‘I can cure your men of walking off the program. Let’s put on the girls.’

—Jacqueline Cochran

Maps rustled, chairs scraped, and the room carried that wartime mix of urgency and doubt. Somewhere between the briefing table and the flight line, Jacqueline Cochran pressed an argument that still sounded …

Read more

“Operators are putting Collaborative Combat Aircraft to work faster—developing tactics through early experimentation & shaping how they’ll be used in the future fight.”

—U.S. Air Force Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

Under the wide California sky, the U.S. Air Force and Anduril kicked off the maiden tests of the trailblazing YFQ-44A at Edwards Air Force Base, where legends are born. In true aviator spirit, operators are taking the stick early, steering this futuristic bird through real-world trials and shaping the playbook as they go. It’s all part of the Air Force’s bold new approach—less red tape, more throttle—to fast-track game-changing tech straight into the hands of those who fly and fight.

What is Happening at the Edwards Air Base?

Under the endless blue canopy of Southern California, the YFQ-44A’s latest chapter unfolded: a cinematic tale of grit, innovation, and hands-on flying. Air Force personnel from the Experimental Operations Unit (EOU) and the 412th Test Wing weren’t just running drills; they were rewriting the rulebook for operating Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) in the kind of hostile environments where every second counts.

The operation began with the YFQ-44A departing Anduril’s test site—most likely the Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, the same ground where it first touched the sky—and making its way to the legendary runways of Edwards Air Force Base.

Once there, EOU airmen took charge of the entire show: from meticulous pre- and post-flight checks to arming and disarming the bird, to commanding its every move during daily sorties. It was the operators, not engineers or test pilots, in the cockpit: real warfighters putting steel to the test.

Lt. Col. Matthew Jensen, commander of the EOU, summed it up: “Every sortie flown was done with a warfighter kicking the tires and controlling the prototypes.” This wasn’t a sterile lab exercise or a carefully staged display.

It was boots on the tarmac, sweat on brows, and a relentless drive to “learn by doing,” moving at a pace and risk level that had the blessing of the Air Force’s senior leadership. The mission: make sure CCAs are battle-ready for the toughest arenas, not just on paper but out in the wild, where it matters most.

Anduril’s secret weapon? Not a sprawling control center or racks of hardware, but a ruggedized Menace-T laptop—fit for a Hollywood close-up—acting as the heart of ground ops.

With just this device and a couple of trusty Pelican cases, the team uploaded mission plans, triggered autonomous taxi and takeoff, managed the bird in flight, and downloaded data for post-mission analysis.

The exercise proved just how lean operations could be, simulating a forward operating base with almost nothing but grit and tech. Even the maintainers, trained up in mere days, were testament to the system’s simplicity and adaptability.

But this wasn’t just about flying; it was about forging the playbook for the future. The EOU is now hammering out the tactics, techniques, and procedures that will embed CCAs as a frontline force, ready for any conflict.

This all happened thanks to a rare fusion of command muscle: Air Combat Command and Air Force Materiel Command joined forces, fast-tracking the experiment and letting real operators shape the future at breakneck speed.

Col. Timothy Helfrich, who oversees acquisition for fighters and advanced aircraft, nailed the spirit: “An 85% solution in the hands of a warfighter today beats a perfect one that never arrives.” It’s innovation on afterburner, where the sky’s not even the limit.

The EOU and the Features of the YFQ-44

June 2025, Nellis Air Force Base—cue the buzz of anticipation as the Experimental Operations Unit (EOU) officially takes flight, charged with fast-tracking the era of Collaborative Combat Aircraft.

Once just a detachment under Eglin’s 53rd Wing, the EOU now stands tall as a full-fledged squadron, a move the Air Force calls a “significant step forward” toward fielding real operational CCAs before the decade is out.

The timing couldn’t be more cinematic: Beale AFB in California is tapped to host the first CCA Aircraft Readiness Unit, while, back at Nellis, the ground shakes as the YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A fire up for their first ground tests in May 2025.

The EOU’s mission? Be the crucible where man and machine learn to fly as one. It’s not just about theory.

This unit will put human-machine teaming to the test in gritty, live-fly scenarios, making sure the tactics and techniques dreamed up in simulators actually hold water where it counts. Every sortie is a chance to refine what works, toss out what doesn’t, and push the edge of what’s possible.

And at the pointy end of this revolution is the YFQ-44A Fury—a jet built for high-G showdowns, brushing up against Mach 1, its modular bay ready to host radar, IRST, or electronic warfare gadgets as the mission demands.

With a pair of AIM-120 AMRAAMs on its wings and the GA-ASI YFQ-42 flying as its partner, the Fury leads a new breed of unmanned wingmen, rewriting the playbook for air combat and locking in the future of the fight.

Writing the Loyal Wingman Playbook

This isn’t just another test flight. It’s a turning point for the U.S. and its allies. The Air Force is no longer treating Collaborative Combat Aircraft as a “someday” vision, but as a real capability, shaped in the here and now by the very operators who may one day fly into combat with these machines.

During the April 2026 exercise at Edwards Air Force Base, the YFQ-44A took flight with the Experimental Operations Unit, laying down the first building blocks for the tactics and procedures that will make CCAs more than just prototypes. They’ll be warfighters’ trusted partners in the battlespace.

The EOU’s mission is clear: get these next-gen aircraft into the field before the decade is out, and do it with a lean, fast-paced model that puts operators and rapid deployment front and center.

For the U.S., this means a future air force that can stretch its wings, spread risk, and keep humans safer by teaming pilots with tough, cost-effective uncrewed wingmen.

For American allies, it’s a sign that the playbook of air warfare is changing—human-machine teams, distributed operations, and quicker adaptation are becoming the new normal.

What matters most isn’t just the tech, but that the Air Force is learning to fight with it now, while the playbook is still being written.

This Week in Aviation History

On 26 April 1948, out in the sun-bleached expanse of Southern California’s Muroc Field—today’s Edwards Air Force Base—test pilot George Welch took the prototype XP-86 Sabre on a legendary flight. He pointed the nose down at a gutsy 40-degree dive and blasted through the Sound Barrier, carving his place in history. That moment marked the Sabre as only the second American aircraft to ever go supersonic, chasing the thunder of those who came before.

Breaking the Sound Barrier

In the annals of high-speed flight, the story of George Welch and the XP-86 Sabre reads like something straight out of a Hollywood script.

According to Albert W. Blackburn, a fellow test pilot and author of “Aces Wild: The Race For Mach 1,” Welch may have been the true trailblazer, pushing the prototype Sabre past the sound barrier as early as its first flight on October 1, 1947, well before Chuck Yeager’s historic X-1 run.

Blackburn claims Welch broke Mach 1 not just once, but three times before Yeager’s red-letter day, citing radar runs recording Mach 1.02 and 1.04 on 13 November 1947. Yet, the world never heard a whisper; allegedly because Secretary of the Air Force W. Stuart Symington, Jr. ordered it all kept under wraps.

The legend might have stayed buried if not for a slip across the Atlantic. During a live radio interview, British test pilot Wing Commander “Bee” Beamont casually revealed he’d smashed the sound barrier in the second XP-86 Sabre prototype.

With the cat out of the bag, the U.S. Air Force finally acknowledged Welch’s feat—though they officially dated it to 26 April 1948.

Back in those early days, not long after the XP-86’s maiden lift-off, Welch dropped by the office of aerodynamicist Edward J. Horkey at North American’s Inglewood plant.

There, he recounted his flight with a wry grin: a climb to 35,000 feet, a steep power dive, and an airspeed indicator that seemed frozen—until, like a scene out of a suspense flick, it suddenly snapped to 410 knots. The jet felt solid, with nothing but a slight roll to the left.

Horkey’s verdict: Welch was brushing up against “Mach effects”—a phenomenon that would become legendary as the “Mach jump,” with Welch its first chronicler.

The XP-86 Sabre would go on to become the stuff of legend, dominating the skies of the Korean War and rolling off production lines nearly 10,000 strong across the U.S., Canada, Australia, and Japan.

Welch himself was already a legend, having been recommended for the Medal of Honor for his daring as a P-40 pilot at Pearl Harbor. Tragically, he lost his life doing what he loved—testing the F-100A Super Sabre—on October 12, 1954. For aviators everywhere, his story is a testament to grit, speed, and the relentless pursuit of the unknown.

A Closer Look at the Sabre

Let me take you back to the golden age of flight, where the sky was a wild frontier and every new jet was a leap into the unknown. Picture this: October 1947—a sleek, silver XP-86 streaks down the runway, powered by a gutsy Allison J35 engine.

That first flight was a taste of things to come. By April 1948, the XP-86 wasn’t just flying. It was breaking barriers, pushing past the speed of sound in a shallow dive, leaving nothing but a sonic boom and wide-eyed ground crews in its wake.

The Air Force saw the future, and they wanted in. On December 1947, they put in a hefty order for 221 P-86As, this time beefed up with a more powerful General Electric J47 engine. Names changed as fast as the technology; by June 1948, the P-86A became the iconic F-86A, the Sabre.

September 1948 brought bragging rights—a world speed record at 671 miles per hour. But the Sabre wasn’t just fast; it was a pilot’s dream, handling like a sports car at 40,000 feet. Armed to the teeth with six nose-mounted .50-caliber guns, and later, a radar-guided sight, the Sabre was ready for anything.

Then came Korea. December 1950 saw the 4th Fighter Interceptor Wing touch down in Seoul, ready to tangle with the MiG-15. In the first-ever clash between swept-wing jets, Lt. Col. Bruce Hinton bagged a MiG, starting a streak. By war’s end, Sabres racked up nearly 800 kills for fewer than eighty losses.

The Sabre kept evolving. New engines, better guns, even all-weather radar models. Built not just in the U.S., but in Canada, Japan, and Italy, over 8,400 Sabres took to the skies. Of those, 554 were the legendary F-86A, a true star of the jet age.

George Welch and the Sabre Legacy

George Welch’s story is stitched right into the fabric of American airpower, standing tall at not just one, but two turning points in aviation history. He was already a legend as one of the first U.S. pilots to scramble and fight back over Pearl Harbor, and that fighting spirit carried him into the jet age, where he blazed new trails.

As the folks at the Smithsonian put it, Welch was among the first to notch an air-to-air victory in World War II, and then he helped kickstart the era of jet and supersonic fighters that would become the backbone of the U.S. Air Force. He wasn’t just a gutsy pilot. He was the bridge that connected the old world of roaring piston engines to the sleek, high-velocity jets that followed.

Enter the F-86 Sabre. The bird that made the leap from propellers to swept wings real and lasting. The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force calls the Korean War the moment the modern Air Force truly took shape, with the Sabre as its unmistakable icon.

But the Sabre’s legend didn’t stop at American borders; the RAF Museum tells how it flew with the Royal Air Force when it mattered most, faced down MiG-15s in NATO service over Germany, and showed the world that Western airpower had met the challenge with a world-class swept-wing fighter. Every time Welch dove toward the sound barrier and every Sabre kill over Korea helped write the new rules for air superiority.

From Welch and the Sabre to the present, the Air Force’s mission hasn’t changed: stay ahead of the curve in speed, tactics, and tech; always one step ahead of the next challenger.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“At 0956z it made a right-hand turn off it’s track back to Sigonella and back out into the Persian Gulf. Two minutes later at 0958z it began a descent from 50,000ft down to 9,500ft by 1011z, at which point @flightradar24lost it’s signal.”

—Armchair Admiral Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

High above the shimmering expanse of the Persian Gulf, the MQ-4 Triton glides on its patrol run, slicing through the morning haze. Suddenly, its transponder crackles out a warning, a communication blackout. With the pilot’s voice lost to the wind, the big bird banks gently and begins a silent, self-directed descent, the fate of its mission now hanging in the balance.

MQ-4 Triton Disappears over Persian Gulf

The evening skies over the Persian Gulf had a story to tell on 9 April, 2026. High above the blue, a U.S. Navy MQ-4C Triton drone—one of those silent aviators that fly without a pilot onboard—vanished from the digital gaze of flight trackers.

One moment it was cruising at a breathtaking 52,000 feet, bound for its home base at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Italy. The next, it began a slow, dramatic descent, dropping to 9,500 feet in just under fifteen minutes. On its way down, the drone’s transponder blinked out a 7400 code: a silent SOS to the world, signaling that its remote pilot had lost contact.

But the drama didn’t end there. As the Triton continued its descent, it reportedly switched to a 7700 squawk, the universal sign for a full-blown emergency. In those tense final moments, the drone appeared to veer toward Iranian airspace before its signal faded for good.

No official word has come from the Navy yet, and the fate of the Triton remains shrouded in mystery. Did it crash into the Gulf’s waters? Was it somehow intercepted, jammed, or brought down by unseen hands? The only certainty is uncertainty, though history does offer clues.

The U.S. has lost several drones over the years in the region, including at least sixteen MQ-9 Reapers. Back in 2019, Iran shot down a similar RQ-4A over international waters. These drones are programmed to circle and wait if they lose their link home, not to land, leaving them vulnerable in the vast, contested skies.

For now, the Triton’s last flight is just another chapter in the tense, cinematic saga of unmanned flight over the Gulf.

A Closer Look at the Triton

The Triton is no ordinary machine, but a relentless storyteller in the sky. Soaring above 50,000 feet, it sees farther, lingers longer, and moves with effortless grace. It’s the aviator’s answer to the world’s wildest oceans; a sentry that never tires, keeping watch for over 24 hours at a stretch, covering 7,400 nautical miles on a single mission.

Triton isn’t just watching; it’s narrating the unfolding story of the sea below, tracking ships, spotting threats, and relaying every detail to its crewed allies in real time. The data flows fast—across domains, across continents—giving decision-makers the edge to act before danger even shows its face.

It’s Northrop Grumman’s legacy of high-flying autonomy, now sculpted into a winged guardian that warns of missiles, hunts for hidden dangers, and brings home the big picture from a safe distance.

With its ultra-long endurance and sharp senses, Triton is more than a scout. It’s a sentinel for homeland defense, always present, always vigilant, always ready for the next chapter.

• Primary Function: Persistent Maritime ISR

• Contractor: Northrop Grumman

• Propulsion: Rolls-Royce AE3007H

• Length: 47.6 feet (14.5 meters)

• Wingspan: 130.9 feet (39.9 meters)

• Height: 15.4 feet (4.7 meters)

• Weight: Max design gross take-off: 32,250 pounds (14,628.4 kilograms)

• Crew: 5 per ground station (Air Vehicle Operator, Tactical Coordinator, 2 Mission Payload Operators, SIGINT coordinator)

What Triton’s Disappearance Signals

Triton isn’t just a drone. It’s the Navy’s eye in the sky, a high-flying storyteller with the soul of an aviator. Imagine it soaring above 50,000 feet, keeping watch over the endless blue, its sensors sweeping vast stretches of ocean for over a day at a time.

While the world below hustles, Triton glides with cinematic calm, scanning, listening, always collecting the next chapter of the maritime saga.

When one of these silent sentinels vanishes over the Persian Gulf, the story takes a dramatic twist. This isn’t just a technical glitch; it’s a reminder that even the most advanced surveillance can be knocked off course in these tense waters.

For allies who count on Triton’s long reach and sharp vision—catching early warning signs, spotting shifting threats—its loss sends ripples through the whole network.

The big lesson? In this airborne chess game, losing a Triton means more than a blip on the radar. It raises the stakes on how we command, communicate, and secure the skies.

The Triton’s real superpower is giving everyone a heads-up before trouble erupts. Its sudden silence is a cinematic cliffhanger. It is a signal that the watchers, too, are being watched, and the contest for control overhead is only growing sharper.

This Week in Aviation History

The Red Baron—Manfred von Richthofen—soared through the clouds as the most feared ace of World War I, a legend with a flair for the dramatic. In just 19 months, this Prussian nobleman downed eighty Allied planes, his bright-red aircraft cutting a bold figure across the war-torn skies. When he took the helm of the notorious Flying Circus, his myth only grew, the stuff of dogfights and whispered campfire tales. But in April 1918, the sky wrote a new ending: the Baron was shot down over France, his cinematic journey cut short in a blaze of glory.

The Death of the Red Barron

Manfred von Richthofen—the legendary Red Baron—was no stranger to danger in the skies, but his luck nearly ran out in July 1917. During a fierce dogfight with British pilots, a bullet grazed his head, fracturing his skull.

He survived, but the wound haunted him. Richthofen returned to his Flying Circus within weeks, yet he was never quite the same. The headaches lingered, and some believe he battled not just physical pain, but the invisible scars of PTSD: a shadow that followed him through the clouds.

Fast-forward to 21 April 1918. Richthofen’s final chapter unfolds over the fields of Vaux-sur-Somme, France. He chased an enemy fighter low to the ground, his crimson aircraft swooping like a hawk. Suddenly, Australian machine gunners opened fire from below, and Canadian ace Arthur Roy Brown joined the fray from above. In the whirlwind of bullets, Richthofen was struck in the chest.

He crash-landed and died in the field: a cinematic end befitting an aviator’s saga. Brown was credited with the kill, but the truth is murky; historians still debate whether the fatal shot came from the air or the ground.

Allied soldiers buried Richthofen with full honors. He was just 25, but with 80 confirmed kills, he’d set a record unmatched in World War I.

The Red Baron’s legend soared long after his death, immortalized in books, movies, songs, and comic strips. His story remains the stuff of aviation lore—cinematic, mysterious, and forever flying through history.

Who was the Infamous Red Baron?

It’s 2 May 1892, and a boy named Manfred von Richthofen is born into a world of privilege—a stately Prussian manor, old family crests, and rolling estates that would one day become part of Poland.

Young Manfred’s days are a blur of horseback rides, hunting parties, and lively sport, the kind of golden youth you’d expect from aristocracy. But at just 11 years old, the adventure takes a sharp turn: off to military school he goes, trading childhood games for the discipline of cadet life.

Fast forward to 1911, the age of aviation is just on the horizon, and Manfred, now a poised young officer, earns his commission with the 1st Uhlan cavalry regiment. But when the Great War erupts, the world changes overnight. He rides with his regiment across both the Eastern and Western Fronts, earning the Iron Cross for his raw courage.

Yet the trenches soon swallow the glory, and Manfred, bored stiff by supply runs, aches for something more daring. “I didn’t join up to fetch cheese and eggs,” he supposedly quips to his superiors, his eyes lifted skyward.

The fates answer. By the summer of 1915, our restless aviator is soaring above Russia. First, as a backseat observer, scanning the world below from a rattling reconnaissance plane.

He earns his wings soon after on the Western Front, where the real thrill of flight—of combat—calls to him. It’s here he crosses paths with the legendary Oswald Boelcke, who recognizes a kindred spirit and recruits Manfred into Jasta 2, Germany’s new elite fighter squadron.

Under Boelcke’s sharp tutelage, Manfred becomes more than just another pilot. On September 17, 1916, he claims his first aerial victory, sending a British craft spiraling down over France. One by one, the tally grows.

Five kills, and he’s officially a “flying ace.” Sixteen, and he’s the top living German pilot. For his precision and daring, he’s awarded the coveted Pour le Mérite: the famed “Blue Max.”

Come January 1917, Manfred is handed the reins to his very own squadron, Jasta 11, a collection of hotshot pilots that includes his own younger brother, Lothar. But it’s not just his flying that sets him apart.

Manfred’s Albatros D.III soon roars through the clouds painted a brilliant, unmistakable red: a streak of fire against the sky. The legend is born: the Red Baron. Or, as some called him, “le Petit Rouge,” “the Red Battle Flier,” and “the Red Knight.”

In the cockpit, with the wind at his back and his enemies before him, Manfred von Richthofen became the very spirit of chivalry and danger: a hero, a hunter, and the master of the skies.

The Legacy of “Ace of Aces” for Modern-Day Aviators

The legend of Manfred von Richthofen doesn’t just live on because he was World War I’s most famous ace. His last flight, a sun-drenched, adrenaline-soaked chase over the trenches, revealed the true nature of air combat at its core.

As the folks at From Balloons to Drones tell it, Richthofen wasn’t just a hotshot with a crimson triplane. He was a master of discipline, sharp thinking, and knowing exactly when to strike or when to slip away into the clouds.

But on April 21, 1918, something changed. The Red Baron pushed past his own rules, doggedly chasing Wilfrid May low over enemy territory, blind to the danger below. One moment of tunnel vision—one break in discipline—and ground fire brought down the king of the skies.

That’s the gut punch of his story. You can be the best stick-and-rudder pilot in the world, but if your judgment slips. If you let the thrill of the chase override your training, your doctrine, your survival instincts; even legends can fall.

The lesson is as clear as a summer sky: airpower is about more than machines. It’s about the person in the cockpit, their training, their tactics, their split-second choices, and their ability to learn—fast—when the world turns upside down. Richthofen’s last sortie became a textbook on why disciplined thinking and adaptability aren’t just nice-to-haves; they’re what keep you alive up there.

And then there’s the myth. The Red Baron—more than a pilot, now a folk hero with his own share of mystery. Who fired the final shot? The debate rages on, fueling his legend and cementing that last dogfight as one of aviation’s great what-ifs.

All these years later, the lesson still echoes across cockpits and command centers. Whether you’re dueling in canvas-and-wire biplanes or piloting drones by satellite, one thing hasn’t changed: airpower rewards sharp thinking and punishes even the briefest lapse.

That’s the Red Baron’s real legacy: a warning, a legend, and a story still soaring through the ages.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“This project demonstrates that AATC can serve as a rapid response mechanism when combatant commanders face urgent capability gaps.”

—Col. Daniel Wittmer, AATC commander

Mission Briefing

Now, imagine this scene. There’s a new gadget on the block: the Probe Refueling Adapter. Born out of battlefield urgency, this little invention lets the A-10 break free from always waiting for the KC-135, opening up a whole new world of refueling possibilities for our sky-hardened aviators.

A-10C Can Now Use Probe and Drogue Refueling

Just days after a shadowy photo of the A-10 sporting some unfamiliar hardware made its rounds online, the Air National Guard Air Force Reserve Command Test Center, AATC, for those in the know, decided to pull back the curtain.

They revealed a game-changing upgrade for the venerable A-10C Thunderbolt II. No longer just the tank-busting hero of the battlefield, the Warthog now sports a sleek probe and drogue air refueling capability. It is a transformation that could alter its future in the fight.

Traditionally, the A-10C has been fueled in-flight via a refueling receptacle right on the nose, just ahead of the cockpit, where the boom operator from a tanker would plug in that flying boom.

With the retirement of the KC-10 and the KC-46 still waiting in the wings for certification, the A-10’s options for a mid-air sip of gas were looking slim. Basically, it was stuck relying on the KC-135. But when the situation downrange started getting dicey, commanders put out a call: they needed an answer, fast.

That’s when the magic happened. Multiple organizations leapt into action, compressing timelines and tossing red tape out the hangar doors. The result? The A-10 can now tank up from C-130-based refuelers like the KC-130J Super Hercules, the MC-130J Commando II, and the HC-130J Combat King II.

The AATC became the maestro, coordinating the effort across a whole constellation of units and partners. The probe itself was cooked up by a mystery industry player, while the A-10 System Program Office made sure every bolt and wire met strict standards.

ARCWERX—the innovation engine for the Guard and Reserve—kept contracts flying through the pipeline, while the techs at Luke Air Force Base bent metal and made sure the supporting parts were ready on the double. The 418th Flight Test Squadron even provided a Combat King and crew to test out the new setup.

According to Lt. Col. Luke Haywas, the A-10 Combined Test Force director, everyone moved with a sense of urgency, but never at the expense of safety or technical rigor. They didn’t cut corners. They just put the pedal down on every process.

Here’s the kicker: the adapter slips right into the A-10’s nose refueling port, converting it from the old-school boom method to the probe and drogue setup. It’s field-configurable, meaning flight line crews can swap it in or out in just a few hours: no depot visits, no waiting around.

The Warthog can now morph between refueling modes to fit whatever the mission demands. For the A-10 and its crews, that’s not just a technical upgrade. It’s a lifeline, and a testament to what happens when airmen and innovators rally for the mission.

Warthog’s Probe and Drogue

The A-10 Warthog, that legendary beast of the battlefield, is still waiting for a green light to cozy up for a drink with the Air Force’s shiny new KC-46 Pegasus tanker. Testing is ongoing, suspense in the air, and for now, the Warthog’s only lifeline in the sky is the tried-and-true KC-135 Stratotanker.

The problem is, that’s a single point of failure—one hiccup, one unavailable Stratotanker, and suddenly, a mission could be hanging by a thread.

So, what’s the holdup? Turns out, all eyes are on the boom; specifically, the actuator tucked inside the KC-46’s refueling boom. The A-10C just can’t push hard enough to stay latched on, especially at the lower speeds it calls home.

Unlike its faster, slicker jet siblings, the Warthog isn’t built for breakneck sprints. Top speed? About 420 miles per hour, if you’re asking the Air Force. But when it’s time to refuel, the A-10C is crawling along at a leisurely 200 knots; far below the 300 knots where most fighters get their top-off. That leaves the KC-46 lumbering at the edge of its flight envelope, heavy and slow, just to keep pace.

Now, if you’re thinking, “Why not use something a little more laid-back, like a C-130 tanker?”—you’re onto something. C-130s are naturals at low-and-slow, with altitudes and airspeeds that play nice with the A-10’s style. The Air Force itself points out that these tankers are a better match for close air support and combat rescue missions, too. Problem is, there’s no C-130 with a flying boom out there. At least, not yet.

What we do have are C-130s equipped with the probe-and-drogue system, and they’re already out in the wild. Enter the new Probe Refueling Adapter: simple, clever, mounted right atop the old refueling port. With a little training, A-10 pilots could be cleared for this new system in no time.

Refueling Flexibility, Renewed Relevance

The U.S. and its allies are looking for an edge, and suddenly, the trusty A-10C gets a clever upgrade. It’s not just a quick hardware fix; this new Probe Refueling Adapter is a game-changer.

Instead of being stuck waiting for a giant KC-135 tanker, the A-10C can now refuel from nimble, drogue-equipped C-130s. That’s a big deal because A-10s fly low and slow, just like the C-130s: making them a perfect match.

This tweak means more A-10s can stay in the fight, supporting troops on the ground, swooping into dangerous search-and-rescue ops, and handling missions where tanker access is scarce or risky.

For American planners and coalition partners, it’s a breath of fresh air. Now, they can shape flexible air packages, mixing old legends like the A-10 with newer jets. No need to depend on a single tanker type.

Even better, this fix happened fast; it didn’t get bogged down in endless red tape. The message? Small changes can make a massive difference. It’s about resilience, adaptability, and squeezing new potential from veteran aircraft in modern conflict zones.

And here’s the closing shot: if a quick upgrade can make the A-10 so much more versatile, what other classic warbirds might be waiting for their own revival?

As tanker access shapes tomorrow’s air battles, the future of aviation is looking more like a team sport. Where the right support, not just the flashiest fighter, wins the day.

This Week in Aviation History

Flashback to the Korean War, when Navy pilots faced the harsh reality that their strike aircraft just couldn’t cut it against well-defended targets in any weather. Enter the Grumman A-6 Intruder—a marvel engineered to soar low, slip past enemy radar, and hunt down even the smallest targets, rain or shine.

First taking to the skies in 1960, the Intruder quickly became a fixture on aircraft carriers, joining the Navy in ‘63 and the Marines a year after. By 1968, the “A” model was officially in Navy hands, earning its stripes over the jungles of Vietnam and later in the electrified opening hours of Desert Storm. With more than 7,500 hours in the air, over 6,500 landings, and hundreds of dramatic carrier launches and recoveries, the Intruder’s story reads like a blockbuster saga of grit, innovation, and sheer flying nerve.

The Origins of the Intruder

It’s the late 1950s, and the U.S. Navy needs a new workhorse for the skies. Their trusty Douglas Skyraider, a prop-driven legend, is showing its age. Meanwhile, the Marines are clamoring for a close air support jet that can leap off short runways.

Lessons fresh from the Korean War add urgency; a new attack aircraft needs to fly long, fly low under the radar, and strike with precision, whatever the weather throws at it.

The brass drafts up a wish list in 1957: Speed, range, payload, short takeoff, plus a twist. Instead of patching together airframe and weapons from different shops, this time the winning design must seamlessly integrate the whole system from day one. It’s a tall order, and the competition is fierce.

Enter Grumman, already carving its name in aviation lore. Their answer: the A2F Intruder (later rebranded the A-6 in 1962). Picture this: a twin-jet beast with engines tucked into its wings and a crew of two sitting side-by-side, the Bombardier/Navigator riding a bit lower and further back so the pilot can see right.

Up front, a bulbous nose crams in a powerful radar suite: big for targeting, smaller for hugging the terrain. All this feeds into a cutting-edge nerve center called DIANE (Digital Integrated Attack and Navigation Equipment). Thanks to DIANE, the A-6 could fly blind through clouds and storms, its CRT screens (a first for combat jets) guiding the crew to their mark with all-weather precision.

The Intruder’s oddball looks quickly earned it nicknames including “Flying Drumstick,” “Iron Tadpole,” and, affectionately, “Double Ugly.” But there was beauty in its function. The Navy placed its first order in 1959, and by April 1960, the prototype was airborne.

Early experiments—like jet tailpipes that could tilt for shorter takeoffs—were scrapped after tests, but innovations like beefed-up nose gear for the Navy’s new catapult launch system stuck. The Intruder even beat out most other jets in adopting this new tech.

By 1963, the A-6A was rolling off the line for the Navy, and a year later for the Marines. VA-75, the first operational squadron, took Intruders to Vietnam in 1965, unleashing the aircraft’s true potential: flying at night or through monsoon squalls, zeroing in on targets without ever having to see them out the window. DIANE did the seeing for them.

The story didn’t stop there. As technology raced ahead, so did the Intruder. Some A-6s became specialized Iron Hand B models, hunting enemy missiles. Others (the C models) packed heavy, high-tech sensor pods for night interdiction; though these were eventually replaced by sleeker, more reliable laser targeting pods.

The Intruder’s punch was legendary: in one mission, a pair dropped two dozen bombs on a North Vietnamese power plant so silently, the enemy thought a squadron of B-52s had paid a visit. That raid earned a Navy Cross.

The saga’s final chapter arrived with the A-6E, first tested in 1970. This upgrade brought state-of-the-art avionics, radar, and navigation, with hundreds of older Intruders rebuilt and new ones rolling off the line.

The Intruder, in all its rugged, cinematic glory, became the backbone of Navy and Marine attack squadrons for decades. It is a true legend born from a blend of wartime necessity, technical audacity, and the relentless drive to own the night.

A Closer Look at the Intruder

The Grumman A-6A Intruder—a burly, all-weather attack bomber, tough as nails and powered by not one, but two roaring turbojet engines. Its cockpit? Side-by-side seating for the dynamic duo: the pilot and the “b/n”—that’s bombardier/navigator for the uninitiated. They sat shoulder to shoulder, ready to take on whatever the skies (or the sea) threw at them. The wings? Slightly swept, just enough to let you know this bird means business.

Now, let’s set the stage with numbers that matter: The A2F-1, as the prototype was first called, stretched out a solid 53 feet, 3 inches from nose to tail, and those wings spanned 53 feet even.

Just about the wingspan of a DC-3, if you’re counting. Standing on the deck, it measured over 15 feet tall, with wings that covered more than 500 square feet. Those wings swept back at a cool 25 degrees, giving the Intruder that predatory look.

She was no lightweight, either. Empty, she tipped the scales at over 23,000 pounds, but fully loaded and ready to launch, she could weigh in at a beefy 53,000 pounds.

Under the hood—or, more accurately, under the fuselage—were two Pratt & Whitney J52-P-6 turbojets.

These weren’t just any engines; they’d already proved themselves pushing the AGM-28 Hound Dog cruise missile. Each J52 had a 12-stage compressor, a two-stage turbine, and could kick out 7,500 pounds of thrust at normal power, or crank it up to 8,500 pounds for those “hold my beer” moments.

The exhaust nozzle could even dip down 23 degrees to help the Intruder leap off short runways. because sometimes, you just need a little extra kick.

What about performance? The A-6A could settle into a cruise at 429 knots, high above the world at 44,000 feet, or scream across the deck at sea level at 566 knots. She could claw her way up to nearly 50,000 feet and stretch her legs for over 2,000 nautical miles; enough range to make any adversary nervous.

In short, the Intruder was a cinematic marvel of engineering: rugged, reliable, and always ready for action—rain, shine, or the darkest night over the open sea.

The A-6’s Enduring Flightpath

The A-6 Intruder, the legend born from a bold idea, gave the Navy an attack jet that could hit its mark, rain or shine, day or night, no matter what the clouds or the enemy had to say about it.

When the Intruder first took to the sky on April 19, 1960, it wasn’t just another airplane on the flight deck. This beast could pack a heavy punch and deliver it through the worst weather, thanks to its groundbreaking DIANE navigation and attack system (and later, the TRAM suite on the A-6E).

Vietnam was where the Intruder’s legend really took off. While other jets waited for clear skies, A-6 crews launched into the murk, flying solo or in tight pairs, threading through flak and dodging missiles.

Their accuracy in the soup was the stuff of squadron legend. And the A-6 didn’t retire with Saigon’s fall. It kept coming back, from Lebanon’s chaos to the Libyan coast, over Bosnia, and during the fireworks of Desert Storm and Operation Praying Mantis.

What’s the true legacy? The A-6 proved that a combat jet’s worth isn’t just about speed or looking pretty. It’s about how far it can reach, how sharp its sensors are, how tightly the crew works together, and—most of all—how it performs when the weather turns ugly and the stakes are sky-high. That’s a lesson modern airpower still takes to heart.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Now in our 5th week of the campaign, it is my operational assessment that we are making undeniable progress. We don’t see their navy sailing. We don’t see their aircraft flying, and their air and missile defense systems have largely been destroyed.”

—CENTCOM Chief Adm. Brad Cooper

Mission Briefing

Fifteen years after a secretive U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel crash-landed in Iran, its mysterious clone finally met its end; caught in a cinematic explosion captured by CENTCOM’s cameras. The footage, straight out of an action flick, shows the destruction of this stealthy doppelgänger, easy to spot thanks to its compact flying-wing shape and those quirky twin humps on its wings. Like a scene from a high-stakes spy drama, the saga of the Iranian-made Sentinel closes with a bang, not a whisper.

Iranian-made Sentinel Destroyed in U.S. Strikes

Since the RQ-170 crash landing, Iranian engineers have reverse-engineered and tweaked their own versions of the drone, occasionally rolling them out in IRGC promo videos during their annual Strait of Hormuz exercises; showcasing a blend of bravado and technical prowess.

But in a recent CENTCOM video that feels straight out of an espionage thriller, we see one of these Sentinel clones, along with a light tactical vehicle and a surface-to-air missile launcher—possibly a Servom Khordad or Ra’ad, both Iranian spins on the Russian Buk-M2—lined up in the crosshairs.

The footage is pure cinematic suspense: targets are painted with a pulsing laser, likely courtesy of an MQ-9 Reaper’s electro-optical sensor, as the camera hones in for the kill. Moments later, precision-guided munitions like the GBU-12 or GBU-49 Paveway II, or maybe even an AGM-114 missile, streak in.

Explosions light up the frame, but for all the drama, there’s a twist; the SAM system’s destruction doesn’t trigger the telltale secondary blasts you’d expect from a live warhead or propellant. The video cuts away before the smoke clears, leaving us with a cliffhanger: were these real targets, or just decoys meant to draw fire?

CENTCOM chief Adm. Brad Cooper, sounding every bit the calm pilot after a successful sortie, declared, “We are making undeniable progress. We don’t see their navy sailing. We don’t see their aircraft flying, and their air and missile defense systems have largely been destroyed.”

In the ongoing campaign, the line between reality and showmanship is as thin as the drone’s shadow over the desert.

The American RQ-170 Sentinel and its Iranian Counterpart

The aircraft spotlighted in the recent footage carries a legacy stretching back to December 2011, when an American RQ-170 Sentinel—flying a covert mission near Afghanistan—unexpectedly ended up in Iranian hands.

Iranian officials insisted they’d used electronic warfare wizardry to hijack the drone’s navigation, while others quietly chalked it up to a possible technical hiccup. Either way, Tehran got its hands on one of America’s most elusive recon drones, a low-observable marvel built for peering into hostile territory from high above, bristling with sensors and wrapped in radar-evading curves.

The RQ-170, a product of rapid innovation from Lockheed Martin’s famed Skunk Works and the U.S. government, was designed to collect crucial battlefield intelligence. Pilots from Air Combat Command’s 432nd Wing at Creech Air Force Base and the 30th Reconnaissance Squadron at Tonopah Test Range have been flying these stealthy birds since 2007, delivering eyes-in-the-sky support to commanders around the globe.

Fast-forward to 2014, and Iran rolled out what it claimed was a homegrown copy—the Shahed-171 Simorgh—showcasing the drone in parades and promotional reels. Iranian footage over the years has revealed a cottage industry of reverse-engineered Sentinels, assembled from composite materials, packed with custom electronics, and even sporting both propeller and jet-powered variants.

While these Iranian drones looked smaller and simpler than their American muse, the resemblance was unmistakable, right down to their flying-wing silhouettes. The family grew to include the nimbler Shahed-191 Saeqeh and other offshoots, with propaganda clips showing launches from flatbeds and supposed regional missions, though Western analysts remain skeptical about their real combat punch.

So when CENTCOM’s video captures the destruction of an Iranian Sentinel clone, it’s more than just a single strike. It’s a snapshot of a technological relay race. High-tech designs leap borders, get reimagined and rebuilt, only to find themselves back in the crosshairs years later, shaping the evolving drama of twenty-first-century aerial warfare.

More than a Drone Kill

The reported takedown of an Iranian RQ-170 clone isn’t just another notch on CENTCOM’s scoreboard. It’s a high-stakes signal flare to both friends and rivals.

In striking not only launchers and ammo dumps but also one of Iran’s more advanced flying-wing drones—born from the infamous 2011 Sentinel incident—the U.S. is showing it’s willing to go after the brains of the operation, not just the fists.

This drone wasn’t a random target: it was a deliberate hit on the backbone of Iran’s surveillance and air defense web.

For U.S. allies, especially those counting on clear shipping lanes and strong deterrence, the strike is double-edged. It reassures them that Washington can still find and swat down high-value tech, but it’s also a wake-up call; proof that Iran has come a long way since capturing that American drone, spinning it into a whole fleet of homegrown operators.

This is more than just a flashy explosion on a desert plain; it’s a reminder that adversaries have their own playbook, learning and adapting with every encounter.

So, while the dust settles and analysts pore over the footage, the real story is about what comes next. Is this a one-off victory, or just the opening scene in a bigger campaign aimed at blinding and dismantling the surveillance-strike networks underpinning Iran’s regional ambitions? Only time—and the next chapter—will tell.

This Week in Aviation History

In April 1943, American codebreakers cracked Japanese naval transmissions and uncovered the travel itinerary of Japan’s top admiral—the architect of Pearl Harbor. With this intelligence, the stage was set for a dramatic payback mission straight out of a wartime thriller.

The Killing of Isoroku Yamamoto

Operation Vengeance reads like a page torn from a wartime thriller, set in motion on April 18, 1943, when the U.S. set out to intercept and kill Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto: the mastermind behind Pearl Harbor and the face of Japanese naval power.

This was no ordinary mission: it was a masterclass in intelligence-enabled air warfare, blending codebreaking sleuth work, bold long-range fighter tactics, and split-second timing to strike at a target whose loss would shake the Japanese war effort.

The whole operation hinged on a single decrypted Japanese message, a rare stroke of luck that revealed Yamamoto’s Solomon Islands inspection itinerary down to the minute—departure time, route, destination, even the makeup of his flight.

The Americans instantly grasped the magnitude of the opportunity, but also the risk: acting too obviously could tip off the Japanese that their codes were cracked, jeopardizing a priceless intelligence advantage.

With Yamamoto deep inside enemy territory, only the P-38 Lightnings of the 339th Fighter Squadron had the range for the job. Major John W. Mitchell led his squadron on a demanding overwater approach, navigating with the precision of a watchmaker to avoid detection and reach the ambush point at just the right moment.

When Yamamoto’s two twin-engine bombers, protected by fighter escorts, appeared near Bougainville, the Americans struck. In the ensuing dogfight, both bombers were shot down. Yamamoto died in the jungle, his death shrouded in subsequent Japanese censorship and American mythmaking.

For Japan, the loss was a thunderbolt; for the U.S., it was a symbolic victory, proof that American reach could extend into the enemy’s inner sanctum.

Yet the story didn’t end with the dogfight. Decades of debate followed over who fired the fateful shots. Captain Thomas Lanphier was credited, but Rex Barber and others long contested the claim, showing how the fog of war can leave even legendary missions with unresolved details.

The Anatomy of the Killer Lightning

The P-38 Lightning took shape as a bold experiment in twin-engine interceptor design, its sleek lines and twin booms promising both speed and innovation. Back in February 1939, Lt. Ben Kelsey rocketed a prototype across the country in a record-shattering 7 hours and 48 minutes; a feat that ended with a crash landing, but didn’t stop the Lightning’s momentum.

Development pressed on, and by September 1940, the first batch of YP-38s was in the air. Early models had their share of quirks—turbulent airflow over the tail and scary moments at high dive speeds, where compressibility threatened to tear the aircraft apart—but persistent engineering ironed out those wrinkles.

The P-38E marked the Lightning’s first major production run, swapping out the original 37mm cannon for a 20mm powerhouse and rolling off the line in late 1941. The P-38F followed, adding pylon racks for bombs or drop tanks, stretching the Lightning’s legs for long-range missions.

More tweaks came with the P-38G and H, the latter packing an upgraded Allison engine for extra punch. By August 1943, the P-38J arrived with cockpit heating (a godsend in icy altitudes), improved engine cooling, a flat bulletproof windscreen, more wing fuel, and sharper handling.

Versatility was the Lightning’s calling card. It could dive bomb, level bomb, strafe, snap photos, or escort bombers deep behind enemy lines. The Germans dubbed it “The Forked-Tail Devil” when it debuted in North Africa, and by September 1943, it was the only Allied fighter able to stick with bombers all the way to Germany.

But nowhere did the Lightning shine brighter than the Pacific, where its range and firepower made legends of seven of the top eight USAAF aces. Most famously, it was P-38s that hunted down Admiral Yamamoto in 1943, turning aviation history on its head. Until the war’s final days, the P-38 was the USAAF’s go-to fighter in the Pacific skies.

Operation Vengeance’s Legacy

Imagine the Pacific, 1943: Operation Vengeance unfolds not just as a clandestine shootout, but as a cinematic collision of brains, nerve, and timing. This wasn’t your average dogfight.

It was the moment when American codebreakers cracked the secret itinerary of Admiral Yamamoto, architect of Pearl Harbor, and turned raw intelligence into a high-stakes, pinpoint strike deep in enemy skies. Suddenly, the rules changed: with the right intel, even the most elusive figure could be hunted down, no fortress too far.

Yamamoto’s downing was a thunderclap, echoing far beyond the cockpit. In the U.S., it became a banner moment of payback and pride; in Japan, it was a shockwave that rattled the highest command, a reminder that war’s reach can be personal and precise. This single mission rewrote the playbook. Airpower wasn’t just about blowing things up, but sending a message, shifting psychology, and proving a nation’s resolve.

But the story doesn’t end in the jungle. Operation Vengeance lit a fuse that burns into today’s headlines, sparking debates about the ethics of targeting leaders, the risks to secret sources, and how we gauge the true cost of a ‘decapitation strike.’

From the South Pacific to the corridors of modern power, it’s a reminder: the might of air warfare isn’t just in destruction, but in the audacity to find, reach, and reshape the future from the sky.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The effectiveness of intercepting enemy drones and missiles on this aircraft is 98%. These are impressive numbers.”

—Unnamed Ukrainian Air Force Pilot

Mission Briefing

Most folks talk about the F-16 like it’s the only bird in the sky for Ukraine—a natural choice, given how common and well-studied it is, plus it fits neatly into the NATO flock. But let me tell you, that’s just one part of the story. What Ukraine really needed, and fast, was a machine fit for daring missions in skies crawling with danger—something more than just a jack-of-all-trades, but a master of survival. This is where Mirage 2000-5 comes into play.

Mirage 2000-5 Enters the Picture

Back in March 2026, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense didn’t mince words. They made it clear that the Mirage 2000-5 was more than just a flashy addition to their hangars. No, sir.

These jets became key players in knocking out cruise missiles and swatting down attack drones, right when the skies were thick with danger. Russia, since 2024, has been waging a relentless campaign, unleashing waves of Shahed drones, decoys, cruise missiles, and even the occasional ballistic missile.

Imagine, on March 24, 2026, Ukraine reported facing 999 drones in a single day. The largest drone barrage since the war began. That’s not just a statistic; that’s the kind of day that tests the very soul of a nation’s air defense.

Now, in a fight like this, you don’t want to burn through your rarest, hardest-to-replace resources on every threat. You want an aircraft that can handle the dirty work: intercept the slow movers, patrol the front, dash across the map, and still be ready to strike the ground with pinpoint accuracy.

The Mirage 2000-5 isn’t a luxury; it’s a force multiplier. It takes on missions that would otherwise drain the fleet’s most precious assets, freeing them up for the truly hairy jobs.

But let’s not get carried away. The Mirage 2000-5 isn’t a silver bullet, nor does it replace the F-16. The F-16 is still the long-game play for Ukraine. More airframes, better supply lines, a broader arsenal, and the promise of a uniform NATO-aligned fleet sourced from friendly skies across the West.

The Mirage, by contrast, is here in smaller numbers. Its support network is tighter. You can’t just ring up the factory for spare parts; production lines are history. What you see is what you get.

Yet, that’s precisely what makes the Mirage 2000-5 so valuable. It fills a gap, plain and simple. It’s the right tool at the right time, giving Ukraine the ability to intercept missiles and drones and to drop French precision munitions. All without having to wait for the perfect solution. In war, urgency can outweigh doctrine, and sometimes a good answer right now beats the best answer next year.

There’s a lesson here, too, about the folks at Dassault who built these machines. The Mirage 2000-5 isn’t fresh off the assembly line. It hails from another era, a different style of air war.

And yet, look at it now: flying hard in a conflict bristling with modern threats, from enemy fighters to electronic jamming and long-range missiles. No one’s pretending it’s invincible. What it proves is that a well-kept, thoughtfully upgraded jet can still pack a punch decades after its first flight.

While everyone else dreams about the next generation—combat clouds, AI, and sixth-gen superjets—Ukraine is living a harsher reality, where the best jet is the one that can take off, survive, hunt, and hit its mark.

So here we are, the Mirage 2000-5, small in number, limited in some ways, but making a mark that most wouldn’t have dared predict a year ago. The real story isn’t about this fighter winning the war single-handedly. It’s about how, in a grinding war of attrition, a seasoned old warrior with the right upgrades can become the ace up your sleeve.

Why did they choose the Mirage?

The real twist in Ukraine’s air war isn’t about showing off the Mirage 2000-5 as some prestige trophy. They’re calling it what it is: a hunter of cruise missiles. That’s not just talk, either.

This Mirage isn’t the same old fighter from days gone by. With its updated RDY radar, modern avionics, real-time data link, and a set of French missiles, it’s a serious upgrade over Ukraine’s older MiG-29s. These features make it a specialist at taking down tough but not supersonic targets. Think cruise missiles and attack drones zigzagging through the chaos.

Ukrainian defense officials have pointed out how the Mirage can lock onto even the sneakiest drones: Shahed, Geran, Gerbera and so on. And that’s no small feat. Tracking a lumbering bomber or a darting fighter is one thing, but catching a low, slow, or tiny drone—often hidden in a wave of incoming threats—demands top-notch radar, fast data processing, and the right missiles at the pilot’s fingertips. The Mirage’s tech lets a lone pilot juggle all of that, firing off shots quickly when every second counts.

The proof, as they say, is in the flying. One Mirage pilot told the Ukrainian Air Force in November 2025 that his jet scored a 98% hit rate against drones and missiles; a number to take with a pinch of salt, sure, but a sign that in real battles, crews trust this plane.

A big part of that trust comes down to the Mirage’s weapons. Ukrainian jets carry MICA missiles, which work at long or close range and aren’t just for dogfights. They’re perfect for picking off stealthy drones and missiles, too. This gives Ukraine mobile air defense that doesn’t try to replace big ground-based systems, but rather complements them, filling gaps when needed.

Even the older Magic 2 missile is getting its moment; great for close-up encounters with targets that radiate heat. It might not sound glamorous, but in a war where Russian attacks are constant and cheap, that’s exactly what Ukraine needs: practical, reliable tools.

What does it mean to the US Allies?

The story of France’s Mirage 2000-5s arriving in Ukraine is more than just another headline about fighter jets changing hands. It’s a sign that the days of waiting around for the perfect, one-size-fits-all solution are over.

Now, allies are cobbling together a quick-reaction, layered airpower force out of whatever tried-and-true jets can fill the gaps; right now, not next year.

The Mirage isn’t just for show, either. It’s already out there hunting Russian cruise missiles and drones, and it’s flexing into precision strike missions with those French AASM Hammer bombs.

This jet doesn’t replace the F-16; it runs alongside it, plugging holes as a mobile air-defense layer and doubling up as a strike platform, all in a war where the enemy throws everything and the kitchen sink at you.

There’s a lesson here for the U.S. and its partners: real alliance strength isn’t about having only the shiniest new jets, but about getting older, upgraded birds like the Mirage into the mix fast enough to actually make a difference.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense has hammered home that Mirages can bag cruise missiles and drones—including those Shahed types—and use a mix of NATO-standard weapons, proving how adaptable Western arsenals can be when speed matters more than perfection. In the end, the Mirage’s combat debut is both a wake-up call and a blueprint: future airpower may hinge more on how fast we can blend proven machines and munitions into a real fighting force before the next storm breaks.

This Week in Aviation History

On the morning of 15 April 1952, Boeing’s ace test pilot “Tex” Johnston and Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Guy Townsend pushed all eight engines of the YB-52 Stratofortress to the max and let her loose down the runway. That was the moment the legendary bomber prototype truly came alive, roaring into aviation history with every ounce of power unleashed.

YB-52’s Initial Flight Has Begun

The YB-52, an eight-engine beast, charges down the runway with its wings arching skyward, easily carrying a whopping 235,000 pounds on its first flight.

Once she hit V2, that magic takeoff speed, the big bomber lifted gracefully off the ground—helped along by those wings set at a six-degree angle—and at precisely 11:08 a.m., she was airborne, launching a new chapter in aviation history.

For the first forty minutes, Tex Johnston and Guy Townsend kept her circling over Seattle, ticking through system checks, making sure every dial and gauge lined up just right.

Then, satisfied, they pointed the Stratofortress up to 25,000 feet and headed off toward Larson Air Force Base at Moses Lake for more rigorous testing, keeping her aloft for a record-breaking 3 hours and 8 minutes: the longest maiden flight Boeing had ever clocked at that point.

Tex radioed back that the YB-52 flew exactly as the engineers had promised, a rare treat in the test pilot’s world.

The YB-52 was originally meant to be the second of two XB-52 prototypes, but so many changes and upgrades were worked in that she deserved a new name. The first XB-52 should’ve flown first, but an accident during ground tests left her grounded.

Both prototypes featured that signature tandem cockpit—pilot and co-pilot sitting one behind the other—just like the B-47 before them. The wings, swept back and perched high on the fuselage, carried four pairs of turbojets in twin pods, cleverly placed to keep the plane balanced and the airflow clean.

Add to that the unique landing gear, four main struts with two wheels each, able to pivot for crosswind landings, and you’ve got a design that let those wings flex and fly unlike anything else in the sky.

The Anatomy of the Stratofortress

The Stratofortress stretched a majestic 152 feet from nose to tail, with wings reaching a staggering 185 feet across. It is so broad that her vertical fin could be folded over to the right just to squeeze into a hangar.

Standing tall at nearly 50 feet, she cast a shadow that covered 4,000 square feet of ramp. Those wings weren’t just for show, either: they angled back at nearly 37 degrees, set at a 6-degree angle of incidence, with a hint of dihedral for stability.

Empty, she tipped the scales at 155,200 pounds, but fueled and loaded, she could take off at a mighty 405,000 pounds.

Under the hood, the YB-52 packed eight Pratt & Whitney Turbo Wasp YJ57-P-3 turbojet engines: cutting-edge for their day, with a two-spool design and 16-stage compressor.

Each engine delivered a steady 8,700 pounds of thrust, making this bomber a true heavyweight champion. These powerplants were over 15 feet long, three and a half feet wide, and weighed in at 4,390 pounds apiece.

She wasn’t just big, she was fast. The YB-52 cruised at 519 miles per hour, could hit 611 at altitude, and boasted a jaw-dropping range of over 7,000 miles. Neither the YB-52 nor her sister prototype carried any weapons in those early days. They were all about testing and proving the concept.

Boeing built 744 Stratofortresses between 1952 and 1962 in Seattle and Wichita. The final model, the B-52H, entered service in 1960, and the very last one rolled out in 1962: number 61-0040, still flying for the Air Force after more than 21,000 hours aloft.

Most earlier models are long gone, but 76 B-52Hs are still in service, with legends like Ghost Rider even returning from the Boneyard. As for the old YB-52 prototype, she went to the Air Force museum, but by the mid-60s, even she was consigned to history and scrapped.

Stratofortress’ Enduring Contrail

The YB-52 Stratofortress wasn’t just a successful prototype. It was the opening act for one of aviation’s greatest legends. When she first took to the skies in April 1952, she brought the Air Force into a new era as its first all-jet, intercontinental heavy bomber, setting the stage for a platform that would shape American power and strategy for generations.

The B-52 didn’t just serve as the backbone of Strategic Air Command; she proved her mettle in Vietnam’s Arc Light and Linebacker II, then kept on flying into new missions; everything from globe-spanning strike runs to post-Cold War operations.

What makes the B-52 story so remarkable is its adaptability: setting records, taking on fresh missions, and modernizing with every twist in doctrine and technology. Boeing still calls her a cornerstone of U.S. deterrence, and the Air Force isn’t letting go anytime soon; upgrades are keeping this old warbird ready for whatever comes next.

So, that first flight in 1952 wasn’t just the launch of a bomber; it was the birth of a living legend, a saga that continues to evolve as the world changes.

As we move into an age of standoff weapons, networked warfare, and renewed big-power rivalry, the Stratofortress keeps doing what it does best: combining range, payload, and unmistakable presence to make sure American airpower is always heard, loud and clear, wherever it’s needed most.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

Beginning on March 4, 2026, Iranian forces have declared the Strait “closed,” threatening and carrying out attacks on ships attempting to transit the Strait.

—U.S. Congressional Report

Mission Briefing

Soaring low over the shimmering waters of the Strait of Hormuz, F-15E and F-16 fighters unleashed the latest in guided bomb technology, striking their naval targets with precision. This daring operation, captured in sweeping detail, offers a rare glimpse into the evolving strategies and doctrines that shape modern aerial warfare.

The Older Fighters’ Comeback

One might think these birds are relics. After all, the F-15E took its maiden flight back in ’89, and the F-16 even earlier, in ’78. But let me assure you: these jets have aged like fine wine, reborn again and again through relentless modernization.

Climb inside a modern F-15E today and you’re surrounded by cutting-edge tech: the razor-sharp AN/APG-82 AESA radar, electronic warfare suites sophisticated enough to fool even the best enemy sensors, and secure data links connecting pilots to a web of information.

The latest F-16 Block 70s? They come loaded with sensors that rival those found on fifth-generation stealth fighters. But the real ace up their sleeve? Payload. The F-15E can haul more than 10,400 kilograms of ordnance—more than an F-35 flying in stealth mode. When you need to bring the rain on hardened targets, there’s no better workhorse.

And let’s talk cost. The F-35 is a marvel, no doubt, but it’s expensive to fly; over $33,000 an hour. The F-16? You can keep one in the air for less than a third of that. That’s why U.S. doctrine is crystal clear: use the stealth jets to slip past enemy defenses, kick open the door, and then send in the older platforms to deliver the heavy punches.

This layered approach is what keeps the F-15E and F-16 front and center in real-world ops. Stealth jets scout and disrupt, drones keep watch and strike as needed, and these classic fighters hit the targets that matter most. It’s a symphony of airpower—each player with a vital role.

Now, the Strait of Hormuz; that’s not just any patch of water. It’s the world’s energy chokepoint: a 33-kilometer-wide passage where up to 20 million barrels of oil flow each day. Any hint of trouble here, and the world feels it instantly. Iran knows this, and over the years they’ve packed the area with anti-ship missiles, sea mines, naval drones, and swarms of fast attack craft, all designed to tip the balance.

That’s why recent U.S. strikes zeroed in on those very threats: missile sites and related facilities along the coast. The goal? Stop trouble before it ever reaches open water. By taking out the weapons ashore, you keep the shipping lanes open and avoid a messy confrontation at sea. It’s classic aviator strategy: control the skies and you control the sea. That’s how you keep the world’s lifeblood flowing, one mission at a time.

Under the Hoods of These Conventional Fighters

General Characteristics of F-15E
Primary function: Air-to-ground attack aircraft
Contractor: The Boeing Company
Power plant: Two Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 or 229 turbofan engines with afterburners
Thrust: 25,000 - 29,000 pounds each engine
Wingspan: 42.8 feet (13 meters)
Length: 63.8 feet (19.44 meters)
Height: 18.5 feet (5.6 meters)
Weight: 37,500 pounds ( 17,010 kilograms)
Maximum takeoff weight: 81,000 pounds (36,450 kilograms)
Fuel capacity: 35,550 pounds (three external tanks plus conformal fuel tanks)
Payload: depends upon mission
Speed: 1,875 mph (Mach 2.5 plus)
Range: 2,400 miles (3,840 kilometers) ferry range with conformal fuel tanks and three external fuel tanks
Ceiling: 60,000 feet (18,288 meters)
Armament: One 20mm multibarrel gun mounted internally with 500 rounds of ammunition. Four AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles and four AIM-120 AMRAAM or eight AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles. Any air-to-surface weapon in the Air Force inventory (nuclear and conventional)
Crew: Pilot and weapon systems officer
Unit cost: $31.1 million (fiscal year 98 constant dollars)
Initial operating capability: September 1989
Inventory: 219 total force

General characteristics of F-16 Fighting Falcon
Primary function: multirole fighter
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corp.
Power plant: F-16C/D: one Pratt and Whitney F100-PW-200/220/229 or General Electric F110-GE-100/129
Thrust: F-16C/D, 27,000 pounds
Wingspan: 32 feet, 8 inches (9.8 meters)
Length: 49 feet, 5 inches (14.8 meters)
Height: 16 feet (4.8 meters)
Weight: 19,700 pounds without fuel (8,936 kilograms)
Maximum takeoff weight: 37,500 pounds (16,875 kilograms)
Fuel capacity: 7,000 pounds internal (3,175 kilograms); typical capacity, 12,000 pounds with two external tanks (5443 kilograms)
Payload: two 2,000-pound bombs, two AIM-9, two AIM-120 and two 2400-pound external fuel tanks
Speed: 1,500 mph (Mach 2 at altitude)
Range: more than 2,002 miles ferry range (1,740 nautical miles)
Ceiling: above 50,000 feet (15 kilometers)
Armament: one M-61A1 20mm multibarrel cannon with 500 rounds; external stations can carry up to six air-to-air missiles, conventional air-to-air and air-to-surface munitions and electronic countermeasure pods
Crew: F-16C, one; F-16D, one or two
Unit cost: F-16A/B , $14.6 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars); F-16C/D,$18.8 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)
Initial operating capability: F-16A, January 1979; F-16C/D Block 25-32, 1981; F-16C/D Block 40-42, 1989; and F-16C/D Block 50-52, 1994
Inventory: total force, F-16C/D, 1017

What the Hormuz Strikes Meant for America and Its Allies

From the cockpit view, those recent strikes in the Strait of Hormuz are about far more than a single operation. They’re a message sent across the world’s shipping lanes. For the U.S. and its allies, hitting targets tied to Iran’s anti-ship and naval arsenal is a clear signal: we’re ready to defend this critical maritime chokepoint before a spark turns into a crisis.

With nearly a fifth of global oil flowing through these narrow waters, even minor instability can send shockwaves through energy markets and economies everywhere.

For America’s partners—especially Gulf states and Western nations relying on secure sea routes—the strikes offer more than just reassurance. They prove that Washington is willing to act, and that well-upgraded classics like the F-15E and F-16 still pack a serious punch when paired with precision munitions and sharp-eyed sensors.

The doctrine is practical: stealth jets might clear the way, but seasoned fighters deliver the heavy, persistent blows needed to keep the lanes open.

Beneath the roar of the engines, there’s a quieter undertone: the next round of conflict in this region may hinge less on air dominance and more on who can keep the oil flowing and the sea lanes open when the pressure mounts. That’s the real high-stakes game in play.

This Week in Aviation History

Carrier planes from Task Force 58 roar off the decks, hunting the mighty Yamato as it surges toward Okinawa with its escort of cruisers and destroyers. In wave after relentless wave, 386 aircraft hammer the Japanese fleet, pounding Yamato, Yahagi, and four destroyers beneath the waves of the East China Sea. But the skies are far from safe—off Okinawa, kamikaze pilots strike back, slamming into six Allied ships, among them the carrier Hancock and battleship Maryland. It’s a day when the fate of giants is decided by the fierce battles above and below the waves.

The Death of the Yamato

Let’s set the scene: April 6, 1945. The Yamato (pride of the Imperial Japanese Navy and the heaviest battleship ever built) steams out on Operation Ten-Go, a desperate, almost suicidal dash toward Okinawa.

Her orders are clear but grim: run straight into the teeth of the American fleet, low on fuel and with only a handful of escorts at her side. Japan’s strategic situation has grown dire, and Yamato’s mission is as much about honor as it is about hope.

But she never makes it. Over the horizon, Task Force 58—the U.S. Navy’s fast carrier strike arm under Admiral Marc Mitscher—waits with decks bristling with aircraft. On April 7, the skies fill with American carrier planes, launching wave after wave against Yamato and her escorts.

It’s the mature carrier system at its peak: scouts, fighters, bombers, and torpedo planes all working in perfect coordination, striking from far beyond the reach of the big guns below. The result is devastating; a hurricane of bombs and torpedoes rains down, and the Yamato, along with her consorts, is sent to the bottom before she ever threatens the Okinawa landings.

Yamato’s destruction is more than just the loss of a warship. She was built as a floating fortress, the embodiment of Japanese naval might, but her end proves a stark lesson: battleships, no matter how massive, cannot survive without air superiority in the age of carriers. When Yamato explodes and capsizes, it isn’t just steel and sailors lost. It’s the final curtain call for the era of battleship supremacy.

In the grand narrative of Okinawa, this strike became a defining moment. TF 58’s aviators didn’t just sink a legend; they changed the nature of naval warfare, closing the book on one age and opening another written in the contrails of carrier aircraft.

The Task Force 58

Task Force 58 or the Fast Carrier Task Force, became the steel fist of America’s Fifth Fleet under Admiral Raymond Spruance. Born in January 1944 and shaped by the vision of Admiral Marc Mitscher, TF 58 was more than just a collection of ships. Picture it: sleek fleet carriers, nimble light carriers, battleships, cruisers, destroyers, and an entire logistical train, all sailing as one.

But what made TF 58 legendary wasn’t just its sheer might; it was how seamlessly it combined scouting, fighter screens, strike aviation, anti-aircraft guns, and at-sea resupply into a single, mobile war machine. This was naval warfare, reimagined for the modern age.

As the U.S. pushed west across the Pacific, TF 58 became the spearhead—covering landings in the Marshalls, Marianas, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa, while striking deep at enemy bases, even reaching the Japanese Home Islands. Here, the carrier truly dethroned the battleship. No longer content to simply shepherd amphibious landings, TF 58 shaped the battlefield itself, softening targets and breaking enemy strength before the boots ever hit the sand.

The true test came in June 1944, at the Battle of the Philippine Sea. Under Mitscher’s command, TF 58’s aviators turned the skies into a shooting gallery, annihilating Japan’s carrier air power in the infamous “Marianas Turkey Shoot.” Hundreds of Japanese planes fell, carriers were lost, and the skilled aircrews who could never be replaced vanished from the war.

The outcome? Not just tactical victory, but strategic dominance—America now controlled the Marianas, opening the door to the final push toward Japan.

TF 58’s reach was breathtaking. In early 1945, its carriers launched the first air strikes on Tokyo since the Doolittle Raid, and, soon after, aircraft from its decks hunted down and destroyed the massive battleship Yamato, proving once and for all that the era of the battleship was over.

Task Force 58 wasn’t just a formation. It was the vanguard of a new kind of naval power: fast, coordinated, and able to strike first from oceans away. In its wake, it left no doubt; the future of naval warfare belonged to the carrier. For further reading, check out the Naval History and Heritage Command or the National Park Service.

The Legacy of Task Force 58 and Yamato’s Lost

The mighty battleship Yamato, the crown jewel of Japanese sea power, surges toward Okinawa on her final sortie. She’s an icon of naval might, bristling with guns and shrouded in thick armor, the very symbol of an era when battleships ruled the waves. But that day, the Yamato never even comes within range of her enemy’s guns.

Instead, she’s caught by the long reach of Task Force 58, the U.S. Navy’s Fast Carrier Task Force, a floating armada of carriers and their escorts commanded by Marc Mitscher. From over the horizon, wave after wave of carrier-based aircraft descend, pounding Yamato and her escorts with bombs and torpedoes. The great ship is overwhelmed, capsizing and exploding in a towering fireball before she ever has a chance to turn her guns on the enemy.

That moment was more than just the destruction of a ship. It was the thunderous end of an era. Yamato, once the pride of Japan’s navy, was built to dominate through brute strength and armor. But she fell not to another battleship, but to the coordinated might of carrier aviation, striking from far beyond the range of her big guns. Her sinking marked the collapse of an old doctrine, one that believed the heaviest armor and the biggest guns would always decide sea battles.

In contrast, Task Force 58 embodied a bold new future. With its seamless blend of carriers, fighters, bombers, scouting planes, and the logistical muscle to stay at sea for months, it showed what modern naval power looked like: fast, flexible, networked, and able to project force at staggering distances. Its victories in the Philippine Sea and against Yamato proved that from now on, naval battles would be won by those who controlled the skies.

This legacy still echoes today. The world’s great fleets are centered on carriers, not battleships, and every contest for the world’s sea lanes (from the Cold War to the present) reminds us: the first battle is for the air above the waves. Control that, and you control the sea.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

This is the final deployment for the 14th Fighter Squadron based at Misawa, Japan, as it prepares to retire its F-16s and transfer them to other units, including the 480th Fighter Squadron and the 77th Fighter Squadron.

—Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch

Before we get started with this week’s newsletter, a quick note: I’ve been publishing this newsletter for 151 consecutive weeks (dating back to March 2023) and in that time the newsletter has come out every Tuesday morning. Not this week. As some of you may know, YouTube had demonetized my channel for “mass-produced” “inauthentic” content - this was clearly in error and I (along with my amazing viewers) fought the decision. We won. I am very thankful that it was overturned, and again - my incredible viewers (and readers) rose to the occasion and made a storm on X (Twitter) that got the attention of human reviewers. YouTube has been mass banning channels that are AI generated (a much needed task in my opinion) but it appears they were a little overzealous with their bans. Again, I am very happy to be reinstated, and the reason I am writing this here is because as you can imagine, my whole world and workflows were disrupted. I’m getting back into the routines, so rest assured that moving forward we will resume our regular posting schedule. Thanks for reading this and for reading this newsletter. Now you know.

-Tog

And now, onto this week’s newsletter:

Mission Briefing

Just four weeks after Epic Fury roared into action, the tempo in the skies and seas is only building. You’ve got F-16Cs slicing through the stratosphere, EA-18Gs and E-2Ds joining the fray, engines humming as they head for the heart of the Middle East. Out at sea, the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group cuts a determined wake, steel and resolve pushing through blue water. And on the ground, the rumor mill is alive: word is, the 82nd Airborne Division might be prepping for the call. The whole scene feels like the opening frames of a high-stakes reel, machines, men, and rumors all converging, the story unfolding with every passing hour.

More Assets are Deploying

Over the past few days, the air above us has gotten a whole lot busier. F-16CM Block 50 Fighting Falcons—what we call Vipers—have been streaking through the sky, joined by the Navy’s EA-18 Growlers and E-2D Hawkeyes.

Each one brings its own brand of power and purpose. Out at sea, the USS Boxer’s Amphibious Ready Group is pushing toward the Middle East, soon to rendezvous with the USS Tripoli’s group, which shipped out just last week.

You can feel the tension building—rumors swirl that the 82nd Airborne Division might be on alert, boots laced and gear packed, ready to move at a moment’s notice. The government hasn’t ruled out sending troops into Iran, but no green light yet.

The F-16s are coming in from all directions. Some launched out of Aviano and Spangdahlem in Europe, others from Shaw and McEntire back on the East Coast, and now, even Misawa Air Base in Japan has joined the dance. Those Misawa Vipers are on what could be their last overseas run; soon that base will switch over to the F-35 Lightning II.

Tanker issues delayed the Atlantic crossing, but nothing stops a determined aircrew; now, up to 24 jets are converging at Spangdahlem, arriving in waves. Some of those Vipers are already peeling off, bound for undisclosed airfields in the Middle East. Nobody’s saying exactly where, but you can bet they’ll be right where they’re needed most.

Meanwhile, six more Growlers lifted off from Oceana, Virginia, touched down in the Azores to refuel, then pressed on toward the fight, some loaded with state-of-the-art jamming pods. The whole operation feels like the opening act of a high-stakes air campaign; steel birds, restless seas, and every pilot waiting for the next call.

Fighter Jets are Not the Only Birds

Fighter jets might steal the spotlight, but they’re not the only birds heading into the fray for Operation Epic Fury. Back on March 16, while the first Growlers took to the air, five E-2D Hawkeye early warning aircraft touched down at Lajes, their radomes gleaming against the Atlantic sky.

A few days later, the Hawkeyes lifted off again, bound for Aviano Air Base in Italy, before pressing on toward the Middle East. Their final destination? That’s still a bit of a mystery. Maybe they’ll join one of the Carrier Air Wings out at sea, or perhaps they’ll settle in with a land-based squadron.

These E-2Ds aren’t your average spotters. They come armed with cutting-edge AESA radar, the kind that can sniff out even the sneakiest threats—low-flying drones and cruise missiles that hug the earth to avoid detection.

Once in theater, the Hawkeyes will work alongside the Air Force’s E-3 Sentry AWACS, and just recently, the Royal Australian Air Force sent an E-7A Wedgetail to the mix. It’s a real gathering of airborne sentinels, each playing their part in the unfolding drama.

Let me share with you what’s under the hood of the Hawkeye

Overall Length: 57 ft. 8.75 in
Wing Area: 80 ft. 7 in
Weight (Empty): 40,484 lbs
Speed: 300+ kts
Ceiling: 37,000 ft.
Power Plant: Two Rolls-Royce T56-A-427A Turboprop engines (5100 shp each)
Sensors: Fully integrated open architecture system
Crew: five; two pilots, three mission systems operators with the option for the co-pilot to act as fourth mission systems operator.
Prime Contractor: Northrop Grumman

Holding the Line, Building the Strike Package

Four weeks into Operation Epic Fury, the tempo is still building. Every new wave of jets and warships heading out signals something loud and clear: this isn’t just a single punch thrown in the dark. Washington’s making it clear: this is a campaign built to last, with layers of protection and the muscle to ramp things up if the situation demands.

I’ve seen reports of more F-16Cs, EA-18G Growlers, and E-2D Hawkeyes streaming toward the Middle East, with the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group riding the waves nearby. For the U.S., these moves aren’t just about keeping the engines hot; they’re about flexibility, about having options.

The F-16s bring sheer numbers and quick reaction across scattered airfields; the Growlers are the ghosts in the electronic ether, jamming and hunting enemy radars; and the E-2Ds, perched high above, scan for threats that try to slip under the radar.

This isn’t only for America’s benefit. The buildup is a message to allies: the U.S. is all-in, not just with fighters and ships, but with the brains and tech that guide modern warfare. Australia’s already sent in an E-7A Wedgetail, showing it’s a team effort in the skies.

Operation Epic Fury isn’t just about hitting targets; it’s about keeping friends close, sending a warning to would-be troublemakers, and shaping the chessboard for whatever comes next. Whether these reinforcements stay as a shield or turn into a spear, they’ll set the tone for the next act in this unfolding drama.

This Week in Aviation History

April 1917: folks were already calling it the Great War, and with good reason. The fields of France and Russia were packed with millions of soldiers, locked in a deadly standoff where thousands fell every single day; even when no one was charging forward. Then came April 6th, when the United States stepped into the fray, throwing its lot in with France, Britain, Russia, and the rest of the Allies. They faced a formidable lineup: Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. All bracing for what would become a truly global fight.

Why did the US join the War?

President Woodrow Wilson had just been sworn in for his second term, having won over the American people with the promise, “He Kept Us Out of War.” Folks thought Wilson was a man too proud to send young Americans into the meat grinder that was Europe.

In fact, diplomats across the Atlantic called the United States “The Great Neutral,” and for a while, that title fit. American envoys worked tirelessly, hoping to broker peace as the trenches filled and the casualties mounted. But even a president can’t outrun the winds of war forever.

The first sign that the storm was coming was a note, hand-delivered by the German ambassador on January 31. “Unrestricted submarine warfare,” it read. No more warnings, no more safe passage—any ship, friend or foe, near Britain, France, Italy, or the Eastern Mediterranean was fair game for German U-boats.

Now, to us today, that might sound like just another piece of military strategy, but back then, it sent shockwaves through the American public. It was a move born of desperation. Germany needed to cut off Britain to win before their own resources ran dry. But to Americans, it was yet another sign of German aggression, the war machine grinding on, civilians and soldiers alike in its path.

Wilson was stunned. The very next day, he cut diplomatic ties with Germany, though he still held back from war. Then came the Zimmermann Telegram—a real cloak-and-dagger moment.

British intelligence intercepted a secret message from Germany’s foreign minister to its ambassador in Mexico, offering Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico in exchange for Mexico turning on the U.S. The news broke on February 28, and you could feel the mood shift. Americans were furious; the idea of foreign powers carving up their land was too much to bear. Wilson ordered American merchant ships to arm themselves.

March rolled in, and German U-boats made good on their threats, sending three U.S.-flagged ships to the bottom of the sea. The pressure mounted, and Wilson finally called Congress to a special session on April 2.

When he stepped up to the podium, he wasn’t the reluctant leader anymore. He was a man with purpose. “The world must be made safe for democracy,” he declared, pledging that America wasn’t after land, riches, or power. The fight was for liberty and the rights of mankind.

Four days later, Congress gave its answer. The declaration of war was signed, and the United States stepped into the storm, determined to tilt the balance in the name of freedom.

The Nation’s Defense Potential

At the dawn of the twentieth century, America was a sleeping giant; an industrial powerhouse ready to change the course of history. Picture this: by 1900, U.S. Steel alone was turning out more steel than the whole of Great Britain.

Henry Ford was cranking out Model Ts on assembly lines, making horse-and-buggy transportation look ancient overnight. Farms were getting machines, freeing up hands for the factories. America’s cities buzzed with a growing, literate workforce, mass production was in full swing, and railroads stitched the nation together; change was in the air, and the future looked unstoppable.

But when war erupted across the ocean, the United States military was still caught in another era. The Great War was industrialized carnage—millions in the trenches, millions more behind the lines, and factories churning out weapons day and night.

The U.S. Army, though, was tiny: just over 120,000 enlisted men and fewer than 6,000 officers, scattered from the Wild West to outposts in the Philippines and the Caribbean. Equipment was scarce—hardly any machine guns, no tanks, not much artillery, and barely any planes.

The National Guard was even more uneven, with old gear and patchy training. The Army hadn’t fought in big divisions since the Civil War, and few officers knew how to move or command massive units. The Navy, with 300 ships and 60,000 sailors, was respectable; but nothing like Britain’s Royal Navy.

So when war was declared in April 1917, no one really knew what role America would play. Yet the declaration itself marked something big: the moment America stepped onto the world stage, unprepared but determined. It would take time for U.S. military power to grow up. But when it did, it would help turn the tide of the war.

How World War I Changed Aviation

In 1914, flying meant braving the elements in open cockpits, clutching a paper map, and trusting your gut more than your gauges. But war has a way of speeding up progress. Soon, those flimsy scout planes evolved into fighters, bombers, and the first true air warriors. The big ideas of airpower—scouting, moving fast, hitting hard, and ruling the skies—were all born in that crucible.

For the United States, joining the fight in April 1917 was a leap into the unknown. With few planes and even fewer trained pilots, America was far from ready, but the moment marked a turning point.

The country learned fast, grew stronger, and began to project its power across oceans. World War I left two legacies: it transformed aviation from a daring experiment into a battlefield necessity, and it pushed America to the center of world affairs. Even today, when conflict flares, airpower and American resolve are still the keys to shaping war and forging peace.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran’s short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their navy… That is the clear objective of this mission.”

—Secretary of State Marco Rubio

Mission Briefing

In the dark, early hours of 28 February 2026, U.S. Central Command launched a major campaign at the president’s command. CENTCOM made its intent unmistakable: to dismantle the Iranian regime’s security backbone by targeting sites deemed an imminent threat. The opening strikes fell on the Revolutionary Guards’ command centers, missile and drone launch sites, air defenses, and military airfields—linchpins of Iran’s military might. From the very beginning, this was no mere warning shot, but a calculated campaign to disrupt and unseat the adversary’s power.

What is Operation Epic Fury?

From the very beginning, this was no fleeting demonstration of might. The campaign’s intention was deep disruption—an operation designed to shake the adversary’s foundations.

Yet, as the first sorties thundered across the night sky, the political objectives began to shift beneath them. According to Reuters, the White House and Pentagon soon layered new aims atop the original mission: destroy Iran’s offensive missiles, cripple its navy, neutralize its support for regional proxies, and ensure Tehran never acquires nuclear weapons.

Each new goal added a dimension of strategic coercion, but also a layer of fragility; because, as any seasoned aviator knows, the more reasons you fight, the harder it is to recognize when you’ve truly won.

General Dan Caine’s early reports set the stage for a classic air campaign, but on a scale rarely seen in modern warfare. On February 27, before the world even knew the fight had begun, U.S. Cyber and Space Commands moved first; working to blind and disrupt Iranian detection and communications.

Then, in the darkest hours of February 28, over a hundred aircraft launched from airstrips and carrier decks, joined by Tomahawk missiles and precision rockets. The first wave struck with synchronized fury, hammering more than a thousand targets in just one day. The message was unmistakable: seize the tempo, deny the enemy a chance to regroup.

In the days that followed, command centers, intelligence nodes, missile batteries, air defenses, and naval assets came under relentless attack. The idea was simple—”stun and disorient” the adversary, as Reuters put it, while U.S. forces established air superiority overhead. This wasn’t a campaign to occupy ground, but to dominate every domain; air, sea, command, missiles, communications, and logistics.

CENTCOM’s official reports, released after ten and then thirteen days, read like a roll call of American airpower. B-1s, B-2s, and B-52s thundered overhead; F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, F-22s, and F-35s patrolled the skies; electronic warfare aircraft jammed signals; advanced early warning planes and reconnaissance platforms swept the horizon; MQ-9 Reapers hunted from above.

Missile defense systems, carrier strike groups, refueling tankers, and LUCAS drones completed the picture. CENTCOM hinted at “special capabilities”—the sort aviators only speak of in hushed tones.

This arsenal wasn’t assembled for show. It represented a fully integrated architecture for strike, intelligence, command, missile defense, and logistics—sustaining a campaign meant to endure ballistic salvos, drone swarms, naval skirmishes, and regional ripples. As Reuters aptly put it, this was the largest U.S. operation since the 2003 invasion of Iraq; a testament to both the challenge at hand and the scale of America’s commitment.

Targets, Tactics, and Tempo

CENTCOM’s latest briefings pull back the curtain on a campaign that has evolved far beyond its opening salvos. Thirteen days in, the target list had grown: not just launch sites and command centers, but weapons factories, surface-to-air missile installations, and the full arc of Iran’s naval mine-laying capability; from warships to the factories and warehouses that keep them supplied.

The March 12 report tallies the cost: nearly 6,000 targets struck, with over ninety Iranian vessels hit or destroyed; more than sixty ships and thirty mine-layers among them.

This marks a clear shift; from neutralizing an immediate threat to systematically degrading Iran’s ability to project power. It’s a move any seasoned strategist would recognize. Iran’s playbook has always been layered; missiles and drones, scattered logistics, denial of the seas through mines and small boats.

Hitting launchers without shutting down the assembly lines would buy only a brief calm. Sinking warships without dismantling the mining infrastructure would leave vital oil lanes in peril. Operation Epic Fury is designed to break this cycle, dismantling the machinery that lets Tehran strike from afar. In military terms, it’s sound doctrine. Politically, it’s a heavier lift, for every new target brings new complexities.

Washington, meanwhile, points to rapid momentum. By March 2, Reuters reported that U.S. air superiority was secure, enabling deeper and broader strikes. The Pentagon announced a sharp drop in Iranian missile and drone launches as stockpiles and launch sites fell. On the tactical map, Epic Fury was doing what it set out to do: disrupt the enemy’s tempo and coordination, forcing Iran onto the defensive.

Yet, every victory comes at a price. CENTCOM’s daily bulletins tell that story, too. By March 1, three American lives had been lost; the toll climbed to seven by March 8, after a soldier wounded in Saudi Arabia succumbed.

Reuters revealed that about 140 service members were wounded in the campaign’s first ten days, most able to return to duty, but eight remained gravely injured. This is no costless exercise. It is paid for in sweat, blood, and sacrifice.

As mid-March arrives, the word from the White House is “relentless.” Ceasefire is off the table; the operation presses on, intensifying with U.S. strikes on Kharg Island—the linchpin of Iran’s oil exports.

Kharg moves nearly 90% of Iran’s oil, around 1.55 million barrels a day. The message is clear: America can strike at the heart of Iran’s economic might, signaling serious intent while holding back—at least for now—from directly crippling the oil infrastructure itself.

Operation Epic Fury and the Weight of Alliance

For America and its allies, Operation Epic Fury was more than a thunderous display of arms. It was a signal flare in the night, declaring intent to restore order in a region slipping toward chaos.

From the cockpit’s view, Epic Fury struck at the very arteries of Iran’s military machine: command centers, missile batteries, air defenses, naval forces, drone workshops, and logistics lines all came under fire. The aim was clear: paralyze Iran’s ability to threaten bases, ships, air routes, and global trade lanes, giving the U.S. and its partners time to seize back the initiative before Tehran could regroup.

For allies, especially those who rely on Gulf security and the free flow of commerce, Epic Fury was a reassurance mission as much as an offensive one. The sheer might on display—heavy bombers, stealth fighters, carriers, destroyers, missile shields, and surveillance networks—showed that the United States would shoulder risk and stand guard, wielding enough force to blunt missile barrages and keep the coalition safe.

Yet, tactical victory does not guarantee strategic control. Even as thousands of targets burned and Iran’s naval reach was curtailed, the bigger question loomed: could these battlefield gains be translated into lasting stability and a safer future for the region?

Epic Fury, then, was as much about present protection as it was about the uncertain road ahead. This campaign shielded allies today, while leaving the work of true security for tomorrow.

This Week in Aviation History

01 April 1945—a date etched into the annals of aviation and military history. On that morning, U.S. ground forces launched the Battle of Okinawa, the largest amphibious assault in the Pacific theater. For those of us who cherish the legends of the air, this was more than just another campaign; Okinawa was the last great barrier before Imperial Japan itself.

With the island secured, the stage would be set for America’s air power to reach its full, unbridled potential—strategic bombers poised to strike the Japanese mainland, supply lines strangled, and forward bases prepared for Operation Olympic, the planned final invasion set for later that year.

The Battle of Okinawa

On 15 March 1945, as Marines declared the end of organized resistance on Iwo Jima, Admiral Raymond Spruance—commander of the Fifth Fleet—was already charting a course into the unknown. Aboard his flagship, the USS Indianapolis, Spruance sailed toward the Ryukyu Islands, accompanied by Admiral Marc Mitscher’s formidable Fast Carrier Task Force 58.

In the days ahead, the Pacific would bear witness to a gathering of might that defied imagination: over 1,600 ships and 350,000 naval personnel converging under Spruance’s command to form the largest amphibious assault force in the history of warfare. Their mission: seize Okinawa, the last sentinel before the heartland of Imperial Japan.

With Iwo Jima and soon Okinawa in Allied hands, the strategic equation shifted. The U.S. could now unleash its full arsenal—long-range bombers, relentless blockades, and newly established forward bases—preparing the ground for Operation Olympic, the final invasion of Japan set for autumn. But before that could happen, a storm of steel and sacrifice awaited.

A grim preview came on March 19, as Task Force 58 struck at Honshū and Kobe Harbor. The USS Franklin, one of America’s proud carriers, was struck by two bombs from a Japanese dive bomber. Her crew’s valor saved the ship, but the cost was staggering: over 800 sailors lost in a single morning; a stark reminder that the enemy, though diminished, was far from beaten.

Navy planners knew the closer they sailed to Japan, the fiercer the resistance would become. The enemy’s arsenal now included a new and terrifying weapon: the kamikaze. These weren’t conventional sorties; these were pilots willing to become the weapon itself. At Leyte Gulf and Iwo Jima, such attacks had been a menace, but now, within reach of the Japanese homeland, the threat loomed larger.

Estimates warned of thousands of enemy aircraft poised for suicide missions. Those estimates, grimly, would prove true. On March 31, Spruance himself felt the sting when a kamikaze struck the Indianapolis. The damage sent the flagship limping back to San Francisco, placing her on a path to her own tragic destiny.

Despite the fury from above, the invasion of Okinawa began with precision and purpose. Minesweepers cleared safe passage, warships unleashed thunderous bombardments, and carrier-based aircraft flew relentless sorties.

On April 1^st (Easter Sunday) Lieutenant General Simon Bolivar Buckner Jr.’s Tenth Army landed unopposed on Okinawa’s western shores, their sights set on two vital airstrips. Astonishingly, both fell without resistance.

The ground campaign split in two: Marines pressed north, securing the lightly defended territory, while Army troops turned south toward the fortress-like Shuri Line. By mid-April, the Marines had swept their sector, but the Army’s advance slowed, grinding against entrenched defenders.

As the weeks dragged on, the lines blurred; Marines and soldiers alike locked in brutal combat, inching forward at staggering cost. By June’s end, the butcher’s bill was sobering: 49,151 American casualties, more than 12,500 killed or missing. Okinawa had become not just a stepping stone, but a crucible; proving the resolve, sacrifice, and unbreakable spirit of those who flew and fought beneath the Pacific sky.

The Importance of Real-Time Adaptation and Allied Partnership

Every day at Okinawa, the cost in lives and steel climbed higher, forcing the Navy to adapt its ways in the face of a threat few had truly anticipated. The kamikaze was unlike anything naval commanders had seen before. Pilots turning their planes into living weapons, undeterred by odds or firepower.

To meet this new reality, the Navy became a crucible of innovation: radar pickets were refined, combat air patrols adjusted, strikes against enemy airfields intensified, and small islands were seized to anchor early warning radars. In the process, sailors caught a fleeting glimpse of the future; a time when war at sea would be decided not just by bombs or torpedoes, but by guided missiles streaking in from beyond the horizon.

The radar pickets, small ships stationed far from the main fleet, became the sentinels and sacrificial shields of the armada. Their job was to spot incoming threats and sound the alarm, buying precious minutes for the larger ships to prepare. But in doing so, these pickets became the kamikazes’ first targets.

As the tempo of attacks escalated, the picket line was pushed out—from 40 miles to 60—stretching the fleet’s defenses thin, but granting more time to react. Ideally, each radar picket team would have included four to six destroyers and half a dozen supporting craft, all matched in speed and maneuverability.

In reality, losses forced the Navy to improvise, mixing ship types and requiring each group to adapt its tactics on the fly when the sky darkened with enemy aircraft.

Admiral Spruance, ever the tactician, ordered the capture of small offshore islands to extend the Navy’s reach. These outposts became hubs for fighter direction and early warning, giving the fleet a new edge in the deadly chess match over Okinawa.

After the battle, one flotilla commander would say, “Never in the annals of our glorious naval history have naval forces done so much with so little against such odds for so long a period.” Such praise became a refrain for the picket crews—stretched to the limit, yet unbroken.

The crucible of Okinawa demanded more than tactical brilliance; it required true teamwork. The operation was a patchwork of commands and services—the overall strategy set by Admiral Nimitz, the assault led by Spruance, and the ground war waged by a joint Army-Marine Corps force under Buckner.

The complexity was staggering. Smooth cooperation meant drawing clear lines of authority, especially as the campaign shifted from sea to shore. Spruance held the power to decide when amphibious gave way to ground fighting, but even then, rivalries had to be set aside. And set aside they were, as Army, Navy, and Marine forces melded into a single, unstoppable team; proving that, even amid chaos, unity could carry the day.

The Battle of Okinawa’s Enduring Legacy

The Battle of Okinawa’s legacy is etched not just in its staggering scale, but in the truths it revealed about modern warfare’s true cost. From April to June 1945, Operation Iceberg became the Pacific’s largest, bloodiest crucible: Army, Marines, Navy, Coast Guard, and allies, all locked in a brutal campaign that demanded everything from everyone.

Victory didn’t come with the first wave ashore. Japanese defenders melted into caves and strongholds, refusing open battle and turning Okinawa into a grinding trial of endurance. Over 12,000 Americans fell. Japanese forces were nearly annihilated, and the toll on Okinawan civilians was devastating.

There were lessons, paid for in blood. Okinawa proved that winning the Pacific required more than firepower. It demanded flawless joint cooperation, mastery of amphibious landings, logistical genius, and the grit to face an enemy fighting from the shadows, willing to die rather than yield.

Kamikaze attacks, relentless and desperate, sank 26 Allied ships and damaged 168 more, a stark reminder that even the strongest fleet can be threatened by unconventional tactics.

But the deepest legacy is human. It lives in the stories of sacrifice—soldiers, sailors, Marines, correspondents, and civilians—and in acts of courage like Desmond Doss at Hacksaw Ridge. Okinawa stands as both a warning and a guide: in war, technology alone is never enough. Victory belongs to those who endure, who unite, and who find strength in the darkest hours.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

A-10s have routinely been equipped with Sidewinders as a last layer of self defence against hostile aircraft, but with the increased use of small uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) like the Shahed 136 as attack munitions, the A-10 can now use them in a more offensive role

—U.S. Central Command

Mission Briefing

The A-10 Warthogs, those rugged workhorses of the U.S. Air Force, have shifted gears in Operation Epic Fury. According to General Dan Caine’s briefing from the Pentagon on March 19, 2026, these jets are now prowling the southern flank, eyes locked on the fast attack boats darting through the Strait of Hormuz. The mission: hunt down threats on the waves with the same relentless precision they’ve always shown on land.

Warthogs are Hunting the Iranian Fast Attack Craft in the Strait of Hormuz

From the very start of Operation Epic Fury, there was no mystery about the A-10 Thunderbolt II’s involvement; CENTCOM made it official within the first 48 hours. But the story deepened when U.S. Central Command released new images: the unmistakable silhouette of the Warthog, bristling with both anti-air and anti-surface weaponry.

Outfitted with a LITENING targeting pod, a pair of Maverick missiles, Sidewinders, a centerline fuel tank for extra range and loiter time, and an APKWS rocket pod, these jets looked ready for any mission the battle demanded. Until now, though, the A-10 had never been confirmed flying missions over Iran itself.

Traditionally, the Hogs had been deployed to Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, where their reputation was forged in the classic role of close air support; providing cover for ground troops and hammering Iran-backed Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq.

But with the escalation of Epic Fury, the A-10s made a leap from the familiar desert theater to a new domain: the open waters and contested straits of the Persian Gulf.

It’s a transition that makes perfect sense to those who know the type. Over the past decade and a half, the A-10 has quietly expanded its resume beyond tank-busting and battlefield support.

In 2011, during Operation Unified Protector, a Warthog teamed up with a P-3 Orion to take out a patrol boat and several small attack craft in Misrata, Libya—a harbinger of things to come.

More recently, faced with escalating asymmetric threats in the Red Sea and the Black Sea; where swarms of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and small boats have challenged even the most advanced navies. The Warthog has become a familiar sight at maritime exercises, training to counter these fast, elusive foes.

By the 2020s, the A-10 was a regular participant in Maritime Surface Warfare drills, including a notable 2023 exercise where two Hogs joined the USS Stethem in the Gulf of Oman to engage simulated surface threats.

The logic is clear: with high-value warships and tankers vulnerable to massed attacks by USVs, the ability to loiter low and slow, deliver precise, flexible firepower, and operate in tight quarters is more valuable than ever.

The A-10’s legendary maneuverability, robust payload, and unflappable accuracy make it a nightmare for fast-moving targets; on land and now, increasingly, at sea.

So, as Epic Fury unfolds, the Warthog writes a new chapter in its storied legacy, proving that an old warrior with the right tools and the right crew can adapt to any battlefield—from the dust of Iraq to the blue of the Persian Gulf—wherever the mission calls.

Anatomy of the Warthog

The A-10 Thunderbolt II is a pilot’s dream when it comes to low and slow maneuvering; hugging the terrain with uncanny precision and delivering its arsenal with unrivaled accuracy.

Built to linger over the battlefield, the Warthog can take off from short, rough strips close to the front, operate in lousy weather or low visibility, and keep watch for hours, ready to strike at a moment’s notice; even in the dead of night, thanks to night vision goggles and NVIS-compatible cockpits.

The all-around bubble canopy offers panoramic views, while titanium armor cradles the pilot and vital systems, letting the jet shrug off hits that would down lesser aircraft.

Redundant controls, self-sealing fuel cells, and manual backups mean the A-10 can keep flying even when wounded, surviving direct fire up to 23mm and still bringing its pilot home. In the chaos of close air support, the Warthog is more than a machine—it’s a steadfast guardian, engineered to endure the toughest fight and turn the tide for those on the ground.

General characteristics
Primary function: close air support, airborne forward air control, combat search and rescue
Contractor: Fairchild Republic Co.
Power plant: two General Electric TF34-GE-100 turbofans
Thrust: 9,065 pounds each engine
Wingspan: 57 feet, 6 inches (17.42 meters)
Length: 53 feet, 4 inches (16.16 meters)
Height: 14 feet, 8 inches (4.42 meters)
Weight: 29,000 pounds (13,154 kilograms) Maximum Takeoff Weight: 51,000 pounds (22,950 kilograms) Fuel Capacity: 11,000 pounds (7,257 kilograms)
Payload: 16,000 pounds (7,257 kilograms)
Speed: 450 nautical miles per hour (Mach 0.75)
Range: 2580 miles (2240 nautical miles)
Ceiling: 45,000 feet (13,636 meters)
Armament: one 30 mm GAU-8/A seven-barrel Gatling gun; up to 16,000 pounds (7,200 kilograms) of mixed ordnance on eight under-wing and three under-fuselage pylon stations, including 500 pound (225 kilograms) Mk-82 and 2,000 pounds (900 kilograms) Mk-84 series low/high drag bombs, incendiary cluster bombs, combined effects munitions, mine dispensing munitions, AGM-65 Maverick missiles and laser-guided/electro-optically guided bombs; infrared countermeasure flares; electronic countermeasure chaff; jammer pods; 2.75-inch (6.99 centimeters) rockets; illumination flares and AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles.

Warthogs on Watch: Guardians of the US and Allies

When the United States unleashed its A-10 Thunderbolt IIs against Iranian fast attack craft in the Strait of Hormuz, it was more than just a change in tactics. It was a declaration that this critical maritime artery would be defended with every tool in the arsenal.

In Operation Epic Fury, the Warthogs left their traditional close air support roles behind, taking to the skies over one of the world’s most volatile chokepoints to hunt the nimble boats that could threaten warships, tankers, and global commerce alike.

The Strait of Hormuz is no ordinary waterway; it’s a flashpoint where a handful of small boats, if left unchecked, could have global consequences.

For America’s allies—especially those with stakes in Gulf stability—the sight of A-10s loaded for both air and surface threats brought reassurance. These jets, equipped for drones and fast craft alike, can loiter for hours, maneuver at low altitudes, and strike with surgical precision, bringing a new layer of deterrence beyond what surface ships alone could offer.

Perhaps most striking, the mission underscored why the A-10 still matters, even as retirement looms. The Warthog’s adaptability for modern, networked, and maritime missions proves that legacy aircraft can still find new purpose.

As the Gulf’s battlespace evolves, the A-10 shows that old legends don’t fade quietly. They simply find new horizons to defend.

This Week in Aviation History

The first A3D-1s rolled off the production line and joined the fleet on 31 March 1956, arriving not long after the Navy welcomed the jet-age carrier USS Forrestal. Almost from day one, these new birds proved their mettle, showcasing what the future of carrier aviation could truly be.

Skywarrior Rising: The Navy’s Atomic Age Answer

The world and the future of warfare changed in an instant when atomic bombs fell over Japan in August 1945. Naval aviators, fresh from the triumphs of World War II, knew the aircraft carrier’s mobility had been the key to victory in the vast Pacific, allowing swift, devastating strikes across a scattered theater.

But in the postwar years, as the smoke cleared, a fierce debate ignited within the ranks of America’s military visionaries. The Army Air Forces, soon to become the independent U.S. Air Force, argued that nuclear-armed heavy bombers would render both sprawling armies and mighty fleets obsolete; air power alone, they claimed, would decide the next great conflict, and thus, all strategic air should be under the control of the new Air Force.

The Navy, unwilling to surrender the oceans or the skies above them, answered with conviction and innovation. Their answer was the A3D Skywarrior, an aircraft that would become synonymous with versatility and endurance at sea.

In 1947, the Navy issued a challenge: design a jet-powered bomber capable of delivering a 10,000-pound atomic weapon over 2,000 nautical miles, launched from the decks of the planned super carrier United States. Douglas Aircraft, led by the legendary Ed Heinemann, took up the call.

Heinemann’s team engineered an aircraft with an impressive gross weight of 68,000 pounds (significantly lighter than rival proposals), powered by twin jet engines tucked into nacelles beneath high-mounted wings, leaving ample space for a cavernous internal bomb bay.

Though the super carrier United States was abruptly canceled just weeks after Douglas received the contract for two prototypes, the Skywarrior project pressed on. In its final form, the A3D boasted a pair of Pratt & Whitney J57-P-6 engines, each producing 9,700 pounds of static thrust and pushing the bomber to speeds exceeding 600 miles per hour.

Heinemann’s relentless focus on weight reduction meant the Skywarrior could launch from modified Essex-class carriers, relics of World War II reworked for the jet age. But the quest for lighter flight came with a price: no ejection seats. Instead, the crew relied on an escape chute—a risky prospect that led to the aircraft’s unforgettable nickname among aviators: “All Three Dead.”

31 March 1956 marked a new era as the first production A3D-1s joined the fleet, just months after the USS Forrestal, the Navy’s first jet carrier, was commissioned. The Skywarrior wasted no time proving its worth. On July 31, 1956, one of these bombers flew nonstop from Hawaii to New Mexico; a staggering 3,200 miles in just 5 hours and 40 minutes, without a single refueling.

The following year, a pair of A3Ds made history with a carrier-to-carrier transcontinental flight, launching from the Bon Homme Richard off California and landing on the Saratoga steaming off Florida, cementing the Skywarrior’s place in the legend of naval aviation.

Under the Hood of the Skywarrior

Dimensions: Length: 74 ft, 5 in.; Height: 22 ft., 8 in.; Wingspan: 72 ft., 5 in.

Weights: Empty: 35,999 lb.; Gross: 70,000 lb.

Power Plant: Two 9,700 lb. static thrust Pratt & Whitney J57-P-6 turbojets

Performance: Maximum Speed: 621 M.P.H.; Service Ceiling: 39,000 ft.; Range: 2,990 miles

Armament: Two 20mm cannon in tail and provision for 8,700 lb. of ordnance, including nuclear weapons

Crew: Pilot, bombardier/navigator, gunner (attack configuration)

Skywarrior: An Enduring Callsign

The Douglas A-3 Skywarrior redefined what a naval aircraft could be. Conceived in the tense dawn of the Cold War, it gave the U.S. Navy a jet bomber capable of hauling big payloads over long distances. All from the moving deck of an aircraft carrier. For its day, that was an engineering marvel, the result of Ed Heinemann’s team stripping away every ounce they could, creating the heaviest bird to ever launch regularly from a carrier.

But the Skywarrior’s legacy soared well beyond dropping bombs. As strategy shifted and new threats emerged, the Whale adapted. It became a tanker, a reconnaissance platform, an electronic warfare workhorse, and a testbed for the Navy’s changing technology.

The National Naval Aviation Museum pays special tribute to the KA-3B’s vital refueling missions and credits later EA-3B and NEA-3B variants with keeping the Skywarrior relevant deep into the late Cold War.

That kind of adaptability is rare. The Skywarrior wasn’t just a bomber; it was a bridge from the Navy’s early nuclear ambitions to the modern age of versatile, multi-role carrier aviation.

Even after its attack days were over, the A-3 found new missions; proving that the greatest warplanes aren’t just built for one fight, but for every challenge that follows as the world and the mission change.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

U.S. Central Command is aware of the loss of a U.S. KC-135 refueling aircraft. The incident occurred in friendly airspace during Operation Epic Fury, and rescue efforts are ongoing. Two aircraft were involved in the incident. One of the aircraft went down in western Iraq, and the second landed safely.

This was not due to hostile fire or friendly fire.

—US Central Command

Mission Briefing

They say the KC-135 met its fate not in hostile skies, but after a fateful encounter with another bird in friendly airspace. While the second aircraft made it home without a scratch, the tanker did not. It was during Operation Epic Fury—the news came down from U.S. Central Command on 12 March 2026—a reminder that even familiar skies can hold dangers of their own.

The Stratotanker Went Down in Western Iraq During the Epic Fury

Operation Epic Fury has summoned the services of many KC-135 Stratotankers. Those steadfast giants of the sky that keep our fighting force fueled and ready. In recent days, several of these tankers have been spotted weaving their way through Israeli airspace, some flashing the emergency squawk code 7700; a distress beacon every aviator knows well.

For those watching the digital trails from afar, questions immediately began to swirl: were any of these tankers in distress tied to the grim incident that soon followed off the Israeli coast? The fog of war, as always, makes details elusive.

This loss marks the first time in nearly thirteen years that a Stratotanker has failed to return home. The last time tragedy struck was on May 3, 2013, when KC-135R 63-8877 of the 22nd Air Refueling Wing left McConnell Air Force Base for the skies over Kyrgyzstan, only to meet disaster near the village of Chaldovar, a hundred miles from its point of departure. The echoes of that loss still linger in the minds of those who have worn the uniform.

This time, according to reports, it was another KC-135 that found itself entangled in the incident; a midair encounter that ended in catastrophe. Official statements have ruled out enemy or friendly fire, but the rumor mill, stoked by social media, has been quick to suggest otherwise.

As speculation spread, U.S. Central Command issued steady updates, confirming what every aviator dreads: all six crew members aboard the tanker perished. Their names now join the honored roll: Maj. John A. Klinner, Capt. Ariana G. Savino, Tech. Sgt. Ashley B. Pruitt, Capt. Seth R. Koval, Capt. Curtis J. Angst, and Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons—a team drawn from the 6th Air Refueling Wing at MacDill and the 121st at Rickenbacker, united in service and sacrifice.

Their loss brings the toll of U.S. lives claimed since the conflict with Iran ignited to thirteen: six in an Iranian strike on Kuwait, one in Saudi Arabia, and now these six souls lost in the skies. The investigation is ongoing, but officials believe a midair collision may be at the heart of the tragedy.

On the ground, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s words cut through the uncertainty: “War is hell, war is chaos, and as we saw yesterday with the tragic crash of our KC-135 tanker, bad things can happen. American heroes, all of them.”

Even as details trickle out—confirmation that a second KC-135 returned safely after sustaining damage, that another tanker declared an emergency before landing in Tel Aviv. The loss is keenly felt. In the world of aviation, every scar in the sky tells a story. This one will be remembered.

The Tanker’s Anatomy

The KC-135 Stratotanker is the quiet powerhouse of the U.S. Air Force. It is the legend that has faithfully fueled America’s global reach for more than six decades. If you picture the heart of an aerial fleet, think of the KC-135: its silhouette cutting across the sky, wings swept back at a sharp 35 degrees, four turbofans rumbling as it hauls up to 322,500 pounds into the blue.

This is no ordinary aircraft. It’s the lifeline that keeps fighters and bombers on station, that stretches the boundaries of possibility for the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and even allied squadrons around the world.

But the KC-135 is more than a tanker. Its cargo deck can be pressed into service for passengers or freight. When the mission calls for it, the Stratotanker transforms into a flying hospital, ferrying wounded warriors to safety with patient support pallets strapped securely in place.

At the heart of its refueling magic is the flying boom: a marvel of midair engineering, controlled by a dedicated boom operator lying prone at the rear, guiding the fuel-laden probe into thirsty receivers.

Some KC-135s are fitted with a drogue for probe-equipped aircraft, and a few can even refuel two aircraft at once with their wingtip pods. In the world of aviation, the KC-135 is the unsung hero—steady, reliable, and always ready to answer the call.

General Characteristics

Primary Function: Aerial refueling and airlift

Prime Contractor: The Boeing Company

Power Plant: CFM International CFM-56 turbofan engines

Thrust: 21,634 pounds each engine

Wingspan: 130 feet, 10 inches (39.88 meters)

Length: 136 feet, 3 inches (41.53 meters)

Height: 41 feet, 8 inches (12.7 meters)

Speed: 530 miles per hour at 30,000 feet (9,144 meters)

Ceiling: 50,000 feet (15,240 meters)

Range: 1,500 miles (2,419 kilometers) with 150,000 pounds (68,039 kilograms) of transfer fuel; ferry mission, up to 11,015 miles (17,766 kilometers)

Maximum Takeoff Weight: 322,500 pounds (146,285 kilograms)

Maximum Transfer Fuel Load: 200,000 pounds (90,719 kilograms)

Maximum Cargo Capability: 83,000 pounds (37,648 kilograms), 37 passengers

Pallet Positions: 6

Crew: Three: pilot, co-pilot and boom operator. Some KC-135 missions require the addition of a navigator. The Air Force has a limited number of navigator suites that can be installed for unique missions.

Aeromedical Evacuation Crew: A basic crew of five (two flight nurses and three medical technicians) is added for aeromedical evacuation missions. Medical crew may be altered as required by the needs of patients.

Unit Cost: $39.6 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)

Date Deployed: August 1956

When the Tanker Falls, the Mission Trembles

For the United States and its allies, the loss of a KC-135 in western Iraq is a sobering reminder: modern air campaigns soar not just on the wings of fighters and bombers, but on the backs of the support fleet that keeps the whole machine in motion. The reports are clear: a combat mission, two tankers in the air, and a tragedy unfolding over friendly territory, untouched by hostile fire.

Strategically, the stakes are immense. A KC-135 isn’t just a number in the inventory; it’s the lifeline that extends the reach of airpower, lets strike packages linger, and sustains the relentless tempo demanded by coalition operations.

Its loss doesn’t just echo through squadrons. It sends a signal from Washington to NATO to Gulf allies: even outside the shadow of enemy missiles, the logistics lifeblood of air war is vulnerable to chaos, chance, and the fog of conflict.

Then, there’s the human toll. All six crew members lost, raising the war’s toll and reminding us that behind every sortie is a cost measured in lives, not just flight hours. For every ally, the lesson is crystal clear: winning the skies isn’t just about sharp fighters, but about resilient command and support. The next crisis may hinge not on the flashiest jet, but on the quiet giants that keep them aloft.

This Week in Aviation History

26 March 1967: Colonel Robert Ray Scott led twenty F-105 Thunderchiefs from Takhli, Thailand, on a daring strike near Hanoi. Flying his F-105D, call sign “Leech 01,” Scott wasn’t just guiding the attack; he became part of the legend. As bombs fell and flak blossomed, he spotted a MiG-17 closing in. With a cool hand and the roar of his 20mm Vulcan cannon, Scott downed the enemy fighter, etching his name into the annals of air combat and proving once more the mettle of America’s aviators.

Colonel Robert Ray Shot Down a MiG using F-105

The 355th Tactical Fighter Wing, led by Colonel Robert Ray Scott, staked its claim in the skies over North Vietnam. The mission was routine at first: a strike near Hoa Lac airfield, F-105 Thunderchiefs thundering into enemy territory. But as any aviator knows, routine can turn legendary in a flash.

Colonel Scott caught sight of a MiG-17 launching from Hoa Loc airfield. With the instincts of a seasoned hunter, he banked left, ready to pursue. Three more MiGs soon revealed themselves, circling the airfield in single-ship trail; silver flashes marked with the unmistakable red star.

Scott fixed his gaze on the closest, pressed the attack, and closed the distance as the MiG tried to shake him. He fired, watching rounds tear into the left wing, debris spinning away. The MiG rolled into a desperate, low escape, but Scott pulled away, having done what few could claim: he’d bested a MiG in its own backyard. The pilot, Second Lieutenant Vũ Huy Lượng of the 923rd Fighter Regiment, did not survive.

This victory was more than a tally mark. For Scott, it was a bridge across eras. He’d flown the Northrop P-61 Black Widow in World War II, hunting in the dark skies over India and China. He’d already claimed two victories back then, and now, decades later, he joined the rarest company; becoming only the second U.S. Air Force pilot, after the renowned Colonel Robin Olds, to score kills in both World War II and Vietnam.

Scott’s own story began in Des Moines, Iowa, in 1920, the son of a railroad worker. He found his wings early, trading college for the cockpit when he enlisted as an Aviation Cadet just before America entered World War II. By the war’s end, he’d earned both the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal, his courage proven in combat.

After WWII, Scott returned home, finished his degree, and didn’t stop learning, earning two master’s degrees before returning to the sky. In 1952, he graduated from the Air Force’s test pilot school at Edwards, flying the cutting-edge North American F-86D.

But combat was never far, and Scott would eventually fly 305 missions across three wars—a career marked by valor, with four Silver Stars, three Legions of Merit, six Distinguished Flying Crosses, and sixteen Air Medals. He passed away in California in 2006, his legacy resting among heroes at Arlington.

Even the machines that carried these men found their fate in the crucible of war. Scott’s F-105D, serial number 59-1772, would claim one more victory; a month after Scott’s triumph, Major Harry E. Higgins downed another MiG-17 with its cannon. But by 1970, the Thunderchief itself was lost to anti-aircraft fire over Laos; the pilot, a testament to the skill and luck that defines aviators, was rescued.

Some stories in aviation are written in contrails and thunder, in moments where history and heroism meet. Colonel Scott’s was one of them, a reminder that every sortie has the potential to become legend.

What Made the Thud stand out?

Back in 1951, Republic Aviation set out to craft a supersonic tactical fighter-bomber that would outpace the aging F-84F. Their answer was the F-105 Thunderchief—known to those who flew her as the “Thud.”

The first prototype, the YF-105A, took to the skies in October 1955, but it wasn’t until June 1959 that the F-105D made its debut. Over the years, 833 Thunderchiefs would roll off the line, with 610 of them built as the D-model, each bearing the ambition of Republic’s engineers and the hopes of every young pilot who strapped in.

When the Gulf of Tonkin incident thrust Southeast Asia into the world’s spotlight in 1964, the Air Force called upon the F-105 for its speed and muscle. The Thud played a starring role in Operation Rolling Thunder, delivering more than 12,000 pounds of conventional bombs per mission; a payload that even eclipsed the legendary B-17 of World War II.

Though born for nuclear strike, the Thunderchief proved itself a brawler in the jungles and skies of Vietnam, flying hard and hitting harder. Eventually, the F-4 Phantom took over the Thunderchief’s mantle, and by July 1980, the last F-105D had flown its final Air Force sortie.

One of these storied birds now sits on display, painted as she looked with the 357th Tactical Fighter Squadron at Takhli Royal Thai Air Base. Her name, Memphis Belle II, pays homage to the iconic B-17F and those two red stars beneath the cockpit?

They mark the MiGs she brought down in combat over Southeast Asia, a quiet testament to her legacy before she landed for good at the museum in April 1990.

TECHNICAL NOTES:
Armament: One M61 Vulcan 20mm cannon and more than 12,000 lbs. of ordnance
Engine: One Pratt & Whitney J75-P-19W of 24,500 lbs thrust
Maximum speed: 1,390 mph
Cruising speed: 778 mph
Range: 2,206 miles
Ceiling: 51,000 ft.
Span: 34 ft. 11 in.
Length: 64 ft. 5 in.
Height: 19 ft. 8 in.
Weight: 52,838 lbs. maximum

The Thud: A Call Sign That Endures

The F-105 Thunderchief—known to every pilot and crew chief as the “Thud”—earned its legend in the crucible of speed, power, and sacrifice. Born in 1951 to outrun and outgun the aging F-84F, the Thunderchief grew into much more than its designers ever imagined.

It became the workhorse of the early air war over North Vietnam, the Cold War’s answer to an urgent call for reach and muscle. Though conceived as a nuclear strike jet, the Thud carried over 12,000 pounds of bombs—more than the famed B-17s of World War II—and bore the brunt of Rolling Thunder when the conflict in Southeast Asia erupted in 1964.

But the Thud’s real story is written in the nerves of those who flew it. Take March 26, 1967: Colonel Robert Ray Scott, leading a flight of 20 Thunderchiefs from Takhli, carved a piece of history near Hanoi.

Coming off the target, he tangled with a MiG-17, downing it with the F-105’s Vulcan cannon; a weapon never meant for dogfights, but fearsome in the right hands. The Thud would notch 27 MiG kills during the war, most with the Vulcan, a fighter-bomber forced to fight as a warrior in the most contested skies of the era.

Yet every legend bears a cost. Of 833 Thunderchiefs built, a staggering 395 were lost in Vietnam; a somber testament to the danger faced by their crews.

Today, as airpower evolves into new shapes and technologies, the Thud’s story endures: in the end, range, speed, payload, and the courage of those at the controls are still what get a mission in, and hopefully, bring it home.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

I believe I captured a “first” today.

—Jarold Hamilton, Director of Photography CALLSIGN Magazine

Mission Briefing

10 March 2026—high over the rugged stretches of Eastern California, the future of American airpower slipped into view. The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider, still more rumor than routine, was seen tucked in behind a KC-135 Stratotanker, dancing through a five-and-a-half-hour aerial refueling mission.

For those lucky enough to be watching and quick enough with a camera, this was history in the making: the first Raider prototype, ghostly and poised, trailing the specially outfitted tanker from Edwards Air Force Base. Each frame captured by those photographers is more than a photo; it’s a glimpse of tomorrow’s legend, as the next generation of long-range strike quietly proves its mettle against the endless California sky.

Stealth Meets the Boom

Early spring over the Mojave Desert, and the horizon is alive with the drama of flight testing. In a moment that will linger in the memory of aviation enthusiasts, photographers caught the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider refueling from a KC-135. Each frame a glimpse into the future of American airpower.

Among those behind the lens were Jarod Hamilton and Ian Recchio, their images capturing not just the legendary B-21, but the full tapestry of the mission: the ever-present F-16 chase plane, and a rare sight: a modified Douglas NC9D business jet, callsign N879AD, used by Raytheon as a testbed, weaving its own story into the day’s events.

The photos, taken at altitude over the Mojave, reveal striking details. Even with the compression of long lenses, the B-21’s size stands out alongside the tanker, hinting that this stealth bomber may be more imposing than earlier estimates suggested.

The KC-135, serial number #61-0320, wore the special NKC-135 designation—equipped for unique test support, and trackable online throughout the mission. Public data confirmed the refueling took place at FL230, or 23,000 feet, a stage set for over five hours of formation flying and fuel transfer.

This flight is more than a test. It’s a signal of rapid progress. The Air Force and Northrop Grumman are accelerating B-21 production, with Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota preparing to welcome its first Raiders in 2027.

Construction crews are busy at Ellsworth, expanding runways and building the infrastructure that will support a new era of stealth. The work is so extensive, the base’s B-1B Lancers have temporarily relocated to Grand Forks.

Final assembly of the B-21 takes place in Palmdale, California, where its predecessor, the B-2 Spirit, first took shape. Multiple airframes are in production, and the program’s second prototype arrived at Edwards AFB in September 2025; stripped of the distinctive air data probe and trailing cone used on the first.

That orange-tipped probe is visible in the images from Hamilton and Recchio, confirming that the aircraft refueling over the Mojave was indeed the very first prototype, still wearing the tools of a test article.

For those watching the skies, these images are more than snapshots. They are a front-row seat to history in motion. A new stealth legend taking shape, one flight, one test, one refueling at a time.

What is the B-21 Raider?

Step into the future of American airpower, and you’ll find the B-21 Raider waiting at the vanguard. This isn’t just another stealth bomber. It’s a dual-capable, penetrating strike aircraft, designed to slip through the world’s most sophisticated defenses and deliver either conventional or nuclear munitions.

When tomorrow’s threat environment demands the impossible, the Raider will answer, forming the backbone of an Air Force bomber fleet built on the enduring partnership of B-21s and B-52s.

But the B-21 is more than a bomber. It’s the centerpiece of a new family of long-range strike systems, seamlessly integrating intelligence, surveillance, electronic warfare, and advanced communications into its mission set.

Built to adapt, the Raider will accommodate both manned and unmanned operations, and wield a formidable arsenal of stand-off and direct-attack munitions.

At its core, the Raider is engineered for evolution. Its open systems architecture means future upgrades can be integrated with less risk; ensuring this aircraft will keep pace as adversaries adapt and the nature of conflict changes.

Guided by the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office and developed by Northrop Grumman and a team of industry partners, the B-21’s journey began with the award of its engineering and manufacturing contract in October 2015.

Names like Pratt & Whitney, Collins Aerospace, and BAE Systems have all played a part in forging this next-generation bomber.

Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, will be the first to greet the Raider, its runways and training facilities already being prepared for the arrival of the fleet. The name itself is a tribute; an echo of the legendary Doolittle Raiders, who launched a daring strike against Japan in 1942, shifting the course of history and lifting Allied morale.

The B-21 carries that legacy forward as the first bomber of the 21st century, ready to write the next chapter in airpower’s story.

General Characteristics
Primary Function: Nuclear-capable, penetrating strike stealth bomber
Lead Command: Air Force Global Strike Command
Inventory: Minimum of 100 aircraft
Average Unit Procurement Cost (APUC): $550 million (base year 2010 dollars) / $639 million (base year 2019 dollars) / $692 million (base year 2022 dollars)
*APUC is the total costs of all procurement funding to include, aircraft flyaway costs, support equipment, training, spares, and engineering change orders divided by a minimum of 100 aircraft.
*Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates directed B-21 Average Procurement Unit Cost as a key performance parameter as the best means to control costs.
Munitions: Nuclear and conventional
Operational: Mid-2020s

Beyond the Horizon: The B-21’s Refueled Promise

Aerial refueling is what transforms the B-21 from a promising stealth platform into a true strategic game-changer. On March 10, the Raider proved its mettle, taking on fuel from a specially modified KC-135 over California during a marathon five-and-a-half-hour sortie.

But this was more than just a technical milestone. The Air Force and Northrop Grumman are racing to deliver the first operational B-21 to Ellsworth AFB by 2027, signaling that the U.S. isn’t just fielding a new bomber, but is building the support network to let that bomber fly farther, loiter longer, and arrive with a menu of options.

For America, this is a message of credible reach. Each successful refueling brings the next-generation bomber force closer to true operational range.

For allies, it’s reassurance: American long-range strike is still anchored in survivability, robust logistics, and the power to project force across oceans and into the world’s toughest neighborhoods. A proven refueling envelope means missions can launch from safer distances, holding adversaries at risk even when the forward edge is under threat.

With conflict spreading in the Middle East—war with Iran, attacks on shipping, and worries over energy and trade; the symbolism of a refuelable B-21 grows sharper. It doesn’t mean escalation, but it does mean America has credible options, even if bases, ports, or sea lanes are pinched. That’s a signal allies in Europe, the Gulf, and Asia need as instability ripples through oil markets and alliance planning.

The deeper truth is this: the bombers that matter most will be the ones with range, stealth, and endurance woven together. In a world where crises leap borders, the aircraft that can launch from afar, survive, and keep allied reach alive. Those are the tools that shape tomorrow’s battlespace.

This Week in Aviation History

22 March 1979—a date when the cold expanse above the ocean welcomed a new sentinel. That day, the Lockheed CP-140 Aurora soared into the sky for the first time, charting a course that would define decades of maritime patrol excellence.

Born from the proven bones of the P-3 Orion yet outfitted with cutting-edge electronics, the Aurora quickly earned its reputation as a watchful guardian. With a reach of 5,000 nautical miles and a belly ready for a broad arsenal, this aircraft became the long-range eyes and striking arm of maritime operations, patrolling distant waters with quiet confidence and relentless purpose.

Aurora’s Maiden Flight

The CP-140 Aurora stands as a mainstay of the Royal Canadian Air Force’s maritime patrol fleet, a close cousin to the famed Lockheed P-3 Orion that has long served American squadrons.

Though their frames are nearly twins, the Aurora’s soul is different. Its nerves and senses drawn from the S-3 Viking, an aircraft whose advanced electronics suite gave it an edge in the hunt, long after the Viking’s own retirement from U.S. Navy and NASA service.

Beneath its wings and inside its belly, the Aurora carries more than just promise. Its internal weapons bay can host up to eight weapons, maxing out at a hefty 4,800 pounds, while ten wing-mounted hardpoints add another 2,450 pounds of punch.

The Aurora is as comfortable dropping Mk 46 Mod V torpedoes as it is unleashing conventional bombs, and with a minor tweak, it can even fire air-to-surface rockets. Add in flares, smoke markers, and signal chargers, and you’ve got an aircraft ready for any twist the mission throws its way.

Born for the Cold War, the Aurora was Canada’s answer to prowling Soviet submarines; an eye in the sky with teeth to match. Decades later, even as sleeker, jet-powered patrol planes join the world’s fleets, the Aurora keeps flying, loyal and effective.

When its watch finally ends, the CP-140 will be remembered for dogged reliability and the quiet confidence it brought to every patrol over restless seas.

Under the Hood of the Aurora

Step onto the flight line at Greenwood or Comox and you’ll meet a machine built for long-haul vigilance: the CP-140 Aurora. Crewed by two pilots, a flight engineer, and a team of up to ten mission specialists, the Aurora is purpose-built for the demands of extended patrol.

Its long fuselage stretches 116 feet, nearly 100 feet of wingspan reaching out to the horizon, every angle and twist of its NACA airfoils tuned for stability and endurance. This bird’s no lightweight: empty, she tips the scales at over 61,000 pounds, and when fully loaded for a mission, she can reach a mighty 142,000 pounds.

Power comes from four Allison T56-A-14 turboprops, each churning out over 4,500 horsepower and spinning broad, four-bladed Hamilton-Standard propellers.

These engines, a symphony of compressors and turbines, keep the Aurora flying at up to 395 knots, with a ceiling above 35,000 feet. With 9,200 gallons of fuel in her tanks, the Aurora can stretch her legs across 5,100 nautical miles; enough range to cross continents or patrol the remotest seas. Stationed 1,000 nautical miles from base, she can keep watch for more than eight hours at a time, a tireless sentinel above the waves.

Beneath that long fuselage, the Aurora carries eight Mark 46 Mod V torpedoes in her weapons bay, with ten underwing hardpoints for extra punch. Sonobuoys spill from her belly, hunting for hidden submarines, while the MAD boom on her tail sniffs out magnetic signatures lurking below.

Decades of upgrades, from the AIMP modernization to the ASLEP structural overhaul, have kept the Aurora sharp and ready, with service assured into the next decade.

From her first flight to her enduring watch, the Aurora remains a testament to Canadian ingenuity and aerial endurance; a cold warrior turned timeless guardian.

Aurora’s Legacy

The legacy of the CP-140 Aurora isn’t just measured in flight hours or decades of service. It’s the story of an aircraft that became the backbone of Canada’s airborne watch. First taking wing in 1979, the Aurora arrived as a Cold War sentinel, tasked with guarding the vast maritime approaches and asserting Canadian sovereignty from the Arctic to the Pacific.

But the Aurora’s true mark came from its ability to evolve. No longer just a sub hunter, it grew into Canada’s primary airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform, supporting missions at sea, along the coasts, and deep inland—both at home and far abroad.

Through incremental modernization and structural renewal, the Aurora gained cutting-edge sensors, communications, and avionics, extending its relevance well into the 21st century.

This transformation allowed the Aurora to step far beyond its original brief, flying ISR missions over the Middle East and supporting international coalitions, while still keeping a vigilant eye on Canada’s own frontiers. In the end, the Aurora’s legacy is one of resilience and adaptation—a Cold War patrol aircraft reborn as a modern sentinel, bridging eras and missions with quiet confidence and enduring Canadian resolve.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“At 3:38 pm, on Friday February 27, the United States Central Command, through the Secretary of War, received the final go order from President Trump.”

—Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Mission Briefing

Confirmation didn’t come with fanfare. Just a ripple among those who know what to look for. Enthusiasts, eyes on the quiet dance of flight paths and transponder blips, were the first to sense the extraordinary: USAF B-1B Lancer bombers, lifting off from the plains of South Dakota, had been called into the fray, bound for Iranian military targets.

In a moment thick with history, General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, addressed the nation. Operation Epic Fury, he revealed, was underway. The B-1B Lancers—swept-wing titans of American airpower—had struck deep into territory holding Iranian ballistic missile sites and command centers, their thunder unmistakable even to those far from the fight.

B1B Lancers Direct from Ellsworth AFB

The mission itself unfolded like a scene from a new chapter in aviation’s great drama. Just a day after B-2 Spirit bombers had carved silent paths through the night, the B-1s departed Ellsworth Air Force Base. Their route carried them from the heartland, across the Atlantic’s vast expanse, and through the Mediterranean’s storied skies. Overhead, aerial tankers kept the Lancers fueled and ready, a lifeline stretched taut across continents, ensuring these bombers could reach their distant objective and return to tell the tale.

As enthusiasts tracked the telltale signatures of B-1B bombers along the U.S. East Coast, word arrived from across the Atlantic: the United Kingdom would now open its bases—RAF Fairford and Diego Garcia included—to U.S. missions of a certain character. This subtle shift set the aviation world abuzz with speculation. Would the Lancers pause at Fairford, or strike Iran before pressing onward to the distant outpost in the Indian Ocean?

In the end, the B-1s mirrored their B-2 Spirit counterparts, tracing a round-trip arc from Ellsworth and back, their mission precise and fleeting. Yet, the newfound access to Fairford and Diego Garcia promises greater flexibility for planners charting future sorties: an ever-widening canvas for American airpower.

For all its swept-wing grace and reduced radar signature, the B-1B is no ghost; it lacks the true stealth of the B-2. The specifics of the Lancers’ payload on this mission remain cloaked, but with a quiver full of long-range stand-off weapons, the B-1 can strike from afar, keeping clear of the enemy’s most dangerous reach. The B-2, by contrast, carried 2,000-pound guided bombs, necessitating a closer approach to hardened targets.

The skies over Iran have grown hazardous for defenders. U.S. and Israeli aircraft, wielding both kinetic and electronic force, have steadily eroded Iranian air defenses. Even medium-altitude drones like the Hermes 900 now prowl deep into Iranian territory, though as ever, risk is part of the mission: one such drone was ultimately brought down by a well-placed missile.

What Makes These Lancers Stand Out?

Take a moment to look upon the B-1B Lancer; not just as a machine, but as a symphony of engineering designed to thrive in the unforgiving theater of modern conflict. Its sleek, blended wing and body, those shifting, variable-geometry wings, and the pulse of its afterburning turbofan engines aren’t just for show.

They deliver a rare combination of range, agility, and raw speed, giving the Lancer the ability to outmaneuver and outpace threats, whatever the altitude or mission profile demands. Watch as its wings sweep forward for gentle landings, air refueling, or high-altitude weapon employment; then snap aft, the Lancer’s main combat stance, to slice through the air at high subsonic or supersonic speeds.

This flexibility, paired with an impressive payload and sharp radar targeting, makes the B-1B an invaluable player in any strike force, seamlessly weaving into mixed formations with the confidence of a seasoned aviator.

Step inside, and you’ll find a cockpit wired for versatility. The B-1B’s synthetic aperture radar peers through weather and darkness, tracking moving vehicles and locking onto targets with surgical precision. Its GPS-aided Inertial Navigation System frees crews from the tether of ground-based aids, enabling pinpoint strikes wherever the mission calls. Add to that a data link—Link-16—feeding real-time information from command centers, and you’ve got a warbird that can pivot on a moment’s notice, striking emerging threats with the speed of thought.

Survivability isn’t left to chance. The B-1B guards itself with a robust array of defenses: electronic jammers, radar warning receivers, chaff and flares, and even a towed decoy. It is an integrated shield that complements its already modest radar signature. The ALQ-161 system stands as a silent sentinel, detecting enemy threats and unleashing tailored jamming responses, sometimes even before the crew senses danger.

The story doesn’t stop there. Today’s B-1Bs are evolving, with upgrades to radar, cockpit systems, and communications ensuring these aircraft remain relevant on the fast-paced battlefields of tomorrow.

As older components are replaced and new capabilities come online, the B-1B continues to embody the spirit of adaptability; ready to write the next chapter whenever it’s called to fly.

B-1B Epic Fury: Long-Range Thunder, Alliance Lift—And the Middle East Network War Ahead

The appearance of the B-1B in Operation Epic Fury is no accident. It’s a clear signal that, when the stakes are high and the timeline tight, Washington turns to what the alliance trusts most: a bomber that marries range, payload, and adaptability in one formidable airframe.

These Lancers, launched from Ellsworth and fueled by an intricate ballet of aerial tankers, crossed continents to strike Iranian missile sites and command centers—no lengthy build-up or forward staging required.

For American strategists, this is about demonstrating reach and tempo, reminding the world that the U.S. can deliver decisive blows to time-sensitive targets—like missile batteries and command nodes—without waiting for the slow machinery of deployment to grind into gear. The B-1B’s relevance endures because it carries the Air Force’s heaviest conventional load and fits seamlessly into joint strike formations, always ready to be retasked as the situation evolves.

For the broader alliance, the story is bigger than the bomber. It’s about the invisible scaffolding: permissions, partnerships, and infrastructure. With the UK opening bases like RAF Fairford and Diego Garcia, the alliance turns theoretical range into operational pressure.

Yet, as each sortie launches amid escalating Middle East tensions, the challenge grows. Not just in striking targets, but in defending the vital networks of bases, tankers, and radars that make these missions possible.

The next chapter won’t be written by bombers alone, but by how alliances reinforce the web of support that makes airpower credible under fire.

This Week in Aviation History

Operation STRANGLE officially took flight on 19 March 1944; a date that marked the beginning of a relentless Allied effort to suffocate German supply lines in Italy. For nearly two months, aircrews flew mission after mission, weaving a tightening net across critical roads and railways, determined to cut off the enemy’s lifeline.

The curtain on STRANGLE officially fell on May 11, the day Allied forces surged forward with a ground offensive of massive scale against the German lines. Yet, the air campaign didn’t simply stop. It evolved. As troops pressed on, the mission continued under a new banner: Operation DIADEM, named for the ground offensive itself. In the end, STRANGLE was more than a campaign; it was the crucial overture to a broader symphony of Allied power, setting the tempo for the battles that would follow.

The Airman’s First Act in the Italian Campaign

Operation STRANGLE stands as one of the most instructive chapters in the tale of airpower. It is a case study in both its promise and its limits during the Italian Campaign.

The Allies, buoyed by earlier air successes and eager to break a grinding stalemate on the ground, hatched a plan as bold as it was straightforward: sever the German lifeline by bombing roads and rails into submission. The vision was simple—choke the enemy’s supplies, and the German war machine would shrink, forced to yield or retreat.

Yet, as any seasoned aviator will tell you, the sky is never as simple as the briefing room. STRANGLE’s challenge was never in the will or the sorties flown, but in the assumptions guiding them. Allied planners believed relentless bombing could cripple German logistics.

But the Luftwaffe-era dream of starving the enemy out ran headlong into a reality of German resilience. Locomotives rolled off factories with surprising speed, and rolling stock filled Europe’s rail yards. Even more critically, the Germans required far less supply than Allied intelligence estimated.

Where planners expected the enemy to need 4,500 tons per day, the real number—thanks to static defensive lines—was closer to a third of that. The brutal math meant that starving the German army was a taller task than anyone realized.

Still, STRANGLE wasn’t wasted effort. In its first week, Allied bombers slashed rail capacity from 80,000 to just 4,000 tons per day. But the shock didn’t cause an immediate collapse.

Instead, it denied the Germans the chance to stockpile fuel and ammunition for the looming Allied spring offensive—Operation DIADEM. STRANGLE’s true impact was less about triggering surrender and more about quietly undermining readiness, making it harder for German forces to mount a powerful defense when DIADEM began.

The pressure STRANGLE exerted changed German behavior. By early April, under relentless Allied air attacks, German supply convoys became nocturnal, moving only after dark, losing the efficiency of daytime round trips and the predictability vital to military logistics.

Kesselring’s staff would later admit that Allied airpower made it impossible to accurately calculate travel times. It is an invisible but decisive erosion of German command and control.

STRANGLE’s last and perhaps greatest lesson was jointness. Without coordinated pressure from Allied ground forces, airpower alone could not force a decisive break. General Ira Eaker lamented that the air campaign needed the Army to push harder, faster—to make the Germans burn through reserves and feel the full sting of interdiction.

As Air Marshal Slessor would later conclude, air strikes alone might not make the Germans withdraw, but they could make it impossible for them to resist a determined ground assault. In the end, STRANGLE set the table for DIADEM, showing that air and ground, working in concert, turn disrupted supply into battlefield victory.

The Marauder and Operation STRANGLE

Spring 1944: the Italian peninsula is a crossroads of war, and the Martin B-26 Marauder is a familiar silhouette in the cloud-dappled sky. In Operation STRANGLE, the B-26 wasn’t chasing glory with headline-grabbing city raids.

It was flying the daily, determined grind to choke off the German army’s lifeline to the Gustav Line. This wasn’t about dropping bombs on city centers; it was about precision, about smashing bridges, marshalling yards, and rail chokepoints over and over until the enemy’s timetable was in tatters.

The Marauder’s logbook from those months is a testament to relentless purpose. Day after day, Twelfth Air Force B-26 crews were tasked with striking railway bridges near Sarzana and Viareggio, hammering tracks, and coordinating with other Allied bombers to hit critical marshalling yards. STRANGLE’s mission for the Marauder was clear: keep the arteries of enemy supply constricted, force German forces to push their supplies onto roads—routes slower, riskier, and easier for fighter-bombers to target.

Official records from this period read like a litany of bridge-breaking sorties: formations of B-26s pounding the Ligurian coastline, targeting the northern approaches to Rome, and, as noted in April 1944, repeatedly assaulting rail bridges near La Spezia. These weren’t one-and-done missions. The Marauder’s value lay in persistence, coming back again and again, “re-breaking” repaired bridges, turning every patch job into another setback for German logistics.

Operationally, the B-26 Marauder was the right tool for the job: able to deliver daylight, medium-altitude bombing with accuracy and enough punch to keep the German supply web frayed. It was not glamorous work.

The Marauder didn’t chase tanks or strafe the front lines. But as the campaign wore on, it was the unglamorous, persistent hammering of rail lines that turned Germany’s streamlined supply system into a nightly test of endurance.

Every train forced into detours, every convoy made slower and more vulnerable under the watchful eyes of Allied airmen. In Operation STRANGLE, the Marauder flew not for spectacle but for victory—one bridge, one yard, one timetable at a time.

TECHNICAL NOTES:
Armament: 11.50-cal. machine guns; 4,000 lbs. of bombs
Engines: Two Pratt & Whitney R-2800s of 2,000 hp each
Maximum speed: 285 mph
Cruising speed: 190 mph
Range: 1,100 miles
Ceiling: 19,800 ft.
Span: 71 ft.
Length: 58 ft. 6 in.
Height: 20 ft. 3 in.
Weight: 37,000 lbs. loaded
Serial number: 43-34581

Operation STRANGLE: A Call Sign That Endures

Operation Strangle’s legacy is a lesson carved in the skies over Italy. It is a proof that air interdiction can be decisive, if you set your sights on the right objective. The campaign didn’t yield its most anticipated prize: a hasty German retreat from the Gustav Line. That shortfall forced the airpower thinkers of the postwar era to abandon the alluring myth that bombing railways alone could “starve” an army out of its defenses.

Instead, Strangle’s real victory came in a subtler, more powerful form. By relentlessly battering bridges, rail yards, and chokepoints, Allied aircrews denied the Germans the ability to restock their fuel and ammunition, or to build up the reserves needed to blunt the coming Allied spring offensive. The result was not a dramatic collapse, but a slow, relentless erosion of German readiness. RAND’s later study echoed this truth: even when withdrawal didn’t come, interdiction was still delivered by forcing the enemy’s hand in ways the planners hadn’t fully anticipated.

Strangle also left a doctrine lesson that endures: under Allied air superiority, German movements grew unpredictable, convoys forced into the night, logistics thrown into disarray. Interdiction could paralyze an army’s sense of time and space, but it delivered its most lethal blows when ground offensives drove up consumption and forced movement.

The enduring message for modern air campaigns is clear. Airpower wins quickest when it attacks the enemy’s system and times its disruption to a joint offensive, turning chaos into collapse.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

The ES-3A Shadow provides indications and warnings for the Battle Group commander, and is normally assigned to AQ, the Command and Control Warfare commander, for tasking and mission assignment.

—Federation of American Scientists

Red lights wash the ready room, and the map is already crowded with arrows, emitter rings, and thin grea…

Read more

I am deeply proud of the professionalism and bravery of our Armed Forces personnel who have in recent days, successfully taken action across the region to protect our allies and defend British interests.

—Defence Secretary John Healey MP

Mission Briefing

The UK Ministry of Defence has revealed that its F-35B Lightning stealth fighters intercepted and took down hostile drones over Jordan, moving swiftly to safeguard the skies. In response, new defensive measures are now being put in place to further protect RAF Akrotiri, underscoring the commitment to keeping allied airspace secure.

New Defences are Deployed for RAF Akrotiri

Amid mounting speculation and rising regional tensions, Prime Minister Keir Starmer took to social media just after 1600 UTC on 3 March 2026, to confirm what many in the British press had guessed: the Royal Navy is dispatching HMS Dragon, a Type 45 air defense destroyer, along with Wildcat helicopters equipped for counter-drone warfare, to shield Cyprus from further aerial threats.

The Ministry of Defence swiftly followed with an official statement, revealing that RAF F-35B Lightnings operating from Akrotiri had already intercepted and destroyed drones over Jordan—part of a larger effort since six F-35Bs were sent to the base last month.

Defence Secretary John Healey underscored the urgency: “We are moving quickly to further reinforce our defensive presence in the Eastern Mediterranean. HMS Dragon brings world-class air defence capability, and our Wildcat helicopters are armed with Martlet missiles to counter the growing drone threat.

I am deeply proud of the professionalism and bravery of our Armed Forces personnel who have in recent days, successfully taken action across the region to protect our allies and defend British interests.”

These F-35B engagements join a series of recent actions, including a Royal Air Force Typhoon from the UK-Qatar 12 Squadron downing an Iranian drone headed for Qatar, and a UK counter-drone unit in Iraq neutralizing threats to coalition airbases.

On 01 March, RAF Akrotiri itself was hit by a one-way drone—likely launched by Iran or a regional proxy—causing only minor damage, with several other drones stopped before reaching the base.

Despite criticism aimed at the government for not preventing the attack, it’s worth noting that even the most fortified sites in the region have struggled to intercept every threat. In response, the UK has bolstered Akrotiri with additional air defense radars and counter-UAS systems, though the full extent of these reinforcements remains undisclosed.

The Wildcat HMA2 helicopters, proven in previous carrier strike group operations, are set to join HMS Dragon. Possibly embarking as the destroyer sails past RNAS Yeovilton, or arriving sooner via strategic airlift.

The stage is set for a robust British defense posture, as the UK moves decisively to protect its interests and allies across the Eastern Mediterranean.

The Features of the HMS Dragon and the RAF’s F-35B Lightning

HMS Dragon, with the bold red Welsh dragon gracing her bow, cuts a distinctive figure among the world’s warships. It is a symbol of modern British naval power. She’s one of six Daring-class, Type 45 air defence destroyers, engineered for the threats of today and tomorrow.

While her name conjures images of raw destruction, HMS Dragon is as adaptable as she is fearsome: her missions range from intercepting pirates and defending against missile attacks to delivering vital humanitarian aid, all under the command of a 200-strong crew based out of Portsmouth.

The centerpiece of Dragon’s arsenal is the Sea Viper missile system: a technological predator capable of tracking, targeting, and destroying everything from drones to cruise missiles and fighter jets.

In just ten seconds, eight missiles can leap from her decks, and up to sixteen can be guided at once, striking targets over seventy miles away. Her radar, scanning out to 250 miles, tracks hundreds of threats at once, giving Dragon a watchful eye over sea and sky alike.

But she’s more than missiles. Dragon bristles with close-in weapons: Phalanx 20mm cannons for last-ditch defense, a 4.5-inch naval gun, 30mm auto-cannons, miniguns, and a battery of machine guns.

Her flight deck and hangar are ready to launch a Merlin helicopter: an all-weather hunter for maritime patrol, rescue, or offensive missions at a moment’s notice.

Overhead, the F-35B Lightning takes British airpower into the future. With stealth, advanced sensors, and mission systems, this short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing jet can fight air-to-air, strike ground targets, conduct electronic warfare, and share a live picture of the battle with other forces.

Whether launching from carriers or remote airstrips, Lightning brings the unseen edge to every fight; making the team of ship and aircraft a formidable force on today’s unpredictable front lines.

How Akrotiri Became the New Frontline of Allied Airpower

The UK’s swift move to confirm that RAF F-35B Lightnings shot down drones over Jordan—followed by deploying the formidable HMS Dragon and Wildcat helicopters with Martlet missiles to bolster RAF Akrotiri—signals a sea change in allied airpower: the defense of the base itself has returned to the front line.

No longer just a rear-area sanctuary, Akrotiri now stands as a vital node in the coalition’s Eastern Mediterranean network, a linchpin for U.S. and allied operations, refueling, intelligence gathering, and rapid strike response as regional tensions rise.

For the United States, this is burden-sharing brought to life. The UK’s reinforcement of Akrotiri helps shield not just the base, but the entire connective tissue of coalition airpower that holds deterrence together.

It’s a reminder that fifth-generation fighters aren’t just for stealthy strike missions. They’re now essential players in the counter-drone fight, their sensors, engagement discipline, and quick reaction ability strengthening the allied kill chain whenever drone threats surge.

Across the alliance, the lesson is clear: even the cheapest one-way drones can have outsized impact, disrupting operations and threatening runways unless partners layer their defenses; combining fighters in the air, ships like HMS Dragon with Sea Viper missiles at sea, helicopters, ground-based counter-UAS systems, and shared early warning.

Akrotiri’s defense is more than a local skirmish. It’s a rehearsal for a future where the alliance must ask itself a hard question: how many vital bases can truly be kept open when the skies are thick with drones and missiles?

This Week in Aviation History

17 March 1947—a date that marked a turning point in the skies. That morning, the North American B-45 Tornado thundered aloft on its maiden flight, ushering in a new era for American airpower.

As the nation’s first operational jet bomber, the B-45 didn’t just break speed records. It broke new ground in how wars would be fought, carrying the torch for both bombing runs and high-stakes reconnaissance at the dawn of the Cold War. Its silhouette on the tarmac was more than metal and engines; it was a signal that the jet age had truly arrived.

The First Flight of the North American B-45 Tornado

As the final chapters of World War II unfolded, a new threat appeared on the horizon: Nazi Germany’s Arado 234 jet bomber. This sleek machine could outrun and outclimb any Allied fighter, signaling a leap in technology that sent shockwaves through American command.

The Luftwaffe’s Me 262 fighter had already proven itself a world-beater, and now the Arado 234 was rewriting the rules for bombing and reconnaissance. Britain answered with the Gloster Meteor, darting after V-1 flying bombs, while the U.S. fielded the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star; too late for the European front, but destined for the skies over Korea.

Against this backdrop, the B-45 Tornado was born. From drawing board to runway, three years ticked by, and by the time the Tornado took flight, the world was already peering ahead to even faster bombers like the B-47 Stratojet and B-58 Hustler. Still, the B-45 earned its stripes.

In the Korean War, it flew both bombing and reconnaissance missions, slipping out mostly at night to avoid the lethal MiG-15s prowling the daylight skies. Later, the Tornado was upgraded to carry nuclear weapons, cementing its significance as the Cold War deepened.

Though retired in 1959 and soon eclipsed by faster, more advanced aircraft, the B-45 Tornado’s service was a bridge between eras—a jet that captured the urgency and innovation of its time, and proved that the race for the skies never truly ends.

The Anatomy of the B-45

With a top speed of 570 miles per hour and the ability to haul a 22,000-pound bomb load, the B-45 Tornado was a leap ahead. It is almost twice as fast as the B-29 Superfortress and able to carry a similar payload.

While the massive Convair B-36 “Peacemaker” could lift nearly 100,000 pounds, the B-45 traded brute strength for pure speed, and that made all the difference in the dawning jet age.

Armed with twin .50 caliber tail guns and crewed by four—a pilot, co-pilot, navigator/bombardier, and tail gunner—the Tornado was also the first jet bomber capable of aerial refueling, giving it a combat radius of 1,000 miles and the stamina to strike deep or slip away when it counted.

Stationed in Europe, the B-45 was ready for the unthinkable. It can deliver a nuclear payload right in the heart of the Cold War, standing as a silent deterrent against Soviet aggression.

Its silhouette, with straight wings and twin engine pods hanging from each side, looked dated even when new, but it soared above piston-engine fighters at altitudes up to 46,000 feet.

Only 143 were built, flown exclusively by the USAF and Britain’s RAF. And for a brief moment, the B-45 even found fame in Hollywood, appearing in films like War of the Worlds and Strategic Air Command; proof, perhaps, that legends can be both quiet and enduring.

TECHNICAL NOTES:
Armament: Two .50-cal. machine guns in the tail and 22,000 lbs. of bombs
Engines: Four General Electric J47s of 6,000 lbs. thrust each
Maximum speed: 570 mph
Range: 1,000 miles
Ceiling: 37,550 ft.
Span: 89 ft.
Length: 75 ft. 4 in.
Height: 25 ft. 2 in.
Weight: 110,000 lbs. maximum

The Tornado’s Enduring Flightpath

The true legacy of the B-45 Tornado is that it took jet bombers from blueprint to battle-ready, marking the moment when America’s airpower leapt from late-WWII dreams to Cold War realities.

The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force lists its many firsts: the first U.S. production four-engine jet bomber, the first jet to carry an atomic bomb, and—thanks to its RB-45 variant—the first multi-jet reconnaissance aircraft to refuel midair. These achievements didn’t just fill museum plaques; they shaped what strategic airpower would mean for the 1950s and beyond.

Combat quickly shaped the Tornado’s story. In Korea and the Far East, RB-45s proved the promise and peril of jet reconnaissance: fast and bold, but not invincible as enemy fighters and air defenses evolved. Pilots had to adapt, switching up tactics and timing, learning on the fly what it meant to survive in the new jet age.

That’s the enduring lesson of the B-45: real innovation isn’t finished at the rollout ceremony. The Tornado’s value came from how it grew under pressure: pioneering airframes, refueling in the sky, and a new way of thinking about basing and reconnaissance.

From the B-45’s first jet-powered leap to today’s stealth fighters, one truth remains: airpower endures only by evolving faster than the threats it faces.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“We are following the same detailed approach used in every other aircraft developmental test program to validate structural performance, flight characteristics and safe separation.”

—Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Ken Wilsbach

Mission Briefing

On 23 February 2026, the U.S. Air Force unveiled a striking image: Anduril’s YFQ-44A Fury, the latest fighter drone, soaring with an AIM-120 AMRAAM missile strapped beneath its wing. This wasn’t just a photo op. The Fury had just completed its first captive carry tests, proving it could shoulder the Air Force’s premier air-to-air missile. With this milestone, the Air Force officially launched the weapons integration phase for its next generation of collaborative combat aircraft.

The Fighter Drone that Carries an AMRAAM

The story of the YFQ-44A Fury reached a new milestone on 23 February 2026, when the Air Force pulled back the curtain and shared the first image of this sleek Anduril-built “fighter drone” carrying an AIM-120 AMRAAM missile.

This wasn’t just a photo op. It marked the Fury’s debut in captive carry evaluations, a crucial step in the weapons integration phase of the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program.

In the California sun—most likely at Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, where the Fury first took flight a few months earlier—engineers and test pilots put the airframe through its paces with inert, non-explosive missiles slung beneath its wings.

These tests aren’t about spectacle; they’re about precision and safety. By using inert AMRAAMs, the team can measure aerodynamic performance, structural integrity, and safe separation in a controlled environment, ensuring that the Fury can handle the stresses of live weapons down the line. Every angle, every vibration, every load is meticulously analyzed, confirming that the drone and missile are a match made for the battlespace of tomorrow.

“We are following the same detailed approach used in every other aircraft developmental test program,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Ken Wilsbach. This means validating every aspect of performance, just as would be done for a new manned fighter. Safety comes first, and before the Fury or any CCA platform is cleared to carry live weapons, it must prove itself again and again on the test range.

At its heart, the CCA program is about more than hardware. It’s about a new era in human-machine teaming. These drones are being built to fly alongside piloted fighters as loyal wingmen, extending the reach, survivability, and punch of America’s airpower.

The vision is a force-multiplying network of autonomous systems that can sense, strike, and shield. All while keeping human pilots out of the most dangerous airspace. And no matter how smart the drone, a human operator still holds the final say over weapons release, ensuring command and accountability are never compromised.

While the Fury takes center stage in this phase of testing, the other CCA contender—the General Atomics YFQ-42A Dark Merlin—has yet to be pictured carrying a missile.

But the message is clear: the future of air combat is taking shape, one careful, calculated test flight at a time.

The Anatomy of the Fury Fighter

The YFQ-44A isn’t just another drone with a pilot hiding behind a screen. This is a leap into the new era of true autonomy in the skies. From its maiden taxi to every flight since, the Fury has operated semi-autonomously, not by remote control, but by executing its missions on its own terms.

There’s no stick and throttle, no hidden hand guiding its every move. Instead, Anduril’s innovation lets the aircraft follow a mission plan, adjust its own controls and throttle, and return to base with a single command; all while an operator oversees, ever vigilant but never directly flying the machine.

But this fighter drone wasn’t built to fly; it was engineered to win. The Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program isn’t about building remote-controlled aircraft. It’s about creating teammates for the high-end fight.

YFQ-44A’s onboard systems process vast amounts of data at combat speed, identifying targets, commanding weapon effects, and amplifying the lethality and survivability of every formation it joins.

On the ground, its software backbone handles maintenance and vehicle health, ensuring the Fury is always ready for action.

What makes the YFQ-44A revolutionary isn’t just its hardware, but its brain—the autonomy that turns it into a force multiplier. By weaving autonomy into every test and mission from day one, Anduril is tackling airpower’s toughest challenges head-on, learning faster and pushing the technology further.

In this new age, autonomy is the key to delivering affordable, scalable airpower and keeping the peace—making the YFQ-44A not just a machine, but a harbinger of the future’s air dominance.

How Fury Expands Allied Airpower

Seeing the YFQ-44A Fury carry an inert AIM-120 isn’t just a milestone—it’s the moment concept becomes reality in the journey from sketches to operational hardware.

This test isn’t combat, but it’s critical: the Air Force is proving that an uncrewed fighter can shoulder air-to-air missiles, manage the physical demands of external stores, and edge closer to real-world deployment. For allies and partners, it’s a clear signal—America is committed to building a distributed, risk-tolerant air force, moving beyond reliance on a shrinking fleet of costly, crewed jets.

Strategically, the message runs deeper. Collaborative Combat Aircraft are designed to fly in formation with manned fighters, expand missile capacity, and take on the most dangerous missions; so pilots don’t have to.

If this vision is realized, allied air forces will gain new strength from human-machine teams, modular upgrades, and affordable mass, multiplying combat power without breaking the bank on every new threat. Just as vital, the Air Force assures that humans remain in control of weapons release, grounding this bold future in familiar command and legal guardrails.

In the end, this isn’t just about a photograph. It’s a glimpse into the future of allied airpower, where speed in fielding trusted autonomous wingmen could tip the balance in tomorrow’s skies.

This Week in Aviation History

The aircraft that would become the legendary AD (A-1) Skyraider took to the skies for the first time on 11 March 1945. It quickly proved its worth in the Korean War, famously striking the Hwaechon Dam and excelling in both strike and close-air-support roles. Known as the AD for “Attack Douglas” until it was redesignated the A-1 in 1962, the Skyraider picked up the affectionate nickname “Able Dog.” Many aircrews also called it the “SPAD,” a nod to the rugged World War I fighter and a fitting tribute to its own reputation for toughness and reliability.

The Proud American Skyraider

The birth of the Skyraider is the stuff of aviation legend. It is a tale that began not in a factory, but in a Washington hotel room in July 1944. There, Douglas Company’s chief engineer Ed Heineman, chief designer Leo Devlin, and chief aerodynamicist Gene Root sketched out a design bold enough to catch the eye of Navy Bureau of Aeronautics officials.

So impressed were the Navy brass that they awarded Douglas a contract on the spot, with one caveat: Douglas had to deliver its prototypes on the same timeline as competitors who’d had a six-month head start.

Rising to the challenge, the Douglas team rolled out the first XBT2D-1 almost four months ahead of schedule. On March 1945, that prototype took its maiden flight, and by April 7th, it was turning heads at the Navy Proving Ground in Patuxent River, Maryland. Test pilots praised the aircraft as superior to any dive-bomber yet evaluated.

Within weeks, on May 5, the Navy gave the green light for full production. Due to a reorganization in naval aircraft designations, the new attack plane became the AD-1—soon to be known as the Skyraider.

Over the next twelve years, Douglas produced 3,180 Skyraiders in eight major models and no fewer than 37 different variants. The Skyraider’s versatility was unmatched: it served as a dive-bomber, electronic warfare platform, early warning radar system, target-towing tug, search and rescue lifeline, and even a nuclear delivery vehicle.

Though born into Navy service, the Skyraider’s reach extended across the globe, flying with the Marine Corps, Air Force, Vietnamese and French air arms, the British Royal Navy, and even the air forces of Cambodia, Chad, and the Central African Republic.

The end of World War II brought a pause in production, but the Skyraider’s story was just beginning. As new models and more powerful R-3350 engines emerged, the aircraft’s performance only improved.

By 1950, the AD-4 was rolling out of the factory; the most numerous of all Skyraider variants. One record-setting AD-4B from NAS Dallas lifted 14,941 pounds, besting even its own empty weight.

Skyraiders proved indispensable during the Korean War, flying close air support for Marines and cutting off North Korean resupply lines. Their ability to haul heavy ordnance, deliver pinpoint dive-bombing, and survive punishment in the skies made them legends among combat crews.

Pilots called the Skyraider “the best and most effective close-support aircraft in the world.” The AD-5, with its wide fuselage, side-by-side seating, and ample room for additional crew, became the most versatile variant of all; capable of handling missions from early warning to electronic warfare, and etching the Skyraider’s place in aviation history as a true “jack-of-all-trades.”

The Tough and Ever-Reliable “Spad”

The Navy set out to create a single aircraft capable of both dive-bombing and torpedo runs. It is a workhorse to replace specialized World War II attack planes.

What Douglas delivered was no beauty queen: the Skyraider’s barrel-shaped fuselage and blunt lines looked more brute than ballerina. But what it lacked in elegance, it made up for in muscle, able to haul a staggering 8,000 pounds of ordnance; outclassing even the legendary B-17 Flying Fortress.

When the Skyraider first took flight, it offered pilots an unforgettable experience. “My first impression was that I was in for the ride of my life,” one aviator recalled, surrounded by the thunder and vibration of the mighty 3350 radial engine. “That first flight... was something to behold.”

Dubbed the “Able Dog” or “Spad,” the Skyraider earned its stripes over Korea, where it became a legend among attack pilots and ground troops alike. It hit everything from fortified bridges and power plants to the Hwachon Dam—famously using aerial torpedoes. The Skyraider’s versatility saw it modified for electronic countermeasures, night attacks, and more, adapting to every challenge Korea threw its way.

Even as jets began crowding carrier decks, the Skyraider remained a fixture. Some pilots trained for “Sandblower” nuclear missions; long, low-level flights that tested both machine and man, earning the nickname “Butt Busters.”

The A-4 Skyhawk eventually took over as the Navy’s primary attack aircraft, but Skyraiders still thundered off decks during Vietnam, flying the first retaliatory strikes after the Tonkin Gulf incident and braving ever-deadlier antiaircraft fire until 1968, when those risks finally grounded most attack variants.

Below is a quick rundown of the ever-reliable Spad.

TECHNICAL NOTES
Armament: Four 20 mm cannons and up to 10,000 lbs. of assorted bombs,
rockets, cluster munitions, gun pods, and flares
Engine: Wright R-3350-26WD Duplex-Cyclone of 2,700 hp
Cruising speed: 200 mph
Combat radius: 300 miles

First Flight, Lasting Impact: The Significance of the “Able Dog”

The legacy of the A-1H Skyraider is a testament to the idea that real combat value can’t be measured by speed or sleek lines alone. In the jungles and skies of Southeast Asia, this stout, old-school aircraft proved its worth with unmatched close air support and search-and-rescue escort missions.

Packing heavy firepower, flying low and precise, shrugging off damage, and lingering over the battlefield longer than any jet, the Skyraider became a lifeline for troops in need.

Over Vietnam, it flew more than 90,000 sorties; earning a place in history with two Medals of Honor and fourteen Air Force Crosses, the final chapter for single-engine, prop-driven attack planes in USAF combat.

But the Skyraider’s impact didn’t end when its engine finally cooled. Lessons learned from its heroic missions directly shaped the design and doctrine of the A-10 Thunderbolt II, the Air Force’s legendary “Warthog.” With straight wings, a rugged build, and a mission-first mentality, the A-10 carries the Skyraider’s torch; proving that survivability and persistent firepower never go out of style.

What endures most is the Skyraider’s lesson: in air combat, it’s the aircraft that can take punishment, stick with the mission, and deliver for those on the ground that earns its place in legend.

Even as aviation races ahead with new technology, the Skyraider stands as a reminder that true value is found in grit, endurance, and the ability to deliver when it matters most.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

Now 34 years later, as I concentrate on stewardship across the fleet, it’s obvious the crew takes great pride and ownership of USS Nimitz. I appreciate all the work you do to maintain this warship to ensure it is combat-ready and continues to strengthen deterrence.

—Adm. Steve Koehler, commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet

Read more

“Dark merlins are hunting machines, built for speed and aerodynamics.”

—GA-ASI President David R. Alexander

Mission Briefing

On 23 February 2026, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems christened its YFQ-42A drone with a name worthy of its promise—“Dark Merlin.” This wasn’t just a ceremonial gesture; it marked a pivotal transition as the craft left behind simple test flights and stepped boldly into the realm of true mission autonomy.

Now, “Dark Merlin” stands ready to prove itself not as a mere prototype, but as a future wingman in the evolving world of collaborative combat aviation.

When Dark Merlin Takes Wing

On February 23, 2026, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems revealed a name for its YFQ-42A drone: “Dark Merlin.” The choice is rich with meaning; the merlin, a nimble falcon, hunts in groups and is prized for its agility.

That’s no accident; it’s a nod to the vision of drones flying in formation with crewed aircraft, hunting together in the skies. But let’s set the record straight: this name isn’t yet stamped with the official approval of the US Air Force.

For now, “Dark Merlin” is a narrative anchor, a way to give personality to a prototype while the Air Force’s formal naming process remains down the runway.

That distinction matters, especially at this crossroads in the CCA (Collaborative Combat Aircraft) program. The Air Force hasn’t yet locked in the full structure of the fleet: industrial partners, production tempo, software standards, levels of autonomy, and budget priorities are all still in play.

Naming this drone “Dark Merlin” gives it a face at a moment when the service is still weighing how modular and flexible the next generation of airpower should be.

At its core, the CCA concept aims to solve a problem that’s plagued modern air forces: how to increase numbers, reach, and tactical options without endlessly ramping up the count—and cost—of piloted jets.

As part of the Next Generation Air Dominance vision, these drones are designed to fly alongside 5th generation fighters like the F-35A, and one day, their 6th generation successors.

The Air Force hopes to field a fleet of at least 1,000 CCAs in various roles: missile carriers, network extenders, electronic warriors, decoys, and scouts. Each designed to push risk onto unmanned platforms and keep human pilots where their judgment matters most.

But let’s not kid ourselves: the real challenge isn’t building a budget-friendly F-35 lookalike. It’s forging a team—a human-machine partnership—capable of outthinking, outmaneuvering, and outlasting anything a single aircraft could achieve, even in the chaos of tomorrow’s contested skies.

What Dark Merlin Brings to the Fight

Step into the next chapter of air combat and you’ll find the YFQ-42A, a machine crafted not just for flying, but for thinking and fighting alongside its human counterparts. Born from the “genus-species” lineage that began with the XQ-67A Off-Board Sensing Station, the Dark Merlin takes the lessons of its predecessors and pushes them further.

With advanced digital engineering as its backbone, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems has reimagined what it means to field a collaborative combat drone, optimizing every curve and capability for the battlespace of tomorrow.

Look closer at the airframe, and you’ll spot a host of subtle evolutions. The engine’s serrated air inlet echoes the stealthy lines of the B-2 Spirit, while the fuselage and nose have shed the ‘shovel’ shape of the XQ-67 for something sleeker and more conventional.

The wings, swept with a sharper angle and broader surface, speak to a need for speed and agility, while the V-tails, shorter and more refined, hint at careful calibration for both stealth and maneuverability. Every adjustment is a response to the demands of the CCA program: reduce radar cross-section, enhance performance, and ensure survivability in contested skies.

Yet the true heart of the YFQ-42A isn’t just its steel and composites; it’s the sophisticated autonomy core that lets it act as a teammate, not just a tool. This digital brain, refined through years of dogfighting experience with the MQ-20 Avenger, is now proving itself in new ways.

In a recent milestone, Dark Merlin completed its first semi-autonomous flight using Collins Aerospace’s Sidekick Collaborative Mission Autonomy software, seamlessly integrated via the government’s Autonomy Government Reference Architecture (A-GRA).

Picture this: from the ground, a human operator cues up mission commands, sending them winging through secure links to the aircraft. The YFQ-42A executes each order with precision for over four hours, validating not only the reliability of Sidekick’s software, but also the flexibility and robustness of the A-GRA system.

This open, modular approach—MOSA, as the military calls it—means that autonomy software can be swapped or upgraded without tearing apart the airframe, ensuring the fleet stays competitive and adaptable as technology races forward.

This isn’t just about one drone, or even one program. The goal is to create a dynamic, competitive ecosystem where mission software moves swiftly between platforms, innovation is baked in, and the Air Force can avoid the trap of vendor lock. By separating software from hardware, the service accelerates its ability to adapt, outpace adversaries, and keep the technological edge sharp.

In the sky, the YFQ-42A is set to fly not just with the Next Generation Air Dominance platform—the future Boeing F-47—but also alongside today’s most advanced fighters, the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II.

With stealth in its bones and autonomy in its brain, Dark Merlin is poised to give warfighters the decisive advantage in the unpredictable air battles of the future—a true partner in the evolving dance of man and machine.

Dark Merlin and the Future of Coalition Air Combat

For the United States, Dark Merlin is more than a new piece of hardware. It’s a proving ground for the future of air combat. This isn’t just about flying another drone; it’s about answering a fundamental question: can the Air Force truly harness the power of human-machine teams on a scale that changes the nature of war?

With the YFQ-42A, part of the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program, the Air Force aims to field a fleet of modular, cost-effective, and operationally relevant autonomous aircraft designed to operate alongside the most advanced fifth- and sixth-generation fighters.

General Atomics built Dark Merlin from the ground up with modularity and adaptable autonomy at its core. The goal is clear: integrate new mission systems rapidly, enable seamless teaming in the most demanding combat environments, and keep pace with the evolving technological landscape.

For Washington, this signals a possible breakthrough: finding a way to generate greater combat mass, maintain persistence, and offer tactical flexibility without relying solely on a handful of exquisite, crewed fighters. The CCA’s pursuit of “affordable mass” is especially relevant for sustained campaigns in the Pacific, where scale and endurance will be decisive.

Dark Merlin’s recent semi-autonomous flight showed more than just advanced engineering. It demonstrated that real-time operator control, mission adaptability, and robust reliability are within reach.

And this isn’t just a U.S. story. The CCA program is being discussed with allies, raising the prospect of shared autonomy standards, interoperable force packages, and future export opportunities. Imagine a future where Dark Merlin and its kin fly not just with American jets, but alongside allied aircraft across the globe, multiplying the reach and resilience of the entire coalition.

If Dark Merlin succeeds, it’s not just about drones joining the fight. It’s about forging a new era where software-driven wingmen become an everyday reality, redefining what deterrence and allied airpower look like on the world stage.

This Week in Aviation History

On 14 March 1921, the squadron claimed the title 95th Pursuit Squadron, and by 1924, the now-iconic kicking mule emblem was officially worn on their aircraft at Selfridge Field, Michigan. By 1935, the unit had transitioned to attack duties, and just before World War II, it became the 95th Bombardment Squadron.

As the storm of war gathered, the squadron patrolled America’s west coast in B-18 Bolos and B-23 Dragons, hunting for enemy submarines. Their vigilance paid off. They’re credited with sinking the first Japanese submarine off Oregon’s coast, marking their place in history before the wider conflict began.

The Saga of the 95th Reconnaissance Squadron

The story of the 95th Reconnaissance Squadron reads like a living chronicle of American airpower, stretching back to the dawn of aerial combat. Born at Kelly Field, Texas, on 20 August 1917, as the 95th Aero Squadron, this unit first took to the skies in the nimble French-built Nieuport 28.

Even in those early months, the squadron’s spirit was bold—they sailed for France, braving the unknown, and spent a bitter winter training for the crucible to come. On 8 March 1918, the 95th became the very first American squadron to fly combat missions in World War I, earning their motto, “First to the Front.”

Throughout the war, the 95th flew alongside the French Sixth and Eighth Armies, as well as the American Expeditionary Force’s First Army. It was during these sorties that the iconic kicking mule emblem appeared on their aircraft—a blue ring symbolizing their theater, the mule capturing their reputation for striking “swift and accurate.” By war’s end, the squadron had transitioned from the Nieuport 28 to the Spad XIII and the British S.E.5, racking up 230 patrols and earning credit for downing over 35 enemy aircraft and twelve observation balloons.

The years between the wars were marked by movement, redesignations, and a parade of new aircraft. The 95th was inactivated, reactivated, and shifted across assignments, flying a fascinating mix of machines—including the German Fokker D.VII, the PW-8, PW-9, P-1 Hawk, P-12, the P-26 Peashooter, and the A-17. On 14 March 1921, the squadron became the 95th Pursuit Squadron, and by 1924, their kicking mule emblem was officially recognized while based at Selfridge Field, Michigan.

Change was a constant companion. In 1935, the unit shifted to become an attack squadron, and by October 1939, they were redesignated as the 95th Bombardment Squadron.

As the world edged toward a second great conflict, the 95th found itself flying anti-submarine patrols along America’s west coast in B-18 Bolos and B-23 Dragons. It was here, on the eve of World War II, that the squadron made history once more—credited with sinking the first Japanese submarine off the coast of Oregon, a testament to their vigilance and skill.

After carving its name in North Africa, the 95th pressed forward with the Allied advance into Italy, making its home on the rugged airstrips of Sardinia and Corsica. By the autumn of 1944, the squadron was moving into France, alternating sorties from airfields across France and Austria as the war drew to a close.

Yet perhaps the most storied chapter from World War II came not over Europe, but in the Pacific—when six of the legendary Doolittle Raid’s sixteen crews hailed from the 95th Bombardment Squadron. All told, the 95th flew a staggering 601 combat missions in just over two years of relentless wartime operations.

After a brief pause, the squadron was reborn for the Korean War in 1952, taking to the skies in B-26 Invaders for light bombardment, interdiction, and armed reconnaissance. Post-war, the 95th traded its Invaders for B-66 Destroyers in Japan before standing down again in 1958.

The squadron’s story reignited on October 1, 1982, this time as the 95th Reconnaissance Squadron, operating the U-2/TR-1 from RAF Alconbury in England. When Alconbury’s chapter ended in 1993, the history lived on: the RC-135 crews at RAF Mildenhall adopted the 95th’s storied name, ensuring its legacy endured.

Today, the 95th flies missions from Mildenhall and Souda Bay, Crete, still at the vanguard of reconnaissance, still writing new chapters in the skies above Europe and beyond.

Under the Hoods of Bolos and the Dragons

Let me give you a rundown of two of the birds that the 95^th flew.

B-23 Dragon (Specifications)

• TYPE: Medium Bomber

• POWER: Two Wright R-2600-3 Radial piston engines with 1,600 hp. each

• SPEED: Maximum - 282 mph, Cruising - 210 mph.

• RANGE : 1,400 miles (with 4000 lbs of bombs)

• SERVICE CEILING: 31,600 ft

• WEIGHTS: Empty: 19,089 lbs, Combat: 26,500, Maximum: 32,400 lbs

• MAXIMUM PAYLOAD: 4,400 lb. (1996 kg) of bombs carried internally

• DIMENSIONS: Span 92 ft, Length 58 ft 4 3/4 in, Height 18 ft 5 1/2 in.

• CREW: Five; Pilot, Co-Pilot, Radio Operator, Bombardier and Tail gunner

• PRODUCTION TOTALS: 38 ; 15-18 converted into UC-67

Specification of Douglas B-18 Bolo

• Armament: Three .30-cal. guns (in nose, ventral and dorsal positions), plus 4,500 lbs. of bombs carried internally

• Engines: Two Wright R-1820-53s of 1,000 hp each

• Crew: Six

• Maximum speed: 215 mph at 15,000 ft.

• Cruising speed: 167 mph

• Range: 2,100 miles

• Ceiling: 23,900 ft.

• Span: 89 ft. 6 in.

• Length: 57 ft. 10 in.

• Height: 15 ft. 2 in.

• Weight: 27,000 lbs. loaded

• Serial number: 37-0469

The Legacy Carried Forward

The legacy of the 95th Reconnaissance Squadron isn’t just about age—it’s a story of transformation without ever losing its soul. Born in 1917 as the 95th Aero Squadron, it stands as one of the oldest Air Force units, its logbook filled with nearly every chapter of American air warfare. Over a century, the 95th has flown 25 types of aircraft, shifted through pursuit, attack, bombardment, and reconnaissance roles, and earned honors in every era from World War I dogfights to today’s intelligence-driven missions.

What sets the 95th apart is relentless adaptation. From launching biplanes in the Great War to orchestrating RC-135 operations above the Arctic Circle, the squadron has always evolved to meet the moment. Its history is stitched with valor—like providing crews for the legendary Doolittle Raid and operational relevance, whether in historic campaigns or cutting-edge exercises with allies.

In every transformation, the 95th demonstrates an enduring truth of airpower: aircraft may change, but the true mark of a unit is its ability to keep finding ways to serve, lead, and matter: no matter how the mission evolves.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

Now is the time to rebuild the U.S. Air Force’s long-range combat forces to defeat threats that are “the most serious and most challenging the nation has encountered since 1945.”

—Quote from Mitchell Institute Policy Paper

Mission Briefing

Picture this: a new report from the Mitchell Institute has sent ripples through the aviation world, declaring that the U.S. Air Force needs 500 more combat aircraft to stay ahead of China by 2030.

This isn’t about sheer numbers. It’s about keeping the skies open in a future where a shorthanded fleet could mean stalemate in the Western Pacific. The study’s authors aren’t mincing words: they want to see at least 300 F-47 fighters and 200 B-21 Raider bombers soaring, far beyond today’s modest plans.

It’s a bold vision, drawn with urgency, as if the next chapter in airpower history is waiting just over the horizon.

A Shocking Study Calls for Hundreds of F-47 and B-21 Raider

The phrase “500 additional aircraft” isn’t tossed around lightly. It lands with the weight of a thunderclap—a shot across the bow for anyone paying attention in the world of airpower. In early 2026, the Mitchell Institute’s report, “Strategic Attack: Maintaining the Air Force’s Capacity to Deny Enemy Sanctuaries,” threw that number into the air like a challenge, painting a stark picture of the widening gap between what America’s Air Force aspires to do and the reality of its current procurement plans.

At the heart of the recommendation is a simple, urgent logic. To keep the initiative against a peer adversary—especially one as formidable as China—the United States needs a force capable of punching deep into the enemy’s heartland. The aim isn’t just to score a dramatic raid, but to disrupt the tempo of enemy air and missile salvos, to knock the adversary off balance and keep them guessing day after day.

The report calls for a minimum of 200 B-21 stealth bombers, built to endure and persist, and 300 F-47 fighters, a new breed designed to be “campaign-compatible”; not just impressive in isolation, but ready to fight, regenerate, and return for another round.

The numbers may make headlines, but it’s the diagnosis that should give every strategist pause. The Air Force, the authors suggest, is built for exceptional raids—those daring, surgical strikes that make for riveting headlines. But what about the long haul? There’s a world of difference between a “raid force” and a “campaign force.” The former dazzles with a single operation; the latter endures the grind of sustained conflict. That’s the chasm the report warns against a fleet that shines in a flash, but falters when the fight drags on.

It’s easy to confuse an impressive inventory with genuine power, but real airpower is what can take off, fight, survive losses, and keep coming back. Here’s the cold reality: the US Air Force’s total fleet hovers around 5,025 aircraft. But look closer—mission availability averages about 62%, a figure that’s set off alarm bells in the aviation press. That means roughly 1,900 aircraft could be grounded at any moment. In the vast Indo-Pacific theater, where distances stretch logistics to the breaking point and sustained operations wear down even the best-maintained jets, that’s a sobering handicap.

And then the politics come into play. Every time a jet is retired early “to finance the future,” the operational mass shrinks. Fewer planes in the sky means commanders get cautious, risking rare birds less, keeping them farther from the action, and ceding initiative to an enemy content to wage war from behind thick layers of protection. This, the report argues, is the danger. Without a surplus to absorb losses and keep the fight going, strategy becomes timid; just as the adversary bets on speed and surprise.

The Mitchell Institute’s analysis isn’t fixated on the sheer number of Chinese jets. Instead, it focuses on operational reality: China is shaping its mainland into an invulnerable rear base, a sanctuary shielded by dense, modern air defenses and bristling with long-range strike weapons: ballistic, cruise, and even hypersonic missiles that threaten every base and runway in the region.

The Pentagon’s own reports echo the warning. China is advancing rapidly, fielding new air-to-air missiles like the PL-15, rolling out cutting-edge platforms at airshows in Zhuhai—the J-35A, the J-15D—and signaling an industrial engine determined to build, iterate, and deploy at speed.

A Closer Look at F-47 and B-21 Raider

The Air Force’s F-47 is set to rewrite the playbook, flying nearly 70 percent farther without refueling than the legendary F-22.

That means tankers can hang back, safely out of harm’s way—a crucial edge for any campaign across the vast Pacific, where every mile matters and every risk is magnified.

Thanks to its advanced design, the F-47 will boast a combat radius of more than 1,000 nautical miles—leaving the F-22’s 590 miles and the F-35’s 670 in the dust. And with speeds topping Mach 2 and “stealth++” features, this sixth-generation fighter offers more than just range.

It brings a level of survivability and lethality that’s been the subject of quiet briefings and whispered speculation among those in the know. General Allvin’s recent infographic gives us a rare glimpse behind the curtain, hinting that the F-47 isn’t just a step ahead. It’s a leap.

But the future of airpower doesn’t rest on fighters alone. The B-21 Raider is poised to become the backbone of America’s bomber force, a dual-capable ghost built for both conventional and nuclear missions.

The Raider isn’t just a bomber. It’s the centerpiece of a family of systems that includes intelligence gathering, electronic warfare, and long-range strike capabilities, able to operate with or without a crew on board. From stand-off missiles to direct-attack munitions, the B-21 brings versatility and resilience, ready to breach even the most sophisticated defenses.

Allied Airpower and the 500-Aircraft Debate

In the Indo-Pacific, sheer airpower quality is no longer a guarantee. Without enough combat mass and ready jets, even the finest aircraft can’t tip the balance. That’s the heart of the Mitchell Institute’s warning: America’s current plans may fall short for a drawn-out campaign against China’s well-protected mainland, with its dense air defenses and long-range missile threat.

The question is shifting from “Can we strike?” to “Can we endure—absorbing losses, regenerating sorties, and sustaining relentless pressure?” A force tailored for headline-grabbing raids, the report argues, can still be too small for the grind of real war. Readiness and availability matter; what’s on the ramp is more important than what’s on paper.

This isn’t just America’s challenge. In the high-stakes Pacific, credible deterrence is a team effort. If the U.S. needs more stealthy, penetrating aircraft, then allied basing, rapid dispersal, runway repair, tanker support, munitions stockpiles, and interoperable fighters all become critical.

It is also crucial to “bridge” solutions, like F-35 and F-15EX buys and collaborative combat aircraft, underscoring the urgency for allied coordination now, not just when the latest platforms are fielded.

The bottom line? The next chapter of deterrence will hinge not only on breakthrough jets but also on whether America and its allies can muster resilient, sustainable combat power before a crisis puts their preparations to the ultimate test.

This Week in Aviation History

On March 4, 1948, NACA test pilot Herbert H. Hoover etched his name in history, becoming the first civilian to shatter the sound barrier aboard the X-1-2 rocket plane. The X-1 program would go on to push the envelope even further, with Chuck Yeager blazing past Mach 2.4 thanks to improved machines and fuel systems. By the program’s close in November 1958, 27 daring pilots had logged 238 flights across several X-1 variants, each sortie a bold step into the unknown.

A First for Supersonic Research

The dream of rocket-powered flight was first sparked not in the skies, but on the ground; born in the daring world of auto racing. That bold vision took flight on June 11, 1928, when the Lippisch Ente soared into history as Germany’s first rocket-propelled aircraft.

Stateside, the quest for speed intensified in the early 1940s as pilots and engineers grappled with a new frontier: the mysterious, turbulent air near the speed of sound. The National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA)—which would later become NASA—and the U.S. Army Air Forces (USAAF) joined forces to conquer this transonic barrier. Their goal was clear: push aircraft beyond Mach 1 and unlock the secrets that lay beyond.

On March 16, 1945, Bell Aircraft was tasked with building three experimental planes to probe the transonic regime. Thus, the X-1 was born, powered by a formidable XLR-11 rocket engine from Reaction Motors Inc., which burned a volatile cocktail of alcohol, water, and liquid oxygen. Air-launched from the belly of a lumbering B-29 Superfortress, the X-1 would ignite its rockets and tear through the thin skies above.

The first X-1, delivered in December 1945, made its debut glide at Pinecastle Field, Florida, before the program shifted to the sun-baked expanse of Muroc Field in California’s Mojave Desert. By mid-1947, two X-1s were flying: one for the Air Force, hell-bent on smashing Mach 1, and one for NACA, devoted to meticulous transonic research.

It was on October 14, 1947, that Chuck Yeager etched his name into legend, pushing the X-1 to Mach 1.06 and becoming the first human to break the sound barrier. Just months later, on March 4, 1948, NACA’s Herbert H. Hoover followed suit, the first civilian to cross into supersonic territory.

With upgrades and new fuel delivery systems, the X-1 eventually reached speeds of Mach 2.44. By the time the program closed in November 1958, an elite cadre of 27 pilots had flown 238 sorties, each flight a step deeper into the unknown.

The quest didn’t stop there. Between 1959 and 1968, 12 test pilots took the X-15 rocket plane—another marvel of American engineering—on 199 breathtaking flights, pushing the envelope of hypersonic flight and skimming the very edge of space itself.

What is Bell X-1-2?

The first generation of X-1 aircraft didn’t just break the sound barrier. They shattered the conventions of how we explore the skies. These were not warbirds or airliners, but pure research machines, built with a single purpose: to chase the unknown and gather the data that wind tunnels and theory could no longer provide.

The X-1’s legacy is more than speed; it’s the birth of the experimental aircraft, dedicated solely to pushing the boundaries of flight, unburdened by the needs of the battlefield or the marketplace.

In the late 1930s and early 1940s, aircraft designers faced a daunting new frontier. As planes crept faster, their wings began to encounter both subsonic and supersonic airflow, creating a host of unpredictable and often dangerous problems—compressibility effects, surging drag, wild trim changes, turbulence that rattled teeth, and sudden losses of control.

Even the best wind tunnels of the day couldn’t accurately capture what was happening at these speeds; their own data became unreliable as models approached the sound barrier.

Visionaries like John Stack of the NACA, Ezra Kotchner of the Army Air Forces, and Walter Diehl of the Navy recognized that only a specialized research aircraft. The one built to fly directly into the teeth of these mysteries. It could unlock the secrets of supersonic flight.

The Army Air Forces handed the challenge to Bell Aircraft, tasking the company with building three experimental planes that would become the X-1 fleet.

The X-1’s shape was inspired by something already proven stable at supersonic speed: the .50 caliber machine gun bullet. Its fuselage mirrored this form, while its wings were straight and thin for minimum resistance.

The X-1-1 carried an 8 percent thickness-to-chord wing; the X-1-2’s was slightly thicker at 10 percent. Propulsion came from the XLR-11 rocket engine, a four-chambered powerhouse burning a volatile mixture of liquid oxygen and alcohol-water.

Rockets were still a controversial choice. Many at NACA and the Navy preferred jet propulsion, but the Army Air Forces were determined to bet on rocket power.

Bell delivered the first X-1 in December 1945, and soon after, NACA was asked to oversee instrumentation and data analysis. This brought a sharp team of engineers into the heart of the project.

The first glide flight—no engine, just pure aerodynamics—took place on January 19, 1946, at Pinecastle Field in Florida, with Bell’s Jack Woolams at the controls. Ten more glide flights followed, each one testing the X-1’s handling near the ground, before the aircraft went back to Bell for its rocket engine installation.

By October 1946, the X-1-1 was delivered to what’s now NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center at Edwards, California—then known as Muroc Flight Test Unit. NACA engineers arrived that September to prepare for the X-1-2’s debut.

On October 11, Bell test pilot Chalmers “Slick” Goodlin took the X-1-2 on its maiden glide flight, moving on to powered runs by December, reaching Mach 0.79. By June 1947, both X-1s had proven their mettle up to Mach 0.8, at which point Bell’s contract was fulfilled.

That summer, a new agreement shaped the X-1 program’s next phase. The Army Air Forces would use the thinner-winged X-1-1 to push hard for Mach 1.1, aiming to break barriers quickly with NACA’s technical support.

Meanwhile, NACA would take the thicker-winged X-1-2 on a more deliberate path, gathering the detailed, methodical data needed to understand the treacherous transonic regime. The age of the research aircraft and the supersonic era had truly begun.

From Breakthrough to Blueprint: The X-1-2 Legacy

The X-1-2 may not have the fame of “Glamorous Glennis,” but its legacy runs deeper—transforming the triumph of breaking the sound barrier into the science of making supersonic flight routine.

When the aircraft passed to NACA, it became a true flying laboratory, probing the tough questions that followed the first Mach 1 milestone: How do you control a plane when shock waves rule the airframe? What happens in steep turns or sudden pull-ups?

NACA pilot Herbert H. Hoover took the stick in late 1947, methodically flying research missions and, by March 4, 1948, nudging the X-1-2 to Mach 1.029; not in pursuit of glory, but to collect hard data.

Hoover’s flights marked a crucial shift: the X-1 series was no longer just about speed records, but about launching a new era of experimental, purpose-built research aircraft.

The X-1-2’s influence only grew as it was later rebuilt as the X-1E, pushing further into the high-Mach unknown and building on lessons from every setback. Its greatest legacy isn’t a single headline, but a philosophy—measure, learn, refine, fly again—the very foundation of modern flight testing that propels aviation innovation to this day.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“We are honored to reach this agreement with the U.S. Air Force, ensuring the F110-GE-129 remains the engine of choice for the world’s F-15 and F-16 fleets.”

—Amy Gowder, president and CEO, Defense & Systems at GE Aerospace.

Read more