and the room for error is getting tighter by the day.

NATO’s Nuclear Shield Takes Flight

What was once a holdover from Cold War days is now morphing into a more active response to Russia’s pressure campaign on Europe. The latest talks are about moving beyond the old nuclear-sharing playbook: Poland and the Baltic states are now in the frame as potential hosts for dual-capable jets that could carry U.S. bombs, not just the usual suspects farther west.

For NATO’s eastern members, the subtext is clear. They want real, visible proof that the American nuclear umbrella covers them too. NATO keeps emphasizing that dual-capable aircraft are the backbone of its nuclear deterrent, with Washington still firmly in charge of the bombs. Poland and Lithuania have admitted they’re in discussions about taking on a bigger role, though Poland says no nukes are coming just yet.

From the U.S. side, it’s about showing extended deterrence: even if conventional forces shift, Moscow needs to know that attacking NATO would mean consequences. The F-35A’s new certification to carry the advanced B61-12 bomb gives NATO a slick, stealthy way to deliver its message, making the deterrent posture more credible than ever.

But there’s turbulence ahead. Any expansion could be seen as provocation by Russia, and allies would need to invest in secure bases and political buy-in. With over 100 B61 bombs already on the continent, this isn’t just symbolism. It’s a real shift in NATO’s nuclear footprint, and a signal that Europe’s next airpower story might be about building a broader, modernized nuclear shield.

This Week in Aviation History

15, June 1944: The first American raid on Yawata kicked off the bold campaign to bomb Japan’s home islands from the skies. Sure, it wasn’t a smashing victory, but it proved those mighty B-29s could cross oceans and strike at the heart of enemy territory. It was the opening scene in a new chapter of aerial warfare—risky, relentless, and just getting started.

Superfortress Bombing of Japan

Back in the wild, uncertain dawn of the Pacific War, the Japanese swept across the map with the force of a tidal wave, seizing islands and outposts at a pace that left Allied commanders scrambling.

Every day, the enemy’s reach grew longer, their strongholds inching closer to the American dream of striking back. The U.S. had bombers, legendary birds like the B-17 Flying Fortress and the B-24 Liberator. But these old workhorses just didn’t have the legs for the job. The Pacific was simply too wide, its blue expanse swallowing any hope of a sustained bombing campaign on Japan’s doorstep.

Then, on the distant horizon, came the promise of something extraordinary: the Boeing B-29 Superfortress. This wasn’t just another bomber. It was an engineering marvel, a beast born from the fevered ambition of Army brass who’d been eyeing high-altitude, long-range bombers since 1938.

Before the prototype even left the ground, the Army ordered 250 of these giants from Boeing, betting the farm on a machine that would outclass anything in the skies.

When the XB-29 finally roared down the runway in September 1942, it was like something out of a pilot’s wildest dreams: nearly 100 feet long, a wingspan stretching further than a city block, and weighing in at over sixty tons when loaded for bear. Four Wright Duplex Cyclone engines, each one a snarling powerhouse, could sling the Superfortress through the clouds at up to 375 miles per hour.

Inside, the crew of eleven cruised at altitudes above 30,000 feet in pressurized comfort, while the defensive turrets bristled with .50-caliber machine guns. Best of all, she could carry a staggering ten tons of bombs, enough to leave a mark on any target below.

At first, the brass thought about sending these beauties to Europe. But by the time the B-29s were ready for action, the skies over Germany were already thick with Allied bombers. It was in the Pacific, against Japan, that the Superfortress would write its legend.

General H. H. Arnold, a man whose mind soared as high as his bombers, knew the challenge: U.S. bases in the Aleutians were too far, and the vital Mariana Islands weren’t yet in American hands. The solution was bold, base the B-29s in India, then leapfrog them over the treacherous Himalayas (the infamous “Hump”) to airfields in China, finally putting Tokyo within reach.

President Roosevelt, playing the long game, quickly approved the plan—Operation Matterhorn—in late 1943, eager to keep China’s leader, Chiang Kai-shek, in the war and give Japan a taste of what was coming. For the aviators at the tip of this spear, the very idea of a globe-spanning bombing force was the stuff of legend. The B-29 was their Excalibur.

By spring 1944, the Twentieth Air Force was formed, with Arnold at the helm and the Superfortress its crown jewel. Command was tight: no ground general, British or American, could touch the B-29s except in a true emergency. Supplies for the Chinese bases had to be flown in, often requiring seven round trips from India just to deliver enough fuel for a single bombing mission.

With the Seventy-third Bombardment Wing reassigned to the Marianas, the remaining Fifty-eighth Wing could only muster full-scale raids a few times a month; hampered by teething troubles, engine failures, and green crews pushing a brand new machine to its limits.

It wasn’t until 15 June 1944, after months of sweat, setbacks, and sky-high hopes, that the first B-29s finally lifted off for their inaugural raid on Japan.

Under the Hood of the Superfortress

The B-29 was dreamed up in 1940 as the next leap beyond the B-17 and B-24. By September 1942, she soared on her maiden flight, a gleaming promise of what was to come. Fast forward to December 1943, and the U.S. Army Air Forces brass decided Asia was where this long-range titan would shine, especially for those marathon flights over the Pacific toward Japan.

By the end of 1944, B-29s thundered off runways on Saipan, Guam, and Tinian, bringing the war right to Japan’s doorstep. When the Korean War erupted in June 1950, the Superfortress was called back into action, ready for another round.

She had her share of close calls, dodging MiG-15 jets, but still packed a punch against a variety of enemy targets. One storied B-29, Bockscar, wrapped up her journey with a final flight to the museum on September 26, 1961. That marked the close of an era, but her legend still echoes across aviation history.

TECHNICAL NOTES:
Armament: Eight .50-cal. machine guns in remote controlled turrets plus two .50-cal. machine guns and one 20mm cannon in tail; 20,000 lbs. of bombs
Engines: Four Wright R-3350s of 2,200 hp each
Maximum speed: 357 mph
Cruising speed: 220 mph
Range: 3,700 miles
Ceiling: 33,600 ft.
Span: 141 ft. 3 in.
Length: 99 ft.
Height: 27 ft. 9 in.
Weight: 133,500 lbs. maximum
Serial number: 44-27297

B-29s Beyond the Horizon

The true legacy of the 15 June 1944 B-29 Superfortress raid on Yawata isn’t found in the battered buildings or twisted metal. It’s in the new era it launched. That night, American bombers clawed their way from India, through makeshift bases in China, to finally touch the Japanese homeland with a weapon the world had never seen: the very-heavy bomber.

Clouds, balky engines, and the vast stretch of ocean and mountains made the raid less deadly than hoped, but that wasn’t the real story. The real shockwave hit when Japan realized that nowhere was out of reach anymore.

Yawata was the first lightning flash before the storm. It showed the awesome potential of strategic bombing in the Pacific. The B-29s could fly high, fly far, and carry mountains of bombs, but they also needed rivers of fuel, expert crews, and bases that were never close enough. Operation Matterhorn laid bare the logistical mountain to climb, with every drop of fuel having to cross the Himalayas before a single bomber could launch.

Still, the raid gave the B-29 force its baptism by fire, teaching hard lessons that would shape the relentless air assaults from the Marianas later on. Yawata’s legacy is one of transformation: from a daring experiment to a full-force campaign, from desperate logistics to airpower dominance, and from Japan’s sense of safety to the undeniable fact that distance was no longer a shield.

It ushered in a new age in which long-range bombers, forward bases, and cutting-edge tech rewrote the rules of war from the sky. Even now, with stealth jets, nuclear bombers, and drones prowling the horizon, the message endures: in airpower, whoever owns the long arm of reach sends the first—and loudest—warning before the fight begins.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The future of the Air Force is flying over Edwards Air Force Base today.”

— Retired Air Force Lt. Col. and 412th Test Wing spokesman Mike Paoli

Quick note, this was written prior to the B-52 accident at Edwards AFB. My condolences, thoughts, and prayers to all the affected families.

Read more

MQ-9B SeaGuardian® advanced intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance #UAS with an anti-submarine warfare system enables persistent submarine tracking while simultaneously maintaining maritime domain awareness for U.S. and international forces.

—General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc (GA-ASI)

Mission Briefing

The MQ-9B, once spotted with just two Sonobuoy Dispensing System pods, now rolls out flaunting four, stepping deeper into its new anti-submarine warfare role. Imagine the transformation. One moment it’s a familiar bird, the next it’s bristling with fresh gear, ready for a different kind of hunt. It’s a crucial upgrade, the kind of twist aviators love to tell in hangar tales.

SeaGuardian’s Submarine-Hunting Edge

It’s late May 2026, and the MQ-9B Sea Guardian is making waves at the Canada Security (CANSEC) exhibition. Up front, this isn’t just any drone.

It’s the SeaGuardian, freshly outfitted for anti-submarine warfare, and for the first time, it’s showing off four Sonobuoy Dispensing System pods. Up until now, we’ve only seen her with two, so this is a big deal in the world of unmanned aviation.

A little history here: General Atomics had hinted last December that four pods might be in the cards, especially after the SeaGuardian became the first unmanned bird to drop Multi-static Active Coherent sonobuoys.

But, as things go, the official photos back then only showed two pods, leaving everyone guessing whether the four-pod setup was just a rumor or a classified secret.

Then, at CANSEC 2026, the curtain lifts. There she is, nose pointed at the camera, four pods mounted diagonally under her wings, and an extra pod slung along the centerline. Ready for a high-tech radar, either from Leonardo or Raytheon.

Previous snapshots with the radar pod always had just two SDS pods, so seeing this five-pod loadout is a true cinematic reveal. Of course, every extra pod means a trade-off: more gear in the sky, but maybe less time up there.

Even so, with the SeaGuardian’s endurance clocking in at up to 40 hours, she’s still got plenty of fuel for the hunt.

The SeaGuardian and Her Pods

According to GA-ASI’s own product catalogue, each Sonobuoy Dispensing System (SDS) pod can carry either 10 standard-issue ‘A’ size sonobuoys or twice as many in the smaller ‘G’ size configuration.

Line up four of those bad boys under the SeaGuardian’s wings, and you’re looking at a payload of 40 ‘A’s or a whopping 80 ‘G’s. That’s a whole lot of underwater ears, ready to fan out across the ocean on command.

Just remember, these pods aren’t exactly lightweight: empty, each one weighs in at 132 kilos, but stuff it full of sonobuoys and it tips the scales at a burly 340 kg per pod.

Flash back to December 2025. GA-ASI quietly let slip that their latest test flight had more pods than ever before. Essentially doubling the number of sonobuoys the SeaGuardian could carry.

Insiders caught the hint: four pods were likely in play, even if the hangar photos from that day only showed the aircraft with two. That trial was a milestone, marking the first time any UAV had dropped the cutting-edge Multi-Static Active Coherent (MAC) sonobuoys, specifically the AN/SSQ-125 model.

And that’s not the only trick up SeaGuardian’s sleeve: previous trials tested the AN/SSQ-36 Bathythermal, the trusty AN/SSQ-53G DIFAR for passive listening, and the AN/SSQ-62F DICASS for active sub-hunting; all launched from the SDS pods.

GA-ASI’s press team loves to hype the combination of the SDS and Sonobuoy Monitoring and Control System (SMCS), and for good reason. Coupled with the SeaGuardian’s suite of multi-domain sensors, you’ve got a drone that can keep tabs on just about everything; surface ships, submarines lurking below, the whole nine yards.

That means persistent, automated sub-tracking and maritime awareness, all without risking a single pilot. In the era of high-stakes, high-tech naval ops, that’s a game-changer.

When Drones Listen Beneath the Waves.

The MQ-9B SeaGuardian, now outfitted with four sonobuoy pods, has shifted the anti-submarine game for the U.S. and its allies. Sure, the P-8 Poseidon and MH-60R Seahawk are still the heavy hitters when it comes to hunting subs, but the SeaGuardian brings something new to the table, endurance.

It can patrol vast slices of ocean, scatter acoustic sensors far and wide, and keep listening for hours on end, all without putting a human crew through marathon missions or in harm’s way.

Why does this matter? Because the underwater world is heating up. Russian subs still prowl the North Atlantic and Arctic, and China’s navy is pushing farther into the Indo-Pacific, turning surveillance gaps into big-time vulnerabilities.

With multiple pods, the SeaGuardian gives commanders an always-on eye (and ear) over key straits, carrier routes, and undersea cables.

But here’s the twist: it’s not about replacing manned aircraft. Instead, drones like the SeaGuardian are force multipliers, stretching the reach of patrol crews. They can help paint the undersea picture, tip off a P-8, back up distributed fleets, or keep tabs on areas too big for manned planes to cover nonstop.

For smaller allies, modular unmanned ASW brings a way to pitch in without breaking the bank.

Yesterday’s drones just watched the fight from above. Tomorrow’s will listen below the waves, changing the script for maritime warfare.

This Week in Aviation History

In June 1982, Israeli ground forces moved into Lebanon, determined to put an end to cross-border terror attacks. They called it Operation Peace for Galilee, but what started as a targeted push soon transformed into a drawn-out conflict with Lebanon. The results? A complicated mix. Some successes, plenty of challenges, and a legacy that’s still debated today.

How UAV Networks Took Center Stage in the Bekaa Air War

Back in June 1967, during the Six Day War, Israel’s air force was small but razor-sharp. In a feat straight out of a pilot’s dream, the IAF launched a surprise onslaught, flying over 3,000 sorties and crushing the air forces of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.

By the time the dust settled, the Arab states had lost around 400 aircraft, and their armies were in full retreat across the Sinai, Golan Heights, and West Bank.

But dominance doesn’t last forever. When the War of Attrition kicked off in 1969, the game changed. Egypt, now flush with Soviet hardware—sleek jets and, more ominously, advanced SAMs—pushed back hard against Israeli positions in the Sinai.

The IAF found itself in a new world, one where Soviet-made surface-to-air missiles could knock out even the best pilots. Sporadic raids destroyed some SAM sites, but the losses were mounting.

Fast-forward to the years leading up to the 1982 Lebanon War. Syria started planting state-of-the-art SA-6 batteries in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley, and Israeli aircraft took losses; including fighters, Scouts, and Mastiffs.

But this time, Israel had a new card to play: years of relentless UAV reconnaissance. When the Lebanon War erupted in June 1982, Israeli UAVs delivered real-time tactical intelligence, giving commanders a live feed of the battlefield.

The real breakthrough came in the Bekaa Valley. UAVs flew in close, luring Syrian radar to life. Decoy drones mimicked manned attacks, soaking up missiles, and then Israeli jets swooped in to finish the job. Nearly all Syrian air defenses were wiped out: a dramatic turning point for drone warfare.

Mini-UAVs then fed ground troops over-the-hill intelligence, directed artillery, and checked the aftermath of battles. For the first time since Napoleon’s day, commanders could see the real-time positions of friend and foe alike.

The clincher? These UAVs kept a constant eye on Syrian airfields, warning the IAF whenever enemy fighters scrambled. This was the dawn of true loitering surveillance—real-time, persistent eyes in the sky. Forever changing how airpower and ground operations played out on the modern battlefield.

The Tadiran Mastiff and the Mazlat Scout: Pioneers of the Modern Surveilla UAV Era

After the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Israel’s military was hungry for a new advantage. Field commanders needed a way to peek “over the hill” and see what was coming. The challenge?

Build a drone that could lug a 10-kilo payload out to 30–50 kilometers and deliver instant intel.

Tadiran Electronic Industries answered the call with the Mastiff, a compact trailblazer that first took to the skies in 1973. At just 3.3 meters long with a 4.25-meter wingspan and a pre-payload weight of 72 kilos, this little machine could cruise at 185 km/h and loiter for over seven hours.

But what really set the Mastiff apart was its tech: miniaturized electronics and a data-link system that sent back live, high-res video right to operators’ screens. For the Israeli forces, it was like having eyes in the sky, offering real-time, deep reconnaissance and the kind of on-station surveillance that simply hadn’t existed before.

In many ways, the Mastiff was the first of its kind: a true modern surveillance UAV that changed the game.

But make no mistake about forgetting another pioneer, the Mazlat Scout. Back in 1978, Israel Aircraft Industries rolled out this fiberglass-framed, piston-powered bird with a 13-foot wingspan and a radar signature so faint it was practically invisible.

Lightweight and tough to track, the Scout packed a turret-mounted TV camera that fed real-time, 360-degree surveillance back to its operators—slick, simple, and effective.

Fast forward to 1982 and the Bekaa Valley showdown. Israeli forces deployed a squadron of Scouts to sniff out Syrian missile batteries, luring enemy radars to life. The result?

Israeli bombers swept in and wiped out 15 of 17 sites, opening the skies for unchallenged air superiority. The Scout proved that sometimes, the quietest flyers make the biggest impact.

When the UAVs Changed the Battlefield

The story of the Mazlat Scout and Tadiran Mastiff in the Bekaa Valley isn’t just about missile sites reduced to rubble. It’s about the arrival of a whole new way to fight and see the battlefield.

In June 1982, Israel put these nimble, remotely piloted birds to work as serious tools of airpower. No longer experimental, the Scout and Mastiff became the eyes and ears over Syrian defenses, streaming real-time intel to commanders and goading radar crews into revealing their positions.

The Scout’s live TV feed and the Mastiff’s long-haul stamina gave Israeli planners a view earlier generations could only dream of—persistent, rolling coverage before manned jets entered the danger zone.

But their power wasn’t just in the hardware. It was psychological warfare at its best. Syrian crews on the ground had to guess: was that drone overhead just a harmless observer, clever bait, or the signal that a strike was coming? That doubt turned their defenses into targets.

The instant a radar flared to life, Israeli jets and electronic warfare teams swooped in with pinpoint timing. Drones weren’t just watching anymore. They were a living part of the kill chain.

The impact went far beyond Lebanon. The Scout and Mastiff’s success lit the path for U.S. programs like the RQ-2 Pioneer, and proved that drones could scout, deceive, direct, and survive.

Today’s SeaGuardian and Reaper owe their legacy to those early flights—the blueprint for modern unmanned airpower was written in the skies above the Bekaa Valley.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

MQ-28 just went international! Three flights from Point Mugu proved rapid allied deployment, autonomous ops and payload integration — paving the way toward exportable uncrewed capability.

—Boeing Defense

Mission Briefing

Boeing just tipped their hat—turns out the MQ-28 Ghost Bat has soared through three daring test flights over California’s Point Mugu Sea Range, far from its home turf in Australia. The sky’s the limit now, as this ghostly bird stretches its wings across new horizons.

Ghost Bat Breaks Stateside: New Skies for a Maverick Machine

On 27 May 2026, Boeing made headlines by announcing the MQ-28 Ghost Bat has officially taken to American skies, marking its first flights outside its native Australia. In this very land, it was dreamed up and built by Boeing’s Australian team.

The Ghost Bat, a sleek, uncrewed aviator, slicing through the Pacific airspace above California’s Point Mugu Sea Range, not once but three times, as part of its operational test campaign at the legendary U.S. Naval Base Ventura County.

These flights weren’t just for show. The mission? Prove the Ghost Bat could think for itself and operate autonomously, all while demonstrating that it can be rapidly deployed and sustained from any allied outpost.

Boeing’s message was crystal clear: the world is watching, and interest in autonomous combat aircraft is taking off. These U.S. flights aren’t just a technical milestone. They’re a signal to global partners that the Ghost Bat is ready to spread its wings beyond the Outback, opening the door for future exports and international collaborations.

Glen Ferguson, the program’s global director, summed it up: Point Mugu’s test flights are a proving ground, not just for the Ghost Bat’s flight systems, but for the entire idea of deploying next-gen tech from remote, allied locations.

While Boeing kept the flight dates under wraps, aviation sleuths already spotted at least one Ghost Bat at NAS Ventura County in a video from December 2025, following a visit from U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

That clip showed an early model dressed in high-visibility orange stripes, while the latest footage reveals a more recent, all-gray ATS-008 variant, sporting a nose-mounted IRST sensor and the Phantom Works insignia on its tail—details sure to quicken any aviation buff’s pulse.

Let’s not forget: before these U.S. sorties, American Navy test pilots flew out to Australia to get hands-on with the Ghost Bat, working alongside their Aussie counterparts. Whether those same pilots took the stick (or, more accurately, the console) during the Point Mugu flights remains a mystery shrouded in California mist.

One thing’s for sure, the Ghost Bat’s journey has just begun, and the sky’s looking wide open ahead.

The Anatomy of the Ghost Bat

The MQ-28 Ghost Bat, originally dubbed the Boeing Airpower Teaming System (ATS), was crafted by Boeing Defence Australia for the Royal Australian Air Force to operate as a multirole, unmanned wingman alongside piloted jets.

Dreamed up back in 2013, the Ghost Bat made its grand debut at the 2019 Australian Airshow, turning heads before its first flight at the vast Woomera Range Complex in southern Australia on February 27, 2021.

This isn’t your average drone. It’s a next-gen Loyal Wingman, built with brains and brawn. Its 1.5-cubic-meter nose was designed for versatility, ready to swap out payloads to handle ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), aerial radar sweeps, electronic warfare, or even to carry attack munitions.

Over 55 Aussie companies lent their expertise to bring this vision to life, and by February 2024, the program had already pulled in a hefty $600 million in funding.

The Ghost Bat is all about teaming up, powered by artificial intelligence that lets it coordinate seamlessly with crewed military aircraft. Think of it as the size of a lightweight fighter, sporting side air intakes, striking cranked-kite wings, and canted V-tails.

Built to go the distance, with a range approaching 3,200 kilometers, and the smarts to fly solo if needed. Artistic renderings show this stealthy bird flying in loose formation with E-7A Wedgetail AEW&C aircraft and even F-15EX fighters, ready to slip into a supporting or special-mission role on demand.

Glen Ferguson, leading the MQ-28 global charge, spells out the action: a launch operator oversees takeoff, but once airborne, Ghost Bat is handed over to the crew of a manned aircraft—anything from an E-7A to an F-35A or F/A-18F—who then task it for missions like surveillance or reconnaissance.

This teamwork, called Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T), doesn’t always mean flying wingtip-to-wingtip; sometimes, Ghost Bat operates dozens of kilometers away, depending on what the mission calls for.

Stealth is the name of the game, with three different nose options shown in Boeing’s concept art: one packing an IRST sensor, others likely for ISR or electronic warfare, ready to jam or hunt enemy radars.

Ghost Bat can also play guardian, escorting critical assets like Wedgetails or KC-30 tankers. Whether it’s considered expendable tech or a backbone for manned platforms is still up in the air. But when the mission wraps, Ghost Bat returns to its launch operator for a smooth touchdown, ready to be prepped for the next adventure.

Ghost Bat Goes Allied

The Ghost Bat’s maiden flights over American soil are more than just a feather in Boeing’s cap. They’re the opening scene of a new era in allied airpower. For Australia, seeing their homegrown, uncrewed marvel soar above California is proof positive that years of R&D and partnership with Boeing Defence Australia are bearing global fruit.

The Ghost Bat isn’t just an Australian experiment anymore; it’s fast becoming a contender for export and a game-changer in future coalition air campaigns.

Stateside, the Point Mugu flights prove this autonomous bird can slip seamlessly into America’s rigorous test ranges and could soon fit into the pulse of U.S. combat operations.

The Ghost Bat isn’t here to replace pilots, but to serve as a loyal wingman. Stretching sensor range, hauling mission gear, and shouldering risk where the skies get dicey. Boeing’s trials showed the jet could deploy quickly, operate on its own, and stick around for the long haul. All big, bold checkmarks for global partners eyeing next-gen airpower.

Together, Australia and the U.S. are writing the script for a future where allies don’t just share runways. They build the autonomous machines that will fly side by side in tomorrow’s battles.

This Week in Aviation History

Pioneer 10 was NASA’s first mission to the outer planets. The mission was a spectacular success and the spacecraft notched a series of firsts unmatched by any other robotic spacecraft to date. Crossed the orbit of Neptune to become the first human-made object to go beyond Neptune.

What is Pioneer 10?

Picture the early 1970s, the dawn of interplanetary adventure, when NASA’s Pioneer 10 stole the spotlight as the first robotic pathfinder headed for the mysterious outer planets. From the moment it thundered off the launchpad atop an Atlas Centaur rocket. Its third stage a modified engine from the Surveyor moon lander.

Pioneer 10 was destined for the record books. This spacecraft wasn’t just on a mission; it was writing the playbook: the first to break Mars’ orbit, the first to brave the asteroid belt, the first to pierce Jupiter’s swirling storms, and, ultimately, the first man-made probe shot toward the stars, on a trajectory out of the solar system and into the cosmic unknown.

Powered by two compact nuclear generators (SNAP-19 RTGs) humming with about 140 watts during its Jupiter flyby, Pioneer 10 zipped through space at a then-unmatched 32,110 miles per hour.

After a couple of mid-course tweaks, the probe threaded its way through the asteroid belt; dodging more rocks than anticipated and measuring the soft glow of Zodiacal light. Teaming up with its sibling, Pioneer 9, it captured data on a particularly fierce solar storm, showing just how wild the Sun’s temper could get.

But the real drama unfolded as Pioneer 10 closed in on Jupiter. On November 26, 1973, it crossed into Jupiter’s magnetic domain, recording a sudden drop in solar wind and a hundredfold temperature spike.

By December, Pioneer 10 was beaming back images better than Earth-based telescopes could dream of, capturing the planet’s iconic Great Red Spot and the swirling bands of its atmosphere. On December 4, it made its closest approach—racing past Jupiter at 78,000 mph, just 81,000 miles above the cloud tops, snapping hundreds of photos, and soaking up data from six of its eleven scientific instruments.

Not every moment was smooth sailing. Intense radiation fried its photopolarimeter before it could snap Io, but Pioneer 10 still managed flybys of Callisto, Ganymede, and Europa. It even ducked behind Jupiter for a radio experiment, peering into the giant’s secrets.

By journey’s end in January 1974, the probe had not only survived, but revealed plasma in Jupiter’s magnetic field and mapped the planet’s enormous magnetotail stretching all the way to Saturn. Still cruising strong, Pioneer 10 crossed Neptune’s orbit in 13 June 1983. The first of its kind to leave every planet behind, a true cosmic trailblazer.

What Happened After Neptune?

For more than twenty years, NASA kept its cosmic line open to Pioneer 10, routinely checking in until March 31, 1997, when the spacecraft was 67 astronomical units away; farther than any deep-sea call ever made.

Budget constraints ended those regular catch-ups, but Pioneer 10 wasn’t quite ready for a silent fade. As long as its nuclear heart—the RTG power source—held out, scientists would occasionally coax data from its Geiger tube telescope and charged particle sensors, chasing whispers from the edge of the solar system.

Pioneer 10 wore the crown as humanity’s farthest envoy until Voyager 1 took the lead in February 1998. Yet, Pioneer 10 kept going. NASA’s team caught a good signal in August 2000, and the probe sent its last full telemetry in April 2002.

Less than a year later, on January 23, 2003, a faint final signal, traveling 7.6 billion miles over more than eleven hours, reached Earth, a cosmic farewell. By then, the RTG’s power had ebbed, leaving the spacecraft’s radio silent. A final attempt to make contact in 2006 drew only static.

Not bad for a mission designed to last just 21 months. By November 2017, Pioneer 10 was a ghost ship, adrift about 11 billion miles from home, second in distance only to Voyager 1.

It’s now heading in the direction of Aldebaran, the red eye of Taurus, a stellar rendezvous set for two million years from now. Unlike the Voyagers and Pioneer 11, Pioneer 10’s course carries it upstream, straight into the nose of the heliosphere where the interstellar wind blows in.

And in case someone—or something—finds it, Pioneer 10 carries a golden greeting: a plaque etched with the images of a man, a woman, the solar system, and a cosmic map to Earth, using 14 pulsars as signposts.

Should intelligent life ever intercept this interstellar messenger, they’ll have all they need to figure out where this tiny relic came from and when it began its long, lonely journey.

Trailblazer Among the Planets: Pioneer 10’s Legacy

The legend of Pioneer 10 begins with a bold leap into the cosmic unknown. Launched in 1972, this plucky spacecraft became NASA’s first emissary to the outer planets, blazing a trail past Mars, threading through the asteroid belt, and racing by mighty Jupiter.

Its journey was a masterclass in trust. Engineers sent their robotic scout into a realm of countless hazards, from tumbling rocks to Jupiter’s punishing radiation. Though built for a 21-month adventure, Pioneer 10 lasted more than 30 years, signing off with a final whisper from 7.6 billion miles out in January 2003.

Pioneer 10’s flyby of Jupiter was a game-changer, delivering images and data that Earth-based gear could only dream of. Suddenly, Jupiter’s atmosphere, radiation, and magnetic mysteries were open books.

The mission also proved that radioisotope power could keep a spacecraft alive far from the Sun, clearing the runway for the deep-space missions that followed. But there was heart, too: a plaque on board turned Pioneer 10 into an interstellar ambassador, carrying humanity’s greeting to the stars.

Pioneer 10’s greatest legacy? Turning the outer solar system from distant dream into reachable reality. Every probe that has since chased the horizon—to Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, and beyond—has soared through the door this trailblazer opened. In the grand story of space exploration, it’s proof that tomorrow’s greatest journeys always start with one small, daring step into the unknown.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Fear the Bones.”

—Jolly Rogers’ Motto

Steam moves along the carrier deck, curling in the jetwash as a fighter crouches in the catapult, nose tipped at a horizon painted in battleship gray. In the cockpit, a gloved hand drapes across the throttles; on the deck, crew members ghost through the fog and shadows beneath outstretched wings.

The ocean roars, the jet answers back, raw and ferocious. But before the launch officer’s hand comes down, before afterburners rip the morning open, one signal has already shattered the silence—a white skull and crossbones, grinning from a black tailfin.

Subtle? Not a chance. That was never the point.

For generations of aviators, the Jolly Rogers’ mark has meant more than danger. It’s memory in motion, flown from the bent wings of World War II Corsairs, slashing through the Cold War on Tomcats, still riding the thunder on Super Hornets today.

The bones have outlasted squadrons, aircraft, even the Navy’s bureaucracy, because some symbols refuse to fade.

This Deep Dive traces the legend: how a pirate flag became the most cinematic, swaggering, and enduring war mark in naval aviation.

Born Under the Bones

The legend of the Jolly Rogers didn’t start with quiet tradition. It began with a shot of pure defiance, painted in bone-white on the flanks of Navy fighters roaring into World War II.

Read more

“The MQ-20 successfully exchanged critical autonomous responses with the F-35, and the F-35 was able to send autonomy commands to the MQ-20 via a Bashi Pilot Vehicle Interface, directing the MQ-20 to execute tactical maneuvers, adjust waypoints, and pass ADS-B track data to the F-35.”

—GA ASI (General Atomics Aeronautical Systems)

Mission Briefing

An F-35 Lightning II pilot, tablet in hand, calls the shots mid-flight, sending commands straight to the MQ-20 Avenger. It’s man and machine teaming up in real time—a dramatic leap in tactical autonomy you have to see to believe.

When F-35 Takes the Avenger

The sleek, futuristic form of the MQ-20 Avenger drone finally paired up with the legendary F-35 Lightning II fighter jet, a partnership years in the making.

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, the brains behind the MQ-20, has pulled off a milestone in aviation innovation, quietly announcing this breakthrough after a string of successful tests with the F-22 Raptor.

The company is keeping some cards close to the vest, not revealing exactly when this Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) demonstration took place, but the implications are crystal clear: the future of air combat is arriving fast.

It took a squadron of collaboration to make it happen. Picture the F-35 Joint Program Office, 309th Software Engineering Group, the 461st and 370th Flight Test Squadrons, Lockheed Martin, and Autonodyne all in the mix.

Each one playing a part in orchestrating this aerial symphony. At the heart of the demonstration was General Atomics’ TacACE (Tactical Autonomy Ecosystem) software, riding on the backbone of the Autonomy Government Reference Architecture (A-GRA), providing the MQ-20 with cutting-edge autonomous decision-making.

Just like in previous test flights, the MQ-20 Avenger stepped in as a stand-in for what’s soon to be the next generation of Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA), working to accelerate the arrival of these game-changing platforms for the U.S. Air Force. GA-ASI is already hard at work producing and testing the YFQ-42A CCA, the first of its kind for the program’s Increment 1 phase—think of it as the next chapter in the story.

Here’s where it gets exciting: the F-35 pilot, instead of gripping a traditional flight stick, is on the ground, tablet in hand, seamlessly sending tactical autonomy commands to the MQ-20.

The commands are routed through TacACE and transmitted to the drone via Beyond Line of Sight communications. No need for the pilot to even leave the tarmac. Previous F-22 tests never made it clear whether pilots were on the ground or airborne, but this time, the company confirms the F-35 stayed earthbound during the command relay.

The demonstration wasn’t just a show. It was a proof of concept for the hardware, software, networks, and systems that bring MUM-T to life.

The MQ-20’s TacACE responded to the F-35’s commands in real time, executing tactical maneuvers, adjusting waypoints, and sharing critical ADS-B track data back to the pilot via the Bashi Pilot Vehicle Interface, a flexible, tablet-based system designed to work across different aircraft platforms.

This latest leap marks another giant step toward realizing a world where unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft fly as loyal wingmen, extending sensor reach, increasing survivability, and taking on the risky missions so pilots don’t have to. The future of air power just got a little closer, and it’s looking cinematic from here.

The Lightning and the Avenger

The Avenger ER, a jet-powered marvel, streaking across the sky with high-speed agility and endurance to match. This is no ordinary remotely piloted aircraft.

It’s a next-gen, multi-mission powerhouse, built for wide-area surveillance, rapid-response strike missions, and just about any demanding scenario the military or civilian world can throw at it.

With operational and transit speeds that leave the Predator B-series in the dust, the Avenger ER redefines what flexibility and survivability look like in the skies, responding at a moment’s notice and repositioning in record time.

Under its sleek skin, a commercial Pratt & Whitney turbofan engine roars to life, delivering over 5,000 pounds of thrust. That means it can leap off runways under 5,000 feet long and stay airborne for more than 20 hours, cruising above 50,000 feet at up to 400 KTAS.

Whether it’s carrying a formidable internal payload of precision munitions or loading its wings with a sensor array, the Avenger ER brings next-level versatility to the fight.

Meanwhile, in the same battlespace, the F-35 Lightning II holds its own as the quarterback of the skies. This isn’t just a fighter jet. It’s the connective nerve center of modern warfare, seamlessly integrating operations across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains.

The F-35’s advanced sensors and communications suite turn it into a force multiplier, able to share critical information with every asset in the network, enhancing the effectiveness and survivability of every platform it connects with.

In today’s contested environments, air dominance hinges on secure, high-tech teamwork. The F-35’s role as a node in the 21st-century security network means it’s not just fighting battles. It’s shaping the future of joint operations, leading the charge and helping every asset return home safely.

How the F-35 is Leading the Next Generation of Networked Airpower

An F-35 Lightning II, not just flying solo, but commanding the MQ-20 Avenger, orchestrating moves with a few taps on a tablet. This isn’t your classic fighter jet calling the shots. It’s a cutting-edge, fifth-gen aircraft acting as mission control for an autonomous wingman, relaying commands through secure data links and satellites.

In a world where battlefields are swarming with advanced air defenses, long-range missiles, and electronic jamming, this kind of human-machine teamwork isn’t just cool—it’s critical. Sending pilots alone into that chaos is risky and costly.

For the U.S. and its allies, this test is a glimpse into the future: Collaborative Combat Aircraft, where seasoned aviators and intelligent drones hunt together. Today’s F-35 could evolve from a stealth striker into an airborne quarterback, managing a team of loyal unmanned partners and stretching the reach of every coalition air force.

The strategic takeaway? Airpower is shifting from a contest of standalone jets to a symphony of networked teams. Victory will favor those who fuse human skill and AI muscle into cohesive, adaptive formations.

Years from now, we might look back on this F-35 and MQ-20 test as the spark that launched a new era, where pilots don’t just fly, they lead intelligent swarms across the skies.

This Week in Aviation History

Imagine the scene: June 1965, Gemini IV rockets into orbit with James McDivitt and Ed White at the helm for a four-day adventure above the Earth. Midway through their mission, White makes history, stepping out into the void for America’s first-ever spacewalk. It was a bold leap that set the stage for a new era in space exploration.

Blast Off: Gemini IV Walks into Space

Gemini IV thundered off the pad at Cape Canaveral’s Complex 19 right on the dot, carving a path into orbit by 10:22 a.m. Within minutes, astronauts Jim McDivitt and Ed White were circling Earth, their craft arcing between 162 and 282 kilometers above the clouds.

Early on, they tried to rendezvous with the rocket’s spent second stage, but after burning through nearly half their fuel, mission control called it off—there were bigger milestones ahead.

One of those milestones came fast. Ed White, suited up and pressurized, waited as McDivitt brought the cabin pressure down to zero. At 2:34 p.m., they swung open the hatch. Two minutes later, White emerged, propelled by a small gas gun, drifting tethered in the black: America’s first spacewalk.

The gun’s fuel ran dry in just three minutes, so White tugged on his tether and twisted, floating and maneuvering in the void for a full 23 minutes before climbing back inside.

Closing the hatch wasn’t easy, but the duo finally got it sealed and repressurized the cabin.

For the next 30 hours, they cruised in drifting flight to save precious fuel. When a computer glitch nixed the planned computer-guided landing, McDivitt and White had to rely on old-school techniques, initiating a zero-lift, ballistic reentry like the Mercury days.

The retrofire started the 62nd orbit; splashdown followed 16 minutes later in the Atlantic, a little off target but safe. Recovery choppers whisked the crew to the U.S.S. Wasp, and the capsule soon followed.

During their nearly 98-hour journey, McDivitt and White conducted eleven experiments on everything from cosmic rays to heart function. Except for the cancelled rendezvous and missed computer reentry, they checked off every box, sealing Gemini IV’s legacy as a mission of firsts and feats.

Inside the Gemini IV Mission

Jim McDivitt joined NASA’s second astronaut class in 1962, stepping into the fast lane of the space race. He took command of Gemini IV in June 1965, steering the mission into the history books. Later, as Apollo 9’s commander, McDivitt helped shepherd the first test flight of the full Apollo spacecraft—Lunar Module included—marking a giant leap for lunar ambitions.

Ed White, McDivitt’s Gemini IV crewmate and fellow Group 2 recruit, made spacewalking history on that same flight, gliding into the void as America’s first spacewalker. White’s cool confidence became an inspiration for generations of aviators and explorers.

Tragically, fate intervened: White, assigned to the very first Apollo mission, lost his life in the Apollo 1 fire of 1967. Both men left indelible marks on the legacy of human spaceflight, forever remembered for their courage and pioneering spirit.

Mission Facts

Crew: James A. McDivitt Jr. (Command Pilot) and Edward H. White II (Pilot)

Backup Crew: Frank F. Borman II and James A. Lovell Jr.

Payload: Gemini 4

Mass at launch: 3,574 kg

Launch Date: Jun. 3, 1965, 10:15:59 a.m. EST (15:15:59 UT)

Launch Site: Complex 19, Cape Canaveral, United States

Launch Vehicle: Titan II

Revolutions Completed: 62

Duration: 97 hours, 56 minutes, 12 seconds (4 days, 1 hour, 56 minutes, 12 seconds)

Landing Date: Jun. 7, 1965, 12:12:11 EST (17:12:11 UT)

Landing Site: Western Atlantic, 27.73° N, 74.18° W

Recovery Ship: U.S.S. Wasp

Gemini IV: Pioneers of the High Frontier

Gemini IV wasn’t just a four-day ride around the Earth. It was a crucial leap into the unknown, straight out of an aviator’s wildest dreams.

Commander James McDivitt and pilot Ed White blast off into legend, ready to test if humans could really settle into the cosmic frontier. Then comes the showstopper: Ed White cracks open the hatch, and for the first time, an American drifts free above Earth’s curve; tethered by just eight meters of lifeline, a pistol-grip thruster in hand.

For 23 minutes, he floats, spins, and steers like a barnstormer in zero-g, until the fuel runs dry and it’s just muscle and guts keeping him tethered to home.

But this wasn’t just a spectacle; it was a dress rehearsal for the future. Gemini IV taught NASA hard lessons: better tools, sharper plans, tighter comms, and nerves of steel for the crews.

It paved the runway for Apollo and those lunar bootprints, and it gave birth to spacewalking as a craft, a skill that would one day build the International Space Station and send us back to the Moon.

The mission even broke ground at Houston’s new Mission Control, setting the stage for every mission since. In the grand story of space, Gemini IV is where America first learned: space isn’t just a distant horizon; it’s a frontier where human hands can truly get to work.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Today during the Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing, I announced the MQ-25A Stingray is moving into the production phase. Integrating unmanned refueling extends the lethality of our Carrier Strike Groups and equips our force with a decisive advantage to fight and win against any adversary.”

—Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao

Mission Briefing

After its maiden voyage, the Navy’s MQ-25 Stingray soared past Milestone C—earning the green light for low-rate initial production. In true sky-pioneer fashion, this uncrewed tanker is now cleared to roll off the line and join the fleet.

Stingray Cleared for the Carrier Tanker Fight

In the marbled halls of the Senate, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Navy Hung Cao steps up to the mic, eyes bright with the kind of excitement only aviators and dreamers know. At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, he drops a bombshell—one with the thrum of jet engines behind it: The MQ-25 Stingray, the Navy’s uncrewed aerial tanker, has just hit Milestone C.

Translation? The Stingray has been greenlit for Low-Rate Initial Production. The ink is barely dry on its first official flight, which happened less than a month ago, on April 25.

The Navy’s own Portfolio Acquisition Executive Aviation office is already prepping the paperwork. This summer, they’ll award the first LRIP contract. Three aircraft to start, with the option to tack on three more in Lot 2, and five in Lot 3.

The MQ-25 isn’t just another drone; it’s a force multiplier. “Unmanned refueling extends our reach against any adversary,” Cao tells the senators, his words echoing through the chamber.

“Moving the MQ-25A Stingray to Milestone C and into production is arming our warfighters with a capability that increases the lethality of our Carrier Strike Groups. This is a decisive advantage that delivers our warfighters what they need to fight and win.”

Vice Adm. John E. Dougherty IV, the Navy’s aviation acquisition chief, chimes in, underscoring how the Stingray will keep carriers agile, lethal, and always ready. “Milestone C approval represents an important step for this program. MQ-25A will provide persistent aerial refueling and unlock greater capacity across the air wing, ensuring our carrier strike groups remain lethal, flexible, and forward ready.”

You can almost hear the applause from the Boeing team. Troy Rutherford, their MQ-25 program VP, calls it a “historic milestone,” promising to get this “game-changing unmanned aircraft” out to the fleet and into the heart of carrier operations.

Let’s rewind to April 25, 2026. After years of anticipation, the MQ-25A Stingray finally lifts off for its maiden operational flight from MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, Illinois.

For two hours, the Stingray soars, guided by both Boeing and Navy pilots at the controls of the UMCS MD-5 ground station. Lockheed Martin’s high-tech system humming in the background. A company-owned TA-4J Skyhawk and a Navy UC-12M Huron tag along as chase planes, keeping a watchful eye.

This flight marks nearly seven years since the original T1 prototype’s first sortie back in 2019. Now, the production MQ-25 flies with the same Cobham ARS pod found on the Navy’s F/A-18s, meaning it can deliver up to 16,000 pounds of fuel 500 nautical miles out to sea. For the Navy, it’s not just a milestone. It’s a leap into a new era of carrier air wing endurance and reach.

The Carrier-Based Unmanned Aircraft

Imagine this: the MQ-25 Stingray is about to make history as the world’s first operational, carrier-based unmanned aircraft, designed to refuel the Carrier Air Wing and Carrier Strike Group right from the deck at sea.

By weaving this persistent, sea-going tanker into the air wing, the Navy will unlock longer missions and free up strike fighters for what they do best, carrying out combat missions far from home.

This isn’t just another drone; the MQ-25 is laying the runway for a future where manned and unmanned aircraft work together seamlessly, pioneering the Navy’s next chapter in carrier aviation.

The plan? Eventually, every NIMITZ and FORD-class carrier will be MQ-25 ready. The journey begins with test flights at Boeing’s Illinois facility, then heads to Patuxent River, Lakehurst, and Eglin AFB, as the Navy puts this game-changer through its paces.

Specifications:

Primary function: Aerial refueling

Contractor: Boeing

Propulsion: Rolls-Royce AE3700N

Length: 51.0 ft

Wingspan (wings spread): 75.0 feet

Wingspan (wings folded): 31.3 feet

Height (wings spread): 9.8 feet

Height (wings folded): 15.7 feet

Stingray Extends the Carrier’s Reach

The U.S. Navy, long master of the seas and sky, now faces a new frontier. Not a battle for air superiority, but a challenge of distance and endurance. Enter the MQ-25 Stingray, the Navy’s cinematic leap from manned might to autonomous innovation.

It’s the world’s first operational carrier-based drone, not just another gadget but a flying lifeline, built to keep the fleet’s most precious assets—its strike fighters—soaring further, longer, and with more punch than ever before.

Imagine yourself on the deck of a carrier, wind whipping past as jets roar to life. In the old days, F/A-18 Super Hornets handled refueling, siphoning their own combat potential to keep others airborne.

But now, the Stingray rolls out from the hangar, wings gleaming in the sunrise, ready to take on the grunt work. Suddenly, more Super Hornets are free to do what they were born for: striking deep, defending the fleet, and making every mile of ocean count.

With the MQ-25, the Navy isn’t just solving a logistics problem. It’s rewriting the rules. This drone can deliver up to 16,000 pounds of fuel 500 nautical miles out, a game-changer for a carrier in hostile waters.

Allies watch and take note: here is a shield that stretches further, a sword that stays sharper, a partner who doesn’t tire. In places where distance and danger once set the boundaries, the MQ-25 pushes them back.

But look closer, and you’ll see more than a refueling drone. This is the quiet revolution. The first step to an air wing where manned and unmanned fly side by side, each learning from the other, each expanding the art of what’s possible on a floating city at sea.

Today, it’s just fuel. Tomorrow? It could be anything. The MQ-25 is the bridge to that future—silent, steady, and utterly transformative.

This Week in Aviation History

It’s June 1942, and somewhere in the vast blue heart of the Pacific, American and Japanese warships clash in a five-day spectacle that would flip the script on the whole Pacific War. The air is thick with tension, engines roar, and history is rewritten in the wake of dogfights and thunderous explosions.

Strategic Background and the Role of Communications Intelligence

Imagine slipping on your flight goggles and soaring back to the spring of 1942, when the world was a chessboard and the Pacific Ocean was the grand arena. Japan’s ambitions were sky-high: they wanted to carve out a vast empire in East Asia and the Southwest Pacific, kicking the United States out of the driver’s seat.

The master plan? Crush the US Pacific Fleet and capture the tiny speck called Midway Atoll, a remote outpost more than 3,200 miles from San Francisco, perched on the edge of nowhere. From there, Japanese bombers could strike Pearl Harbor again, tightening their grip on the Pacific and, they hoped, forcing the Americans to the peace table.

Midway, a lonely set of islands in the far reaches of the Hawaiian archipelago, had quietly become a linchpin. The US had annexed it in the 1800s, but by 1940, it was buzzing with construction crews and military planners fortifying it for the storm they saw coming.

After the shock of Pearl Harbor in December 1941—when Japanese destroyers lobbed shells at Midway’s Naval Air Station—the Americans beefed up their presence. By June 1942, the atoll bristled with PBY Catalinas, B-17s, and 4,000 determined personnel, all bracing for the fight they knew was on the horizon.

The battle exploded from June 3rd to 7th, a five-day clash across an oceanic expanse as big as the continental US. Warships dueled at distances where you could barely see the enemy, trading steel and fire over 50 to 150 miles.

But behind the scenes, the real secret weapon was codebreaking. American cryptanalysts, hunched over their desks, had cracked Japanese messages and learned of an attack on a place called “AF.”

With a clever ruse involving a fake water shortage, they confirmed AF was Midway. Armed with this intel, Admiral Chester Nimitz readied the US Navy for a counterpunch that would echo across history.

The Battle of Midway

Slide into the cockpit with me and let’s fly back to the dawn of 3 June 1942. The Pacific sky is endless, and somewhere below, a PBY seaplane from Midway is on patrol. Suddenly, the crew spots a shadow on the ocean—the Japanese Midway Occupation force, lurking southwest of the atoll.

Throughout the day, more glimpses come in: enemy ships are out there, but the prized Japanese carriers remain like ghosts in the mist. B-17 Flying Fortresses and PBYs scramble from Midway, dropping bombs on the ships they can find.

Anti-aircraft fire erupts in angry bursts, forcing the crews to veer away before they can really see what damage they’ve done. Reports trickle in, maybe a cruiser or two have been hit, maybe a transport, but nobody’s sure.

When night falls, the game changes. Four PBY-5As, loaded with Mark XIII torpedoes, slip out for a daring nighttime attack. The first of its kind by these patrol planes. Explosions flash on the dark water. Did they hit anything? Maybe one or two enemy ships took a beating, but the details are lost in the Pacific night.

Dawn breaks on June 4, and the war drums get louder. Japanese carrier planes swoop in, unloading on the US base at Midway. The Marines dig in and take heavy losses, but the base itself, battered but not broken, stands ready.

Out to the east, the US carrier fleet—Yorktown, Enterprise, Hornet—is poised like a coiled spring. Then, as the Japanese planes head home, the tables turn. The US Navy’s torpedo bombers roar off the decks, drawing enemy fighters away.

In their wake, Dauntless dive bombers plunge from the sky, smashing Japanese carriers Kaga and Akagi, then wrecking Soryu. Only the carrier Hiryu remains. She fights back desperately, launching two strikes that pound Yorktown, but the Americans are relentless. By evening, Dauntlesses from Enterprise find Hiryu and finish her.

June 5: Rear Admiral Spruance chases the retreating Japanese fleet west as Akagi and Hiryu are scuttled. Yorktown’s battered crew refuses to give up. On June 6, Enterprise and Hornet’s SBDs hammer the fleet again, sinking Mikuma and damaging more ships.

But a lurking Japanese submarine sneaks in, torpedoing Yorktown and the destroyer Hammann. At dawn on June 7, Yorktown finally slips beneath the waves, ending one of the most dramatic chapters in naval history.

Midway: The Carrier Battle That Turned the Pacific Tide

The legend of Midway isn’t just about the spectacle of four Japanese carriers slipping beneath the waves. Picture it: June 1942, the Pacific’s vast blue stretching in every direction, and the fate of the war hanging by a thread.

After the gut-punch of Pearl Harbor, Midway was the moment the tide turned. A showdown that stopped Japan’s island-hopping cold and put the wind back in America’s sails. The Naval History and Heritage Command calls Midway one of World War II’s most crucial clashes, and the National WWII Museum agrees: this battle rewrote the script for the Pacific theater.

But Midway’s true legacy? That ran deeper than the dogfights. This was a test of brains, nerve, and new tech. American codebreakers cracked the enemy’s plans before a single bomb dropped, proving that sometimes, victory starts in a stuffy room with headphones, not just out on the sea.

Aircraft carriers took center stage, trading blows from beyond the horizon; it was the pilots and their warbirds, not old-school battleships, that shaped the outcome. When Japan lost Akagi, Kaga, Soryu, and Hiryu, their carrier force was gutted. The U.S. lost the Yorktown, but kept enough punch to go on the offensive.

Midway was also about guts under pressure. Pilots launched into the unknown, sailors and commanders made split-second calls, intelligence officers gambled on half-seen signals. The war didn’t end there, but its course was forever changed. Japan’s expansion hit a wall, and the long, hard push through Guadalcanal and the Solomons began.

The real takeaway? Wars—then and now—aren’t won by machines alone. It takes sharp minds, grit, sacrifice, and bold moves in the heat of the moment. That’s what bridges the decks of 1942’s carriers to the high-tech command centers and contested skies of today.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The enemy was terrified of Cobras.”

—Walker Jones, Vietnam Cobra pilot

The jungle canopy shivered beneath the rotor wash as the slim helicopter nosed into the fight, its cockpit stacked in tandem like a fighter’s blade drawn over Vietnam.

Ahead, the treeline was no longer just terrain; it was a threat line, a place where ambushes waited, radios cracked, and troop ships needed a guardian fast enough to stay with them and deadly enough to clear the way.

Read more

“Aircraft to be reconfigured between boom and probe refueling capability based on mission requirements.”

—The Air National Guard Air Force Reserve Command Test Center

Mission Briefing

Little more than a month after that first daring test flight, the A-10C now roars over Middle Eastern sands, sporting its new Probe Refueling Adapter. Thanks to this upgrade, the Warthog can top off its tanks from the HC-130J mid-air, using the probe and drogue system, just like the big birds do. It’s a whole new chapter for close-air support, and the sky’s never looked better.

A10s Now Have New Refueling Probe and Angry Kitten EW Pod

The curtain lifts over the Middle East, and the first dramatic stills emerge: the A-10C Thunderbolt II, affectionately known as the Warthog, is caught mid-tango with an HC-130J Combat King II, sipping fuel through its brand new Probe Refueling Adapter.

This valuable upgrade, first trialed in early April, unlocks a whole new world of refueling possibilities for the battle-hardened A-10, which until now had to rely on the lumbering KC-135 Stratotanker and couldn’t yet belly up to the futuristic KC-46 Pegasus.

The brass saw a problem: without more refueling options in theater, the Warthog’s operational leash was just too short. Enter the C-130-based tankers, ready to keep the A-10 in the fight.

The photos, dropped on 21 May 2026, freeze the action: 107th Fighter Squadron Warthogs, Michigan-bred and fresh in theater since April, trading fuel with the HC-130J over the U.S. Central Command’s vast domain.

But look closer, and you’ll spot another twist. These A-10s are sporting the Angry Kitten electronic warfare pod, a gadget that made its combat debut on F-16s during Operation Epic Fury but has never before been spotted on A-10s overseas. For the Warthog, it’s a new chapter of adaptability and grit, with the sky as its stage.

The Pod and the Probe

If you ever catch a glimpse of the A-10C Thunderbolt II on the ramp, you’ll spot its trademark air refueling receptacle right on the nose, just forward of the cockpit. It is a design tailored for the classic flying boom, where the tanker’s operator guides the fuel probe home.

But as the old KC-10 tankers faded into history and the advanced KC-46 certification lagged behind, the Warthog’s world started shrinking. Tethered to the aging KC-135s, planners found their mission map severely restricted, the A-10’s range at the mercy of limited refueling options.

That’s when the call came down for a solution. The answer: a Probe Refueling Adapter, designed and tested at breakneck speed, first trialed on April 2, 2026. This ingenious device slips right into the A-10’s nose receptacle, transforming the jet from a boom-only bird to one ready for probe and drogue refueling, the kind C-130 tankers deliver.

The best part? The adapter is field-configurable. According to the Air National Guard Air Force Reserve Command Test Center, flight line crews can install it in just a few hours—no need for depot downtime. Now, mission planners can switch the A-10 between boom and probe refueling modes on the fly, tuning each jet to the demands of the day’s fight.

But there’s more to this new act than just fuel. If you look closely at those fresh photos, you’ll spot the Warthog sporting the Angry Kitten electronic warfare pod, a gadget with a story of its own. Originally hatched from the AN/ALQ-167 as a humble training pod, Angry Kitten has grown into a modular, digital EW powerhouse.

Its journey began with the South Carolina Air National Guard’s F-16s, headed for the Middle East and Operation Epic Fury. Born from Georgia Tech Research Institute’s vision back in 2013, Angry Kitten was designed to deliver ‘cognitive EW’—a system smart enough to analyze enemy signals and choose its own tailored response, even adapting on the fly to new threats.

Since those early days, Angry Kitten has flexed its digital claws on the A-10, MQ-9 Reaper, F/A-18 Hornet, and C-130 Hercules.

Now, it’s front-line ready. The Navy highlights its core: the Technique Description Language (TDL), a hybrid architecture fusing high-speed hardware with adaptable software—giving the Warthog a new edge in the ever-evolving aerial fight.

A-10’s New Tricks in the Desert Fight

Out in the shifting sands of the Middle East, the A-10 Warthog refuses to fade quietly into history. With its brand-new refueling probe and the Angry Kitten EW pod riding shotgun, the Warthog is proving it’s anything but outdated.

Recently, Aviationist’s lens caught A-10Cs refueling from an HC-130J Combat King II, using the probe for drogue refueling and flexing electronic muscle with Angry Kitten, all on May 9, 2026.

That probe isn’t just a gadget. It’s a ticket to a wider world of tankers. No longer bound to the old boom-only crowd, the A-10 now taps into drogue refueling, giving it more fuel sources and longer legs for close air support, rescue ops, convoy protection, and quick-response missions.

Pairing up with the HC-130J, a specialist in forward-area support and coalition operations, the Warthog gains an expeditionary boost, ready to roam wherever the fight calls.

For America’s allies, these upgrades are a promise: the U.S. still brings relentless, low-flying firepower to the region, and the Warthog is now tuned to face modern electronic threats. Angry Kitten shines brightest here, with rapid software updates between flights, letting crews swap tactics as enemy radars evolve.

Big picture? Washington is wringing more combat utility from its reliable old warriors even as new jets are stretched thin across the globe. Allies see a steady hand; adversaries see legacy aircraft transformed—networked, refueled, and digitally sharpened for today’s fight.

This Week in Aviation History

In the quiet hours just past midnight on 31 May 1967, two HH-3E Jolly Green Giant helicopters lifted off from New York, chasing the horizon in a bold, non-stop dash across the Atlantic. Their engines hummed all the way to Paris, touching down at Le Bourget for the air show just before 2 p.m. on June 1. It was a transatlantic feat that turned heads and wrote a new chapter in aviation history.

Jolly Green Giant’s Non-Stop Transatlantic Flight

The epic flight spanned 4,271 miles, nearly 31 hours of relentless rotor thunder, requiring a staggering nine midair refuelings from HC-130P Combat King tankers.

At the controls were Majors Herbert Zehnder and Donald B. Murras, each commanding a Jolly Green Giant helicopter with a five-person crew. On this journey, Major Zehnder, flying H-211, set an FAI world speed record for helicopters, averaging almost 190 kilometers per hour. It is a record that still stands, a testament to both machine and aviator.

But these weren’t just record-setters, they were warriors. Both Jolly Green Giants, tail numbers 66-13280 and 66-13281, went on to serve with the 37th Air Rescue and Recovery Squadron in Vietnam, where their fates became part of Air Force legend.

“Jolly Green 27” crashed at Kontum in 1970, its pilot, Captain Travis H. Scott, Jr., lost in the inferno, while Major Travis Wofford braved the flames to pull survivors from the wreckage, earning the Air Force Cross and Cheney Medal for his valor. Scott, too, was posthumously awarded the Air Force Cross for his heroism.

Meanwhile, “Jolly Green 28” faced its own trial by fire—shot down over Laos in 1969, her crew rescued before the bird was destroyed to deny it to the enemy. Technical Sergeant Donald G. Smith, the pararescueman, was decorated with the Air Force Cross and the Airman’s Medal for saving the downed pilot of “Misty 11.”

Major Zehnder’s daring didn’t stop with records. He would later pilot another HH-3E on a high-stakes crash landing inside Sơn Tây Prison Camp near Hanoi, earning the Silver Star for his actions.

The Sikorsky HH-3E (nicknamed the Jolly Green Giant) became a legend in its own right. Born from the CH-3C transport, this twin-engine, heavy-lift helicopter was built for Combat Search and Rescue, with a rugged crew of pilots, mechanic, and gunner.

With its massive main rotor, retractable landing gear, rear cargo ramp, and inflight refueling boom, the Jolly Green Giant was always ready for the next impossible mission, no matter where the call came from.

The Rescue Chopper Built to Reach Beyond the Front Line

Picture the HH-3E Jolly Green Giant on the ramp, rotors spinning like a windstorm. She stretches out a majestic 72 feet, 7 inches long and stands 18 feet, 10 inches tall, a true colossus of the rescue world. Her five-bladed main rotor sweeps a massive 62-foot circle overhead. Each blade is nearly half a meter wide, churning the air at a steady 203 rpm, counter-clockwise from above, with the advancing blade slicing right.

Out back, the tail rotor, also five-bladed, spins a 10-foot arc and hums at a fierce 1,244 rpm, balancing the beast with clockwork precision.

Even empty, the Jolly Green tips the scales at over 13,000 pounds, but she’s built for battle, maxing out at just over 22,000 pounds when fully loaded for action.

Her heart beats in tandem with two General Electric T58-GE-5 turboshaft engines, each pumping out up to 1,500 shaft horsepower, enough grunt to muscle through the roughest combat zones. The transmission can take 2,500 horsepower, channeling pure force to the rotors.

In the air, she cruises at 154 miles per hour, can dash up to 177, and reach altitudes of 14,000 feet. Fill her tanks (external tanks included), and you’ve got a range of 779 miles; long enough to cross borders or seas for a rescue. For defense, she can bristle with a pair of M60 machine guns, ready to lay down cover on the way in or out.

Born from the CH-3 transport line, just 14 were built new as HH-3Es, while dozens more were converted with extra armor, self-sealing fuel tanks, and a rescue hoist.

With a watertight hull, she could set down on water, and her big rear ramp made loading wounded or weary aviators a breeze. Over 170 S-61Rs in her family tree, but the HH-3E was the Air Force’s dedicated Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) hero.

Her legend was forged in the fires of Vietnam. First arriving in 1967, flying out of Udorn and Da Nang. She pulled off long-range rescues across Southeast Asia, even landing in history with the daring Son Tay prison raid.

Her crews walked tall: one Medal of Honor, twenty-four Air Force Crosses, over 190 Silver Stars. She even answered the call in Desert Storm and stood ready during the early Space Shuttle days. By 1995, the last Jolly Greens retired, but their stories still echo wherever aviators need saving.

The Rescue Footprint That Outlived Vietnam

The legacy of the HH-3E Jolly Green Giant isn’t just counted in hours flown or missions chalked up on a clipboard. It’s measured by the creed every rescue crew carries into the fight: “That Others May Live.”

Born from the sturdy Sikorsky CH-3, the HH-3E was transformed into America’s go-to combat search-and-rescue bird during the crucible of the Southeast Asia War, purpose-built to snatch downed airmen from the jaws of danger. At places like Da Nang, legends like Jolly Green 22 proved their worth, not in headlines, but in the mud and fire of real combat.

The Jolly Green’s reach became the stuff of legend in 1967, when two of these giants pulled off the first nonstop helicopter crossing of the Atlantic, an audacious journey powered by aerial refueling and grit. No longer just battlefield workhorses, these birds became strategic assets, able to push beyond the horizon.

Culturally, the HH-3E left its mark as well. The famous “green feet” symbol—born from the impressions made by its massive landing gear in Vietnam’s paddies—became the unofficial badge of the rescue community, a quiet nod to those who bring others home.

From those first green footprints in Southeast Asia to the rescue squadrons of today, the HH-3E’s spirit lives on. The mission endures: go farther, risk everything, and never leave a comrade behind.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“New heavy bomber analysis of alternatives will begin initial planning activities to develop key performance parameters, key system attributes, and additional performance attributes for a follow-on heavy bomber in the USAF. The FY27 work scope will include key planning activities for programmatic, requirements, capabilities, and vendor options that could field in the future.”

—Quote from Air Force Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Volume IV

Mission Briefing

Next year, the U.S. Air Force is kicking off a bold new chapter: they’re rolling out a Heavy Bomber Analysis of Alternatives. Think of it as a high-stakes mission briefing, where they’ll chart the course for the future—deciding whether to supercharge the legendary B-52 with fresh upgrades or set their sights on designing a brand-new heavy bomber altogether. The sky’s the limit, and the story is just beginning.

The Next B-52 Bomber: Analyzing the Alternatives

The B-52 System Improvements project, as it’s called, is more than just a tune-up for an old warbird. The Air Force has set out on a sweeping mission: to keep the legendary Stratofortress not just flying, but dominating, ready for whatever tomorrow’s skies might bring.

This isn’t just about swapping out a part here or bolting on a new gadget there. We’re talking a top-to-bottom overhaul. Think Advanced Wing Weapon Pylons (AWWP), integrating cutting-edge missiles like the LRASM and JASSM, and pushing the envelope with advanced weapon systems.

But the real headline? The Heavy Bomber Analysis of Alternatives. For the first time, there’s talk of what might come after the B-52, a study launching in FY27 to size up the long-range strike game. Will the Air Force stick with the old champ, or is it time for a new contender to take the stage?

Meanwhile, behind the hangar doors, there’s been a hush-hush Advanced Concept Demonstration—a classified proof-of-concept that wrapped up in FY25. No peeks, no details, just hints and possibilities.

The money trail tells its own story: $1 million is set aside in FY27 for the bomber study, while last year’s demonstration drew nearly $4 million. Now, all eyes are on the future, and the only certainty is that the next chapter for America’s heavy bombers is still being written, high above the clouds.

The Future of the Bomber

The B-52 Stratofortress—America’s legendary airborne heavyweight—has been carving contrails across the skies since the dawn of the jet age. And believe it or not, she’s nowhere near ready for retirement.

In fact, the Air Force expects these titans to keep flying until at least 2050. Imagine that: by the time the youngest B-52 finally parks for good, it’ll have outlived not only its own generation, but even the sleeker B-1B Lancer and the futuristic B-2A Spirit bombers that once threatened to steal the spotlight.

Here’s the game plan: the Air Force is betting big on a mixed fleet: 76 modernized B-52Js teaming up with over 100 of the stealthy, next-gen B-21 Raiders. Once the B-21 enters the fray, the Stratofortress’s mission shifts; she’ll hang back and unleash standoff strikes, letting the new kid on the block handle the sneaky stuff up close.

But to stay relevant in this new era, the B-52 needs more than a fresh coat of paint. She’s getting a major overhaul, transforming from the B-52H to the B-52J. The path hasn’t exactly been smooth; delays and development hiccups have made headlines. But the commitment is clear: the Air Force isn’t letting go of its old warhorse just yet.

Two upgrades stand out above the rest. First, the Radar Modernization Program: Raytheon’s AN/APQ-188, a state-of-the-art AESA radar, is replacing the relic AN/APQ-166 that’s been humming since the Cold War.

Borrowing technology from Navy Super Hornets and Air Force Eagles, this radar brings sharper eyes, better target tracking, and the kind of digital muscle that keeps the B-52 in the fight, whether that’s tracking moving targets on the ground or scanning for threats in the air.

Next up, the Commercial Engine Replacement Program. Out go the ancient Pratt & Whitney TF33s: stalwarts since the ‘60s, but well past their prime. In come Rolls Royce F130s, descendants of engines found in luxury Gulfstreams, promising more range, less maintenance, and a cleaner burn. The new engines look familiar but pack a modern punch, sitting closer to the wing for better aerodynamics.

The upgrade rollout starts in 2026 or 2027, with the first B-52Js ready for action by 2033. Full re-engineering wraps up by 2036. The radar’s big debut is still under wraps. But one thing’s certain: the B-52’s saga is far from over. It’s just taxiing out for its next mission.

After the Stratofortress: America’s Next Heavy Bomber Question

The mighty B-52 Stratofortress, that iron-winged legend of American airpower, is getting a new lease on life: fresh engines, modern guts, still roaring into the sunset. But somewhere in a Pentagon conference room, a new story is quietly preparing for takeoff. The United States and its allies are already plotting what comes after the B-52J, even as the old bird gets its upgrades. In 2027, the Air Force will huddle for a Heavy Bomber Analysis of Alternatives, deciding if the future belongs to souped-up B-52s or a yet-unseen heavy bomber built for tomorrow’s skies.

This isn’t just about swapping out old airframes. It’s about keeping a long shadow over the world’s tough neighborhoods, where China, Russia, and others are raising the stakes with their own missiles and fortress-like defenses.

The B-21 Raider, a stealthy ghost, is set to become the backbone of America’s bomber fleet, but the B-52 brings what Hollywood would call “presence”—endurance, payload, and that unmistakable silhouette on the horizon.

For America’s friends in NATO and across the Indo-Pacific, this means the bomber umbrella stays open. U.S. bombers mean reassurance, headaches for rivals, and a fast-moving response force that doesn’t need to park on every runway overseas.

The B-52J will keep flying, but the first whispers of its successor are already in the air—a cinematic prelude to the day a new aviator’s story takes flight.

This Week in Aviation History

27, May 1931: At Langley Field in Virginia, the world’s first full-scale wind tunnel threw open its massive doors, sixty feet wide, thirty feet high, ready to shape the future of flight. Inside, everything from WWII fighters to space capsules and submarines braved the artificial gale, their secrets revealed in the roaring wind.

Wind tunnels have always been the aviator’s crystal ball, letting designers peer into the unknown before their birds ever left the ground. Even the Wright brothers, chasing their dream of powered flight, crafted their own six-foot wind tunnel to test wings before making history in 1903.

Wind Tunnel Lets Airplanes ‘Fly’ on Ground

It is the Roaring Twenties, aviation’s golden dawn, out in Hampton, Virginia, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics—NACA, the grandparent of NASA—was dreaming bigger than ever at its Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory.

Their first wind tunnels gave them a taste for aerodynamic adventure, but those early tunnels just whetted their appetite. After seeing what the Propeller Research Tunnel could do with its big test section, the engineers decided to aim for the sky, literally. They set out to create a wind tunnel massive enough to swallow a whole airplane and lay bare its aerodynamic soul.

Enter Smith J. De France, a man with vision and nerves of steel. In 1929, as the world teetered on the edge of the Great Depression, NACA seized the moment, stretching their budget on cheap materials and snapping up a brigade of talented, suddenly unemployed aeronautical engineers.

Construction moved at a clip, and by May 1931, the Full Scale 30- by 60-Foot Tunnel (FST) was ready for action. Its dedication at the Sixth Annual Aircraft Engineering Conference was a spectacle: the world’s largest wind tunnel stood with its steel skeleton visible to all, a colossus measuring 434 feet long, 222 feet wide, and 97 feet tall—a new landmark at Langley and a beacon for every aviator’s ambition.

As the decades rolled on, the FST became a stage for the next acts of flight. In the postwar 1950s, engineers put cutting-edge ideas through their paces: swept wings, delta shapes, and boundary-layer tricks for low-speed performance.

But this wasn’t just about airplanes. Dirigibles, submarines, radar antennae, gliding parachutes, inflatable planes (even entire wind tunnels) took their turn in the FST’s artificial hurricane.

Jet engines eventually outran the tunnel’s top speeds, but the FST never lost its place in the spotlight. When NASA took the reins in 1958, shifting priorities sparked something new—remote-controlled, free-flying models dancing through the vast test section, bigger and bolder than ever before. Suddenly, radical designs got their moment in the sun, tested with a realism that matched the dreams of their creators.

In the grand sweep of aviation history, the FST wasn’t just a wind tunnel. It was a proving ground for every wild idea and a launchpad for the future of flight.

Where Wings Meet the Wind: Features of the Wind Tunnel

Step into the Full-Scale Tunnel and you’re entering the set of a true aviation epic. Its semi-elliptical test section soars 30 feet high and 60 feet wide, with nothing but open air around the wings.

That meant even aircraft with wingspans up to 40 feet could face the wind head-on, as two massive 35-foot propellers—each spun by a thunderous 4,000-horsepower motor—sent air swirling through the tunnel at anywhere from a breezy 25 to a stormy 118 mph.

The air followed a clever double-return path, splitting into left and right streams that looped around the building, perfectly tuned by rows of airfoil-shaped vanes so that the test section saw only the smoothest, steadiest currents—less turbulence than the older tunnels ever managed.

Planes were mounted atop a six-component strut system, each movement and force meticulously measured by dial-type scales that could read every ounce of air pressure. Early calibrations used real aircraft that also took to the skies, letting engineers compare tunnel data with actual flight results. It worked so well that the tunnel quickly became a national testing treasure, shaping generations of aviation and space research for nearly eighty years.

At first, the focus was on how every part of a plane. Its geometry, construction methods, and those seemingly harmless little bumps changed drag and cooling. The winds soon revealed that even the smallest protrusions could steal performance in ways few expected. In 1938, the Navy’s Brewster F2A-2 Buffalo arrived at Langley, stuck at a sluggish 250 mph.

After engineers hunted down every drag-inducing detail (landing gear, exhaust stacks, gun mounts), they recommended fixes that turned the Buffalo into a contender, giving it a 31-mph boost. That’s the magic of the Full-Scale Tunnel: where every airplane faces the wind and comes out stronger.

The Wind Tunnel’s Lasting Legacy

Picture the dawn of aviation, when flying was more dream than science. It is a wild leap into the unknown. Then, in 1931, Langley’s 30-by-60-foot Full-Scale Wind Tunnel roared to life, a colossal cathedral of wind where real airplanes, not just models, met the invisible currents head-on. Suddenly, flight wasn’t just a hunch; it was a calculation.

When war clouds gathered, this tunnel became the proving ground for every U.S. warbird with a future in the sky. Round-the-clock, mechanics and pilots hustled beneath the cavernous fans as engineers chased the secrets of speed and survival.

Drag was the enemy; the wind tunnel became the crucible. Tests here scrubbed off precious seconds and saved countless lives by helping aircraft slip faster, farther, higher.

But Langley’s reach soared beyond dogfights and bomb runs. Its culture of full-scale testing shaped everything from rotorcraft to reentry vehicles. Anything daring the air to resist.

Though the tunnel’s doors eventually closed, its spirit endures. The Smithsonian’s preserved fan blades whisper of the days when steel giants first learned to fly before ever leaving the ground.

Today’s stealth jets and tomorrow’s dream machines all owe a debt to that wind-borne legacy. Langley proved an eternal truth: every aircraft’s fate is first written in the wind.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Project Constant Peg was a secret program to train U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter aircrews to fly against Soviet-designed aircraft.”

—U.S. Air Force

The Nevada desert is still dark when the briefing room door closes.

Read more

In an effort to rapidly test and make new capabilities available to warfighters, U.S. Air Force and GA-ASI collaborate on demo of Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System using #MQ9A Reaper®.

—General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc (GA-ASI)

Mission Briefing

Out in the Nevada desert, the MQ-9A Reaper took to the skies, loaded with APKWS laser-guided rockets. Pilots and crews watched as the bird unleashed its payload on both air and ground targets, marking another bold chapter in aviation testing.

GA-ASI and U.S. Air Force Test APKWS Guided Rockets on the Reaper

Beneath the endless Nevada sky, where the desert heat shimmers and the horizon seems to go on forever, the MQ-9A Reaper made history. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, in close partnership with the U.S. Air Force, put the legendary remotely piloted aircraft through its paces, this time armed with the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) laser-guided rockets.

The setting was the iconic Nevada Test and Training Range, a proving ground where innovation meets the demands of modern warfare.

Over a series of flights cloaked in operational secrecy, test crews executed a ballet of advanced maneuvers, firing off rockets in a variety of shot profiles. Whether the target was in the air or hugging the desert floor, the MQ-9A crews (eyes sharp, hands steady) delivered every shot with precision. According to General Atomics, every launch was flawless, the kind of performance that turns test flights into legend.

Photos from the event showed the Reaper bristling with new hardware: a LAU-131 A/A pod loaded with inert AGR-20 rockets. While there was no word on the use of other ordnance, the message was clear: the Reaper is evolving, and fast.

The entire test program embodied rapid adaptation, moving from planning to live-fire testing in what felt like the blink of an eye. Whether this rush was due to an urgent operational need or simply the pace of progress, nobody’s saying. But out here, speed is survival.

GA-ASI President David R. Alexander summed up the spirit of the test: APKWS isn’t just another weapon. It’s a force multiplier. By integrating these laser-guided rockets, the Reaper gains the ability to carry more, strike smarter, and do it all at a fraction of the cost of traditional fighter jets. It’s proof that with the right collaboration, the gap between idea and reality can be closed in record time.

The MQ-9A’s new capabilities echo lessons learned from the Gray Eagle STOL platform, which last year used APKWS rockets to swat target drones from the sky. It’s all part of a broader push to give the Air Force more persistent, affordable, and versatile options for countering threats like one-way attack drones; without breaking the bank.

Compared to fighter jets, the Reaper can loiter over the battlefield for hours, ready to strike again and again, all while costing just a fraction to operate. For the Air Force, this means more coverage, fewer headaches, and a leap forward in staying power.

As the dust settles on another day at the range, one thing is clear: the MQ-9A Reaper is writing a new chapter in the story of airpower.

What is the APKWS?

The AGR-20, better known as the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II (APKWS II), is a shining example of old-school hardware meeting cutting-edge innovation. Born from the classic Hydra 70, an unguided rocket with roots stretching back to the folding-fin rockets of the late 1940s.

The APKWS II transforms a tried-and-true workhorse into a modern precision tool. Where these rockets once screamed over the battlefields of Korea and Vietnam with brute force, today they fly with pinpoint accuracy, guided by the beam of a laser.

The secret sauce? Engineers slipped a laser guidance section right between the rocket’s high-explosive warhead and its trusty Mk66 motor. It’s a clever bit of engineering: take a cheap, reliable rocket and give it brains without reinventing the wheel.

Now, instead of relying on heavy bombs or expensive missiles when a lighter touch will do, Air Force pilots can reach for APKWS II: delivering smart, low-collateral strikes at a fraction of the cost. When you don’t need the thunder of a JDAM or the punch of a Hellfire, APKWS II steps up.

Each guidance module hosts four foldable wings, each wing fitted with laser seeker optics boasting a wide field of view. This lets the APKWS II zero in on both still and moving targets, whether they’re hugging the ground or darting across the sky.

BAE Systems, the mastermind behind this upgrade, made sure the rocket’s transformation was seamless; no need to overhaul the aircraft or fire control systems. The only real change? A slightly longer rocket pod, the LAU-131 A/A, lets jets and helos sling more APKWS rounds downrange.

Perhaps the most cinematic twist is how these old Hydra rockets are now being eyed for air-to-air missions. With drone swarms and cheap enemy fliers on the rise, APKWS II offers a low-cost counterpunch.

Compare that to the million-dollar price tags on AMRAAMs or the hefty cost of Sidewinders, and it’s easy to see why commanders are excited. For the price of one missile, you can send dozens of APKWS II rounds skyward.

Sure, there are trade-offs: APKWS II doesn’t have the range or warhead size of the big missiles. But when the job is swatting drones or fending off saturation attacks, quantity and agility win the day. With seven APKWS II rockets packed into a single pod, American aviators are ready to meet the future—one laser-guided shot at a time.

How APKWS Rockets Could Redefine the Drone-Age Air War

The story of the APKWS rockets meeting the MQ-9A Reaper is a scene straight out of a modern war epic—a high desert sky, sunlight glinting off a drone’s wings, and ground crews prepping a payload that’s about to change the rules of the game.

Picture it: at the Nevada Test and Training Range, the Reaper, long known as a silent sentinel, now flexes new muscle. With Air Force crews at the controls, it fires off BAE’s APKWS (laser-guided rockets), the kind that give a humble 2.75-inch Hydra a precision punch. But this isn’t just about flashy tech. It’s about rewriting the script for air combat in the drone age.

Instead of relying on pricey, manned jets to chase down every threat, this test hints at a future where persistent, unmanned patrols handle the bulk of the work—swatting drones, intercepting suspicious craft, and saving the heavy hitters for when it really matters.

For U.S. allies staring down drone swarms or missile barrages, it’s a blueprint for survival: more shots in the magazine, less money out the door.

BAE’s kit turns simple rockets into smart hunters, capable of striking from the air, the ground, or even at other airborne targets. The Reaper’s transformation shows a cinematic shift: from lone-wolf fighters to layered teams—pilots, drones, and affordable guided weapons —choreographed for endurance and adaptability. This is the new air war, where teamwork and thriftiness win the day.

#ad — This issue of Hangar Flying with Tog is sponsored by Surfshark VPN.

In aviation, there’s a difference between being visible and being exposed. A fighter may need to be seen at the right moment—but it never wants to give away more than it has to.

The same idea applies online.

Surfshark VPN helps encrypt your internet connection, protect your browsing activity, and mask your location, giving you an added layer of privacy whether you’re at home, traveling, or using public Wi-Fi.

One feature I personally enjoy is CleanWeb. It helps cut down on the clutter by blocking ads, trackers, malware, and phishing attempts before they turn into a problem. For me, that means a cleaner, less distracting browsing experience—especially when I’m researching aircraft, digging through old sources, or working from a hotel or airport Wi-Fi connection.

Another feature worth checking out is Alternative ID, which lets you generate an alternate online identity and email address for sites where you may not want to hand over your real information. Think of it like not broadcasting your real callsign every time you taxi onto the internet.

Go to https://surfshark.com/flyingwithtog or use code FLYINGWITHTOG at checkout to get 4 extra months of Surfshark VPN.

This Week in Aviation History

After the legendary F-86 Sabre danced across Korean skies, its successor—the F-100—roared onto the scene as the first production jet ever to break the sound barrier in level flight, topping out at a blistering 760 mph. The adventure began on 25 May 1953, when the YF-100A prototype leapt into the California sky above Edwards Air Force Base, rewriting aviation history with a single flight.

The First Supersonic Fighter

The North American F-100 Super Sabre, proudly nicknamed “The Hun,” earned its place as the world’s first supersonic fighter. With a bold 45-degree wing sweep and a roaring afterburning engine, the very first YF-100A prototype smashed past the sound barrier on its maiden voyage over Edwards Air Force Base on 25 May 1953.

The Hun started out as a pure day fighter, but she quickly adapted: later models sported wing-mounted munitions for ground attack and even carried nuclear arms, standing ready on alert in Europe for years. In Vietnam, the F-100 wasn’t just a player. It was a legend, flying more combat sorties than any other fixed-wing bird in the conflict, racking up an astonishing 360,283 missions.

Through it all, the Hun proved herself a war horse: tough, reliable, and always ready to deliver ground support when it mattered most, cementing a legacy that would last 45 years in service.

Yet, breaking the sound barrier came with a price. That daring 45-degree wing sweep—so crucial for supersonic flight—brought its own set of challenges.

Early A models had a stubby tail, which didn’t offer enough rudder authority at steep angles, and the aggressive wing design introduced adverse yaw. Imagine rolling left but feeling the jet resist, rolling the opposite way: an unexpected quirk that could catch even seasoned pilots off guard.

At high angles of attack, the downward aileron would drag, the upward one would slip through the air, and suddenly, the Hun would yaw away from your intended turn. The trick? Keep those ailerons centered under heavy Gs, and dance on the rudder pedals to coax the jet where you wanted her to go.

And then there was the infamous Sabre Dance. If a pilot pulled the nose too high on takeoff or landing, the wingtips could stall, the lift would surge forward, and the jet would pitch up uncontrollably; sometimes spinning out in a wild, unrecoverable dance.

One such harrowing Sabre Dance, flown by First Lieutenant Barty Brooks on January 10, 1956, was captured on film—an enduring, cautionary tale from the golden age of supersonic flight.

Even with all her quirks and demanding flight characteristics, the F-100 won the hearts of her pilots. They wore their ability to wring out every ounce of performance from the jet like a badge of honor, relishing the challenge and the thrill.

Under the Hood of the Widely-Produced Super-Sabre—F-100D

Step into the cockpit of the F-100D, the most prolific Super Sabre of them all, with over 1,200 of these fighter-bombers rolling off the line. Built as an upgrade over the F-100C, the D-model was purpose-built for ground attack, not dogfighting the enemy for control of the skies.

She kept the six underwing hardpoints from her predecessor, but swapped out the old gravity-drop pylons for forced ejection—kicking bombs and stores off her wings with a jolt when the time came to unleash hell.

To tame the jet’s wild side, designers beefed up her tailfin and rudder, adding a distinctive square bulge at the back to house a rear-facing radar warning antenna and the fuel dump pipe. Up front, the nose bristled with the AN/APR-25 radar receiver, ever on the lookout for trouble.

Inside the F-100D’s cockpit, the Minneapolis-Honeywell MB-3 autopilot was a game-changer. Now, a pilot could let the jet fly itself to the target, freeing up both hands for map reading or arming weapons; talk about multitasking at Mach speed.

Of course, when flying tight formation with a squadron, real pilots preferred to keep their hands on the stick. The D-model also boasted an improved low-altitude bombsite (LABS), ready to deliver serious firepower: whether conventional bombs or a suite of nuclear options like the Mk-7, Mk-38, or Mk-43. A typical loadout? Six 750-pounders or four 1,000-pound bombs, ready to rain down on the enemy.

Midway through production, the F-100D got even more teeth. Starting with the 184th airframe, Sidewinder air-to-air missiles joined the arsenal, making the Hun a threat to anything in the sky as well as on the ground.

That same milestone model added a centerline mount for “special stores”—Air Force speak for nuclear weapons. With these upgrades, the F-100D could carry a variety of nukes, with yields ranging from a single kiloton to a jaw-dropping ten megatons, depending on the mission.

The nuclear attack profile was a feat of aviation daring: approaching the target at treetop height and 500 mph, the pilot would yank the nose up in a high-G climb. The computer would handle the split-second bomb release, and with a maneuver like an Immelman, the pilot would flip out of harm’s way, firewalled afterburner roaring, racing for home at blistering speed.

The F-100’s Legend in the Skies

The F-100 Super Sabre, gleaming under the sun, roaring off the tarmac into a sky thick with Cold War tension. She wasn’t just the Air Force’s first supersonic fighter. She was the ticket to a new era, where speed met swagger and every mission felt like history in the making.

But the real legend of the “Hun” wasn’t born from headlines or airshow glory. It was written in the humid haze over Southeast Asia, as pilots strapped in, throttled up, and dove into the unknown. From 1964 to 1971, the F-100 flew more than 360,000 combat sorties; delivering close air support, dodging flak, and keeping ground troops alive. She was a workhorse, a lifeline, and sometimes a last hope.

The Super Sabre’s story didn’t end on the battlefield. She became a star with the Thunderbirds, streaking across continents and lighting up the imagination of crowds from Paris to Peoria. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the F-100 was on the front line, ready for anything. And then came the daring Misty FAC missions—low, fast, and dangerous—where pilots like Dick Rutan etched their names into aviation folklore.

Sure, the F-100 had its flaws. But she taught a generation how to fly on the edge, adapt under fire, and trust their instincts at Mach speed. That’s a legacy worthy of the silver screen and the skies.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

We recently flew the XRQ-73 hybrid-electric unmanned aircraft in collaboration with @AFResearchLab and @northropgrumman at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. Part of the SHEPARD program, the flight proves the military utility of hybrid-electric propulsion.

—DARPA Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

Northrop Grumman and Scaled Composites teamed up to craft the XRQ-73, an unmanned bird with a whisper-quiet engine that runs on electricity spun from a gas turbine. When it lifted off from Edwards Air Force Base in April 2026, DARPA called that maiden flight a leap toward proving just how game-changing hybrid-electric power could be for the future of military aviation.

DARPA’S SHEPARD Prototype Takes Flight

Born from DARPA’s bold SHEPARD program, the XRQ-73 is the next act in a saga that began with the secretive XRQ-72 Great Horned Owl.

This aircraft, shrouded in mystery, made its maiden flight on 14 April 2026: well past its original 2024 target, with the news trickling out only weeks after the fact. That’s just how things go in the world of black projects: milestones are celebrated in whispers, not headlines.

Tipping the scales at around 1,250 pounds, the XRQ-73 sits comfortably in the U.S. military’s Group 3 Uncrewed Aircraft System class. That puts it alongside stalwarts like the RQ-21 Blackjack and RQ-7B Shadow, built to operate up to 18,000 feet and dash along at speeds hitting 250 knots.

Northrop Grumman’s team has clearly kept busy since we first glimpsed the design in 2024. Spotters note new vertical stabilizers at the wings’ tips, a revised air inlet up top, and some fresh blade antennas. There’s even a mysterious forward-facing gadget between the main intakes, possibly a camera or sensor, hinting at advanced situational awareness.

The large belly fairing remains, likely hiding the true heart of the XRQ-73: state-of-the-art ISR (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) payloads, perfectly matched to its stealthy flying wing and whisper-quiet, low-heat hybrid-electric propulsion.

Test flights are marked by the little details; a scatter of black airflow indicators taped to the wings, destined to be peeled off once the engineers have their data. The official photos?

They show the XRQ-73 not on some glamorous runway, but resting quietly on the cracked expanse of Rogers Dry Lake at Edwards Air Force Base. It’s a legendary spot, having welcomed everything from the X-15 to the Space Shuttle, and now it hosts this latest chapter in the evolution of silent, persistent flight.

According to Lieutenant Colonel Clark McGehee, SHEPARD’s program manager, this first flight is just the beginning. “The architecture proven by the XRQ-73 paves the way for new types of mission systems and delivered effects,” he says. This isn’t just a test. It’s a launchpad for tomorrow’s battlefield tech, promising capabilities that are still hidden behind the classified curtain.

So don’t expect splashy airshows or public unveilings anytime soon. The XRQ-73 is likely to remain a ghost on the windswept desert, its advances unfolding quietly, far from the spotlight—just how the best stories in aviation often begin.

Inside the SHEPARD Program

Think of the SHEPARD program as DARPA’s fast-track, risk-busting answer to the Air Force’s Great Horned Owl project: a real-world testbed built on the X-Prime playbook, where fresh tech gets pushed out of the lab and onto the runway in record time.

Instead of endless tinkering, SHEPARD’s mission is clear: take the hybrid-electric bones and key tech from the GHO, fuse them into a new, mission-driven aircraft, and get it flying within just 20 months.

The result? The XRQ-73 SHEPARD—bigger than the earlier XRQ-72, loaded with real-world fuel and mission systems, but still light enough to stay under the Group 3 drone weight limit. Northrop Grumman’s ace team pulled out all the stops in autonomy, design, and rapid prototyping to get this demonstrator airborne.

For them, SHEPARD isn’t just another drone. It’s a leap into the future, a chance to cement their lead in hybrid-electric tech and set the stage for the next era of uncrewed military aviation.

SHEPARD’s Silent Climb: Hybrid-Electric Airpower and the Next Allied Edge

The XRQ-73 SHEPARD isn’t just a new drone. It’s a glimpse into an aviation future that’s quieter, smarter, and tougher to spot. When this hybrid-electric marvel took to the skies over Edwards Air Force Base in April 2026, it wasn’t just about showing off a fancy propulsion system.

DARPA, working alongside AFRL and Northrop Grumman, set out to test how this tech could transform the very way unmanned aircraft deliver effects and adapt to tomorrow’s missions.

For the U.S., SHEPARD hints at a new breed of drone: one that can loiter longer, whisper instead of roar, and slip through contested airspace to gather intelligence without giving away its position. Aviation watchers see the XRQ-73 as the next evolutionary step from the Great Horned Owl, while Northrop Grumman calls it a leap toward lighter, more autonomous systems.

For allies, the promise is even bigger. Imagine sharing a stealthy eye in the sky that can watch vast seas, track shadowy threats, and provide real-time targeting, all without drawing unwanted attention.

SHEPARD’s first flight isn’t just another milestone; it’s a signal that tomorrow’s airpower will be shaped by persistent, discreet machines quietly changing the game before a single missile launches. The future, it seems, is already airborne.

This Week in Aviation History

Marine aviation took flight on 22 May 1912, when First Lieutenant Alfred A. Cunningham arrived at Naval Aviation Camp in Annapolis, eager to join the ranks of early aviators. After just two hours and forty minutes of training in a Wright Model B-1, Cunningham soared solo and earned the distinction of Naval Aviator No. 5.

As more Marines learned to fly, their ambition for independence grew, fueling a push to carve out their own path. That vision took shape on 6 January 1914, when First Lieutenant Bernard L. Smith was sent to Culebra, Puerto Rico, to launch the Marine Section of the Navy Flying School—a bold new chapter for Marine aviation.

A Century of Marine Aviation in the Fight

Marine aviation’s story begins at the dawn of American flight. A time when the Wright brothers had just shown the world what powered wings could do at Kitty Hawk, and the Navy was eager to join the airborne revolution.

Under the guidance of aviation pioneer Glenn Curtiss, the Navy started acquiring its first aircraft, training pilots, and experimenting with bold new ideas: bombing runs, shipboard takeoffs and landings, even the earliest carrier operations.

These early daredevils laid the groundwork for aircraft to become an essential arm in the combined fight.

On 22 May 1912, First Lieutenant Alfred A. Cunningham reported for aviation duty at Annapolis, Maryland, eventually earning the title of Naval Aviator No. 5. Just two years later, the Marines began forging their own path when they established the Marine Section of the Navy Flying School; a sign that Marine aviation was ready to carve out its own legend.

Since those early years, two things have defined Marine aviation: its tight partnership with naval aviation and its relentless focus on helping Marines on the ground.

By 1915, the Corps stood up its first aviation company, and by the time World War I arrived, Marine aviation had grown from a handful of enthusiasts into a fighting force.

Through the 1920s and ‘30s, Marine pilots flew missions over Haiti, the Dominican Republic, China, and Nicaragua, where they honed the close air support tactics that would become a Marine trademark.

World War II was Marine aviation’s crucible, with pilots flying into the teeth of battles at Wake Island, Midway, Guadalcanal, and beyond. The F4U Corsair, with its gull wings and roaring engine, became a symbol of Marine grit and airpower.

In Korea, Marines brought jets and helicopters into the fight, pioneering medevac and troop mobility on rugged terrain, while Vietnam saw Marine Phantoms and Skyhawks, along with helicopters, flying constant support for ground troops from Da Nang to Khe Sanh. Marine aviation’s reach even extended into space, with Marines like John Glenn and Charles Bolden trading cockpits for rockets.

In the decades since, the Corps has kept pushing the envelope. The Harrier jump jet gave Marines the power to take off from tiny ships or rough patches of land, while the MV-22 Osprey blended helicopter lift with airplane speed.

Unmanned drones like the RQ-7 Shadow and ScanEagle joined the lineup, and the F-35B ushered in stealthy, short-takeoff combat power. Through every chapter, Marine aviation has been defined by its mission: to back up the Marine infantryman, whether in canvas-winged biplanes, helicopters, Ospreys, or lightning-fast jets.

That unbreakable bond—sky supporting ground—remains the true heart of Marine aviation.

US Marine Corps Today

The U.S. Marine Corps operates under the Department of the Navy, yet its structure runs more like the Army’s; with a few signature twists.

The Corps is famously organized around the “rule of three,” and its fighting force is built from four main pillars: the operating forces (the tip of the spear), the headquarters (the brains), the supporting establishment (the backbone handling logistics), and the Marine Corps Reserve (the strategic backup).

When big trouble breaks out, the Marines deploy their heavyweight champs—the Marine Expeditionary Forces, or MEFs. There are three MEFs, each a self-sustaining team of ground troops, aircraft, and logistics, ready to take on crises anywhere, whether it’s storming beaches or holding the line at sea.

These MEFs aren’t just for show—they’re designed to fight alone for up to 60 days and act as standing Marine air-ground task forces, ready in both peace and war.

I MEF calls Camp Pendleton, California home and supports the US Indo-Pacific and Central Commands. It’s made up of the 1st Marine Division, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, 1st Marine Logistics Group, and its own Information Group, with a track record stretching from Desert Storm to Iraq and Afghanistan. Across the country, II MEF is based in North Carolina, made up of the 2nd Marine Division, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing, 2nd Logistics Group, and its Information Group, with its focus reaching across the Atlantic to Europe and Africa.

III MEF stands apart, forward-deployed in Okinawa, Japan—America’s tip of the spear in the Pacific—with the 3rd Marine Division, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, 3rd Logistics Group, and the III MEF Information Group.

Marine aviation has its own unique structure, organized into squadrons (the basic unit), which combine into groups, and then into wings. Each level scales up the Corps’ airpower and flexibility.

Legacy and Lessons of Marine Aviation

The true legacy of Marine aviation isn’t just measured in decades, aircraft models, or battle honors. It’s the unbreakable connection between those who fight on the ground and those who fly above. Since First Lieutenant Alfred A. Cunningham’s first day on aviation duty in 1912, every evolution in Marine aircraft has circled back to one mission: support the Marine infantryman, no matter the theater or era.

From the canvas-and-wood biplanes of the early days to the roar of Corsairs in the Pacific, the thunder of Phantoms and Harriers over Vietnam, the innovative Osprey, versatile drones, and the cutting-edge F-35B, Marine aviation’s heartbeat has always been close to the front lines.

The core lesson is that real innovation in the Corps isn’t about gadgets for their own sake, but about meeting the Marines’ needs on the battlefield. Whether it was pioneering close air support in Nicaragua, providing lifelines with helicopters in Korea, or launching jets from improvised landing sites in Vietnam, Marine aviators have stayed with the fight.

Even as technology leaps forward, the mission holds steady: assault support, offensive strikes, reconnaissance, and guarding the force.

Adaptation is the Marine aviation way, never losing sight of its roots. The story even rockets into space with Marine astronauts John Glenn and Charles Bolden. Through all the changes, one promise endures. Wherever Marines deploy, their wings go with them, linking generations in a legacy of loyalty and purpose.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

The Historical Section of the Department of the Navy published seven monographs on the U.S. Navy and World War I between 1920 and 1923.

—Naval History and Heritage Command

Deep below the decks of America’s World War I warships, the true soundtrack of battle wasn’t gunfire, but the pulse of mach…

Read more

The Maverick Act just passed the Senate, allowing the US Navy to transfer a trio of retired F-14D Tomcats and necessary spare parts to the U.S. Space and Rocket Center.

—@OSINTtechnical Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

With the Maverick Act cleared for takeoff, three U.S. Navy F-14D Tomcats are set to land at the Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama—where, just maybe, one legendary bird might roar back to life and dance in the skies once more.

The Maverick Act

The Senate floor is silent, but the Maverick Act rockets through with unanimous consent. It is a rare moment of unity that kickstarts the next chapter of an American aviation legend.

Now, with the House preparing for its own vote as of May 4, all eyes are on Capitol Hill. If this bill clears its final hurdle, it’ll give the Secretary of the Navy the green light to hand over not one, not two, but three F-14D Tomcats to the U.S. Space and Rocket Center Commission in Huntsville, Alabama.

For those who haven’t strolled through its Saturn V shadows, the U.S. Space & Rocket Center is more than just a museum. It’s the largest shrine to space on this planet, a cathedral dedicated to the dreams of flight and exploration since 1970.

The bill doesn’t just talk in generalities either; it calls out the three Tomcats by name, or rather, by Bureau Number: 164341, 164602, and 159437. These are the chosen birds, set to trade carrier decks for museum floors.

But don’t expect these Tomcats to become warbirds again. The legislation is crystal clear: they’re grounded for good when it comes to combat. No missiles, no dogfights, no tricks up their wings. The Secretary of the Navy isn’t on the hook for any repairs or modifications, either. What comes with the jets is what you get, though the package does include a trove of manuals and any leftover spare parts the Navy can spare.

Here’s where the story takes a turn worthy of a Hollywood script. For the first time, there’s an official mention that one of these Tomcats could actually fly again. The Secretary will provide enough spare parts from existing Navy stock to potentially get one bird back in the air, or at least looking sharp in a static display. But if you’re picturing a team of Navy mechanics wrenching away, think again. From this point on, it’s all in the Commission’s hands.

They can seek out nonprofit partners. Think of what the Collings Foundation did for the F-4D Phantom, the only one of its kind still flying in the U.S., to restore, maintain, and even fly the Tomcat for airshows and commemorative events. The Navy’s role ends at the handoff; every dime, every bolt, every drop of sweat after that belongs to the Commission.

And in true aviator fashion, the bill makes it clear: no cost to Uncle Sam. Every expense—transfer, compliance checks, restoration, operation, maintenance—is on the Commission’s tab.

The price of preserving a legend? Worth every penny.

Tomcat: A Hollywood Icon

Picture this: the legendary F-14 Tomcat, wings folded and sun-bleached, slumbers beneath the desert sky. A relic fiercely protected by Uncle Sam. Ever since the U.S. Navy hung up its flight suit in 2006, getting near these cats—or their spare parts—has been like breaching Fort Knox. Washington’s kept a tight grip, making sure not a single bolt ends up in Iranian hands, the only other Tomcat pilots left in the world.

When those jets retired, crews stripped out vital organs before rolling them out to the boneyard. Anything left behind? Often crushed, melted, or lost to history. Bringing one of these beauties back to life isn’t just a matter of dusting off the sand.

It’s a Herculean feat. Deep, painstaking inspections would be just the start, with every rivet and wire tested before the FAA even thinks about giving a thumbs-up.

After two decades baking in the Mojave, the road to revival is long and paved with dollar signs. The Tomcat was never cheap to run, and with spare parts rarer than a clean flight suit after a dogfight, regular airshows are probably a pipe dream. Still, imagine the roar at a heritage flyby. Maybe, just maybe, that day will come, someday down the line.

Let us take a closer look at this legendary bird

Manufacturer:

Grumman Corporation

Type:

Carrier-based air superiority fighter

Crew:

Pilot and Radar Intercept Officer

Powerplant:

Two 27,800 lb. General Electric F110-GE-400 afterburning turbofans

Dimensions:

Length: 62 ft., 8 in.
Height: 16 ft.
Span (max spread): 64 ft., 1 in.

Weight:

Empty: 43,735 lb.
Gross: 74,350 lb.

Performance:

Max Speed: 1,544 mph at 40,000 ft.
Ceiling: 55,000 ft.

Armament:

One 20mm cannon; AIM-7 Sparrow; AIM-9 Sidewinder; AIM-54 Phoenix missiles

F-14 Tomcat: Ghosts of the Desert Hangar No More

The F-14D Tomcat, that wildcat of the carrier deck, might just roar back to life—but not as a warbird, not this time. Under the so-called MAVERICK Act, the U.S. isn’t gearing up to put the Tomcat back into combat, but to let it fly as a symbol, a living legend.

Word is, three F-14Ds could be handed over to the U.S. Space & Rocket Center Commission. One of them? Destined for a second act in the skies, thrilling crowds at airshows and remembrance flights; no missiles, just memories.

For America, this isn’t about muscle. It’s about meaning. The F-14D, the apex predator of Tomcats, sports twin engines, shape-shifting wings, and a cockpit built for two. Once, it prowled the fleet’s edge, ready to defend, with eyes on two dozen targets and the claws to strike six at once. The Smithsonian and the National Naval Aviation Museum call it a bridge, from Cold War standoffs to the last combat missions over Iraq in 2006.

So why bring one back? Because it’s living history. Seeing a Tomcat on the wing connects the next generation with the legends of the carrier deck, the grit of naval aviators, and the spirit of Top Gun.

In a world buzzing with digital distractions, a thundering flyby can still steal the show. If this all comes together, the F-14D will remind us: some stories don’t fade away. They take flight again, ready to inspire the future.

This Week in Aviation History

The Memphis Belle soared into legend, its crew embodying the grit and sacrifice of every bomber team that battled across the skies of Europe. They weren’t just flying missions. They were writing history, one harrowing sortie at a time. When the Belle touched down on American soil after its 25th mission, it became a living symbol of courage and hope for a world at war.

The Memphis Belle: An American Icon

The Memphis Belle was a B-17F heavy bomber flying out of Bassingbourn, England, with the 324th Bomb Squadron, 91st Bomb Group, right at the heart of the USAAF’s early bombing campaign over Europe.

From November ‘42 to May ‘43, the Belle and its crew braved flak and fighters on 25 missions, targeting enemy strongholds across Germany, France, and Belgium. But in true wartime fashion, things weren’t always by the book.

Sometimes the crew flew other B-17s, and sometimes other crews took the Belle into combat, so by the time the Belle’s crew hit their 25th, the plane itself had only logged 24; she completed her own 25th two days later with a different team aboard, and over fifty airmen would eventually have combat time in her storied fuselage.

The Memphis Belle’s crew was a snapshot of the Eighth Air Force. Young men aged 19 to 26, hailing from across America, including places like Washington, Indiana, Texas, and Connecticut.

Despite the legend, they didn’t always fly every sortie together; shifting assignments and the realities of war meant rotating in different copilots, top turret gunners, and waist gunners.

Names like Leviticus “Levi” Dillon, Eugene Adkins, Harold Loch, Bill Winchell, and E. Scott Miller all became part of the Belle’s narrative. Each mission was a gamble, a roll of the dice at 20,000 feet, and camaraderie was forged in the crucible of enemy skies.

As for her name, the Memphis Belle paid tribute to pilot Robert Morgan’s fiancée, Margaret Polk, from Memphis, Tennessee. It is a romance that made headlines but didn’t survive the war bond tour.

The Belle’s iconic nose art, inspired by a George Petty pin-up from Esquire magazine, was first painted stateside, then touched up and later repainted by the talented Col Tony Starcer at Bassingbourn, whose brushwork adorned several other 91st Bomb Group bombers and flight jackets.

In the grand, cinematic sweep of World War II aviation, the Memphis Belle wasn’t just a plane; she was a symbol. Her story woven from love, loss, and the courage of the crews who risked everything for each other.

Fortress in the Sky: The B-17’s Battle-Ready Features Unveiled

The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress carved its legend across every WWII combat zone, but it’s over the skies of Europe where its story truly soared. Alongside the B-24 Liberator, the B-17 became the backbone of America’s strategic bombing might, pounding German industry into submission.

Designed for high-altitude flying and speed, the Fortress bristled with guns, ready to fight its way through enemy defenses. Its advanced turbosupercharged engines let it haul bombs and crews up to 30,000 feet—a lofty perch for war. Powered turrets and flexible machine guns gave gunners a fighting chance, covering every angle as flak and fighters closed in.

Even though the prototype took to the skies back in 1935, there were only a handful of B-17s on hand when the U.S. entered the war in ‘41. That changed in a hurry: Boeing, Lockheed-Vega, and Douglas ramped up production, turning out thousands of Flying Fortresses.

The B-17F came first, fast and formidable, leading the charge in the early days of the bombing campaign. Later, the B-17G rolled off the lines, sporting a nose turret that made it even tougher in a head-on fight. By war’s end in May 1945, over 12,700 B-17s had been built, each one a testament to American industry and the courage of those who flew them.

TECHNICAL NOTES:

Crew: 10

Armament: Up to thirteen .50-cal machine guns and 8,000 lbs of bombs

Engines: Four 1,200 hp Wright R-1820-97 turbosupercharged radials

Maximum speed: 325 mph

Range: 2,800 miles

Combat radius: 600+ miles

Maximum ceiling: 37,500 ft

Empty weight: 35,728 lbs

Maximum gross weight: 48,720 lbs

Memphis Belle: An Enduring Call Sign for a Screen Icon

The Memphis Belle’s legend endures because it embodies not just the might of a B-17F Flying Fortress, but the raw survival, sacrifice, and humanity at the heart of World War II’s air war.

This bomber and her crew pulled off what seemed impossible: completing 25 grueling missions over Nazi-occupied Europe and making it home, when so many didn’t.

Braving relentless flak, enemy fighters, and the freezing, perilous altitudes, the Belle’s team became the first heavy bomber crew to finish their tour and fly back to the States, instantly turning them into symbols of hope and resilience.

The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force now calls the Belle and her crew timeless representatives of every man and woman who helped defeat Nazi Germany from the skies.

But the Memphis Belle’s journey didn’t end when the engines cooled. After combat, she toured America, rallying the home front and selling war bonds as a battered but unbroken icon.

Decades later, her story found new life in Hollywood’s “Memphis Belle,” introducing fresh eyes to the courage of young airmen facing one more dangerous mission.

Today, the real Belle sits proudly at the National Museum, more than just polished aluminum and rivets: a living memorial to the pilots, gunners, mechanics, and families forever changed by her legacy. She reminds us that planes can outgrow their blueprints and become vessels for a nation’s hopes, memories, and stories.

Each time we remember the Memphis Belle, we honor not just history’s machines, but the people whose lives they carried through war and into legend.

In Case You Missed It

What if the RAF had Tomcats? It almost happened:

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“In consultation with @SecWar, we will EXTEND the A-10 “Warthog” platform to 2030. This preserves combat power as the Defense Industrial Base works to increase combat aircraft production.”

—Office of the Secretary of the Air Force Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

The legendary A-10 Thunderbolt II, that iconic warbird with a bite, is set to keep soaring through American skies until at least 2030. That’s the latest word from the top brass—the Secretary of the Air Force himself confirming the Warthog’s saga isn’t over yet. Buckle up, because the story of this battle-hardened aviator is far from finished.

Warthog’s Service Life Extended Until 2030

Strap in and let me tell you a tale from the cockpit. The saga of the A-10 Thunderbolt II, a legend in its own right, takes another twist. The Air Force’s latest game plan keeps two squadrons of the Warthog flying high until 2030, with a third squadron holding the line until 2029. Just a few years ago, the brass wanted to ground the entire fleet by 2026, but Congress wasn’t having it. The old bird’s story, it seems, isn’t ready for a final chapter.

Now, there was talk once that these rugged airframes could be patched up and pushed on into the 2040s. But here’s the truth, as any aviator will tell you: you don’t keep warbirds in the fight without a steady stream of fresh pilots and maintainers.

With the last batch of A-10 drivers just having graduated, odds are stacked against keeping more than a squadron or two past 2030 unless the Air Force dusts off those support pipelines they’ve already mothballed.

According to Pentagon insider Brian Everstine, the units flying on till 2030 include Moody AFB’s frontline squadron and a stalwart reserve unit out at Whiteman AFB. Another squadron at Moody will keep the engines humming till 2029. These are the last chapters in a saga that’s seen the Warthog fly into more than its share of storms.

The critics have always been circling, pointing out the A-10’s vulnerabilities in a sky bristling with modern anti-aircraft threats. They say she’s too slow and too low for today’s dogfights.

But the Warthog’s adapted, picking up new tricks. Taking on drones, delivering precision strikes, and proving she can still put the fear into anyone on the wrong side of her cannon.

Take Operation Epic Fury: A-10s pounded Iran-backed militias in Iraq and Syria, letting stealthier jets handle the real hot zones. Word is, the Hog even tangled with Iranian forces directly, playing hero in a daring search-and-rescue for a downed F-15E pilot. One A-10 was lost, but the pilot punched out safely back over friendly turf.

And just when you thought the engineers were winding down, they rolled out a new refueling mod for the A-10, letting her gas up from hose-and-drogue tankers. That’s no small tweak, especially with the KC-46 still not cleared for Hog duty and the KC-135’s tricky mixed-fleet refueling.

So, ask yourself: would they have bothered with that if the Warthog’s days were numbered? Looks like there’s still some fight—and a few more stories—left in this old bird yet.

The Anatomy of the Warthog

The Warthog isn’t just a brute; she’s nimble, especially down low and slow, where it matters most. This beast can twist and turn at treetop level, hugging the ground while delivering pinpoint firepower exactly where the grunts need it.

She can hang out near the front lines for hours, ready to swoop in at a moment’s notice, and doesn’t mind roughing it. Give her a patch of dirt and she’ll land there, even with clouds barely a thousand feet overhead and visibility you could measure with a yardstick.

Loaded up with both smart bombs and old-school iron, the A-10C brings the rain wherever the fight is, clear skies or socked in, above or below the clouds, day or night.

Thanks to night vision goggles and a suite of next-gen tech, Warthog pilots can hunt in the dark and hit targets you can’t even see from the ground. The big bubble canopy gives you a panoramic view, while the titanium armor wrapped around the cockpit and vital systems means the pilot is sitting in a titanium bathtub—tough as nails and ready for trouble.

Take a hit? The A-10 shrugs off rounds up to 23mm—armor-piercing or high explosive, it doesn’t matter. If hydraulics go out, manual systems keep her flying. Even the fuel tanks are armored and self-sealing, so the Hog can take a beating and make it home in one piece.

The design’s smart, too. Lots of interchangeable parts, engines, landing gear, even vertical stabilizers can swap left to right, making repairs in the field a breeze.

The cockpit is a techie’s dream: comms, GPS, fire control, and a heads-up display that feeds the pilot everything from airspeed to weapons data. The LASTE system helps drop bombs exactly on target, while a full suite of countermeasures keeps missiles and flak at bay.

And then there’s the heart of the beast. The legendary 30mm GAU-8/A Gatling gun, spitting out nearly 4,000 rounds a minute, able to chew through tanks and anything else in its sights. Add in Mavericks, Sidewinders, and laser-guided bombs, and you’ve got a flying arsenal built for the toughest jobs in the sky.

The A-10’s Final Orbit Before Sunset

The A-10 Thunderbolt II’s extension to 2030 means the U.S. Air Force is buying time, combat mass, and close-air-support insurance while the defense industrial base struggles to produce enough newer aircraft fast enough.

The new plan reverses earlier expectations that the Warthog would be fully withdrawn by fiscal year 2029, keeping two squadrons to 2030 and another to 2029. Military Times adds that the retained force is expected to total 54 A-10s through 2029, then 36 aircraft in 2030.

For the U.S., this is a practical battlefield decision. The A-10 remains a rugged, low-altitude attack aircraft designed for close air support, with long loiter time, accurate weapons delivery, and the ability to hit ground and light maritime targets.

In current operations, it gives commanders a cheaper, available platform for lower-threat missions, freeing stealthier aircraft for more dangerous airspace. The recent use of A-10s in Operation Epic Fury, including missions tied to maritime operations in the Strait of Hormuz and combat search-and-rescue support, shows why the aircraft still has operational value.

For allies, the extension signals reassurance: American close-air-support capacity is not disappearing overnight. NATO, Middle East partners, and Indo-Pacific planners gain a little more breathing room while the U.S. transitions toward F-35s, drones, precision weapons, and future collaborative combat aircraft.

But this is not a resurrection. It is a controlled delay. The Warthog’s growl will remain on the flight line a little longer, setting up the next issue: what aircraft, crewed or uncrewed, finally inherits the close-air-support burden when the A-10’s last gun run ends?

This Week in Aviation History

On 16 May 1963, the roar of reentry echoing across the Pacific as aviator-astronaut Gordon Cooper splashes down, grinning behind his helmet visor. It’s the curtain call for Project Mercury, and Cooper, call sign Faith 7, just pulled off the longest American spaceflight to date: 22 orbits, 34 hours in the cosmic void.

He wasn’t just along for the ride; the man ran 11 science experiments, all while his ship started throwing curveballs. When the hardware faltered, Cooper coolly took the stick, flying Faith 7 home by hand like a true sky cowboy. That day, the legend of Mercury’s final flight was written across the heavens in contrails and courage.

When Faith 7 Mission Was Finally Completed

The sky buzzing with anticipation. L. Gordon Cooper, call sign Faith 7, is about to write his name in the stars as the last pilot of Project Mercury. He’s not just a passenger; Cooper is the tip of the spear, hand-picked in November ’62, with Alan Shepard riding shotgun as backup.

Originally tasked with 18 laps around the blue planet, NASA ups the ante to 22 after Walter Schirra’s triumphant run, transforming Cooper’s ride into a marathon through the heavens. That meant more cameras, more science, more sleepless hours for ground control, and a fresh test of what a single human could handle in orbit.

The launch isn’t without drama. Atlas rocket hiccups and a scrubbed attempt on May 14th keep everyone guessing. But on May 15th, Cooper’s Faith 7 finally blasts off from Cape Canaveral, slicing into the void. The first hours are smooth sailing. Cooper snaps photos of Earth, samples the oddball menu of space cuisine, and wrangles a suite of scientific experiments.

Everything from strobe-lit spheres to a tricky tethered Mylar balloon. Faith 7 even beams back the first TV images from an American spacecraft, grainy but historic, as Cooper quips that he’s flying a camera as much as a rocket.

But as any aviator knows, the skies can turn quick. On orbit 19, a phantom reentry signal flashes, then a short circuit knocks out the auto-control system. Carbon dioxide creeps up in the capsule.

Unfazed, Cooper flips to manual. No autopilot, just nerves of steel and years of training. He lines up Faith 7 by hand, times the retrorockets, and rides a blazing trail back through the atmosphere. Parachutes blossom on cue, and Cooper splashes down less than five miles from the waiting U.S.S. Kearsarge, a textbook recovery.

Faith 7’s voyage was more than a record-setter; it was proof that astronauts could push past the unknown, work the science, and steer themselves home when the chips were down.

Cooper’s cool under pressure and the mission’s success gave NASA the green light for the next big leap: Project Gemini, where the path to the Moon would be paved by rendezvous, docking, and even longer journeys. In the legend of the early space race, Faith 7’s flight is a high-flying tale of guts, grit, and a whole lot of faith.

What is Project Mercury?

Project Mercury, America’s first leap into the cosmos and the bedrock of NASA’s crewed adventures. The mission sounded simple: launch a human into orbit, see if they could thrive up there, and bring both astronaut and spacecraft home safely.

But that challenge was epic, so engineers worked fast, leaned on tried-and-true tech, and adapted everything from Atlas rockets to off-the-shelf gadgets. The Mercury capsule packed in a launch escape tower, manual controls, retrorockets, a reentry design tough enough for fire and fury, and the ability to splash down safely in the sea.

Mercury started with the big question: can an American survive and work in space? Alan Shepard answered with his suborbital flight; John Glenn proved orbital flight was possible.

Each mission stretched the limits. Longer stays, sharper control, new experiments, snapshots of Earth, and medical monitoring, all while boosting confidence in both the astronauts and their machines. Mercury wasn’t just about getting there; it was about learning how to operate in orbit when the stakes were sky-high.

The finale came in May 1963, when Gordon Cooper took Faith 7 for 22 orbits in 34 hours, the longest American spaceflight yet. He ran experiments, snapped photos, and when the automated systems failed, steered Faith 7 home by hand, cool as a test pilot on final approach.

NASA had planned 18 orbits, but after Schirra’s Sigma 7 mission, they extended it to 22, testing endurance, tracking, cameras, and human performance, laying groundwork for Gemini.

By the end, Project Mercury had turned spaceflight from a gutsy gamble into a skilled craft; readying NASA for the next era of exploration, where the Moon was waiting.

Legacy of Project Mercury: Faith 7

Project Mercury’s story found its grand finale in May 1963, when L. Gordon Cooper took Faith 7 for a ride that would seal its legacy. Mercury had started with a bold, dangerous question: could an American survive, function, and return from space?

By Cooper’s launch, NASA was done just proving survival—they were pushing the boundaries of endurance, spacecraft toughness, and the kind of quick thinking it takes to handle the unknown.

Faith 7 was where the astronaut truly became the pilot. Cooper orbited Earth 22 times in over 34 hours, setting a new American record. As the mission neared its end, automatic controls failed, but Cooper kept his cool. He eyeballed the horizon, crunched the numbers, and flew the spacecraft home by hand, splashing down almost perfectly beside the U.S.S. Kearsarge; a high-wire act turned masterclass in cockpit nerve.

Faith 7’s real legacy was confidence. NASA saw it could stretch the limits. Longer missions, trickier operations, and real trust in astronaut skill when the chips were down. That hard-earned confidence carried straight into Gemini, Apollo, and every mission since, where human grit and technology have to work side by side.

From Cooper’s hand-flown reentry to today’s lunar dreams, Faith 7 reminds us that the future of spaceflight depends as much on the courage in the cockpit as on the machines that get us there.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Brevity and clarity are the heart of effective radio communications.”

—quote from Unusual Attitudes Segment of Monthly Safety Bulletin

Up here in the cockpit, the first voice you hear often isn’t even human. It’s the sharp snap of static, a clipped call sign breaking through the engine’s hum.

Instinctiv…

Read more