The Maverick Act just passed the Senate, allowing the US Navy to transfer a trio of retired F-14D Tomcats and necessary spare parts to the U.S. Space and Rocket Center.

—@OSINTtechnical Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

With the Maverick Act cleared for takeoff, three U.S. Navy F-14D Tomcats are set to land at the Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama—where, just maybe, one legendary bird might roar back to life and dance in the skies once more.

The Maverick Act

The Senate floor is silent, but the Maverick Act rockets through with unanimous consent. It is a rare moment of unity that kickstarts the next chapter of an American aviation legend.

Now, with the House preparing for its own vote as of May 4, all eyes are on Capitol Hill. If this bill clears its final hurdle, it’ll give the Secretary of the Navy the green light to hand over not one, not two, but three F-14D Tomcats to the U.S. Space and Rocket Center Commission in Huntsville, Alabama.

For those who haven’t strolled through its Saturn V shadows, the U.S. Space & Rocket Center is more than just a museum. It’s the largest shrine to space on this planet, a cathedral dedicated to the dreams of flight and exploration since 1970.

The bill doesn’t just talk in generalities either; it calls out the three Tomcats by name, or rather, by Bureau Number: 164341, 164602, and 159437. These are the chosen birds, set to trade carrier decks for museum floors.

But don’t expect these Tomcats to become warbirds again. The legislation is crystal clear: they’re grounded for good when it comes to combat. No missiles, no dogfights, no tricks up their wings. The Secretary of the Navy isn’t on the hook for any repairs or modifications, either. What comes with the jets is what you get, though the package does include a trove of manuals and any leftover spare parts the Navy can spare.

Here’s where the story takes a turn worthy of a Hollywood script. For the first time, there’s an official mention that one of these Tomcats could actually fly again. The Secretary will provide enough spare parts from existing Navy stock to potentially get one bird back in the air, or at least looking sharp in a static display. But if you’re picturing a team of Navy mechanics wrenching away, think again. From this point on, it’s all in the Commission’s hands.

They can seek out nonprofit partners. Think of what the Collings Foundation did for the F-4D Phantom, the only one of its kind still flying in the U.S., to restore, maintain, and even fly the Tomcat for airshows and commemorative events. The Navy’s role ends at the handoff; every dime, every bolt, every drop of sweat after that belongs to the Commission.

And in true aviator fashion, the bill makes it clear: no cost to Uncle Sam. Every expense—transfer, compliance checks, restoration, operation, maintenance—is on the Commission’s tab.

The price of preserving a legend? Worth every penny.

Tomcat: A Hollywood Icon

Picture this: the legendary F-14 Tomcat, wings folded and sun-bleached, slumbers beneath the desert sky. A relic fiercely protected by Uncle Sam. Ever since the U.S. Navy hung up its flight suit in 2006, getting near these cats—or their spare parts—has been like breaching Fort Knox. Washington’s kept a tight grip, making sure not a single bolt ends up in Iranian hands, the only other Tomcat pilots left in the world.

When those jets retired, crews stripped out vital organs before rolling them out to the boneyard. Anything left behind? Often crushed, melted, or lost to history. Bringing one of these beauties back to life isn’t just a matter of dusting off the sand.

It’s a Herculean feat. Deep, painstaking inspections would be just the start, with every rivet and wire tested before the FAA even thinks about giving a thumbs-up.

After two decades baking in the Mojave, the road to revival is long and paved with dollar signs. The Tomcat was never cheap to run, and with spare parts rarer than a clean flight suit after a dogfight, regular airshows are probably a pipe dream. Still, imagine the roar at a heritage flyby. Maybe, just maybe, that day will come, someday down the line.

Let us take a closer look at this legendary bird

Manufacturer:

Grumman Corporation

Type:

Carrier-based air superiority fighter

Crew:

Pilot and Radar Intercept Officer

Powerplant:

Two 27,800 lb. General Electric F110-GE-400 afterburning turbofans

Dimensions:

Length: 62 ft., 8 in.
Height: 16 ft.
Span (max spread): 64 ft., 1 in.

Weight:

Empty: 43,735 lb.
Gross: 74,350 lb.

Performance:

Max Speed: 1,544 mph at 40,000 ft.
Ceiling: 55,000 ft.

Armament:

One 20mm cannon; AIM-7 Sparrow; AIM-9 Sidewinder; AIM-54 Phoenix missiles

F-14 Tomcat: Ghosts of the Desert Hangar No More

The F-14D Tomcat, that wildcat of the carrier deck, might just roar back to life—but not as a warbird, not this time. Under the so-called MAVERICK Act, the U.S. isn’t gearing up to put the Tomcat back into combat, but to let it fly as a symbol, a living legend.

Word is, three F-14Ds could be handed over to the U.S. Space & Rocket Center Commission. One of them? Destined for a second act in the skies, thrilling crowds at airshows and remembrance flights; no missiles, just memories.

For America, this isn’t about muscle. It’s about meaning. The F-14D, the apex predator of Tomcats, sports twin engines, shape-shifting wings, and a cockpit built for two. Once, it prowled the fleet’s edge, ready to defend, with eyes on two dozen targets and the claws to strike six at once. The Smithsonian and the National Naval Aviation Museum call it a bridge, from Cold War standoffs to the last combat missions over Iraq in 2006.

So why bring one back? Because it’s living history. Seeing a Tomcat on the wing connects the next generation with the legends of the carrier deck, the grit of naval aviators, and the spirit of Top Gun.

In a world buzzing with digital distractions, a thundering flyby can still steal the show. If this all comes together, the F-14D will remind us: some stories don’t fade away. They take flight again, ready to inspire the future.

This Week in Aviation History

The Memphis Belle soared into legend, its crew embodying the grit and sacrifice of every bomber team that battled across the skies of Europe. They weren’t just flying missions. They were writing history, one harrowing sortie at a time. When the Belle touched down on American soil after its 25th mission, it became a living symbol of courage and hope for a world at war.

The Memphis Belle: An American Icon

The Memphis Belle was a B-17F heavy bomber flying out of Bassingbourn, England, with the 324th Bomb Squadron, 91st Bomb Group, right at the heart of the USAAF’s early bombing campaign over Europe.

From November ‘42 to May ‘43, the Belle and its crew braved flak and fighters on 25 missions, targeting enemy strongholds across Germany, France, and Belgium. But in true wartime fashion, things weren’t always by the book.

Sometimes the crew flew other B-17s, and sometimes other crews took the Belle into combat, so by the time the Belle’s crew hit their 25th, the plane itself had only logged 24; she completed her own 25th two days later with a different team aboard, and over fifty airmen would eventually have combat time in her storied fuselage.

The Memphis Belle’s crew was a snapshot of the Eighth Air Force. Young men aged 19 to 26, hailing from across America, including places like Washington, Indiana, Texas, and Connecticut.

Despite the legend, they didn’t always fly every sortie together; shifting assignments and the realities of war meant rotating in different copilots, top turret gunners, and waist gunners.

Names like Leviticus “Levi” Dillon, Eugene Adkins, Harold Loch, Bill Winchell, and E. Scott Miller all became part of the Belle’s narrative. Each mission was a gamble, a roll of the dice at 20,000 feet, and camaraderie was forged in the crucible of enemy skies.

As for her name, the Memphis Belle paid tribute to pilot Robert Morgan’s fiancée, Margaret Polk, from Memphis, Tennessee. It is a romance that made headlines but didn’t survive the war bond tour.

The Belle’s iconic nose art, inspired by a George Petty pin-up from Esquire magazine, was first painted stateside, then touched up and later repainted by the talented Col Tony Starcer at Bassingbourn, whose brushwork adorned several other 91st Bomb Group bombers and flight jackets.

In the grand, cinematic sweep of World War II aviation, the Memphis Belle wasn’t just a plane; she was a symbol. Her story woven from love, loss, and the courage of the crews who risked everything for each other.

Fortress in the Sky: The B-17’s Battle-Ready Features Unveiled

The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress carved its legend across every WWII combat zone, but it’s over the skies of Europe where its story truly soared. Alongside the B-24 Liberator, the B-17 became the backbone of America’s strategic bombing might, pounding German industry into submission.

Designed for high-altitude flying and speed, the Fortress bristled with guns, ready to fight its way through enemy defenses. Its advanced turbosupercharged engines let it haul bombs and crews up to 30,000 feet—a lofty perch for war. Powered turrets and flexible machine guns gave gunners a fighting chance, covering every angle as flak and fighters closed in.

Even though the prototype took to the skies back in 1935, there were only a handful of B-17s on hand when the U.S. entered the war in ‘41. That changed in a hurry: Boeing, Lockheed-Vega, and Douglas ramped up production, turning out thousands of Flying Fortresses.

The B-17F came first, fast and formidable, leading the charge in the early days of the bombing campaign. Later, the B-17G rolled off the lines, sporting a nose turret that made it even tougher in a head-on fight. By war’s end in May 1945, over 12,700 B-17s had been built, each one a testament to American industry and the courage of those who flew them.

TECHNICAL NOTES:

Crew: 10

Armament: Up to thirteen .50-cal machine guns and 8,000 lbs of bombs

Engines: Four 1,200 hp Wright R-1820-97 turbosupercharged radials

Maximum speed: 325 mph

Range: 2,800 miles

Combat radius: 600+ miles

Maximum ceiling: 37,500 ft

Empty weight: 35,728 lbs

Maximum gross weight: 48,720 lbs

Memphis Belle: An Enduring Call Sign for a Screen Icon

The Memphis Belle’s legend endures because it embodies not just the might of a B-17F Flying Fortress, but the raw survival, sacrifice, and humanity at the heart of World War II’s air war.

This bomber and her crew pulled off what seemed impossible: completing 25 grueling missions over Nazi-occupied Europe and making it home, when so many didn’t.

Braving relentless flak, enemy fighters, and the freezing, perilous altitudes, the Belle’s team became the first heavy bomber crew to finish their tour and fly back to the States, instantly turning them into symbols of hope and resilience.

The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force now calls the Belle and her crew timeless representatives of every man and woman who helped defeat Nazi Germany from the skies.

But the Memphis Belle’s journey didn’t end when the engines cooled. After combat, she toured America, rallying the home front and selling war bonds as a battered but unbroken icon.

Decades later, her story found new life in Hollywood’s “Memphis Belle,” introducing fresh eyes to the courage of young airmen facing one more dangerous mission.

Today, the real Belle sits proudly at the National Museum, more than just polished aluminum and rivets: a living memorial to the pilots, gunners, mechanics, and families forever changed by her legacy. She reminds us that planes can outgrow their blueprints and become vessels for a nation’s hopes, memories, and stories.

Each time we remember the Memphis Belle, we honor not just history’s machines, but the people whose lives they carried through war and into legend.

In Case You Missed It

What if the RAF had Tomcats? It almost happened:

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“In consultation with @SecWar, we will EXTEND the A-10 “Warthog” platform to 2030. This preserves combat power as the Defense Industrial Base works to increase combat aircraft production.”

—Office of the Secretary of the Air Force Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

The legendary A-10 Thunderbolt II, that iconic warbird with a bite, is set to keep soaring through American skies until at least 2030. That’s the latest word from the top brass—the Secretary of the Air Force himself confirming the Warthog’s saga isn’t over yet. Buckle up, because the story of this battle-hardened aviator is far from finished.

Warthog’s Service Life Extended Until 2030

Strap in and let me tell you a tale from the cockpit. The saga of the A-10 Thunderbolt II, a legend in its own right, takes another twist. The Air Force’s latest game plan keeps two squadrons of the Warthog flying high until 2030, with a third squadron holding the line until 2029. Just a few years ago, the brass wanted to ground the entire fleet by 2026, but Congress wasn’t having it. The old bird’s story, it seems, isn’t ready for a final chapter.

Now, there was talk once that these rugged airframes could be patched up and pushed on into the 2040s. But here’s the truth, as any aviator will tell you: you don’t keep warbirds in the fight without a steady stream of fresh pilots and maintainers.

With the last batch of A-10 drivers just having graduated, odds are stacked against keeping more than a squadron or two past 2030 unless the Air Force dusts off those support pipelines they’ve already mothballed.

According to Pentagon insider Brian Everstine, the units flying on till 2030 include Moody AFB’s frontline squadron and a stalwart reserve unit out at Whiteman AFB. Another squadron at Moody will keep the engines humming till 2029. These are the last chapters in a saga that’s seen the Warthog fly into more than its share of storms.

The critics have always been circling, pointing out the A-10’s vulnerabilities in a sky bristling with modern anti-aircraft threats. They say she’s too slow and too low for today’s dogfights.

But the Warthog’s adapted, picking up new tricks. Taking on drones, delivering precision strikes, and proving she can still put the fear into anyone on the wrong side of her cannon.

Take Operation Epic Fury: A-10s pounded Iran-backed militias in Iraq and Syria, letting stealthier jets handle the real hot zones. Word is, the Hog even tangled with Iranian forces directly, playing hero in a daring search-and-rescue for a downed F-15E pilot. One A-10 was lost, but the pilot punched out safely back over friendly turf.

And just when you thought the engineers were winding down, they rolled out a new refueling mod for the A-10, letting her gas up from hose-and-drogue tankers. That’s no small tweak, especially with the KC-46 still not cleared for Hog duty and the KC-135’s tricky mixed-fleet refueling.

So, ask yourself: would they have bothered with that if the Warthog’s days were numbered? Looks like there’s still some fight—and a few more stories—left in this old bird yet.

The Anatomy of the Warthog

The Warthog isn’t just a brute; she’s nimble, especially down low and slow, where it matters most. This beast can twist and turn at treetop level, hugging the ground while delivering pinpoint firepower exactly where the grunts need it.

She can hang out near the front lines for hours, ready to swoop in at a moment’s notice, and doesn’t mind roughing it. Give her a patch of dirt and she’ll land there, even with clouds barely a thousand feet overhead and visibility you could measure with a yardstick.

Loaded up with both smart bombs and old-school iron, the A-10C brings the rain wherever the fight is, clear skies or socked in, above or below the clouds, day or night.

Thanks to night vision goggles and a suite of next-gen tech, Warthog pilots can hunt in the dark and hit targets you can’t even see from the ground. The big bubble canopy gives you a panoramic view, while the titanium armor wrapped around the cockpit and vital systems means the pilot is sitting in a titanium bathtub—tough as nails and ready for trouble.

Take a hit? The A-10 shrugs off rounds up to 23mm—armor-piercing or high explosive, it doesn’t matter. If hydraulics go out, manual systems keep her flying. Even the fuel tanks are armored and self-sealing, so the Hog can take a beating and make it home in one piece.

The design’s smart, too. Lots of interchangeable parts, engines, landing gear, even vertical stabilizers can swap left to right, making repairs in the field a breeze.

The cockpit is a techie’s dream: comms, GPS, fire control, and a heads-up display that feeds the pilot everything from airspeed to weapons data. The LASTE system helps drop bombs exactly on target, while a full suite of countermeasures keeps missiles and flak at bay.

And then there’s the heart of the beast. The legendary 30mm GAU-8/A Gatling gun, spitting out nearly 4,000 rounds a minute, able to chew through tanks and anything else in its sights. Add in Mavericks, Sidewinders, and laser-guided bombs, and you’ve got a flying arsenal built for the toughest jobs in the sky.

The A-10’s Final Orbit Before Sunset

The A-10 Thunderbolt II’s extension to 2030 means the U.S. Air Force is buying time, combat mass, and close-air-support insurance while the defense industrial base struggles to produce enough newer aircraft fast enough.

The new plan reverses earlier expectations that the Warthog would be fully withdrawn by fiscal year 2029, keeping two squadrons to 2030 and another to 2029. Military Times adds that the retained force is expected to total 54 A-10s through 2029, then 36 aircraft in 2030.

For the U.S., this is a practical battlefield decision. The A-10 remains a rugged, low-altitude attack aircraft designed for close air support, with long loiter time, accurate weapons delivery, and the ability to hit ground and light maritime targets.

In current operations, it gives commanders a cheaper, available platform for lower-threat missions, freeing stealthier aircraft for more dangerous airspace. The recent use of A-10s in Operation Epic Fury, including missions tied to maritime operations in the Strait of Hormuz and combat search-and-rescue support, shows why the aircraft still has operational value.

For allies, the extension signals reassurance: American close-air-support capacity is not disappearing overnight. NATO, Middle East partners, and Indo-Pacific planners gain a little more breathing room while the U.S. transitions toward F-35s, drones, precision weapons, and future collaborative combat aircraft.

But this is not a resurrection. It is a controlled delay. The Warthog’s growl will remain on the flight line a little longer, setting up the next issue: what aircraft, crewed or uncrewed, finally inherits the close-air-support burden when the A-10’s last gun run ends?

This Week in Aviation History

On 16 May 1963, the roar of reentry echoing across the Pacific as aviator-astronaut Gordon Cooper splashes down, grinning behind his helmet visor. It’s the curtain call for Project Mercury, and Cooper, call sign Faith 7, just pulled off the longest American spaceflight to date: 22 orbits, 34 hours in the cosmic void.

He wasn’t just along for the ride; the man ran 11 science experiments, all while his ship started throwing curveballs. When the hardware faltered, Cooper coolly took the stick, flying Faith 7 home by hand like a true sky cowboy. That day, the legend of Mercury’s final flight was written across the heavens in contrails and courage.

When Faith 7 Mission Was Finally Completed

The sky buzzing with anticipation. L. Gordon Cooper, call sign Faith 7, is about to write his name in the stars as the last pilot of Project Mercury. He’s not just a passenger; Cooper is the tip of the spear, hand-picked in November ’62, with Alan Shepard riding shotgun as backup.

Originally tasked with 18 laps around the blue planet, NASA ups the ante to 22 after Walter Schirra’s triumphant run, transforming Cooper’s ride into a marathon through the heavens. That meant more cameras, more science, more sleepless hours for ground control, and a fresh test of what a single human could handle in orbit.

The launch isn’t without drama. Atlas rocket hiccups and a scrubbed attempt on May 14th keep everyone guessing. But on May 15th, Cooper’s Faith 7 finally blasts off from Cape Canaveral, slicing into the void. The first hours are smooth sailing. Cooper snaps photos of Earth, samples the oddball menu of space cuisine, and wrangles a suite of scientific experiments.

Everything from strobe-lit spheres to a tricky tethered Mylar balloon. Faith 7 even beams back the first TV images from an American spacecraft, grainy but historic, as Cooper quips that he’s flying a camera as much as a rocket.

But as any aviator knows, the skies can turn quick. On orbit 19, a phantom reentry signal flashes, then a short circuit knocks out the auto-control system. Carbon dioxide creeps up in the capsule.

Unfazed, Cooper flips to manual. No autopilot, just nerves of steel and years of training. He lines up Faith 7 by hand, times the retrorockets, and rides a blazing trail back through the atmosphere. Parachutes blossom on cue, and Cooper splashes down less than five miles from the waiting U.S.S. Kearsarge, a textbook recovery.

Faith 7’s voyage was more than a record-setter; it was proof that astronauts could push past the unknown, work the science, and steer themselves home when the chips were down.

Cooper’s cool under pressure and the mission’s success gave NASA the green light for the next big leap: Project Gemini, where the path to the Moon would be paved by rendezvous, docking, and even longer journeys. In the legend of the early space race, Faith 7’s flight is a high-flying tale of guts, grit, and a whole lot of faith.

What is Project Mercury?

Project Mercury, America’s first leap into the cosmos and the bedrock of NASA’s crewed adventures. The mission sounded simple: launch a human into orbit, see if they could thrive up there, and bring both astronaut and spacecraft home safely.

But that challenge was epic, so engineers worked fast, leaned on tried-and-true tech, and adapted everything from Atlas rockets to off-the-shelf gadgets. The Mercury capsule packed in a launch escape tower, manual controls, retrorockets, a reentry design tough enough for fire and fury, and the ability to splash down safely in the sea.

Mercury started with the big question: can an American survive and work in space? Alan Shepard answered with his suborbital flight; John Glenn proved orbital flight was possible.

Each mission stretched the limits. Longer stays, sharper control, new experiments, snapshots of Earth, and medical monitoring, all while boosting confidence in both the astronauts and their machines. Mercury wasn’t just about getting there; it was about learning how to operate in orbit when the stakes were sky-high.

The finale came in May 1963, when Gordon Cooper took Faith 7 for 22 orbits in 34 hours, the longest American spaceflight yet. He ran experiments, snapped photos, and when the automated systems failed, steered Faith 7 home by hand, cool as a test pilot on final approach.

NASA had planned 18 orbits, but after Schirra’s Sigma 7 mission, they extended it to 22, testing endurance, tracking, cameras, and human performance, laying groundwork for Gemini.

By the end, Project Mercury had turned spaceflight from a gutsy gamble into a skilled craft; readying NASA for the next era of exploration, where the Moon was waiting.

Legacy of Project Mercury: Faith 7

Project Mercury’s story found its grand finale in May 1963, when L. Gordon Cooper took Faith 7 for a ride that would seal its legacy. Mercury had started with a bold, dangerous question: could an American survive, function, and return from space?

By Cooper’s launch, NASA was done just proving survival—they were pushing the boundaries of endurance, spacecraft toughness, and the kind of quick thinking it takes to handle the unknown.

Faith 7 was where the astronaut truly became the pilot. Cooper orbited Earth 22 times in over 34 hours, setting a new American record. As the mission neared its end, automatic controls failed, but Cooper kept his cool. He eyeballed the horizon, crunched the numbers, and flew the spacecraft home by hand, splashing down almost perfectly beside the U.S.S. Kearsarge; a high-wire act turned masterclass in cockpit nerve.

Faith 7’s real legacy was confidence. NASA saw it could stretch the limits. Longer missions, trickier operations, and real trust in astronaut skill when the chips were down. That hard-earned confidence carried straight into Gemini, Apollo, and every mission since, where human grit and technology have to work side by side.

From Cooper’s hand-flown reentry to today’s lunar dreams, Faith 7 reminds us that the future of spaceflight depends as much on the courage in the cockpit as on the machines that get us there.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Brevity and clarity are the heart of effective radio communications.”

—quote from Unusual Attitudes Segment of Monthly Safety Bulletin

Up here in the cockpit, the first voice you hear often isn’t even human. It’s the sharp snap of static, a clipped call sign breaking through the engine’s hum.

Instinctiv…

Read more

“By intentionally integrating the 747-8i platform now, we are doing more than bridging a gap; we are executing a strategic stand-up of a high-consequence fleet.”

—@SecAFOfficial Troy Meink

Mission Briefing

It’s 1 May 2026, and the U.S. Air Force takes to the skies with a big announcement. Their newest bird, the VC-25B Bridge (a Boeing 747 graciously gifted by Qatar) has just aced its transformation and flight tests, earning its wings as a stand-in Air Force One.

That’s the call sign reserved for the Commander-in-Chief’s ride. Now, the aircraft is getting suited up in a bold new paint job—classic red, white, and blue—ready to make its cinematic debut later this summer. Buckle up, the next chapter in presidential aviation is about to take flight.

‘Bridge’ Aircraft for New Air Force One Completes Testing

The sky over Texas shimmered with anticipation as a sleek, all-white aircraft took flight, its fresh livery masking a story of urgency and innovation. Fresh from L3Harris’ hangars in Waco, this wasn’t just any airplane. It was the Air Force’s answer to a ticking clock and a fleet growing long in the tooth.

Enter the VC-25 Bridge program, a mission forged from necessity and executed with the kind of focus you see in the movies when the stakes are sky-high. Think of it as the “get it done” squad: one person holding the reins, every player in the game laser-focused on a single goal; putting a new bird in the air, fast, to take the burden off the aging VC-25A jets.

General Dale White summed it up with cinematic clarity: when you give one leader clear authority and everyone rallies behind them, things move at a breakneck pace. “Deliver a bridge capability as soon as possible,” he said. No time for red tape, just results.

The backstory? The VC-25 Bridge, built on a 747-8i frame, is a stopgap hero, stepping in as the long-awaited VC-25B replacement program faces delay after delay. With Boeing’s timeline drifting past 2024 and maintenance for the old VC-25A fleet dragging out, the Air Force needed a fix, now.

February 2025 saw the launch of a dedicated task force. A full-court press, the kind that doesn’t wait for halftime. They pushed the Bridge program forward while also lighting a fire under Boeing, nudging the VC-25B schedule closer by a year, now aiming for 2028. By May, they’d welcomed a former Qatari jet into the fold, ready for its transformation.

Of course, turning requirements into reality is never easy. Shifting specs had slowed things down before, but this time the team zeroed in on the essentials: keep the President safe, secure, and connected, no matter what.

General Ken Wilsbach put it plainly: the mission is about resilience and reliability, whatever the world throws at them. And while the public speculates, the Air Force is keeping the details of the jet’s transformation under wraps. Letting the results do the talking as the story unfolds above our heads.

Features of the “Bridge”

The presidential air fleet is made up of two iconic Boeing 747-200Bs, bearing the tail numbers 28000 and 29000, officially known as VC-25s by the Air Force. Whenever the president steps aboard—on these or any Air Force plane—the world tunes in to the legendary radio call sign: “Air Force One.”

But these aren’t your standard jumbo jets. The VC-25s are packed with specialized electronics, advanced communications gear, their own baggage loader, built-in air-stairs at both ends, and even the ability to refuel midair. They are the true marvels of airborne engineering.

Inside, it’s a flying White House. The president has a private executive suite, complete with a stateroom, office, dressing room, and shower. A conference and dining room is ready for high-stakes meetings or family meals at 30,000 feet. There are secure spaces for staff, Secret Service agents, guests, and the press.

Two full galleys can serve up 100 meals at once, while six lavatories (including accessible ones) keep everyone comfortable. There’s even a medical suite on board, just in case.

General Characteristics
Primary Function: Presidential air transport
Contractor: Boeing Airplane Co.
Power Plant: Four General Electric CF6-80C2B1 jet engines
Thrust: 56,700 pounds, each engine
Length: 231 feet, 10 inches (70.7 meters)
Height: 63 feet, 5 inches (19.3 meters)
Wingspan: 195 feet, 8 inches (59.6 meters)
Speed: 630 miles per hour (Mach 0.92)
Ceiling: 45,100 feet (13,746 meters)
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 833,000 pounds (374,850 kilograms)
Range: 7,800 statute miles (6,800 nautical miles) (12,550 kilometers)
Crew: 30
Passengers: 71
Introduction Date: Dec. 8, 1990 (No. 28000); Dec. 23, 1990 (No. 29000)
Date Deployed: Sept. 6, 1990 (No. 28000); Mar. 26, 1991 (No. 29000)
Inventory: Active force, 2; ANG, 0; Reserve, 0

The Interim Jet Keeping Air Force One Mission-Ready

With the VC-25B “Bridge” aircraft wrapping up its modifications and flight testing, the United States is putting on a cinematic display of strategic foresight. Picture it: a gleaming, freshly painted 747-8, ready to take its place in the skies by summer 2026. Not just as a showpiece, but as a vital link in the chain of presidential mobility.

For the Presidential Airlift Group, this isn’t just a new ride; it’s a lifeline, a way to keep the gears of government turning at altitude while the long-awaited, permanent VC-25B replacements inch their way through delays and budget hurdles.

This moment is about more than swapping out an old jet for a new one. It’s about ensuring the president (and, by extension, the nation) has a secure, resilient flying command post, regardless of what the headlines say about defense procurement woes.

To America’s friends and rivals alike, the message is as clear as the contrail across a blue sky: the U.S. is committed to maintaining credible, flexible airlift for its highest office, even when the perfect solution is still years away.

There’s a bit of drama, too. The interim jet started life as a Qatari 747, a detail that adds an extra layer of political and security intrigue. But the takeaway here is simple: readiness can’t always wait for perfection. The Air Force has chosen action over delay, fielding an “in-between” aircraft to bridge the gap, because the business of leading a nation doesn’t pause for supply chain issues or shifting budgets.

As Air & Space Forces Magazine points out, this Bridge aircraft will serve only until the new VC-25Bs finally arrive. Still, it sets the stage for a new era in presidential aviation, one where adaptability and speed may matter just as much as the latest technology.

When even Air Force One needs a stopgap, it’s a sign that tomorrow’s aerial battlegrounds will be shaped as much by how fast you can adapt as by what you fly. In this high-stakes game, being ready—right now—might be the most powerful statement of all.

This Week in Aviation History

On 14 May 1973, America launched Skylab. It is their very first space station, riding atop the last mighty Saturn V. The Soviets had Salyut a couple of years earlier, but Skylab was bigger, bolder, and packed with gadgets for all kinds of cosmic science. Astronauts became both lab rats and explorers, studying how their bodies handled floating for weeks, gazing back at Earth, and peering into the sun’s secrets.

Even students got a ticket to the stars—well, their experiments did—making class projects a lot cooler than baking soda volcanoes. Three astronaut crews took turns calling Skylab home, some for nearly two months, carrying out a whopping 270 experiments against the backdrop of endless night and day.

The Launching of America’s First Space Station

Just a minute into flight, Houston’s flight controllers saw trouble brewing: Skylab’s micrometeoroid shield, meant to ward off space debris and protect against the Sun’s relentless heat, had deployed far too early.

As the rocket sliced through a cloud bank and thundered past the sound barrier, aerodynamic forces ripped the shield away, tearing and jamming one of the solar panels.

With the shield gone, the station’s belly was exposed to the Sun, and the lab’s main solar arrays were damaged. One stuck, the other torn right off from the force of retrorockets during the final stage separation.

Inside Mission Control, Flight Director Donald Puddy and his engineers faced a nail-biting dilemma: point Skylab toward the Sun for power but risk roasting the lab or turn away and freeze out their power supply.

After a tense day of calculations and coffee, the team found a delicate balance, buying precious time. But onboard temperatures soared, threatening to wreck sensitive equipment and make the station uninhabitable for the astronauts who were supposed to launch just a day later.

NASA delayed the crew’s flight, sending Pete Conrad, Paul Weitz, and Joe Kerwin back to Houston for an intense crash course in space repair. Engineers in Houston and Huntsville worked around the clock, improvising solutions to deploy the stuck solar panel and shade the exposed workshop.

Meanwhile, NASA chief James Fletcher launched an investigation into what went wrong. The board found the shield simply wasn’t built to survive the supersonic winds of launch, and that engineers had focused mostly on what would happen in the weightless calm of orbit, not the violent ride up.

Nobody had assigned a dedicated engineer to champion the shield’s design, and vital conversations between shield designers and aerodynamic experts never happened. Skylab’s near-disaster was a lesson in teamwork, adaptability, and the real-life drama that unfolds when humans dare to build castles in the sky.

Against the odds, a crew would soon fly uphill to save America’s battered space station, proving that the story of exploration is written not just by triumphs, but by how we respond to setbacks.

A Closer Look at the First Space Station

America’s first experimental space station, Skylab, was designed for long durations. Its objectives were twofold: To prove that humans could live and work in space for extended periods, and to expand our knowledge of solar astronomy well beyond Earth-based observations. The program was successful in all respects despite early mechanical difficulties.

Skylab made extensive use of Saturn and Apollo equipment. Through the use of a “dry” third stage of the Saturn V rocket, the station was completely outfitted as a workshop area before launch. Crews visited Skylab and returned to Earth in Apollo spacecraft.

Three, three-man crews occupied the Skylab workshop for a total of 171 days and 13 hours. It was the site of nearly 300 scientific and technical experiments, including medical experiments on humans’ adaptability to zero gravity, solar observations and detailed Earth resources experiments.

The Skylab complex consisted of four major components: the Orbital Workshop (OWS), the Airlock Module (AM), the Multiple Docking Adapter (MDA), and the Apollo Telescope Mount (ATM). The Apollo Command and Service Module transported crews to and from Skylab and remained attached to the station throughout a crew’s occupancy to serve as an emergency escape vehicle.

The OWS served as the main working, living, and sleeping compartment for the crews, and contained exercise equipment, a galley, and many of the scientific experiments for the life sciences studies.

Two large solar arrays on the OWS provided 12.4 kW of power to the station. The AM enabled astronauts to conduct spacewalks, while the MDA included a prime and backup docking port for the Apollo spacecraft and also housed the Earth Resources Experiment Package.

The ATM contained telescopes for solar observations and four solar arrays for additional power. Once in orbit, the complex weighed 170,000 pounds, by far the heaviest spacecraft at that time.

Skylab’s Lasting Legacy

Skylab’s story kicks off with disaster: a wounded station, battered and bruised, refusing to quit. Launched atop the mighty Saturn V, America’s first space station barely made it to orbit before calamity struck: a ripped-away meteoroid shield and a missing solar array. But here’s where legend takes flight.

Rather than throwing in the towel, NASA turned this near-miss into a masterclass in space survival, showing the world that astronauts could do more than ride rockets. They could roll up their sleeves, improvise, and fix what broke, 270 miles above the ground.

Skylab quickly became America’s first classroom in the sky. Over three missions, crews spent 171 days aboard, running almost 300 experiments: testing what happens to the human body in zero gravity, capturing the Sun’s secrets, and looking back at Earth with new eyes. NASA would later call Skylab the bedrock for the science that powers today’s International Space Station and tomorrow’s Moon and Mars adventures.

But Skylab’s most enduring legacy isn’t just the data it sent home. It’s what it proved about us. Humans could adapt, repair, work, sweat, and thrive in space for months at a stretch.

The lessons learned didn’t burn up when Skylab finally reentered Earth’s atmosphere in 1979. Instead, they live on, woven into the fabric of every space station and mission that followed. Skylab’s past keeps orbiting, high above, shaping the future of exploration.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Achieving this first flight underscores the strong partnership between the Navy and our industry partners.”

—Rear Adm. Tony Rossi

Mission Briefing

The first real-deal MQ-25 Stingray just soared into the skies for its maiden voyage—a major leap in the Navy’s quest to bring drone refueling to aircraft carriers. Picture this: a new era of aviation unfolds, with unmanned jets lining up to keep the action going at sea.

A Key Step Toward Carrier-based Unmanned Aerial Refueling

It’s a crisp spring morning at MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, and the future of carrier aviation is about to take flight. The U.S. Navy’s production model MQ-25 Stingray, a sleek, unmanned aerial refueling aircraft, revs up on the runway.

Nearly seven years after its predecessor, the T1 test asset, first kissed the clouds. On April 25, 2026, with anticipation thick in the air, the MQ-25 finally lifts off, trailed by a trusty Boeing TA-4J Skyhawk and a Navy UC-12M Huron, both playing the essential role of chase planes. It’s a cinematic moment: a new chapter for naval aviation, unfolding right before our eyes.

But getting here wasn’t just a matter of flipping a switch. The MQ-25’s first flight had been slated for late 2025, but, like any good adventure, there were a few plot twists. The maiden attempt on April 22 was aborted for reasons still under wraps.

Just another reminder that even cutting-edge tech has its dramatic pauses. Since January, Boeing and NAVAIR have been putting the aircraft through its paces with taxi trials. Those high and low-speed dashes down the tarmac where every system is poked, prodded, and verified. The MQ-25, sporting upgrades like a retractable EO/IR turret, has steadily moved from ground testing to taking on the skies.

The action isn’t slowing down, either. With this first flight in the logbook, the program now shifts into full-on flight test mode, with the Navy’s VX-23 and UX-24 squadrons teaming up to put the Stingray through its paces.

These units, seasoned in both manned and unmanned testing, will orchestrate a series of rigorous evaluations. Everything from system integration checks to new aerial refueling trials, ensuring the aircraft is truly carrier-ready.

All this feeds into the Navy’s vision of achieving Initial Operational Capability by fiscal year 2027, with nine Stingrays set to blaze the trail during testing. The lessons learned from the MQ-25’s journey—every engine start, aborted takeoff, and successful flight—are already shaping the next era of unmanned carrier aviation, where the sky’s the limit and the story’s just getting started.

Fueling the Fight: Inside the MQ-25 Stingray

Think of the MQ-25 as a two-part marvel: there’s the futuristic drone itself—the Air System—and the Unmanned Carrier Aviation Mission Control System, or UMCS, which acts as mission control for carrier launches, recoveries, and everything in between.

The Navy’s PMA-268 crew is at the helm, orchestrating both elements like seasoned conductors, making sure every piece fits just right for seamless carrier integration.

Right now, the MQ-25 is deep into flight testing, building on lessons from its trusty forebear, the T1 test jet. Back in 2019, the first T1 flight opened the door to a whirlwind of discoveries, helping engineers fine-tune systems and software for a fast-paced development cycle.

Boeing came on board in 2018 with a contract to build four engineering models, and by 2020, three more test aircraft were greenlit. The MQ-25 T1 didn’t just taxi around either. By summer 2021, it was already topping off Super Hornets, F-35Cs, and E-2Ds midair.

Then, in December 2021, the MQ-25 took its talents to the USS George H.W. Bush, proving unmanned flight ops are ready for the big stage. The MQ-25’s journey is already rewriting what’s possible for carrier aviation.

General Characteristics

Primary function: Aerial refueling

Contractor: Boeing

Propulsion: Rolls-Royce AE3700N

Length: 51.0 feet

Wingspan (wings spread): 75.0 feet

Wingspan (wings folded): 31.3 feet

Height (wings spread): 9.8 feet

Height (wings folded): 15.7 feet

The Stingray Effect: Extending the Carrier Air Wing’s Reach

For the U.S. Navy, the MQ-25 Stingray isn’t just a high-tech tanker drone. It’s the stealthy solution to one of carrier aviation’s most pressing headaches: how to reach farther, faster, and safer.

As threats like anti-ship missiles and advanced air defenses push carriers farther from shore, the MQ-25 steps in to extend the reach of the carrier air wing. By taking the refueling burden off crewed fighters, this drone lets the F/A-18 Super Hornets get back to doing what they do best—flying strike missions—while pushing the boundaries of how far Navy jets can go on a single hop.

But the Stingray’s impact goes beyond American decks. Wherever U.S. carriers sail; from the Indo-Pacific to the Mediterranean or the Red Sea. So goes the reach of America’s allies.

With the MQ-25 in play, allied air wings can fly farther and linger longer, making coalition carriers a tougher challenge for any adversary and a bigger reassurance for any partner.

Its maiden flight in April 2026 wasn’t just a milestone for the Navy; it was a hint that unmanned systems aren’t just sidekicks anymore. They’re taking center stage. The MQ-25 isn’t about replacing pilots; it’s about letting them fly farther and smarter. As the Stingray proves itself at sea, the real question becomes not if drones have a place on the carrier deck, but just how many roles they’ll take on next.

This Week in Aviation History

On a breezy day on 9 May 1962, the Sikorsky S-64 Skycrane took to the skies for its very first flight over Stratford, Connecticut. Picture this: an audacious machine, more powerful than its predecessor, swapping out the old piston engine for a sleek new turbine. The U.S. Army was so impressed, they snapped up six for testing and soon put in a hefty order for dozens more, dubbing them the CH-54A Tarhe and CH-54B. But the story didn’t end with the military. Sikorsky also crafted a handful of S-64Es and Fs for civilian use. The Skycrane’s debut was pure aviation cinema, marking the rise of a true heavy-lifting legend.

The Skycrane’s Maiden Flight

After the experimental S-60 flying crane proved its mettle, Sikorsky got the green light from the top brass to dream bigger, launching the development of the S-64 Skycrane. This new bird wasn’t just an upgrade. It was a leap, trading the old piston engines for powerful turbines and promising more muscle for heavy lifting.

The mission? Haul hefty cargo with speed and safety, thanks to its clever external load system. But Sikorsky’s team didn’t stop there; they designed a detachable pod slung underneath for moving troops or other internal loads, making the Skycrane even more versatile.

The S-64’s story kicked off with its maiden flight on May 9, 1962, a mere 13 months after Sikorsky’s board gave the go-ahead. By July, the prototype was already strutting its stuff at Fort Benning, Georgia, ready for Army evaluation. All funded straight out of Sikorsky’s pocket up to that point.

The Army was clearly impressed, purchasing six Skycranes for $13 million and giving them the military moniker CH-54A Tarhe. Four of these choppers would soon find themselves in Vietnam, flexing their muscle in the thick of the war. The Germans showed interest too, picking up a couple for testing, but eventually decided to stick with a different bird—the CH-53A, which had an internal cabin.

The Skycrane kept evolving. What began as the S-64A soon morphed, after the Army’s production order and a slew of upgrades (like wider rotor blades), into the CH-54A for the Army and the S-64E in Sikorsky’s books. Years down the line, as new missions emerged, the design evolved again into the CH-54B/S-64F. The Skycrane earned its FAA Type Certificate in July 1965, and by 1969, the beefed-up CH-54B model was rolling off the production line, cementing its legacy as a true heavy-lift legend in aviation history.

The Flying Workhorse That Redefined Heavy Lift

Imagine the S-64 Skycrane rolling out onto the tarmac. A machine that looked more like a flying crane than a traditional helicopter, thanks to its bold, minimalist design. Instead of a standard cabin, Sikorsky stripped things back to basics: just a sturdy “stick” fuselage with no frills, purpose-built for external cargo hauling.

Powering this beast were two roaring Pratt & Whitney JFTD-12 turbine engines, paired with an impressive 72-foot-wide rotor system borrowed from the S-56/S-60, but with some cinematic upgrades: a sixth blade and a beefier blade chord, giving it even more muscle in the sky.

Landing gear got a makeover, too. Gone was the old setup. The Skycrane sported tricycle gear with the nose wheel up front and main wheels behind, a smart tweak learned from the S-60 days to make ground maneuvering around heavy loads far easier.

A tail skid stood guard in case things got wild during nose-up landings. The cockpit setup was pure aviation theater: nestled below the main structure, it housed not just the usual pilot and copilot, but also a third, aft-facing pilot whose job was to command the ship when locking onto or releasing cargo. Add two mechanics to the mix—there for those long missions out in the wild—and you had a five-person crew ready for anything.

One quirk that set the Skycrane apart was its exposed dynamic system—no cowlings covered the guts above, since speed wasn’t the name of the game and easy maintenance trumped aerodynamics. The transmission had its own trick: a three-degree tilt to the left, keeping the chopper level while hovering over a payload, even if it meant the cockpit sat at a quirky angle during cruise.

The aft-facing cockpit was designed with precision in mind, ditching the old rotating seat from the S-60 in favor of a dedicated fly-by-wire station—a pioneering move in helicopter design. Pilots could switch between fine control via SAS servos or take full charge with trim servos connected to the front sticks, letting everyone in the cockpit know what was happening and step in if needed.

And for the grand finale: a 20,000-pound capacity cargo hoist, giving the Skycrane the muscle to raise and lower massive loads at a single point, all while hovering effortlessly in place. This was no ordinary helicopter. It was a flying workhorse, built for the heavy-lifting legends of the skies.

The Helicopter That Turned Lift Into an Art Form

The Sikorsky S-64 Skycrane carved out a legend much grander than its bare-bones silhouette might suggest. Debuting on May 9, 1962, this machine was a radical departure from tradition; a helicopter that ditched the classic fuselage in favor of a raw, exposed frame built purely for lifting. Sikorsky envisioned it as a heavy cargo lifter, built for swift and efficient external-load missions, a design that would go on to reshape how the Army thought about helicopters.

In Army hands, the CH-54 Tarhe proved that helicopters could do so much more than ferry troops or rescue the wounded. It became the go-to for hauling everything from vehicles and artillery to downed aircraft and massive bridge sections, all into rugged terrain where no runway could be found. Drawing on lessons from the earlier S-60, Sikorsky’s Skycrane became the backbone of heavy lifting as the H-54A/CH-54A.

But the Skycrane’s story didn’t end on the battlefield. Thanks to Erickson, it was reborn as the Air Crane, a civilian heavy lifter and firefighting hero, upgraded with modern avionics and improved range to stay relevant well into the twenty-first century.

What the Skycrane really taught the world is that you don’t need sleek looks or firepower to make history in the skies. All you need is a clear mission, sheer muscle, and the guts to stand out. From the S-64 to today’s high-tech support craft, aviation’s unsung heroes keep quietly carrying the future forward.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The AH-64 Apache represents the backbone of the U.S. Army’s attack helicopter fleet.”

—Boeing

The cockpit is dark except for the glow of displays, the kind of green-lit world where terrain becomes data and danger appears as heat against the night. Ahead, somewhere beyond the canopy, a target hides behind distance, dust, and darkness.

Inside the AH-64 Apache, the crew does not simply fly toward the fight. They read it, sort it, and prepare to strike before the enemy fully understands what is coming.

Read more

Thank you to @SenTedBuddNC and @SenatorShaheen for introducing bipartisan legislation to support our Airmen & the future of American airpower.

—Office of the Secretary of the Air Force

Mission Briefing

With the Air Force doubling down on the F-15EX Eagle II, Senators Budd and Shaheen are rolling out a trio of bills to beef up America’s fighter lineup and keep top pilots in the cockpit. The next chapter in U.S. airpower is taxiing to the runway.

Eagles Rising: Senators Fuel the Next Flight Crew

Strap in, because the U.S. Air Force is dialing up the afterburners on its F-15EX Eagle II program, and the story’s only gaining altitude. With plans now calling for as many as 267 of these next-gen fighters, you’d think the sky was the limit. But if a squadron of senators gets its way, this is just the first mission in a much bigger campaign.

Not long after the Pentagon dropped a jaw-dropping $1.5 trillion budget request for 2027—the biggest in U.S. history—Senators Ted Budd (Republican, North Carolina) and Jeanne Shaheen (Democrat, New Hampshire) taxied onto the legislative runway.

As key players on the Senate Armed Services Committee, they’ve rolled out three new bills, all laser-focused on making sure American air dominance isn’t just a legend of the past but the headline act of tomorrow’s fight.

Front and center is the Airpower Acceleration Act, a bill that aims to etch into law a surge in orders for both the stealthy F-35 Lightning II and the mighty F-15EX Eagle II. But here’s the kicker: this act doesn’t just lock in the current 267 jets on the books.

It pushes the throttle forward, aiming for a whopping 329 Eagles in the hangar by the 2030s. Why? To make sure the venerable F-15E Strike Eagle gets a worthy replacement and to guarantee the Air Force’s teeth stay sharp in the coming decades.

The act would put the Air Force on track to boost its combat-ready fighter fleet by 10% between 2030 and 2035, totaling at least 1,369 jets, and then crank that up to a 20% increase—1,558 fighters—from 2035 onward.

Normally, decisions about fleet size live with the Pentagon’s top brass, but Congress has been known to put its foot down. Just ask the Navy about its minimum of 11 aircraft carriers and 31 amphibious ships.

While the bill doesn’t spell out an exact number for F-35s, it’s no secret the Air Force has already signaled a hunger for more Lightnings in the 2027 shopping list. Meanwhile, defense insiders have long cheered the Eagle II’s place in the lineup, highlighting how it teams up with stealth birds like the F-22 and F-35 (and soon, the futuristic Boeing F-47) for unbeatable punch.

But it’s not just about hardware. The second bill in this legislative flight pack—the RETAIN Act—is all about keeping experienced pilots in the cockpit. It’s set to offer creative, non-monetary perks to make sure the Air Force’s best and brightest stick around for the long haul.

The next era of American airpower? It’s already rolling down the runway.

The Anatomy of the Eagles

The F-15EX Eagle II is the Air Force’s most advanced Eagle, built off the F-15QA and set to replace the old F-15C/D fleet. For the first time, this USAF fighter comes with digital fly-by-wire controls and a glass cockpit that feels straight out of a sci-fi flick, complete with touch screens.

It launches with top-tier tech, including APG-82 AESA radar, the Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System, and the EPAWSS self-defense suite. All standards from day one.

The Eagle II also breaks new ground with Open Mission System software, making upgrades and new capabilities as simple as swapping apps. Tied together with the latest Suite 9.1, it shares cutting-edge software with legacy jets, keeping the whole flock ready for whatever the skies throw at them.

Let me give you a rundown of this bird

Contractors: Boeing; BAE Systems (EPAWSS); Raytheon (AESA).
First Flight: Feb. 2, 2021.
Delivered: Mar. 11, 2021-present.
IOC: July 2023 (originally planned).
Production: 104 (planned)
Inventory: Two.
Operator: ACC, AFMC. Planned: ANG.
Aircraft Location: Eglin AFB, Fla. Planned: Fresno ANGB, Calif.; Kadena AB, Japan; Klamath Falls (Kingsley Field); NAS JRB New Orleans, La.; and Portland Arpt., Ore.
Active Variant: •F-15EX. Future F-15C/D replacement based on the F-15QA developed for Qatar.
Dimensions: Span 42.8 ft, length 63.8 ft, height 18.5 ft.
Weight: Max T-O 81,000 lb.
Power Plant: Two General Electric F100-PW-229 turbofans with afterburners, each 29,000 lb thrust.
Performance: Speed Mach 2.5, range approx. 2,762 miles (air refuelable).
Ceiling: 60,000 ft.
Armament: One internally mounted M61A1 20 mm six-barrel cannon (500 rd); combination of up to 12 AIM-9 Sidewinders or AIM-120 AMRAAMs, or combination of up to 24 air-to-ground munitions.
Accommodation: Pilot and (optional) second aircrew member on ACES 5 zero/zero ejection seats.

More Fighters, Sharper Deterrence

For the U.S., this isn’t just another political dogfight in the halls of Congress. It’s a warning light blinking on the Air Force’s dashboard. Senators Ted Budd and Jeanne Shaheen are championing a trio of bills designed to supercharge America’s fighter fleet, green-light more F-15EX and F-35s, and keep veteran pilots in the cockpit as the world gets dicey.

The Airpower Acceleration Act would raise the bar on how many fighters the Air Force must keep ready for action, while companion bills aim to stop experienced aviators from hanging up their helmets just as global competition heats up.

For allies in NATO and the Indo-Pacific, the message rings loud and clear: American jets will still be the thunder overhead when the going gets tough. A bigger, modernized fighter force means more muscle to surge forward, show up where it matters, and seamlessly team up with partner nations across the globe.

The Air Force’s own budget pitch for FY2026 says staying ahead of China’s rising military power demands aggressive modernization. Think F-35As, F-15EXs, new tankers, stealth bombers, and next-gen munitions.

The F-15EX earns its keep not as the stealthy tip of the spear, but as the heavy hitter in the lineup. The missile-hauler backing up the stealth fighters, lugging big payloads into the fight. Air & Space Forces Magazine reports the Air Force could grow its Eagle II fleet to 267, giving old warbirds a rest and slowing down the aging of the force.

But here’s the kicker: buying jets is only half the battle. The real challenge will be making sure ammo stockpiles, pilot training, base defenses, and maintenance crews are ready to keep those birds flying when the sky turns hostile.

This Week in Aviation History

The Battle of the Coral Sea marked the first time the U.S. managed to halt Japan’s unstoppable push across the Pacific after Pearl Harbor. In a groundbreaking twist, it was also the first naval showdown where enemy ships never laid eyes on each other—every shot was called in from afar. The action wrapped up on 8 May 1942, setting a new chapter in naval warfare.

The Battle of the Coral Sea

In early 1942, as the Pacific war heated up, Japan mapped out a bold plan to push their forces south and southeast from the Bismarck Archipelago and the Solomons. Their immediate targets were Tulagi in the Solomons and Port Moresby in New Guinea. They are the key stepping stones for further expansion.

Alongside these, the Japanese eyed the phosphate-rich islands of Nauru and Ocean (Banaba) in the Gilberts chain, vital for fueling their agriculture back home.

Between 29 April and 4 May, Japanese troops stormed and occupied Tulagi, but not without a price: aircraft from the USS Yorktown swooped in, catching several Japanese warships off guard and sending them to the bottom.

With the element of surprise lost, the Japanese Carrier Strike Force surged toward the Coral Sea, eager to track down and wipe out the Allied fleet. What followed, starting on May 7, was a dramatic two-day exchange of airstrikes. Fleets launching waves of aircraft at each other, sight unseen, in a brand-new style of naval combat.

The resulting clashes saw U.S. Navy task forces, reinforced by Australian cruisers, lock horns with the Japanese carriers and their escorts. Tactically, the Japanese came out ahead: they sank the carrier USS Lexington, the destroyer USS Sims, and the oiler USS Neosho, and damaged the Yorktown.

The Allies, meanwhile, managed to sink only the light carrier Shoho and put a hurt on the fleet carrier Shokaku. Forced to withdraw, the Allied ships left the battlefield to the Japanese. But battered Japanese air groups were in no shape for further conquest, and Port Moresby remained out of their grasp.

Crucially, Shokaku was so badly damaged she couldn’t join the next major operation at Midway. Her sister carrier Zuikaku, short on planes and pilots after the heavy fighting, also sat out. When the smoke cleared, Coral Sea had reduced the number of Japanese carriers available for Midway by a third: a pivotal edge for the Allies in the coming fight.

Navy historian Samuel Eliot Morison called it “the Battle of Errors,” with both sides learning on the fly in this new era of carrier warfare. But when the dust settled, it was the Japanese who failed to capitalize on their opportunities.

Amid the chaos, four Medals of Honor were awarded for extraordinary heroism, honoring men from Yorktown, Lexington, and Neosho: some posthumously, all for bravery in the heat of battle.

Inside the Killer Dauntless

Affectionately dubbed the “Slow, But Deadly” by the Marines who flew and cared for it, the Douglas SBD Dauntless dive bomber stood as the Marine Corps’ top-of-the-line bomber when World War II erupted.

Though Dauntless production wrapped up in 1944 with about 5,400 rolling out of the factory, this plucky warbird earned a rare distinction—fighting from the first shots to the final days of WWII, and serving faithfully with the USMC throughout the entire conflict.

Besides the Battle of the Coral Sea, the SBD’s legend was cemented at the Battle of Midway in June 1942, when U.S. Navy Dauntless squadrons dealt a staggering blow to the Japanese fleet, sinking four enemy carriers in just a few hours and turning the tide of the Pacific war.

Let us take a closer look at the Dauntless

SPECIFICATIONS

• Wingspan: 41’ 6”

• Length: 32’ 8”

• Gross Weight: 10,400 lbs.

• Power Plant: Wright C Clone R-1820-52 9 cylinder, Radial Air Cooled, 1000HP

• Armament: 2 .5 cal. Machine guns, 2 .3 cal. Machine guns, 1,200 lbs. of bombs

PERFORMANCE

• Max Speed: 250 mph

• Range: 1,345 miles

• Service Ceiling: 27,100 ft.

• Crew: 2

The Battle of the Coral Sea’s Legacy

The Battle of the Coral Sea rewrote the rulebook for naval warfare in the Pacific. Fought from May 4 to 8, 1942, this clash halted Japan’s drive toward Port Moresby. It is a move that could have put Australia in the crosshairs and stretched Japanese reach even further into the South Pacific.

It came at a steep price: the U.S. lost the carrier Lexington, Yorktown took a beating, and both sides suffered heavy aircraft losses. But the bigger story was this: for the first time in the Pacific War, Japanese expansion was stopped dead in its tracks.

Coral Sea was also a watershed moment for naval combat itself. For the first time, fleets never fired a shot at each other directly. Aircraft did the heavy lifting, launching strikes over the horizon while their ships remained distant sentinels.

Carrier decks, packed with bombers and torpedo planes, became the new center of gravity, and the crews who launched into the unknown became the battle’s true heroes.

That’s why Coral Sea’s echoes still roll through history. Back then, the big question was whether Allied air and sea power could find and stop an enemy before they reached their target.

Today, in the Indo-Pacific, that same challenge remains. Only now, it’s jets, drones, and digital eyes picking up the slack once handled by the likes of Yorktown and Lexington. The real legacy of Coral Sea? The hard-won lesson that whoever commands the skies can shape the fate of the seas and sometimes, the fate of nations.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“With the F-47, we are not just building another fighter – we are shaping the future of warfare and putting our enemies on notice. This platform will be the most advanced, lethal, and adaptable fighter ever developed – designed to outpace, outmaneuver, and outmatch any adversary that dares to challenge our brave Airmen.”

—Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David Allvin

Mission Briefing

The race for the sixth-generation fighter jet isn’t about bragging rights, it’s about tackling a real and relentless challenge. Modern battlefields are a jungle of radars, long-range missiles, jamming, cyber threats, drones, and hypersonic weapons, making survival tougher for even the most cutting-edge jets.

That’s why tomorrow’s fighter isn’t just a lone wolf anymore. It’s transforming into the beating heart of a sprawling air combat system. Teaming up with escort drones, scattered sensors, encrypted data links, electronic warfare, and a torrent of data crunching, all working together to outfox whatever the skies throw its way.

A Response to Concrete Military Problem

Let’s set the record straight: there’s no official playbook that spells out exactly what makes a fighter jet “sixth-generation.” The label is really shorthand for a new breed of aircraft that leap past the F-22s, F-35s, J-20s, and Su-57s of today.

It’s not just about better stealth—it’s about reinventing the very rhythm of air combat. These jets aren’t just flying sensors and missile trucks anymore; they’re becoming orchestrators, commanding swarms of drones, blending data from every corner of the battlespace, jamming enemy signals, and outmaneuvering threats in a storm of electronic warfare.

To talk about the next-gen fighter is to stop thinking of it as a lone wolf. Whether it’s American, British, Japanese, or European programs, they all use different jargon—collaborative combat, combat cloud, advanced human-machine teaming—but they’re singing the same tune: the pilot can’t do it all alone when the sky fills with threats.

Now, aviators need remote sensors, algorithmic copilots, and robotic wingmen to keep up.

Right now, the U.S. is out in front. In March 2025, the Air Force handed Boeing the keys to the Next Generation Air Dominance Platform—now called the F-47—officially declaring it the first sixth-gen fighter.

But the real mission isn’t just to outdo the F-22; it’s about building a force where piloted jets and smart drones fight together, with plans for more than 185 crewed aircraft and their robotic partners.

Hot on America’s heels is Team GCAP, a coalition of the UK, Italy, and Japan, targeting service entry around 2035 (though Japan has voiced doubts about the timeline). The trio has set up a joint government group and, as of June 2025, launched Edgewing, the industrial team driving development.

Their vision? A fighter at the heart of a network of sensors, secure links, and unmanned effectors. Meanwhile, France, Germany, and Spain are chasing their own dream with the SCAF/FCAS program, aiming for a holistic air combat system by 2040. But political friction and industrial rivalries—especially between Dassault and Airbus—have clouded its future, leaving the program’s fate uncertain as of late 2025.

Reasons Behind Such Development

When we talk about stealth in the world of sixth-generation fighters, we’re not just dusting off an old playbook. Gone are the days when hiding from radar by minimizing your jet’s profile was enough.

Now, stealth is a multi-layered art: it’s about masking not only radar signatures, but also managing your heat trail, scrambling your electromagnetic footprint, and staying under the radar—literally and figuratively—even while your jet is buzzing with sensors and streaming data.

The paradox of tomorrow’s jet is that it needs to be hyper-connected, sharing information across the battlespace, without becoming so noisy that it paints a target on its own back. In the 2030s, stealth is a balancing act: comprehensive, relentless, and far more demanding than ever before.

But the real sensory overload comes from the second frontier: sensors and data fusion. The challenge isn’t a shortage of intel, but the flood of it. A sixth-gen pilot faces a torrent of information pouring in from radar systems, electronic warfare suites, infrared detectors, drones, satellites, wingmen, and command posts.

It’s no longer humanly possible to keep up. That’s why manufacturers are racing to build adaptive cockpits, digital copilots, and immersive displays. Cockpits where algorithms don’t just shout warnings, but actually help the pilot make sense of chaos, suggesting the right move at the right moment. Airbus, for instance, imagines a flight deck where the pilot can delegate whole tasks to a drone with just a glance or a gesture, all within a futuristic, augmented-reality interface.

Third, there’s the invisible war raging across the electromagnetic spectrum. In a real fight between heavyweights, comms will get jammed, spoofed, or blacked out entirely. So tomorrow’s jet must be able to survive and fight in the dark, leveraging electronic warfare and robust connectivity to stay ahead. As recent war reports make clear, dominance here isn’t just a bonus. It’s a lifeline.

Finally, the crown jewel: collaborative combat. Loyal wingmen—unmanned escort drones—aren’t here to steal the show from human pilots, but to have their backs. These robotic partners can scout ahead, draw fire, jam enemy radars, launch munitions, or absorb risks too great for any aviator.

The US Air Force is already flying these collaborative combat aircraft, aiming to protect pilots and supercharge the entire force by blending manned and unmanned power in the sky.

Network Supremacy: Redefining Airpower for the Sixth-Generation Battlespace

The real fascination with sixth-generation fighters is less about shiny new jets and more about surviving—and dominating—a battlespace that’s merciless to anything slow, short-legged, or flying solo.

The next breed of combat aircraft won’t just sneak through radar; they’ll be deeply networked and ready to command swarms of drones, never fighting alone. That vision is at the heart of the U.S. Air Force’s F-47 and the broader NGAD program: a long-range, stealthy, and modular machine designed to be the conductor of an entire high-tech orchestra, with collaborative drones as its wingmen.

For America, air superiority is shifting from the old “top gun wins” mindset to a new era where the best network—one that adapts and learns on the fly—wins the day.

The Air Force is making it clear to friends and rivals alike: deterrence in the future won’t rest on just having the flashiest piloted jets, but on the ability to blend sensors, hit targets from afar, and seamlessly mesh manned and unmanned teams, especially in the fiercely contested skies of the Indo-Pacific or Europe, where distance and electronic warfare make old strategies risky.

Allies are picking up the signal, but it’s a double-edged call. Initiatives like GCAP show a real hunger among partners for shared next-gen capabilities and a robust defense-industrial backbone by the 2030s.

Yet the struggles of FCAS are a reminder: it’s not just about aerodynamics or cutting-edge tech; politics, industrial teamwork, and digital integration are just as crucial. In the end, the future of allied airpower may depend less on any single super-jet and more on whether coalitions can actually stitch together truly interoperable, adaptable combat networks; on time and under pressure.

What comes next may matter even more than the aircraft itself: the real contest could be over who fields the most resilient combat cloud, the smartest drone partners, and the industrial base strong enough to keep upgrading them before the next crisis arrives.

This Week in Aviation History

When Commander Task Force 76 got the green light for Operation Frequent Wind, it wasn’t just another mission. It was the final, urgent call to evacuate Americans and South Vietnamese whose loyalty had put them at risk. As the helicopters lifted off and the last refugees cleared the rooftops, the Vietnamese Navy set course for safer shores in the Philippines and Guam under Operation New Life. With that, the long chapter of U.S. Navy involvement in Vietnam quietly closed after a quarter-century of struggle and sacrifice. The last flights marked not just the end of an operation, but the final bow of America’s naval commitment to a nation fighting for its very survival.

Operation Frequent Wind

More than 58,000 names are etched into the polished black granite of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. Stand in that quiet, reflective space long enough and the wall itself seems to change.

It stops being cold stone and starts to feel like you’re walking an empty flight line after the day’s last sortie. Every name a call sign, a crew chief, a wingman, a story that ended mid-mission but never really faded away. And near the close of that long, bitter conflict, the final chapter unfolded fast, hot, and utterly chaotic above the rooftops of Saigon.

The last Americans to fall in Vietnam were Marines: Cpl. Charles McMahon Jr. and Lance Cpl. Darwin Judge, killed by a rocket attack at Tan Son Nhut Air Base on April 29, 1975, less than 24 hours before Saigon itself fell.

That same desperate window claimed two more Marines in the air—Capt. Craig Nystul and 1st Lt. Michael Shea—when their CH-46 Sea Knight helicopter plunged into the South China Sea, just short of recovering aboard USS Hancock. Even as the end drew near, the war was still exacting its price in blood and saltwater.

By then, America’s big ground war was already history. The combat troops had pulled out years before, but South Vietnam was unraveling faster than anyone in Washington dared believe.

What remained was a mad scramble: evacuate Americans, get vulnerable Vietnamese and foreign nationals out, and do it before the final curtain dropped. That became Operation Frequent Wind—the biggest helicopter evacuation ever seen—playing out over April 29 and 30, 1975.

The signal to go didn’t come as a bugle or a shouted command. Instead, it drifted through the airwaves: American Forces Radio played Bing Crosby’s “White Christmas,” followed by a weather forecast for a blistering 105 degrees.

It was a code, absurd and surreal: a Christmas song in the humid heat of Saigon spring. But if you knew, you knew: time to move, time to run for your extraction point. The city was on the edge, with no tickets, no guarantees, and no time to spare.

Evacuations had been underway for weeks by then. Fixed-wing flights had already carried out tens of thousands through Tan Son Nhut, but on April 28 enemy fire made the airport too dangerous for anything with wings.

The job now belonged to the helicopters: whirring rotors, rooftop landings, flight decks stacked with refugees, and nerves stretched to the breaking point.

Out at sea, near Vung Tau, an armada waited: carriers, amphibs, destroyers, support ships: a floating lifeline in the South China Sea, thrown out to catch those fleeing the collapse.

Fighters flew overhead, scanning for threats. Marine, Air Force, and South Vietnamese choppers flew round after round, plucking evacuees from rooftops and hustling them out to the ships. The tempo was manic. Decks jammed with helicopters, some shoved overboard to make room for more, others ditched in the sea so the next bird could land. Sentiment had no place here. Every minute saved could mean another life.

And then came one of the war’s defining images. At 7:53 a.m. on April 30, a Marine CH-46 lifted the last embassy guards from the roof of the U.S. Embassy. Master Sgt. Juan Valdez, who had served an earlier tour in Vietnam, was the last to climb aboard: closing the door on a war he had seen from beginning to end. That detail lingers: one man, two tours, the last witness to a nation’s long goodbye.

Still, not everyone made it out. The window was too narrow, the crowds too thick. Some fled later by boat, picked up at sea; others were left behind. In the end, nearly 140,000 evacuees made it to the United States.

Forty-nine Americans stayed behind or were unaccounted for. Aircraft from Australia, Indonesia, Iran, Poland, Britain, France, and more joined the frantic rescue. Each nation scrambling to pull its people clear.

Even as choppers roared away from Saigon, officials in Washington were still struggling to grasp how quickly it had all unraveled. They’d expected danger, not sudden collapse. Saigon didn’t fade gently. It shattered.

And so the war’s final act was written not with parades or speeches, but with overloaded helicopters, a Christmas song on the radio, and a last desperate liftoff into the hazy morning sky.

The Task Force 76: The Armada at the Edge of Chaos

Admiral Maurice F. Weisner, commander of the Pacific Fleet, gave the order: the 7th Fleet’s amphibious task force—Task Force 76—was to steam into position, thirty miles off Vietnam’s southern tip, and stand by for the signal to begin evacuations.

Rear Admiral Donald Whitmire helmed the operation from the USS Blue Ridge, orchestrating a powerful flotilla. Alongside the carriers Midway, Hancock, and Okinawa, thirteen amphibious ships stood ready, each with helipads and room to shelter hundreds of refugees. Onboard those ships, 6,000 Marines from the 9th Marine Amphibious Brigade, led by Brigadier General Richard Carey, were prepped to storm ashore if the situation on land turned catastrophic.

In the wings, carriers Coral Sea and Enterprise prowled nearby, ready to unleash combat air support at a moment’s notice, all shielded by a perimeter of destroyers and frigates.

Altogether, this Navy–Marine Corps team—the muscle behind Operation Frequent Wind. Counted over 29,400 sailors and 6,000 Marines, a formidable force poised on the edge of chaos in the South China Sea.

But as this armada moved into position, trouble brewed at the U.S. Embassy in Saigon. Ambassador Graham Martin, seasoned and stubborn, refused to prepare for evacuation. As the President’s man on the ground, Martin outranked even the admirals; his word was law.

At 64, Martin clung to the hope that South Vietnam’s ARVN forces could hold the line or that a last-minute peace deal could be brokered with Hanoi. He feared that any hint of evacuation would ignite panic in the city. Martin’s resistance ran deep. He wouldn’t even allow the embassy’s great tamarind tree to be cut down to clear a landing zone for helicopters.

The Operation Frequent Wind’s Legacy

Operation Frequent Wind’s legacy lives on in two worlds: the realm of memory and the pages of military doctrine. For many, it’s the haunting, cinematic finale of America’s long ordeal in Vietnam; the desperate helicopter lifts, the embassy rooftop, the chaos in Saigon’s streets.

But for strategists and planners, it’s also a hard-won lesson in what happens when airpower, sea power, and political choices all collide as the ground shifts beneath your boots. In just forty-eight hours, U.S. forces airlifted 1,373 Americans and 5,595 Vietnamese and third-country nationals to safety, marking the largest helicopter evacuation in history and the closing chapter of America’s military presence in Vietnam.

The operation’s ties to the past are clear. Frequent Wind marked the end of more than twenty years of American involvement, and its frantic pace spotlighted the danger of misjudging how quickly an ally can fall once the tide turns. Even seasoned U.S. leaders underestimated how fast the North Vietnamese advance would unravel the South’s defenses.

Yet Frequent Wind’s lessons reach forward, too. It became the benchmark for noncombatant evacuations, interservice teamwork, and embassy crisis planning. It drove home a painful truth: sometimes, the most important fight comes not on the battlefield, but in the scramble to get your people out when the plan falls apart. In those moments, it’s the ships offshore, the choppers overhead, and the discipline of crews under pressure that form the last lifeline between disaster and deliverance.

That’s why Frequent Wind still echoes today. Not just as the end of a war, but as a warning for every planner that the hardest mission might just be the last one out.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

‘I can cure your men of walking off the program. Let’s put on the girls.’

—Jacqueline Cochran

Maps rustled, chairs scraped, and the room carried that wartime mix of urgency and doubt. Somewhere between the briefing table and the flight line, Jacqueline Cochran pressed an argument that still sounded …

Read more

“Operators are putting Collaborative Combat Aircraft to work faster—developing tactics through early experimentation & shaping how they’ll be used in the future fight.”

—U.S. Air Force Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

Under the wide California sky, the U.S. Air Force and Anduril kicked off the maiden tests of the trailblazing YFQ-44A at Edwards Air Force Base, where legends are born. In true aviator spirit, operators are taking the stick early, steering this futuristic bird through real-world trials and shaping the playbook as they go. It’s all part of the Air Force’s bold new approach—less red tape, more throttle—to fast-track game-changing tech straight into the hands of those who fly and fight.

What is Happening at the Edwards Air Base?

Under the endless blue canopy of Southern California, the YFQ-44A’s latest chapter unfolded: a cinematic tale of grit, innovation, and hands-on flying. Air Force personnel from the Experimental Operations Unit (EOU) and the 412th Test Wing weren’t just running drills; they were rewriting the rulebook for operating Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) in the kind of hostile environments where every second counts.

The operation began with the YFQ-44A departing Anduril’s test site—most likely the Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, the same ground where it first touched the sky—and making its way to the legendary runways of Edwards Air Force Base.

Once there, EOU airmen took charge of the entire show: from meticulous pre- and post-flight checks to arming and disarming the bird, to commanding its every move during daily sorties. It was the operators, not engineers or test pilots, in the cockpit: real warfighters putting steel to the test.

Lt. Col. Matthew Jensen, commander of the EOU, summed it up: “Every sortie flown was done with a warfighter kicking the tires and controlling the prototypes.” This wasn’t a sterile lab exercise or a carefully staged display.

It was boots on the tarmac, sweat on brows, and a relentless drive to “learn by doing,” moving at a pace and risk level that had the blessing of the Air Force’s senior leadership. The mission: make sure CCAs are battle-ready for the toughest arenas, not just on paper but out in the wild, where it matters most.

Anduril’s secret weapon? Not a sprawling control center or racks of hardware, but a ruggedized Menace-T laptop—fit for a Hollywood close-up—acting as the heart of ground ops.

With just this device and a couple of trusty Pelican cases, the team uploaded mission plans, triggered autonomous taxi and takeoff, managed the bird in flight, and downloaded data for post-mission analysis.

The exercise proved just how lean operations could be, simulating a forward operating base with almost nothing but grit and tech. Even the maintainers, trained up in mere days, were testament to the system’s simplicity and adaptability.

But this wasn’t just about flying; it was about forging the playbook for the future. The EOU is now hammering out the tactics, techniques, and procedures that will embed CCAs as a frontline force, ready for any conflict.

This all happened thanks to a rare fusion of command muscle: Air Combat Command and Air Force Materiel Command joined forces, fast-tracking the experiment and letting real operators shape the future at breakneck speed.

Col. Timothy Helfrich, who oversees acquisition for fighters and advanced aircraft, nailed the spirit: “An 85% solution in the hands of a warfighter today beats a perfect one that never arrives.” It’s innovation on afterburner, where the sky’s not even the limit.

The EOU and the Features of the YFQ-44

June 2025, Nellis Air Force Base—cue the buzz of anticipation as the Experimental Operations Unit (EOU) officially takes flight, charged with fast-tracking the era of Collaborative Combat Aircraft.

Once just a detachment under Eglin’s 53rd Wing, the EOU now stands tall as a full-fledged squadron, a move the Air Force calls a “significant step forward” toward fielding real operational CCAs before the decade is out.

The timing couldn’t be more cinematic: Beale AFB in California is tapped to host the first CCA Aircraft Readiness Unit, while, back at Nellis, the ground shakes as the YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A fire up for their first ground tests in May 2025.

The EOU’s mission? Be the crucible where man and machine learn to fly as one. It’s not just about theory.

This unit will put human-machine teaming to the test in gritty, live-fly scenarios, making sure the tactics and techniques dreamed up in simulators actually hold water where it counts. Every sortie is a chance to refine what works, toss out what doesn’t, and push the edge of what’s possible.

And at the pointy end of this revolution is the YFQ-44A Fury—a jet built for high-G showdowns, brushing up against Mach 1, its modular bay ready to host radar, IRST, or electronic warfare gadgets as the mission demands.

With a pair of AIM-120 AMRAAMs on its wings and the GA-ASI YFQ-42 flying as its partner, the Fury leads a new breed of unmanned wingmen, rewriting the playbook for air combat and locking in the future of the fight.

Writing the Loyal Wingman Playbook

This isn’t just another test flight. It’s a turning point for the U.S. and its allies. The Air Force is no longer treating Collaborative Combat Aircraft as a “someday” vision, but as a real capability, shaped in the here and now by the very operators who may one day fly into combat with these machines.

During the April 2026 exercise at Edwards Air Force Base, the YFQ-44A took flight with the Experimental Operations Unit, laying down the first building blocks for the tactics and procedures that will make CCAs more than just prototypes. They’ll be warfighters’ trusted partners in the battlespace.

The EOU’s mission is clear: get these next-gen aircraft into the field before the decade is out, and do it with a lean, fast-paced model that puts operators and rapid deployment front and center.

For the U.S., this means a future air force that can stretch its wings, spread risk, and keep humans safer by teaming pilots with tough, cost-effective uncrewed wingmen.

For American allies, it’s a sign that the playbook of air warfare is changing—human-machine teams, distributed operations, and quicker adaptation are becoming the new normal.

What matters most isn’t just the tech, but that the Air Force is learning to fight with it now, while the playbook is still being written.

This Week in Aviation History

On 26 April 1948, out in the sun-bleached expanse of Southern California’s Muroc Field—today’s Edwards Air Force Base—test pilot George Welch took the prototype XP-86 Sabre on a legendary flight. He pointed the nose down at a gutsy 40-degree dive and blasted through the Sound Barrier, carving his place in history. That moment marked the Sabre as only the second American aircraft to ever go supersonic, chasing the thunder of those who came before.

Breaking the Sound Barrier

In the annals of high-speed flight, the story of George Welch and the XP-86 Sabre reads like something straight out of a Hollywood script.

According to Albert W. Blackburn, a fellow test pilot and author of “Aces Wild: The Race For Mach 1,” Welch may have been the true trailblazer, pushing the prototype Sabre past the sound barrier as early as its first flight on October 1, 1947, well before Chuck Yeager’s historic X-1 run.

Blackburn claims Welch broke Mach 1 not just once, but three times before Yeager’s red-letter day, citing radar runs recording Mach 1.02 and 1.04 on 13 November 1947. Yet, the world never heard a whisper; allegedly because Secretary of the Air Force W. Stuart Symington, Jr. ordered it all kept under wraps.

The legend might have stayed buried if not for a slip across the Atlantic. During a live radio interview, British test pilot Wing Commander “Bee” Beamont casually revealed he’d smashed the sound barrier in the second XP-86 Sabre prototype.

With the cat out of the bag, the U.S. Air Force finally acknowledged Welch’s feat—though they officially dated it to 26 April 1948.

Back in those early days, not long after the XP-86’s maiden lift-off, Welch dropped by the office of aerodynamicist Edward J. Horkey at North American’s Inglewood plant.

There, he recounted his flight with a wry grin: a climb to 35,000 feet, a steep power dive, and an airspeed indicator that seemed frozen—until, like a scene out of a suspense flick, it suddenly snapped to 410 knots. The jet felt solid, with nothing but a slight roll to the left.

Horkey’s verdict: Welch was brushing up against “Mach effects”—a phenomenon that would become legendary as the “Mach jump,” with Welch its first chronicler.

The XP-86 Sabre would go on to become the stuff of legend, dominating the skies of the Korean War and rolling off production lines nearly 10,000 strong across the U.S., Canada, Australia, and Japan.

Welch himself was already a legend, having been recommended for the Medal of Honor for his daring as a P-40 pilot at Pearl Harbor. Tragically, he lost his life doing what he loved—testing the F-100A Super Sabre—on October 12, 1954. For aviators everywhere, his story is a testament to grit, speed, and the relentless pursuit of the unknown.

A Closer Look at the Sabre

Let me take you back to the golden age of flight, where the sky was a wild frontier and every new jet was a leap into the unknown. Picture this: October 1947—a sleek, silver XP-86 streaks down the runway, powered by a gutsy Allison J35 engine.

That first flight was a taste of things to come. By April 1948, the XP-86 wasn’t just flying. It was breaking barriers, pushing past the speed of sound in a shallow dive, leaving nothing but a sonic boom and wide-eyed ground crews in its wake.

The Air Force saw the future, and they wanted in. On December 1947, they put in a hefty order for 221 P-86As, this time beefed up with a more powerful General Electric J47 engine. Names changed as fast as the technology; by June 1948, the P-86A became the iconic F-86A, the Sabre.

September 1948 brought bragging rights—a world speed record at 671 miles per hour. But the Sabre wasn’t just fast; it was a pilot’s dream, handling like a sports car at 40,000 feet. Armed to the teeth with six nose-mounted .50-caliber guns, and later, a radar-guided sight, the Sabre was ready for anything.

Then came Korea. December 1950 saw the 4th Fighter Interceptor Wing touch down in Seoul, ready to tangle with the MiG-15. In the first-ever clash between swept-wing jets, Lt. Col. Bruce Hinton bagged a MiG, starting a streak. By war’s end, Sabres racked up nearly 800 kills for fewer than eighty losses.

The Sabre kept evolving. New engines, better guns, even all-weather radar models. Built not just in the U.S., but in Canada, Japan, and Italy, over 8,400 Sabres took to the skies. Of those, 554 were the legendary F-86A, a true star of the jet age.

George Welch and the Sabre Legacy

George Welch’s story is stitched right into the fabric of American airpower, standing tall at not just one, but two turning points in aviation history. He was already a legend as one of the first U.S. pilots to scramble and fight back over Pearl Harbor, and that fighting spirit carried him into the jet age, where he blazed new trails.

As the folks at the Smithsonian put it, Welch was among the first to notch an air-to-air victory in World War II, and then he helped kickstart the era of jet and supersonic fighters that would become the backbone of the U.S. Air Force. He wasn’t just a gutsy pilot. He was the bridge that connected the old world of roaring piston engines to the sleek, high-velocity jets that followed.

Enter the F-86 Sabre. The bird that made the leap from propellers to swept wings real and lasting. The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force calls the Korean War the moment the modern Air Force truly took shape, with the Sabre as its unmistakable icon.

But the Sabre’s legend didn’t stop at American borders; the RAF Museum tells how it flew with the Royal Air Force when it mattered most, faced down MiG-15s in NATO service over Germany, and showed the world that Western airpower had met the challenge with a world-class swept-wing fighter. Every time Welch dove toward the sound barrier and every Sabre kill over Korea helped write the new rules for air superiority.

From Welch and the Sabre to the present, the Air Force’s mission hasn’t changed: stay ahead of the curve in speed, tactics, and tech; always one step ahead of the next challenger.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“At 0956z it made a right-hand turn off it’s track back to Sigonella and back out into the Persian Gulf. Two minutes later at 0958z it began a descent from 50,000ft down to 9,500ft by 1011z, at which point @flightradar24lost it’s signal.”

—Armchair Admiral Twitter Post

Mission Briefing

High above the shimmering expanse of the Persian Gulf, the MQ-4 Triton glides on its patrol run, slicing through the morning haze. Suddenly, its transponder crackles out a warning, a communication blackout. With the pilot’s voice lost to the wind, the big bird banks gently and begins a silent, self-directed descent, the fate of its mission now hanging in the balance.

MQ-4 Triton Disappears over Persian Gulf

The evening skies over the Persian Gulf had a story to tell on 9 April, 2026. High above the blue, a U.S. Navy MQ-4C Triton drone—one of those silent aviators that fly without a pilot onboard—vanished from the digital gaze of flight trackers.

One moment it was cruising at a breathtaking 52,000 feet, bound for its home base at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Italy. The next, it began a slow, dramatic descent, dropping to 9,500 feet in just under fifteen minutes. On its way down, the drone’s transponder blinked out a 7400 code: a silent SOS to the world, signaling that its remote pilot had lost contact.

But the drama didn’t end there. As the Triton continued its descent, it reportedly switched to a 7700 squawk, the universal sign for a full-blown emergency. In those tense final moments, the drone appeared to veer toward Iranian airspace before its signal faded for good.

No official word has come from the Navy yet, and the fate of the Triton remains shrouded in mystery. Did it crash into the Gulf’s waters? Was it somehow intercepted, jammed, or brought down by unseen hands? The only certainty is uncertainty, though history does offer clues.

The U.S. has lost several drones over the years in the region, including at least sixteen MQ-9 Reapers. Back in 2019, Iran shot down a similar RQ-4A over international waters. These drones are programmed to circle and wait if they lose their link home, not to land, leaving them vulnerable in the vast, contested skies.

For now, the Triton’s last flight is just another chapter in the tense, cinematic saga of unmanned flight over the Gulf.

A Closer Look at the Triton

The Triton is no ordinary machine, but a relentless storyteller in the sky. Soaring above 50,000 feet, it sees farther, lingers longer, and moves with effortless grace. It’s the aviator’s answer to the world’s wildest oceans; a sentry that never tires, keeping watch for over 24 hours at a stretch, covering 7,400 nautical miles on a single mission.

Triton isn’t just watching; it’s narrating the unfolding story of the sea below, tracking ships, spotting threats, and relaying every detail to its crewed allies in real time. The data flows fast—across domains, across continents—giving decision-makers the edge to act before danger even shows its face.

It’s Northrop Grumman’s legacy of high-flying autonomy, now sculpted into a winged guardian that warns of missiles, hunts for hidden dangers, and brings home the big picture from a safe distance.

With its ultra-long endurance and sharp senses, Triton is more than a scout. It’s a sentinel for homeland defense, always present, always vigilant, always ready for the next chapter.

• Primary Function: Persistent Maritime ISR

• Contractor: Northrop Grumman

• Propulsion: Rolls-Royce AE3007H

• Length: 47.6 feet (14.5 meters)

• Wingspan: 130.9 feet (39.9 meters)

• Height: 15.4 feet (4.7 meters)

• Weight: Max design gross take-off: 32,250 pounds (14,628.4 kilograms)

• Crew: 5 per ground station (Air Vehicle Operator, Tactical Coordinator, 2 Mission Payload Operators, SIGINT coordinator)

What Triton’s Disappearance Signals

Triton isn’t just a drone. It’s the Navy’s eye in the sky, a high-flying storyteller with the soul of an aviator. Imagine it soaring above 50,000 feet, keeping watch over the endless blue, its sensors sweeping vast stretches of ocean for over a day at a time.

While the world below hustles, Triton glides with cinematic calm, scanning, listening, always collecting the next chapter of the maritime saga.

When one of these silent sentinels vanishes over the Persian Gulf, the story takes a dramatic twist. This isn’t just a technical glitch; it’s a reminder that even the most advanced surveillance can be knocked off course in these tense waters.

For allies who count on Triton’s long reach and sharp vision—catching early warning signs, spotting shifting threats—its loss sends ripples through the whole network.

The big lesson? In this airborne chess game, losing a Triton means more than a blip on the radar. It raises the stakes on how we command, communicate, and secure the skies.

The Triton’s real superpower is giving everyone a heads-up before trouble erupts. Its sudden silence is a cinematic cliffhanger. It is a signal that the watchers, too, are being watched, and the contest for control overhead is only growing sharper.

This Week in Aviation History

The Red Baron—Manfred von Richthofen—soared through the clouds as the most feared ace of World War I, a legend with a flair for the dramatic. In just 19 months, this Prussian nobleman downed eighty Allied planes, his bright-red aircraft cutting a bold figure across the war-torn skies. When he took the helm of the notorious Flying Circus, his myth only grew, the stuff of dogfights and whispered campfire tales. But in April 1918, the sky wrote a new ending: the Baron was shot down over France, his cinematic journey cut short in a blaze of glory.

The Death of the Red Barron

Manfred von Richthofen—the legendary Red Baron—was no stranger to danger in the skies, but his luck nearly ran out in July 1917. During a fierce dogfight with British pilots, a bullet grazed his head, fracturing his skull.

He survived, but the wound haunted him. Richthofen returned to his Flying Circus within weeks, yet he was never quite the same. The headaches lingered, and some believe he battled not just physical pain, but the invisible scars of PTSD: a shadow that followed him through the clouds.

Fast-forward to 21 April 1918. Richthofen’s final chapter unfolds over the fields of Vaux-sur-Somme, France. He chased an enemy fighter low to the ground, his crimson aircraft swooping like a hawk. Suddenly, Australian machine gunners opened fire from below, and Canadian ace Arthur Roy Brown joined the fray from above. In the whirlwind of bullets, Richthofen was struck in the chest.

He crash-landed and died in the field: a cinematic end befitting an aviator’s saga. Brown was credited with the kill, but the truth is murky; historians still debate whether the fatal shot came from the air or the ground.

Allied soldiers buried Richthofen with full honors. He was just 25, but with 80 confirmed kills, he’d set a record unmatched in World War I.

The Red Baron’s legend soared long after his death, immortalized in books, movies, songs, and comic strips. His story remains the stuff of aviation lore—cinematic, mysterious, and forever flying through history.

Who was the Infamous Red Baron?

It’s 2 May 1892, and a boy named Manfred von Richthofen is born into a world of privilege—a stately Prussian manor, old family crests, and rolling estates that would one day become part of Poland.

Young Manfred’s days are a blur of horseback rides, hunting parties, and lively sport, the kind of golden youth you’d expect from aristocracy. But at just 11 years old, the adventure takes a sharp turn: off to military school he goes, trading childhood games for the discipline of cadet life.

Fast forward to 1911, the age of aviation is just on the horizon, and Manfred, now a poised young officer, earns his commission with the 1st Uhlan cavalry regiment. But when the Great War erupts, the world changes overnight. He rides with his regiment across both the Eastern and Western Fronts, earning the Iron Cross for his raw courage.

Yet the trenches soon swallow the glory, and Manfred, bored stiff by supply runs, aches for something more daring. “I didn’t join up to fetch cheese and eggs,” he supposedly quips to his superiors, his eyes lifted skyward.

The fates answer. By the summer of 1915, our restless aviator is soaring above Russia. First, as a backseat observer, scanning the world below from a rattling reconnaissance plane.

He earns his wings soon after on the Western Front, where the real thrill of flight—of combat—calls to him. It’s here he crosses paths with the legendary Oswald Boelcke, who recognizes a kindred spirit and recruits Manfred into Jasta 2, Germany’s new elite fighter squadron.

Under Boelcke’s sharp tutelage, Manfred becomes more than just another pilot. On September 17, 1916, he claims his first aerial victory, sending a British craft spiraling down over France. One by one, the tally grows.

Five kills, and he’s officially a “flying ace.” Sixteen, and he’s the top living German pilot. For his precision and daring, he’s awarded the coveted Pour le Mérite: the famed “Blue Max.”

Come January 1917, Manfred is handed the reins to his very own squadron, Jasta 11, a collection of hotshot pilots that includes his own younger brother, Lothar. But it’s not just his flying that sets him apart.

Manfred’s Albatros D.III soon roars through the clouds painted a brilliant, unmistakable red: a streak of fire against the sky. The legend is born: the Red Baron. Or, as some called him, “le Petit Rouge,” “the Red Battle Flier,” and “the Red Knight.”

In the cockpit, with the wind at his back and his enemies before him, Manfred von Richthofen became the very spirit of chivalry and danger: a hero, a hunter, and the master of the skies.

The Legacy of “Ace of Aces” for Modern-Day Aviators

The legend of Manfred von Richthofen doesn’t just live on because he was World War I’s most famous ace. His last flight, a sun-drenched, adrenaline-soaked chase over the trenches, revealed the true nature of air combat at its core.

As the folks at From Balloons to Drones tell it, Richthofen wasn’t just a hotshot with a crimson triplane. He was a master of discipline, sharp thinking, and knowing exactly when to strike or when to slip away into the clouds.

But on April 21, 1918, something changed. The Red Baron pushed past his own rules, doggedly chasing Wilfrid May low over enemy territory, blind to the danger below. One moment of tunnel vision—one break in discipline—and ground fire brought down the king of the skies.

That’s the gut punch of his story. You can be the best stick-and-rudder pilot in the world, but if your judgment slips. If you let the thrill of the chase override your training, your doctrine, your survival instincts; even legends can fall.

The lesson is as clear as a summer sky: airpower is about more than machines. It’s about the person in the cockpit, their training, their tactics, their split-second choices, and their ability to learn—fast—when the world turns upside down. Richthofen’s last sortie became a textbook on why disciplined thinking and adaptability aren’t just nice-to-haves; they’re what keep you alive up there.

And then there’s the myth. The Red Baron—more than a pilot, now a folk hero with his own share of mystery. Who fired the final shot? The debate rages on, fueling his legend and cementing that last dogfight as one of aviation’s great what-ifs.

All these years later, the lesson still echoes across cockpits and command centers. Whether you’re dueling in canvas-and-wire biplanes or piloting drones by satellite, one thing hasn’t changed: airpower rewards sharp thinking and punishes even the briefest lapse.

That’s the Red Baron’s real legacy: a warning, a legend, and a story still soaring through the ages.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“This project demonstrates that AATC can serve as a rapid response mechanism when combatant commanders face urgent capability gaps.”

—Col. Daniel Wittmer, AATC commander

Mission Briefing

Now, imagine this scene. There’s a new gadget on the block: the Probe Refueling Adapter. Born out of battlefield urgency, this little invention lets the A-10 break free from always waiting for the KC-135, opening up a whole new world of refueling possibilities for our sky-hardened aviators.

A-10C Can Now Use Probe and Drogue Refueling

Just days after a shadowy photo of the A-10 sporting some unfamiliar hardware made its rounds online, the Air National Guard Air Force Reserve Command Test Center, AATC, for those in the know, decided to pull back the curtain.

They revealed a game-changing upgrade for the venerable A-10C Thunderbolt II. No longer just the tank-busting hero of the battlefield, the Warthog now sports a sleek probe and drogue air refueling capability. It is a transformation that could alter its future in the fight.

Traditionally, the A-10C has been fueled in-flight via a refueling receptacle right on the nose, just ahead of the cockpit, where the boom operator from a tanker would plug in that flying boom.

With the retirement of the KC-10 and the KC-46 still waiting in the wings for certification, the A-10’s options for a mid-air sip of gas were looking slim. Basically, it was stuck relying on the KC-135. But when the situation downrange started getting dicey, commanders put out a call: they needed an answer, fast.

That’s when the magic happened. Multiple organizations leapt into action, compressing timelines and tossing red tape out the hangar doors. The result? The A-10 can now tank up from C-130-based refuelers like the KC-130J Super Hercules, the MC-130J Commando II, and the HC-130J Combat King II.

The AATC became the maestro, coordinating the effort across a whole constellation of units and partners. The probe itself was cooked up by a mystery industry player, while the A-10 System Program Office made sure every bolt and wire met strict standards.

ARCWERX—the innovation engine for the Guard and Reserve—kept contracts flying through the pipeline, while the techs at Luke Air Force Base bent metal and made sure the supporting parts were ready on the double. The 418th Flight Test Squadron even provided a Combat King and crew to test out the new setup.

According to Lt. Col. Luke Haywas, the A-10 Combined Test Force director, everyone moved with a sense of urgency, but never at the expense of safety or technical rigor. They didn’t cut corners. They just put the pedal down on every process.

Here’s the kicker: the adapter slips right into the A-10’s nose refueling port, converting it from the old-school boom method to the probe and drogue setup. It’s field-configurable, meaning flight line crews can swap it in or out in just a few hours: no depot visits, no waiting around.

The Warthog can now morph between refueling modes to fit whatever the mission demands. For the A-10 and its crews, that’s not just a technical upgrade. It’s a lifeline, and a testament to what happens when airmen and innovators rally for the mission.

Warthog’s Probe and Drogue

The A-10 Warthog, that legendary beast of the battlefield, is still waiting for a green light to cozy up for a drink with the Air Force’s shiny new KC-46 Pegasus tanker. Testing is ongoing, suspense in the air, and for now, the Warthog’s only lifeline in the sky is the tried-and-true KC-135 Stratotanker.

The problem is, that’s a single point of failure—one hiccup, one unavailable Stratotanker, and suddenly, a mission could be hanging by a thread.

So, what’s the holdup? Turns out, all eyes are on the boom; specifically, the actuator tucked inside the KC-46’s refueling boom. The A-10C just can’t push hard enough to stay latched on, especially at the lower speeds it calls home.

Unlike its faster, slicker jet siblings, the Warthog isn’t built for breakneck sprints. Top speed? About 420 miles per hour, if you’re asking the Air Force. But when it’s time to refuel, the A-10C is crawling along at a leisurely 200 knots; far below the 300 knots where most fighters get their top-off. That leaves the KC-46 lumbering at the edge of its flight envelope, heavy and slow, just to keep pace.

Now, if you’re thinking, “Why not use something a little more laid-back, like a C-130 tanker?”—you’re onto something. C-130s are naturals at low-and-slow, with altitudes and airspeeds that play nice with the A-10’s style. The Air Force itself points out that these tankers are a better match for close air support and combat rescue missions, too. Problem is, there’s no C-130 with a flying boom out there. At least, not yet.

What we do have are C-130s equipped with the probe-and-drogue system, and they’re already out in the wild. Enter the new Probe Refueling Adapter: simple, clever, mounted right atop the old refueling port. With a little training, A-10 pilots could be cleared for this new system in no time.

Refueling Flexibility, Renewed Relevance

The U.S. and its allies are looking for an edge, and suddenly, the trusty A-10C gets a clever upgrade. It’s not just a quick hardware fix; this new Probe Refueling Adapter is a game-changer.

Instead of being stuck waiting for a giant KC-135 tanker, the A-10C can now refuel from nimble, drogue-equipped C-130s. That’s a big deal because A-10s fly low and slow, just like the C-130s: making them a perfect match.

This tweak means more A-10s can stay in the fight, supporting troops on the ground, swooping into dangerous search-and-rescue ops, and handling missions where tanker access is scarce or risky.

For American planners and coalition partners, it’s a breath of fresh air. Now, they can shape flexible air packages, mixing old legends like the A-10 with newer jets. No need to depend on a single tanker type.

Even better, this fix happened fast; it didn’t get bogged down in endless red tape. The message? Small changes can make a massive difference. It’s about resilience, adaptability, and squeezing new potential from veteran aircraft in modern conflict zones.

And here’s the closing shot: if a quick upgrade can make the A-10 so much more versatile, what other classic warbirds might be waiting for their own revival?

As tanker access shapes tomorrow’s air battles, the future of aviation is looking more like a team sport. Where the right support, not just the flashiest fighter, wins the day.

This Week in Aviation History

Flashback to the Korean War, when Navy pilots faced the harsh reality that their strike aircraft just couldn’t cut it against well-defended targets in any weather. Enter the Grumman A-6 Intruder—a marvel engineered to soar low, slip past enemy radar, and hunt down even the smallest targets, rain or shine.

First taking to the skies in 1960, the Intruder quickly became a fixture on aircraft carriers, joining the Navy in ‘63 and the Marines a year after. By 1968, the “A” model was officially in Navy hands, earning its stripes over the jungles of Vietnam and later in the electrified opening hours of Desert Storm. With more than 7,500 hours in the air, over 6,500 landings, and hundreds of dramatic carrier launches and recoveries, the Intruder’s story reads like a blockbuster saga of grit, innovation, and sheer flying nerve.

The Origins of the Intruder

It’s the late 1950s, and the U.S. Navy needs a new workhorse for the skies. Their trusty Douglas Skyraider, a prop-driven legend, is showing its age. Meanwhile, the Marines are clamoring for a close air support jet that can leap off short runways.

Lessons fresh from the Korean War add urgency; a new attack aircraft needs to fly long, fly low under the radar, and strike with precision, whatever the weather throws at it.

The brass drafts up a wish list in 1957: Speed, range, payload, short takeoff, plus a twist. Instead of patching together airframe and weapons from different shops, this time the winning design must seamlessly integrate the whole system from day one. It’s a tall order, and the competition is fierce.

Enter Grumman, already carving its name in aviation lore. Their answer: the A2F Intruder (later rebranded the A-6 in 1962). Picture this: a twin-jet beast with engines tucked into its wings and a crew of two sitting side-by-side, the Bombardier/Navigator riding a bit lower and further back so the pilot can see right.

Up front, a bulbous nose crams in a powerful radar suite: big for targeting, smaller for hugging the terrain. All this feeds into a cutting-edge nerve center called DIANE (Digital Integrated Attack and Navigation Equipment). Thanks to DIANE, the A-6 could fly blind through clouds and storms, its CRT screens (a first for combat jets) guiding the crew to their mark with all-weather precision.

The Intruder’s oddball looks quickly earned it nicknames including “Flying Drumstick,” “Iron Tadpole,” and, affectionately, “Double Ugly.” But there was beauty in its function. The Navy placed its first order in 1959, and by April 1960, the prototype was airborne.

Early experiments—like jet tailpipes that could tilt for shorter takeoffs—were scrapped after tests, but innovations like beefed-up nose gear for the Navy’s new catapult launch system stuck. The Intruder even beat out most other jets in adopting this new tech.

By 1963, the A-6A was rolling off the line for the Navy, and a year later for the Marines. VA-75, the first operational squadron, took Intruders to Vietnam in 1965, unleashing the aircraft’s true potential: flying at night or through monsoon squalls, zeroing in on targets without ever having to see them out the window. DIANE did the seeing for them.

The story didn’t stop there. As technology raced ahead, so did the Intruder. Some A-6s became specialized Iron Hand B models, hunting enemy missiles. Others (the C models) packed heavy, high-tech sensor pods for night interdiction; though these were eventually replaced by sleeker, more reliable laser targeting pods.

The Intruder’s punch was legendary: in one mission, a pair dropped two dozen bombs on a North Vietnamese power plant so silently, the enemy thought a squadron of B-52s had paid a visit. That raid earned a Navy Cross.

The saga’s final chapter arrived with the A-6E, first tested in 1970. This upgrade brought state-of-the-art avionics, radar, and navigation, with hundreds of older Intruders rebuilt and new ones rolling off the line.

The Intruder, in all its rugged, cinematic glory, became the backbone of Navy and Marine attack squadrons for decades. It is a true legend born from a blend of wartime necessity, technical audacity, and the relentless drive to own the night.

A Closer Look at the Intruder

The Grumman A-6A Intruder—a burly, all-weather attack bomber, tough as nails and powered by not one, but two roaring turbojet engines. Its cockpit? Side-by-side seating for the dynamic duo: the pilot and the “b/n”—that’s bombardier/navigator for the uninitiated. They sat shoulder to shoulder, ready to take on whatever the skies (or the sea) threw at them. The wings? Slightly swept, just enough to let you know this bird means business.

Now, let’s set the stage with numbers that matter: The A2F-1, as the prototype was first called, stretched out a solid 53 feet, 3 inches from nose to tail, and those wings spanned 53 feet even.

Just about the wingspan of a DC-3, if you’re counting. Standing on the deck, it measured over 15 feet tall, with wings that covered more than 500 square feet. Those wings swept back at a cool 25 degrees, giving the Intruder that predatory look.

She was no lightweight, either. Empty, she tipped the scales at over 23,000 pounds, but fully loaded and ready to launch, she could weigh in at a beefy 53,000 pounds.

Under the hood—or, more accurately, under the fuselage—were two Pratt & Whitney J52-P-6 turbojets.

These weren’t just any engines; they’d already proved themselves pushing the AGM-28 Hound Dog cruise missile. Each J52 had a 12-stage compressor, a two-stage turbine, and could kick out 7,500 pounds of thrust at normal power, or crank it up to 8,500 pounds for those “hold my beer” moments.

The exhaust nozzle could even dip down 23 degrees to help the Intruder leap off short runways. because sometimes, you just need a little extra kick.

What about performance? The A-6A could settle into a cruise at 429 knots, high above the world at 44,000 feet, or scream across the deck at sea level at 566 knots. She could claw her way up to nearly 50,000 feet and stretch her legs for over 2,000 nautical miles; enough range to make any adversary nervous.

In short, the Intruder was a cinematic marvel of engineering: rugged, reliable, and always ready for action—rain, shine, or the darkest night over the open sea.

The A-6’s Enduring Flightpath

The A-6 Intruder, the legend born from a bold idea, gave the Navy an attack jet that could hit its mark, rain or shine, day or night, no matter what the clouds or the enemy had to say about it.

When the Intruder first took to the sky on April 19, 1960, it wasn’t just another airplane on the flight deck. This beast could pack a heavy punch and deliver it through the worst weather, thanks to its groundbreaking DIANE navigation and attack system (and later, the TRAM suite on the A-6E).

Vietnam was where the Intruder’s legend really took off. While other jets waited for clear skies, A-6 crews launched into the murk, flying solo or in tight pairs, threading through flak and dodging missiles.

Their accuracy in the soup was the stuff of squadron legend. And the A-6 didn’t retire with Saigon’s fall. It kept coming back, from Lebanon’s chaos to the Libyan coast, over Bosnia, and during the fireworks of Desert Storm and Operation Praying Mantis.

What’s the true legacy? The A-6 proved that a combat jet’s worth isn’t just about speed or looking pretty. It’s about how far it can reach, how sharp its sensors are, how tightly the crew works together, and—most of all—how it performs when the weather turns ugly and the stakes are sky-high. That’s a lesson modern airpower still takes to heart.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“Now in our 5th week of the campaign, it is my operational assessment that we are making undeniable progress. We don’t see their navy sailing. We don’t see their aircraft flying, and their air and missile defense systems have largely been destroyed.”

—CENTCOM Chief Adm. Brad Cooper

Mission Briefing

Fifteen years after a secretive U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel crash-landed in Iran, its mysterious clone finally met its end; caught in a cinematic explosion captured by CENTCOM’s cameras. The footage, straight out of an action flick, shows the destruction of this stealthy doppelgänger, easy to spot thanks to its compact flying-wing shape and those quirky twin humps on its wings. Like a scene from a high-stakes spy drama, the saga of the Iranian-made Sentinel closes with a bang, not a whisper.

Iranian-made Sentinel Destroyed in U.S. Strikes

Since the RQ-170 crash landing, Iranian engineers have reverse-engineered and tweaked their own versions of the drone, occasionally rolling them out in IRGC promo videos during their annual Strait of Hormuz exercises; showcasing a blend of bravado and technical prowess.

But in a recent CENTCOM video that feels straight out of an espionage thriller, we see one of these Sentinel clones, along with a light tactical vehicle and a surface-to-air missile launcher—possibly a Servom Khordad or Ra’ad, both Iranian spins on the Russian Buk-M2—lined up in the crosshairs.

The footage is pure cinematic suspense: targets are painted with a pulsing laser, likely courtesy of an MQ-9 Reaper’s electro-optical sensor, as the camera hones in for the kill. Moments later, precision-guided munitions like the GBU-12 or GBU-49 Paveway II, or maybe even an AGM-114 missile, streak in.

Explosions light up the frame, but for all the drama, there’s a twist; the SAM system’s destruction doesn’t trigger the telltale secondary blasts you’d expect from a live warhead or propellant. The video cuts away before the smoke clears, leaving us with a cliffhanger: were these real targets, or just decoys meant to draw fire?

CENTCOM chief Adm. Brad Cooper, sounding every bit the calm pilot after a successful sortie, declared, “We are making undeniable progress. We don’t see their navy sailing. We don’t see their aircraft flying, and their air and missile defense systems have largely been destroyed.”

In the ongoing campaign, the line between reality and showmanship is as thin as the drone’s shadow over the desert.

The American RQ-170 Sentinel and its Iranian Counterpart

The aircraft spotlighted in the recent footage carries a legacy stretching back to December 2011, when an American RQ-170 Sentinel—flying a covert mission near Afghanistan—unexpectedly ended up in Iranian hands.

Iranian officials insisted they’d used electronic warfare wizardry to hijack the drone’s navigation, while others quietly chalked it up to a possible technical hiccup. Either way, Tehran got its hands on one of America’s most elusive recon drones, a low-observable marvel built for peering into hostile territory from high above, bristling with sensors and wrapped in radar-evading curves.

The RQ-170, a product of rapid innovation from Lockheed Martin’s famed Skunk Works and the U.S. government, was designed to collect crucial battlefield intelligence. Pilots from Air Combat Command’s 432nd Wing at Creech Air Force Base and the 30th Reconnaissance Squadron at Tonopah Test Range have been flying these stealthy birds since 2007, delivering eyes-in-the-sky support to commanders around the globe.

Fast-forward to 2014, and Iran rolled out what it claimed was a homegrown copy—the Shahed-171 Simorgh—showcasing the drone in parades and promotional reels. Iranian footage over the years has revealed a cottage industry of reverse-engineered Sentinels, assembled from composite materials, packed with custom electronics, and even sporting both propeller and jet-powered variants.

While these Iranian drones looked smaller and simpler than their American muse, the resemblance was unmistakable, right down to their flying-wing silhouettes. The family grew to include the nimbler Shahed-191 Saeqeh and other offshoots, with propaganda clips showing launches from flatbeds and supposed regional missions, though Western analysts remain skeptical about their real combat punch.

So when CENTCOM’s video captures the destruction of an Iranian Sentinel clone, it’s more than just a single strike. It’s a snapshot of a technological relay race. High-tech designs leap borders, get reimagined and rebuilt, only to find themselves back in the crosshairs years later, shaping the evolving drama of twenty-first-century aerial warfare.

More than a Drone Kill

The reported takedown of an Iranian RQ-170 clone isn’t just another notch on CENTCOM’s scoreboard. It’s a high-stakes signal flare to both friends and rivals.

In striking not only launchers and ammo dumps but also one of Iran’s more advanced flying-wing drones—born from the infamous 2011 Sentinel incident—the U.S. is showing it’s willing to go after the brains of the operation, not just the fists.

This drone wasn’t a random target: it was a deliberate hit on the backbone of Iran’s surveillance and air defense web.

For U.S. allies, especially those counting on clear shipping lanes and strong deterrence, the strike is double-edged. It reassures them that Washington can still find and swat down high-value tech, but it’s also a wake-up call; proof that Iran has come a long way since capturing that American drone, spinning it into a whole fleet of homegrown operators.

This is more than just a flashy explosion on a desert plain; it’s a reminder that adversaries have their own playbook, learning and adapting with every encounter.

So, while the dust settles and analysts pore over the footage, the real story is about what comes next. Is this a one-off victory, or just the opening scene in a bigger campaign aimed at blinding and dismantling the surveillance-strike networks underpinning Iran’s regional ambitions? Only time—and the next chapter—will tell.

This Week in Aviation History

In April 1943, American codebreakers cracked Japanese naval transmissions and uncovered the travel itinerary of Japan’s top admiral—the architect of Pearl Harbor. With this intelligence, the stage was set for a dramatic payback mission straight out of a wartime thriller.

The Killing of Isoroku Yamamoto

Operation Vengeance reads like a page torn from a wartime thriller, set in motion on April 18, 1943, when the U.S. set out to intercept and kill Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto: the mastermind behind Pearl Harbor and the face of Japanese naval power.

This was no ordinary mission: it was a masterclass in intelligence-enabled air warfare, blending codebreaking sleuth work, bold long-range fighter tactics, and split-second timing to strike at a target whose loss would shake the Japanese war effort.

The whole operation hinged on a single decrypted Japanese message, a rare stroke of luck that revealed Yamamoto’s Solomon Islands inspection itinerary down to the minute—departure time, route, destination, even the makeup of his flight.

The Americans instantly grasped the magnitude of the opportunity, but also the risk: acting too obviously could tip off the Japanese that their codes were cracked, jeopardizing a priceless intelligence advantage.

With Yamamoto deep inside enemy territory, only the P-38 Lightnings of the 339th Fighter Squadron had the range for the job. Major John W. Mitchell led his squadron on a demanding overwater approach, navigating with the precision of a watchmaker to avoid detection and reach the ambush point at just the right moment.

When Yamamoto’s two twin-engine bombers, protected by fighter escorts, appeared near Bougainville, the Americans struck. In the ensuing dogfight, both bombers were shot down. Yamamoto died in the jungle, his death shrouded in subsequent Japanese censorship and American mythmaking.

For Japan, the loss was a thunderbolt; for the U.S., it was a symbolic victory, proof that American reach could extend into the enemy’s inner sanctum.

Yet the story didn’t end with the dogfight. Decades of debate followed over who fired the fateful shots. Captain Thomas Lanphier was credited, but Rex Barber and others long contested the claim, showing how the fog of war can leave even legendary missions with unresolved details.

The Anatomy of the Killer Lightning

The P-38 Lightning took shape as a bold experiment in twin-engine interceptor design, its sleek lines and twin booms promising both speed and innovation. Back in February 1939, Lt. Ben Kelsey rocketed a prototype across the country in a record-shattering 7 hours and 48 minutes; a feat that ended with a crash landing, but didn’t stop the Lightning’s momentum.

Development pressed on, and by September 1940, the first batch of YP-38s was in the air. Early models had their share of quirks—turbulent airflow over the tail and scary moments at high dive speeds, where compressibility threatened to tear the aircraft apart—but persistent engineering ironed out those wrinkles.

The P-38E marked the Lightning’s first major production run, swapping out the original 37mm cannon for a 20mm powerhouse and rolling off the line in late 1941. The P-38F followed, adding pylon racks for bombs or drop tanks, stretching the Lightning’s legs for long-range missions.

More tweaks came with the P-38G and H, the latter packing an upgraded Allison engine for extra punch. By August 1943, the P-38J arrived with cockpit heating (a godsend in icy altitudes), improved engine cooling, a flat bulletproof windscreen, more wing fuel, and sharper handling.

Versatility was the Lightning’s calling card. It could dive bomb, level bomb, strafe, snap photos, or escort bombers deep behind enemy lines. The Germans dubbed it “The Forked-Tail Devil” when it debuted in North Africa, and by September 1943, it was the only Allied fighter able to stick with bombers all the way to Germany.

But nowhere did the Lightning shine brighter than the Pacific, where its range and firepower made legends of seven of the top eight USAAF aces. Most famously, it was P-38s that hunted down Admiral Yamamoto in 1943, turning aviation history on its head. Until the war’s final days, the P-38 was the USAAF’s go-to fighter in the Pacific skies.

Operation Vengeance’s Legacy

Imagine the Pacific, 1943: Operation Vengeance unfolds not just as a clandestine shootout, but as a cinematic collision of brains, nerve, and timing. This wasn’t your average dogfight.

It was the moment when American codebreakers cracked the secret itinerary of Admiral Yamamoto, architect of Pearl Harbor, and turned raw intelligence into a high-stakes, pinpoint strike deep in enemy skies. Suddenly, the rules changed: with the right intel, even the most elusive figure could be hunted down, no fortress too far.

Yamamoto’s downing was a thunderclap, echoing far beyond the cockpit. In the U.S., it became a banner moment of payback and pride; in Japan, it was a shockwave that rattled the highest command, a reminder that war’s reach can be personal and precise. This single mission rewrote the playbook. Airpower wasn’t just about blowing things up, but sending a message, shifting psychology, and proving a nation’s resolve.

But the story doesn’t end in the jungle. Operation Vengeance lit a fuse that burns into today’s headlines, sparking debates about the ethics of targeting leaders, the risks to secret sources, and how we gauge the true cost of a ‘decapitation strike.’

From the South Pacific to the corridors of modern power, it’s a reminder: the might of air warfare isn’t just in destruction, but in the audacity to find, reach, and reshape the future from the sky.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The effectiveness of intercepting enemy drones and missiles on this aircraft is 98%. These are impressive numbers.”

—Unnamed Ukrainian Air Force Pilot

Mission Briefing

Most folks talk about the F-16 like it’s the only bird in the sky for Ukraine—a natural choice, given how common and well-studied it is, plus it fits neatly into the NATO flock. But let me tell you, that’s just one part of the story. What Ukraine really needed, and fast, was a machine fit for daring missions in skies crawling with danger—something more than just a jack-of-all-trades, but a master of survival. This is where Mirage 2000-5 comes into play.

Mirage 2000-5 Enters the Picture

Back in March 2026, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense didn’t mince words. They made it clear that the Mirage 2000-5 was more than just a flashy addition to their hangars. No, sir.

These jets became key players in knocking out cruise missiles and swatting down attack drones, right when the skies were thick with danger. Russia, since 2024, has been waging a relentless campaign, unleashing waves of Shahed drones, decoys, cruise missiles, and even the occasional ballistic missile.

Imagine, on March 24, 2026, Ukraine reported facing 999 drones in a single day. The largest drone barrage since the war began. That’s not just a statistic; that’s the kind of day that tests the very soul of a nation’s air defense.

Now, in a fight like this, you don’t want to burn through your rarest, hardest-to-replace resources on every threat. You want an aircraft that can handle the dirty work: intercept the slow movers, patrol the front, dash across the map, and still be ready to strike the ground with pinpoint accuracy.

The Mirage 2000-5 isn’t a luxury; it’s a force multiplier. It takes on missions that would otherwise drain the fleet’s most precious assets, freeing them up for the truly hairy jobs.

But let’s not get carried away. The Mirage 2000-5 isn’t a silver bullet, nor does it replace the F-16. The F-16 is still the long-game play for Ukraine. More airframes, better supply lines, a broader arsenal, and the promise of a uniform NATO-aligned fleet sourced from friendly skies across the West.

The Mirage, by contrast, is here in smaller numbers. Its support network is tighter. You can’t just ring up the factory for spare parts; production lines are history. What you see is what you get.

Yet, that’s precisely what makes the Mirage 2000-5 so valuable. It fills a gap, plain and simple. It’s the right tool at the right time, giving Ukraine the ability to intercept missiles and drones and to drop French precision munitions. All without having to wait for the perfect solution. In war, urgency can outweigh doctrine, and sometimes a good answer right now beats the best answer next year.

There’s a lesson here, too, about the folks at Dassault who built these machines. The Mirage 2000-5 isn’t fresh off the assembly line. It hails from another era, a different style of air war.

And yet, look at it now: flying hard in a conflict bristling with modern threats, from enemy fighters to electronic jamming and long-range missiles. No one’s pretending it’s invincible. What it proves is that a well-kept, thoughtfully upgraded jet can still pack a punch decades after its first flight.

While everyone else dreams about the next generation—combat clouds, AI, and sixth-gen superjets—Ukraine is living a harsher reality, where the best jet is the one that can take off, survive, hunt, and hit its mark.

So here we are, the Mirage 2000-5, small in number, limited in some ways, but making a mark that most wouldn’t have dared predict a year ago. The real story isn’t about this fighter winning the war single-handedly. It’s about how, in a grinding war of attrition, a seasoned old warrior with the right upgrades can become the ace up your sleeve.

Why did they choose the Mirage?

The real twist in Ukraine’s air war isn’t about showing off the Mirage 2000-5 as some prestige trophy. They’re calling it what it is: a hunter of cruise missiles. That’s not just talk, either.

This Mirage isn’t the same old fighter from days gone by. With its updated RDY radar, modern avionics, real-time data link, and a set of French missiles, it’s a serious upgrade over Ukraine’s older MiG-29s. These features make it a specialist at taking down tough but not supersonic targets. Think cruise missiles and attack drones zigzagging through the chaos.

Ukrainian defense officials have pointed out how the Mirage can lock onto even the sneakiest drones: Shahed, Geran, Gerbera and so on. And that’s no small feat. Tracking a lumbering bomber or a darting fighter is one thing, but catching a low, slow, or tiny drone—often hidden in a wave of incoming threats—demands top-notch radar, fast data processing, and the right missiles at the pilot’s fingertips. The Mirage’s tech lets a lone pilot juggle all of that, firing off shots quickly when every second counts.

The proof, as they say, is in the flying. One Mirage pilot told the Ukrainian Air Force in November 2025 that his jet scored a 98% hit rate against drones and missiles; a number to take with a pinch of salt, sure, but a sign that in real battles, crews trust this plane.

A big part of that trust comes down to the Mirage’s weapons. Ukrainian jets carry MICA missiles, which work at long or close range and aren’t just for dogfights. They’re perfect for picking off stealthy drones and missiles, too. This gives Ukraine mobile air defense that doesn’t try to replace big ground-based systems, but rather complements them, filling gaps when needed.

Even the older Magic 2 missile is getting its moment; great for close-up encounters with targets that radiate heat. It might not sound glamorous, but in a war where Russian attacks are constant and cheap, that’s exactly what Ukraine needs: practical, reliable tools.

What does it mean to the US Allies?

The story of France’s Mirage 2000-5s arriving in Ukraine is more than just another headline about fighter jets changing hands. It’s a sign that the days of waiting around for the perfect, one-size-fits-all solution are over.

Now, allies are cobbling together a quick-reaction, layered airpower force out of whatever tried-and-true jets can fill the gaps; right now, not next year.

The Mirage isn’t just for show, either. It’s already out there hunting Russian cruise missiles and drones, and it’s flexing into precision strike missions with those French AASM Hammer bombs.

This jet doesn’t replace the F-16; it runs alongside it, plugging holes as a mobile air-defense layer and doubling up as a strike platform, all in a war where the enemy throws everything and the kitchen sink at you.

There’s a lesson here for the U.S. and its partners: real alliance strength isn’t about having only the shiniest new jets, but about getting older, upgraded birds like the Mirage into the mix fast enough to actually make a difference.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense has hammered home that Mirages can bag cruise missiles and drones—including those Shahed types—and use a mix of NATO-standard weapons, proving how adaptable Western arsenals can be when speed matters more than perfection. In the end, the Mirage’s combat debut is both a wake-up call and a blueprint: future airpower may hinge more on how fast we can blend proven machines and munitions into a real fighting force before the next storm breaks.

This Week in Aviation History

On the morning of 15 April 1952, Boeing’s ace test pilot “Tex” Johnston and Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Guy Townsend pushed all eight engines of the YB-52 Stratofortress to the max and let her loose down the runway. That was the moment the legendary bomber prototype truly came alive, roaring into aviation history with every ounce of power unleashed.

YB-52’s Initial Flight Has Begun

The YB-52, an eight-engine beast, charges down the runway with its wings arching skyward, easily carrying a whopping 235,000 pounds on its first flight.

Once she hit V2, that magic takeoff speed, the big bomber lifted gracefully off the ground—helped along by those wings set at a six-degree angle—and at precisely 11:08 a.m., she was airborne, launching a new chapter in aviation history.

For the first forty minutes, Tex Johnston and Guy Townsend kept her circling over Seattle, ticking through system checks, making sure every dial and gauge lined up just right.

Then, satisfied, they pointed the Stratofortress up to 25,000 feet and headed off toward Larson Air Force Base at Moses Lake for more rigorous testing, keeping her aloft for a record-breaking 3 hours and 8 minutes: the longest maiden flight Boeing had ever clocked at that point.

Tex radioed back that the YB-52 flew exactly as the engineers had promised, a rare treat in the test pilot’s world.

The YB-52 was originally meant to be the second of two XB-52 prototypes, but so many changes and upgrades were worked in that she deserved a new name. The first XB-52 should’ve flown first, but an accident during ground tests left her grounded.

Both prototypes featured that signature tandem cockpit—pilot and co-pilot sitting one behind the other—just like the B-47 before them. The wings, swept back and perched high on the fuselage, carried four pairs of turbojets in twin pods, cleverly placed to keep the plane balanced and the airflow clean.

Add to that the unique landing gear, four main struts with two wheels each, able to pivot for crosswind landings, and you’ve got a design that let those wings flex and fly unlike anything else in the sky.

The Anatomy of the Stratofortress

The Stratofortress stretched a majestic 152 feet from nose to tail, with wings reaching a staggering 185 feet across. It is so broad that her vertical fin could be folded over to the right just to squeeze into a hangar.

Standing tall at nearly 50 feet, she cast a shadow that covered 4,000 square feet of ramp. Those wings weren’t just for show, either: they angled back at nearly 37 degrees, set at a 6-degree angle of incidence, with a hint of dihedral for stability.

Empty, she tipped the scales at 155,200 pounds, but fueled and loaded, she could take off at a mighty 405,000 pounds.

Under the hood, the YB-52 packed eight Pratt & Whitney Turbo Wasp YJ57-P-3 turbojet engines: cutting-edge for their day, with a two-spool design and 16-stage compressor.

Each engine delivered a steady 8,700 pounds of thrust, making this bomber a true heavyweight champion. These powerplants were over 15 feet long, three and a half feet wide, and weighed in at 4,390 pounds apiece.

She wasn’t just big, she was fast. The YB-52 cruised at 519 miles per hour, could hit 611 at altitude, and boasted a jaw-dropping range of over 7,000 miles. Neither the YB-52 nor her sister prototype carried any weapons in those early days. They were all about testing and proving the concept.

Boeing built 744 Stratofortresses between 1952 and 1962 in Seattle and Wichita. The final model, the B-52H, entered service in 1960, and the very last one rolled out in 1962: number 61-0040, still flying for the Air Force after more than 21,000 hours aloft.

Most earlier models are long gone, but 76 B-52Hs are still in service, with legends like Ghost Rider even returning from the Boneyard. As for the old YB-52 prototype, she went to the Air Force museum, but by the mid-60s, even she was consigned to history and scrapped.

Stratofortress’ Enduring Contrail

The YB-52 Stratofortress wasn’t just a successful prototype. It was the opening act for one of aviation’s greatest legends. When she first took to the skies in April 1952, she brought the Air Force into a new era as its first all-jet, intercontinental heavy bomber, setting the stage for a platform that would shape American power and strategy for generations.

The B-52 didn’t just serve as the backbone of Strategic Air Command; she proved her mettle in Vietnam’s Arc Light and Linebacker II, then kept on flying into new missions; everything from globe-spanning strike runs to post-Cold War operations.

What makes the B-52 story so remarkable is its adaptability: setting records, taking on fresh missions, and modernizing with every twist in doctrine and technology. Boeing still calls her a cornerstone of U.S. deterrence, and the Air Force isn’t letting go anytime soon; upgrades are keeping this old warbird ready for whatever comes next.

So, that first flight in 1952 wasn’t just the launch of a bomber; it was the birth of a living legend, a saga that continues to evolve as the world changes.

As we move into an age of standoff weapons, networked warfare, and renewed big-power rivalry, the Stratofortress keeps doing what it does best: combining range, payload, and unmistakable presence to make sure American airpower is always heard, loud and clear, wherever it’s needed most.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

Beginning on March 4, 2026, Iranian forces have declared the Strait “closed,” threatening and carrying out attacks on ships attempting to transit the Strait.

—U.S. Congressional Report

Mission Briefing

Soaring low over the shimmering waters of the Strait of Hormuz, F-15E and F-16 fighters unleashed the latest in guided bomb technology, striking their naval targets with precision. This daring operation, captured in sweeping detail, offers a rare glimpse into the evolving strategies and doctrines that shape modern aerial warfare.

The Older Fighters’ Comeback

One might think these birds are relics. After all, the F-15E took its maiden flight back in ’89, and the F-16 even earlier, in ’78. But let me assure you: these jets have aged like fine wine, reborn again and again through relentless modernization.

Climb inside a modern F-15E today and you’re surrounded by cutting-edge tech: the razor-sharp AN/APG-82 AESA radar, electronic warfare suites sophisticated enough to fool even the best enemy sensors, and secure data links connecting pilots to a web of information.

The latest F-16 Block 70s? They come loaded with sensors that rival those found on fifth-generation stealth fighters. But the real ace up their sleeve? Payload. The F-15E can haul more than 10,400 kilograms of ordnance—more than an F-35 flying in stealth mode. When you need to bring the rain on hardened targets, there’s no better workhorse.

And let’s talk cost. The F-35 is a marvel, no doubt, but it’s expensive to fly; over $33,000 an hour. The F-16? You can keep one in the air for less than a third of that. That’s why U.S. doctrine is crystal clear: use the stealth jets to slip past enemy defenses, kick open the door, and then send in the older platforms to deliver the heavy punches.

This layered approach is what keeps the F-15E and F-16 front and center in real-world ops. Stealth jets scout and disrupt, drones keep watch and strike as needed, and these classic fighters hit the targets that matter most. It’s a symphony of airpower—each player with a vital role.

Now, the Strait of Hormuz; that’s not just any patch of water. It’s the world’s energy chokepoint: a 33-kilometer-wide passage where up to 20 million barrels of oil flow each day. Any hint of trouble here, and the world feels it instantly. Iran knows this, and over the years they’ve packed the area with anti-ship missiles, sea mines, naval drones, and swarms of fast attack craft, all designed to tip the balance.

That’s why recent U.S. strikes zeroed in on those very threats: missile sites and related facilities along the coast. The goal? Stop trouble before it ever reaches open water. By taking out the weapons ashore, you keep the shipping lanes open and avoid a messy confrontation at sea. It’s classic aviator strategy: control the skies and you control the sea. That’s how you keep the world’s lifeblood flowing, one mission at a time.

Under the Hoods of These Conventional Fighters

General Characteristics of F-15E
Primary function: Air-to-ground attack aircraft
Contractor: The Boeing Company
Power plant: Two Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 or 229 turbofan engines with afterburners
Thrust: 25,000 - 29,000 pounds each engine
Wingspan: 42.8 feet (13 meters)
Length: 63.8 feet (19.44 meters)
Height: 18.5 feet (5.6 meters)
Weight: 37,500 pounds ( 17,010 kilograms)
Maximum takeoff weight: 81,000 pounds (36,450 kilograms)
Fuel capacity: 35,550 pounds (three external tanks plus conformal fuel tanks)
Payload: depends upon mission
Speed: 1,875 mph (Mach 2.5 plus)
Range: 2,400 miles (3,840 kilometers) ferry range with conformal fuel tanks and three external fuel tanks
Ceiling: 60,000 feet (18,288 meters)
Armament: One 20mm multibarrel gun mounted internally with 500 rounds of ammunition. Four AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles and four AIM-120 AMRAAM or eight AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles. Any air-to-surface weapon in the Air Force inventory (nuclear and conventional)
Crew: Pilot and weapon systems officer
Unit cost: $31.1 million (fiscal year 98 constant dollars)
Initial operating capability: September 1989
Inventory: 219 total force

General characteristics of F-16 Fighting Falcon
Primary function: multirole fighter
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corp.
Power plant: F-16C/D: one Pratt and Whitney F100-PW-200/220/229 or General Electric F110-GE-100/129
Thrust: F-16C/D, 27,000 pounds
Wingspan: 32 feet, 8 inches (9.8 meters)
Length: 49 feet, 5 inches (14.8 meters)
Height: 16 feet (4.8 meters)
Weight: 19,700 pounds without fuel (8,936 kilograms)
Maximum takeoff weight: 37,500 pounds (16,875 kilograms)
Fuel capacity: 7,000 pounds internal (3,175 kilograms); typical capacity, 12,000 pounds with two external tanks (5443 kilograms)
Payload: two 2,000-pound bombs, two AIM-9, two AIM-120 and two 2400-pound external fuel tanks
Speed: 1,500 mph (Mach 2 at altitude)
Range: more than 2,002 miles ferry range (1,740 nautical miles)
Ceiling: above 50,000 feet (15 kilometers)
Armament: one M-61A1 20mm multibarrel cannon with 500 rounds; external stations can carry up to six air-to-air missiles, conventional air-to-air and air-to-surface munitions and electronic countermeasure pods
Crew: F-16C, one; F-16D, one or two
Unit cost: F-16A/B , $14.6 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars); F-16C/D,$18.8 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)
Initial operating capability: F-16A, January 1979; F-16C/D Block 25-32, 1981; F-16C/D Block 40-42, 1989; and F-16C/D Block 50-52, 1994
Inventory: total force, F-16C/D, 1017

What the Hormuz Strikes Meant for America and Its Allies

From the cockpit view, those recent strikes in the Strait of Hormuz are about far more than a single operation. They’re a message sent across the world’s shipping lanes. For the U.S. and its allies, hitting targets tied to Iran’s anti-ship and naval arsenal is a clear signal: we’re ready to defend this critical maritime chokepoint before a spark turns into a crisis.

With nearly a fifth of global oil flowing through these narrow waters, even minor instability can send shockwaves through energy markets and economies everywhere.

For America’s partners—especially Gulf states and Western nations relying on secure sea routes—the strikes offer more than just reassurance. They prove that Washington is willing to act, and that well-upgraded classics like the F-15E and F-16 still pack a serious punch when paired with precision munitions and sharp-eyed sensors.

The doctrine is practical: stealth jets might clear the way, but seasoned fighters deliver the heavy, persistent blows needed to keep the lanes open.

Beneath the roar of the engines, there’s a quieter undertone: the next round of conflict in this region may hinge less on air dominance and more on who can keep the oil flowing and the sea lanes open when the pressure mounts. That’s the real high-stakes game in play.

This Week in Aviation History

Carrier planes from Task Force 58 roar off the decks, hunting the mighty Yamato as it surges toward Okinawa with its escort of cruisers and destroyers. In wave after relentless wave, 386 aircraft hammer the Japanese fleet, pounding Yamato, Yahagi, and four destroyers beneath the waves of the East China Sea. But the skies are far from safe—off Okinawa, kamikaze pilots strike back, slamming into six Allied ships, among them the carrier Hancock and battleship Maryland. It’s a day when the fate of giants is decided by the fierce battles above and below the waves.

The Death of the Yamato

Let’s set the scene: April 6, 1945. The Yamato (pride of the Imperial Japanese Navy and the heaviest battleship ever built) steams out on Operation Ten-Go, a desperate, almost suicidal dash toward Okinawa.

Her orders are clear but grim: run straight into the teeth of the American fleet, low on fuel and with only a handful of escorts at her side. Japan’s strategic situation has grown dire, and Yamato’s mission is as much about honor as it is about hope.

But she never makes it. Over the horizon, Task Force 58—the U.S. Navy’s fast carrier strike arm under Admiral Marc Mitscher—waits with decks bristling with aircraft. On April 7, the skies fill with American carrier planes, launching wave after wave against Yamato and her escorts.

It’s the mature carrier system at its peak: scouts, fighters, bombers, and torpedo planes all working in perfect coordination, striking from far beyond the reach of the big guns below. The result is devastating; a hurricane of bombs and torpedoes rains down, and the Yamato, along with her consorts, is sent to the bottom before she ever threatens the Okinawa landings.

Yamato’s destruction is more than just the loss of a warship. She was built as a floating fortress, the embodiment of Japanese naval might, but her end proves a stark lesson: battleships, no matter how massive, cannot survive without air superiority in the age of carriers. When Yamato explodes and capsizes, it isn’t just steel and sailors lost. It’s the final curtain call for the era of battleship supremacy.

In the grand narrative of Okinawa, this strike became a defining moment. TF 58’s aviators didn’t just sink a legend; they changed the nature of naval warfare, closing the book on one age and opening another written in the contrails of carrier aircraft.

The Task Force 58

Task Force 58 or the Fast Carrier Task Force, became the steel fist of America’s Fifth Fleet under Admiral Raymond Spruance. Born in January 1944 and shaped by the vision of Admiral Marc Mitscher, TF 58 was more than just a collection of ships. Picture it: sleek fleet carriers, nimble light carriers, battleships, cruisers, destroyers, and an entire logistical train, all sailing as one.

But what made TF 58 legendary wasn’t just its sheer might; it was how seamlessly it combined scouting, fighter screens, strike aviation, anti-aircraft guns, and at-sea resupply into a single, mobile war machine. This was naval warfare, reimagined for the modern age.

As the U.S. pushed west across the Pacific, TF 58 became the spearhead—covering landings in the Marshalls, Marianas, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa, while striking deep at enemy bases, even reaching the Japanese Home Islands. Here, the carrier truly dethroned the battleship. No longer content to simply shepherd amphibious landings, TF 58 shaped the battlefield itself, softening targets and breaking enemy strength before the boots ever hit the sand.

The true test came in June 1944, at the Battle of the Philippine Sea. Under Mitscher’s command, TF 58’s aviators turned the skies into a shooting gallery, annihilating Japan’s carrier air power in the infamous “Marianas Turkey Shoot.” Hundreds of Japanese planes fell, carriers were lost, and the skilled aircrews who could never be replaced vanished from the war.

The outcome? Not just tactical victory, but strategic dominance—America now controlled the Marianas, opening the door to the final push toward Japan.

TF 58’s reach was breathtaking. In early 1945, its carriers launched the first air strikes on Tokyo since the Doolittle Raid, and, soon after, aircraft from its decks hunted down and destroyed the massive battleship Yamato, proving once and for all that the era of the battleship was over.

Task Force 58 wasn’t just a formation. It was the vanguard of a new kind of naval power: fast, coordinated, and able to strike first from oceans away. In its wake, it left no doubt; the future of naval warfare belonged to the carrier. For further reading, check out the Naval History and Heritage Command or the National Park Service.

The Legacy of Task Force 58 and Yamato’s Lost

The mighty battleship Yamato, the crown jewel of Japanese sea power, surges toward Okinawa on her final sortie. She’s an icon of naval might, bristling with guns and shrouded in thick armor, the very symbol of an era when battleships ruled the waves. But that day, the Yamato never even comes within range of her enemy’s guns.

Instead, she’s caught by the long reach of Task Force 58, the U.S. Navy’s Fast Carrier Task Force, a floating armada of carriers and their escorts commanded by Marc Mitscher. From over the horizon, wave after wave of carrier-based aircraft descend, pounding Yamato and her escorts with bombs and torpedoes. The great ship is overwhelmed, capsizing and exploding in a towering fireball before she ever has a chance to turn her guns on the enemy.

That moment was more than just the destruction of a ship. It was the thunderous end of an era. Yamato, once the pride of Japan’s navy, was built to dominate through brute strength and armor. But she fell not to another battleship, but to the coordinated might of carrier aviation, striking from far beyond the range of her big guns. Her sinking marked the collapse of an old doctrine, one that believed the heaviest armor and the biggest guns would always decide sea battles.

In contrast, Task Force 58 embodied a bold new future. With its seamless blend of carriers, fighters, bombers, scouting planes, and the logistical muscle to stay at sea for months, it showed what modern naval power looked like: fast, flexible, networked, and able to project force at staggering distances. Its victories in the Philippine Sea and against Yamato proved that from now on, naval battles would be won by those who controlled the skies.

This legacy still echoes today. The world’s great fleets are centered on carriers, not battleships, and every contest for the world’s sea lanes (from the Cold War to the present) reminds us: the first battle is for the air above the waves. Control that, and you control the sea.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

This is the final deployment for the 14th Fighter Squadron based at Misawa, Japan, as it prepares to retire its F-16s and transfer them to other units, including the 480th Fighter Squadron and the 77th Fighter Squadron.

—Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch

Before we get started with this week’s newsletter, a quick note: I’ve been publishing this newsletter for 151 consecutive weeks (dating back to March 2023) and in that time the newsletter has come out every Tuesday morning. Not this week. As some of you may know, YouTube had demonetized my channel for “mass-produced” “inauthentic” content - this was clearly in error and I (along with my amazing viewers) fought the decision. We won. I am very thankful that it was overturned, and again - my incredible viewers (and readers) rose to the occasion and made a storm on X (Twitter) that got the attention of human reviewers. YouTube has been mass banning channels that are AI generated (a much needed task in my opinion) but it appears they were a little overzealous with their bans. Again, I am very happy to be reinstated, and the reason I am writing this here is because as you can imagine, my whole world and workflows were disrupted. I’m getting back into the routines, so rest assured that moving forward we will resume our regular posting schedule. Thanks for reading this and for reading this newsletter. Now you know.

-Tog

And now, onto this week’s newsletter:

Mission Briefing

Just four weeks after Epic Fury roared into action, the tempo in the skies and seas is only building. You’ve got F-16Cs slicing through the stratosphere, EA-18Gs and E-2Ds joining the fray, engines humming as they head for the heart of the Middle East. Out at sea, the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group cuts a determined wake, steel and resolve pushing through blue water. And on the ground, the rumor mill is alive: word is, the 82nd Airborne Division might be prepping for the call. The whole scene feels like the opening frames of a high-stakes reel, machines, men, and rumors all converging, the story unfolding with every passing hour.

More Assets are Deploying

Over the past few days, the air above us has gotten a whole lot busier. F-16CM Block 50 Fighting Falcons—what we call Vipers—have been streaking through the sky, joined by the Navy’s EA-18 Growlers and E-2D Hawkeyes.

Each one brings its own brand of power and purpose. Out at sea, the USS Boxer’s Amphibious Ready Group is pushing toward the Middle East, soon to rendezvous with the USS Tripoli’s group, which shipped out just last week.

You can feel the tension building—rumors swirl that the 82nd Airborne Division might be on alert, boots laced and gear packed, ready to move at a moment’s notice. The government hasn’t ruled out sending troops into Iran, but no green light yet.

The F-16s are coming in from all directions. Some launched out of Aviano and Spangdahlem in Europe, others from Shaw and McEntire back on the East Coast, and now, even Misawa Air Base in Japan has joined the dance. Those Misawa Vipers are on what could be their last overseas run; soon that base will switch over to the F-35 Lightning II.

Tanker issues delayed the Atlantic crossing, but nothing stops a determined aircrew; now, up to 24 jets are converging at Spangdahlem, arriving in waves. Some of those Vipers are already peeling off, bound for undisclosed airfields in the Middle East. Nobody’s saying exactly where, but you can bet they’ll be right where they’re needed most.

Meanwhile, six more Growlers lifted off from Oceana, Virginia, touched down in the Azores to refuel, then pressed on toward the fight, some loaded with state-of-the-art jamming pods. The whole operation feels like the opening act of a high-stakes air campaign; steel birds, restless seas, and every pilot waiting for the next call.

Fighter Jets are Not the Only Birds

Fighter jets might steal the spotlight, but they’re not the only birds heading into the fray for Operation Epic Fury. Back on March 16, while the first Growlers took to the air, five E-2D Hawkeye early warning aircraft touched down at Lajes, their radomes gleaming against the Atlantic sky.

A few days later, the Hawkeyes lifted off again, bound for Aviano Air Base in Italy, before pressing on toward the Middle East. Their final destination? That’s still a bit of a mystery. Maybe they’ll join one of the Carrier Air Wings out at sea, or perhaps they’ll settle in with a land-based squadron.

These E-2Ds aren’t your average spotters. They come armed with cutting-edge AESA radar, the kind that can sniff out even the sneakiest threats—low-flying drones and cruise missiles that hug the earth to avoid detection.

Once in theater, the Hawkeyes will work alongside the Air Force’s E-3 Sentry AWACS, and just recently, the Royal Australian Air Force sent an E-7A Wedgetail to the mix. It’s a real gathering of airborne sentinels, each playing their part in the unfolding drama.

Let me share with you what’s under the hood of the Hawkeye

Overall Length: 57 ft. 8.75 in
Wing Area: 80 ft. 7 in
Weight (Empty): 40,484 lbs
Speed: 300+ kts
Ceiling: 37,000 ft.
Power Plant: Two Rolls-Royce T56-A-427A Turboprop engines (5100 shp each)
Sensors: Fully integrated open architecture system
Crew: five; two pilots, three mission systems operators with the option for the co-pilot to act as fourth mission systems operator.
Prime Contractor: Northrop Grumman

Holding the Line, Building the Strike Package

Four weeks into Operation Epic Fury, the tempo is still building. Every new wave of jets and warships heading out signals something loud and clear: this isn’t just a single punch thrown in the dark. Washington’s making it clear: this is a campaign built to last, with layers of protection and the muscle to ramp things up if the situation demands.

I’ve seen reports of more F-16Cs, EA-18G Growlers, and E-2D Hawkeyes streaming toward the Middle East, with the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group riding the waves nearby. For the U.S., these moves aren’t just about keeping the engines hot; they’re about flexibility, about having options.

The F-16s bring sheer numbers and quick reaction across scattered airfields; the Growlers are the ghosts in the electronic ether, jamming and hunting enemy radars; and the E-2Ds, perched high above, scan for threats that try to slip under the radar.

This isn’t only for America’s benefit. The buildup is a message to allies: the U.S. is all-in, not just with fighters and ships, but with the brains and tech that guide modern warfare. Australia’s already sent in an E-7A Wedgetail, showing it’s a team effort in the skies.

Operation Epic Fury isn’t just about hitting targets; it’s about keeping friends close, sending a warning to would-be troublemakers, and shaping the chessboard for whatever comes next. Whether these reinforcements stay as a shield or turn into a spear, they’ll set the tone for the next act in this unfolding drama.

This Week in Aviation History

April 1917: folks were already calling it the Great War, and with good reason. The fields of France and Russia were packed with millions of soldiers, locked in a deadly standoff where thousands fell every single day; even when no one was charging forward. Then came April 6th, when the United States stepped into the fray, throwing its lot in with France, Britain, Russia, and the rest of the Allies. They faced a formidable lineup: Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. All bracing for what would become a truly global fight.

Why did the US join the War?

President Woodrow Wilson had just been sworn in for his second term, having won over the American people with the promise, “He Kept Us Out of War.” Folks thought Wilson was a man too proud to send young Americans into the meat grinder that was Europe.

In fact, diplomats across the Atlantic called the United States “The Great Neutral,” and for a while, that title fit. American envoys worked tirelessly, hoping to broker peace as the trenches filled and the casualties mounted. But even a president can’t outrun the winds of war forever.

The first sign that the storm was coming was a note, hand-delivered by the German ambassador on January 31. “Unrestricted submarine warfare,” it read. No more warnings, no more safe passage—any ship, friend or foe, near Britain, France, Italy, or the Eastern Mediterranean was fair game for German U-boats.

Now, to us today, that might sound like just another piece of military strategy, but back then, it sent shockwaves through the American public. It was a move born of desperation. Germany needed to cut off Britain to win before their own resources ran dry. But to Americans, it was yet another sign of German aggression, the war machine grinding on, civilians and soldiers alike in its path.

Wilson was stunned. The very next day, he cut diplomatic ties with Germany, though he still held back from war. Then came the Zimmermann Telegram—a real cloak-and-dagger moment.

British intelligence intercepted a secret message from Germany’s foreign minister to its ambassador in Mexico, offering Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico in exchange for Mexico turning on the U.S. The news broke on February 28, and you could feel the mood shift. Americans were furious; the idea of foreign powers carving up their land was too much to bear. Wilson ordered American merchant ships to arm themselves.

March rolled in, and German U-boats made good on their threats, sending three U.S.-flagged ships to the bottom of the sea. The pressure mounted, and Wilson finally called Congress to a special session on April 2.

When he stepped up to the podium, he wasn’t the reluctant leader anymore. He was a man with purpose. “The world must be made safe for democracy,” he declared, pledging that America wasn’t after land, riches, or power. The fight was for liberty and the rights of mankind.

Four days later, Congress gave its answer. The declaration of war was signed, and the United States stepped into the storm, determined to tilt the balance in the name of freedom.

The Nation’s Defense Potential

At the dawn of the twentieth century, America was a sleeping giant; an industrial powerhouse ready to change the course of history. Picture this: by 1900, U.S. Steel alone was turning out more steel than the whole of Great Britain.

Henry Ford was cranking out Model Ts on assembly lines, making horse-and-buggy transportation look ancient overnight. Farms were getting machines, freeing up hands for the factories. America’s cities buzzed with a growing, literate workforce, mass production was in full swing, and railroads stitched the nation together; change was in the air, and the future looked unstoppable.

But when war erupted across the ocean, the United States military was still caught in another era. The Great War was industrialized carnage—millions in the trenches, millions more behind the lines, and factories churning out weapons day and night.

The U.S. Army, though, was tiny: just over 120,000 enlisted men and fewer than 6,000 officers, scattered from the Wild West to outposts in the Philippines and the Caribbean. Equipment was scarce—hardly any machine guns, no tanks, not much artillery, and barely any planes.

The National Guard was even more uneven, with old gear and patchy training. The Army hadn’t fought in big divisions since the Civil War, and few officers knew how to move or command massive units. The Navy, with 300 ships and 60,000 sailors, was respectable; but nothing like Britain’s Royal Navy.

So when war was declared in April 1917, no one really knew what role America would play. Yet the declaration itself marked something big: the moment America stepped onto the world stage, unprepared but determined. It would take time for U.S. military power to grow up. But when it did, it would help turn the tide of the war.

How World War I Changed Aviation

In 1914, flying meant braving the elements in open cockpits, clutching a paper map, and trusting your gut more than your gauges. But war has a way of speeding up progress. Soon, those flimsy scout planes evolved into fighters, bombers, and the first true air warriors. The big ideas of airpower—scouting, moving fast, hitting hard, and ruling the skies—were all born in that crucible.

For the United States, joining the fight in April 1917 was a leap into the unknown. With few planes and even fewer trained pilots, America was far from ready, but the moment marked a turning point.

The country learned fast, grew stronger, and began to project its power across oceans. World War I left two legacies: it transformed aviation from a daring experiment into a battlefield necessity, and it pushed America to the center of world affairs. Even today, when conflict flares, airpower and American resolve are still the keys to shaping war and forging peace.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

“The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran’s short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their navy… That is the clear objective of this mission.”

—Secretary of State Marco Rubio

Mission Briefing

In the dark, early hours of 28 February 2026, U.S. Central Command launched a major campaign at the president’s command. CENTCOM made its intent unmistakable: to dismantle the Iranian regime’s security backbone by targeting sites deemed an imminent threat. The opening strikes fell on the Revolutionary Guards’ command centers, missile and drone launch sites, air defenses, and military airfields—linchpins of Iran’s military might. From the very beginning, this was no mere warning shot, but a calculated campaign to disrupt and unseat the adversary’s power.

What is Operation Epic Fury?

From the very beginning, this was no fleeting demonstration of might. The campaign’s intention was deep disruption—an operation designed to shake the adversary’s foundations.

Yet, as the first sorties thundered across the night sky, the political objectives began to shift beneath them. According to Reuters, the White House and Pentagon soon layered new aims atop the original mission: destroy Iran’s offensive missiles, cripple its navy, neutralize its support for regional proxies, and ensure Tehran never acquires nuclear weapons.

Each new goal added a dimension of strategic coercion, but also a layer of fragility; because, as any seasoned aviator knows, the more reasons you fight, the harder it is to recognize when you’ve truly won.

General Dan Caine’s early reports set the stage for a classic air campaign, but on a scale rarely seen in modern warfare. On February 27, before the world even knew the fight had begun, U.S. Cyber and Space Commands moved first; working to blind and disrupt Iranian detection and communications.

Then, in the darkest hours of February 28, over a hundred aircraft launched from airstrips and carrier decks, joined by Tomahawk missiles and precision rockets. The first wave struck with synchronized fury, hammering more than a thousand targets in just one day. The message was unmistakable: seize the tempo, deny the enemy a chance to regroup.

In the days that followed, command centers, intelligence nodes, missile batteries, air defenses, and naval assets came under relentless attack. The idea was simple—”stun and disorient” the adversary, as Reuters put it, while U.S. forces established air superiority overhead. This wasn’t a campaign to occupy ground, but to dominate every domain; air, sea, command, missiles, communications, and logistics.

CENTCOM’s official reports, released after ten and then thirteen days, read like a roll call of American airpower. B-1s, B-2s, and B-52s thundered overhead; F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, F-22s, and F-35s patrolled the skies; electronic warfare aircraft jammed signals; advanced early warning planes and reconnaissance platforms swept the horizon; MQ-9 Reapers hunted from above.

Missile defense systems, carrier strike groups, refueling tankers, and LUCAS drones completed the picture. CENTCOM hinted at “special capabilities”—the sort aviators only speak of in hushed tones.

This arsenal wasn’t assembled for show. It represented a fully integrated architecture for strike, intelligence, command, missile defense, and logistics—sustaining a campaign meant to endure ballistic salvos, drone swarms, naval skirmishes, and regional ripples. As Reuters aptly put it, this was the largest U.S. operation since the 2003 invasion of Iraq; a testament to both the challenge at hand and the scale of America’s commitment.

Targets, Tactics, and Tempo

CENTCOM’s latest briefings pull back the curtain on a campaign that has evolved far beyond its opening salvos. Thirteen days in, the target list had grown: not just launch sites and command centers, but weapons factories, surface-to-air missile installations, and the full arc of Iran’s naval mine-laying capability; from warships to the factories and warehouses that keep them supplied.

The March 12 report tallies the cost: nearly 6,000 targets struck, with over ninety Iranian vessels hit or destroyed; more than sixty ships and thirty mine-layers among them.

This marks a clear shift; from neutralizing an immediate threat to systematically degrading Iran’s ability to project power. It’s a move any seasoned strategist would recognize. Iran’s playbook has always been layered; missiles and drones, scattered logistics, denial of the seas through mines and small boats.

Hitting launchers without shutting down the assembly lines would buy only a brief calm. Sinking warships without dismantling the mining infrastructure would leave vital oil lanes in peril. Operation Epic Fury is designed to break this cycle, dismantling the machinery that lets Tehran strike from afar. In military terms, it’s sound doctrine. Politically, it’s a heavier lift, for every new target brings new complexities.

Washington, meanwhile, points to rapid momentum. By March 2, Reuters reported that U.S. air superiority was secure, enabling deeper and broader strikes. The Pentagon announced a sharp drop in Iranian missile and drone launches as stockpiles and launch sites fell. On the tactical map, Epic Fury was doing what it set out to do: disrupt the enemy’s tempo and coordination, forcing Iran onto the defensive.

Yet, every victory comes at a price. CENTCOM’s daily bulletins tell that story, too. By March 1, three American lives had been lost; the toll climbed to seven by March 8, after a soldier wounded in Saudi Arabia succumbed.

Reuters revealed that about 140 service members were wounded in the campaign’s first ten days, most able to return to duty, but eight remained gravely injured. This is no costless exercise. It is paid for in sweat, blood, and sacrifice.

As mid-March arrives, the word from the White House is “relentless.” Ceasefire is off the table; the operation presses on, intensifying with U.S. strikes on Kharg Island—the linchpin of Iran’s oil exports.

Kharg moves nearly 90% of Iran’s oil, around 1.55 million barrels a day. The message is clear: America can strike at the heart of Iran’s economic might, signaling serious intent while holding back—at least for now—from directly crippling the oil infrastructure itself.

Operation Epic Fury and the Weight of Alliance

For America and its allies, Operation Epic Fury was more than a thunderous display of arms. It was a signal flare in the night, declaring intent to restore order in a region slipping toward chaos.

From the cockpit’s view, Epic Fury struck at the very arteries of Iran’s military machine: command centers, missile batteries, air defenses, naval forces, drone workshops, and logistics lines all came under fire. The aim was clear: paralyze Iran’s ability to threaten bases, ships, air routes, and global trade lanes, giving the U.S. and its partners time to seize back the initiative before Tehran could regroup.

For allies, especially those who rely on Gulf security and the free flow of commerce, Epic Fury was a reassurance mission as much as an offensive one. The sheer might on display—heavy bombers, stealth fighters, carriers, destroyers, missile shields, and surveillance networks—showed that the United States would shoulder risk and stand guard, wielding enough force to blunt missile barrages and keep the coalition safe.

Yet, tactical victory does not guarantee strategic control. Even as thousands of targets burned and Iran’s naval reach was curtailed, the bigger question loomed: could these battlefield gains be translated into lasting stability and a safer future for the region?

Epic Fury, then, was as much about present protection as it was about the uncertain road ahead. This campaign shielded allies today, while leaving the work of true security for tomorrow.

This Week in Aviation History

01 April 1945—a date etched into the annals of aviation and military history. On that morning, U.S. ground forces launched the Battle of Okinawa, the largest amphibious assault in the Pacific theater. For those of us who cherish the legends of the air, this was more than just another campaign; Okinawa was the last great barrier before Imperial Japan itself.

With the island secured, the stage would be set for America’s air power to reach its full, unbridled potential—strategic bombers poised to strike the Japanese mainland, supply lines strangled, and forward bases prepared for Operation Olympic, the planned final invasion set for later that year.

The Battle of Okinawa

On 15 March 1945, as Marines declared the end of organized resistance on Iwo Jima, Admiral Raymond Spruance—commander of the Fifth Fleet—was already charting a course into the unknown. Aboard his flagship, the USS Indianapolis, Spruance sailed toward the Ryukyu Islands, accompanied by Admiral Marc Mitscher’s formidable Fast Carrier Task Force 58.

In the days ahead, the Pacific would bear witness to a gathering of might that defied imagination: over 1,600 ships and 350,000 naval personnel converging under Spruance’s command to form the largest amphibious assault force in the history of warfare. Their mission: seize Okinawa, the last sentinel before the heartland of Imperial Japan.

With Iwo Jima and soon Okinawa in Allied hands, the strategic equation shifted. The U.S. could now unleash its full arsenal—long-range bombers, relentless blockades, and newly established forward bases—preparing the ground for Operation Olympic, the final invasion of Japan set for autumn. But before that could happen, a storm of steel and sacrifice awaited.

A grim preview came on March 19, as Task Force 58 struck at Honshū and Kobe Harbor. The USS Franklin, one of America’s proud carriers, was struck by two bombs from a Japanese dive bomber. Her crew’s valor saved the ship, but the cost was staggering: over 800 sailors lost in a single morning; a stark reminder that the enemy, though diminished, was far from beaten.

Navy planners knew the closer they sailed to Japan, the fiercer the resistance would become. The enemy’s arsenal now included a new and terrifying weapon: the kamikaze. These weren’t conventional sorties; these were pilots willing to become the weapon itself. At Leyte Gulf and Iwo Jima, such attacks had been a menace, but now, within reach of the Japanese homeland, the threat loomed larger.

Estimates warned of thousands of enemy aircraft poised for suicide missions. Those estimates, grimly, would prove true. On March 31, Spruance himself felt the sting when a kamikaze struck the Indianapolis. The damage sent the flagship limping back to San Francisco, placing her on a path to her own tragic destiny.

Despite the fury from above, the invasion of Okinawa began with precision and purpose. Minesweepers cleared safe passage, warships unleashed thunderous bombardments, and carrier-based aircraft flew relentless sorties.

On April 1^st (Easter Sunday) Lieutenant General Simon Bolivar Buckner Jr.’s Tenth Army landed unopposed on Okinawa’s western shores, their sights set on two vital airstrips. Astonishingly, both fell without resistance.

The ground campaign split in two: Marines pressed north, securing the lightly defended territory, while Army troops turned south toward the fortress-like Shuri Line. By mid-April, the Marines had swept their sector, but the Army’s advance slowed, grinding against entrenched defenders.

As the weeks dragged on, the lines blurred; Marines and soldiers alike locked in brutal combat, inching forward at staggering cost. By June’s end, the butcher’s bill was sobering: 49,151 American casualties, more than 12,500 killed or missing. Okinawa had become not just a stepping stone, but a crucible; proving the resolve, sacrifice, and unbreakable spirit of those who flew and fought beneath the Pacific sky.

The Importance of Real-Time Adaptation and Allied Partnership

Every day at Okinawa, the cost in lives and steel climbed higher, forcing the Navy to adapt its ways in the face of a threat few had truly anticipated. The kamikaze was unlike anything naval commanders had seen before. Pilots turning their planes into living weapons, undeterred by odds or firepower.

To meet this new reality, the Navy became a crucible of innovation: radar pickets were refined, combat air patrols adjusted, strikes against enemy airfields intensified, and small islands were seized to anchor early warning radars. In the process, sailors caught a fleeting glimpse of the future; a time when war at sea would be decided not just by bombs or torpedoes, but by guided missiles streaking in from beyond the horizon.

The radar pickets, small ships stationed far from the main fleet, became the sentinels and sacrificial shields of the armada. Their job was to spot incoming threats and sound the alarm, buying precious minutes for the larger ships to prepare. But in doing so, these pickets became the kamikazes’ first targets.

As the tempo of attacks escalated, the picket line was pushed out—from 40 miles to 60—stretching the fleet’s defenses thin, but granting more time to react. Ideally, each radar picket team would have included four to six destroyers and half a dozen supporting craft, all matched in speed and maneuverability.

In reality, losses forced the Navy to improvise, mixing ship types and requiring each group to adapt its tactics on the fly when the sky darkened with enemy aircraft.

Admiral Spruance, ever the tactician, ordered the capture of small offshore islands to extend the Navy’s reach. These outposts became hubs for fighter direction and early warning, giving the fleet a new edge in the deadly chess match over Okinawa.

After the battle, one flotilla commander would say, “Never in the annals of our glorious naval history have naval forces done so much with so little against such odds for so long a period.” Such praise became a refrain for the picket crews—stretched to the limit, yet unbroken.

The crucible of Okinawa demanded more than tactical brilliance; it required true teamwork. The operation was a patchwork of commands and services—the overall strategy set by Admiral Nimitz, the assault led by Spruance, and the ground war waged by a joint Army-Marine Corps force under Buckner.

The complexity was staggering. Smooth cooperation meant drawing clear lines of authority, especially as the campaign shifted from sea to shore. Spruance held the power to decide when amphibious gave way to ground fighting, but even then, rivalries had to be set aside. And set aside they were, as Army, Navy, and Marine forces melded into a single, unstoppable team; proving that, even amid chaos, unity could carry the day.

The Battle of Okinawa’s Enduring Legacy

The Battle of Okinawa’s legacy is etched not just in its staggering scale, but in the truths it revealed about modern warfare’s true cost. From April to June 1945, Operation Iceberg became the Pacific’s largest, bloodiest crucible: Army, Marines, Navy, Coast Guard, and allies, all locked in a brutal campaign that demanded everything from everyone.

Victory didn’t come with the first wave ashore. Japanese defenders melted into caves and strongholds, refusing open battle and turning Okinawa into a grinding trial of endurance. Over 12,000 Americans fell. Japanese forces were nearly annihilated, and the toll on Okinawan civilians was devastating.

There were lessons, paid for in blood. Okinawa proved that winning the Pacific required more than firepower. It demanded flawless joint cooperation, mastery of amphibious landings, logistical genius, and the grit to face an enemy fighting from the shadows, willing to die rather than yield.

Kamikaze attacks, relentless and desperate, sank 26 Allied ships and damaged 168 more, a stark reminder that even the strongest fleet can be threatened by unconventional tactics.

But the deepest legacy is human. It lives in the stories of sacrifice—soldiers, sailors, Marines, correspondents, and civilians—and in acts of courage like Desmond Doss at Hacksaw Ridge. Okinawa stands as both a warning and a guide: in war, technology alone is never enough. Victory belongs to those who endure, who unite, and who find strength in the darkest hours.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

A-10s have routinely been equipped with Sidewinders as a last layer of self defence against hostile aircraft, but with the increased use of small uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) like the Shahed 136 as attack munitions, the A-10 can now use them in a more offensive role

—U.S. Central Command

Mission Briefing

The A-10 Warthogs, those rugged workhorses of the U.S. Air Force, have shifted gears in Operation Epic Fury. According to General Dan Caine’s briefing from the Pentagon on March 19, 2026, these jets are now prowling the southern flank, eyes locked on the fast attack boats darting through the Strait of Hormuz. The mission: hunt down threats on the waves with the same relentless precision they’ve always shown on land.

Warthogs are Hunting the Iranian Fast Attack Craft in the Strait of Hormuz

From the very start of Operation Epic Fury, there was no mystery about the A-10 Thunderbolt II’s involvement; CENTCOM made it official within the first 48 hours. But the story deepened when U.S. Central Command released new images: the unmistakable silhouette of the Warthog, bristling with both anti-air and anti-surface weaponry.

Outfitted with a LITENING targeting pod, a pair of Maverick missiles, Sidewinders, a centerline fuel tank for extra range and loiter time, and an APKWS rocket pod, these jets looked ready for any mission the battle demanded. Until now, though, the A-10 had never been confirmed flying missions over Iran itself.

Traditionally, the Hogs had been deployed to Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, where their reputation was forged in the classic role of close air support; providing cover for ground troops and hammering Iran-backed Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq.

But with the escalation of Epic Fury, the A-10s made a leap from the familiar desert theater to a new domain: the open waters and contested straits of the Persian Gulf.

It’s a transition that makes perfect sense to those who know the type. Over the past decade and a half, the A-10 has quietly expanded its resume beyond tank-busting and battlefield support.

In 2011, during Operation Unified Protector, a Warthog teamed up with a P-3 Orion to take out a patrol boat and several small attack craft in Misrata, Libya—a harbinger of things to come.

More recently, faced with escalating asymmetric threats in the Red Sea and the Black Sea; where swarms of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and small boats have challenged even the most advanced navies. The Warthog has become a familiar sight at maritime exercises, training to counter these fast, elusive foes.

By the 2020s, the A-10 was a regular participant in Maritime Surface Warfare drills, including a notable 2023 exercise where two Hogs joined the USS Stethem in the Gulf of Oman to engage simulated surface threats.

The logic is clear: with high-value warships and tankers vulnerable to massed attacks by USVs, the ability to loiter low and slow, deliver precise, flexible firepower, and operate in tight quarters is more valuable than ever.

The A-10’s legendary maneuverability, robust payload, and unflappable accuracy make it a nightmare for fast-moving targets; on land and now, increasingly, at sea.

So, as Epic Fury unfolds, the Warthog writes a new chapter in its storied legacy, proving that an old warrior with the right tools and the right crew can adapt to any battlefield—from the dust of Iraq to the blue of the Persian Gulf—wherever the mission calls.

Anatomy of the Warthog

The A-10 Thunderbolt II is a pilot’s dream when it comes to low and slow maneuvering; hugging the terrain with uncanny precision and delivering its arsenal with unrivaled accuracy.

Built to linger over the battlefield, the Warthog can take off from short, rough strips close to the front, operate in lousy weather or low visibility, and keep watch for hours, ready to strike at a moment’s notice; even in the dead of night, thanks to night vision goggles and NVIS-compatible cockpits.

The all-around bubble canopy offers panoramic views, while titanium armor cradles the pilot and vital systems, letting the jet shrug off hits that would down lesser aircraft.

Redundant controls, self-sealing fuel cells, and manual backups mean the A-10 can keep flying even when wounded, surviving direct fire up to 23mm and still bringing its pilot home. In the chaos of close air support, the Warthog is more than a machine—it’s a steadfast guardian, engineered to endure the toughest fight and turn the tide for those on the ground.

General characteristics
Primary function: close air support, airborne forward air control, combat search and rescue
Contractor: Fairchild Republic Co.
Power plant: two General Electric TF34-GE-100 turbofans
Thrust: 9,065 pounds each engine
Wingspan: 57 feet, 6 inches (17.42 meters)
Length: 53 feet, 4 inches (16.16 meters)
Height: 14 feet, 8 inches (4.42 meters)
Weight: 29,000 pounds (13,154 kilograms) Maximum Takeoff Weight: 51,000 pounds (22,950 kilograms) Fuel Capacity: 11,000 pounds (7,257 kilograms)
Payload: 16,000 pounds (7,257 kilograms)
Speed: 450 nautical miles per hour (Mach 0.75)
Range: 2580 miles (2240 nautical miles)
Ceiling: 45,000 feet (13,636 meters)
Armament: one 30 mm GAU-8/A seven-barrel Gatling gun; up to 16,000 pounds (7,200 kilograms) of mixed ordnance on eight under-wing and three under-fuselage pylon stations, including 500 pound (225 kilograms) Mk-82 and 2,000 pounds (900 kilograms) Mk-84 series low/high drag bombs, incendiary cluster bombs, combined effects munitions, mine dispensing munitions, AGM-65 Maverick missiles and laser-guided/electro-optically guided bombs; infrared countermeasure flares; electronic countermeasure chaff; jammer pods; 2.75-inch (6.99 centimeters) rockets; illumination flares and AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles.

Warthogs on Watch: Guardians of the US and Allies

When the United States unleashed its A-10 Thunderbolt IIs against Iranian fast attack craft in the Strait of Hormuz, it was more than just a change in tactics. It was a declaration that this critical maritime artery would be defended with every tool in the arsenal.

In Operation Epic Fury, the Warthogs left their traditional close air support roles behind, taking to the skies over one of the world’s most volatile chokepoints to hunt the nimble boats that could threaten warships, tankers, and global commerce alike.

The Strait of Hormuz is no ordinary waterway; it’s a flashpoint where a handful of small boats, if left unchecked, could have global consequences.

For America’s allies—especially those with stakes in Gulf stability—the sight of A-10s loaded for both air and surface threats brought reassurance. These jets, equipped for drones and fast craft alike, can loiter for hours, maneuver at low altitudes, and strike with surgical precision, bringing a new layer of deterrence beyond what surface ships alone could offer.

Perhaps most striking, the mission underscored why the A-10 still matters, even as retirement looms. The Warthog’s adaptability for modern, networked, and maritime missions proves that legacy aircraft can still find new purpose.

As the Gulf’s battlespace evolves, the A-10 shows that old legends don’t fade quietly. They simply find new horizons to defend.

This Week in Aviation History

The first A3D-1s rolled off the production line and joined the fleet on 31 March 1956, arriving not long after the Navy welcomed the jet-age carrier USS Forrestal. Almost from day one, these new birds proved their mettle, showcasing what the future of carrier aviation could truly be.

Skywarrior Rising: The Navy’s Atomic Age Answer

The world and the future of warfare changed in an instant when atomic bombs fell over Japan in August 1945. Naval aviators, fresh from the triumphs of World War II, knew the aircraft carrier’s mobility had been the key to victory in the vast Pacific, allowing swift, devastating strikes across a scattered theater.

But in the postwar years, as the smoke cleared, a fierce debate ignited within the ranks of America’s military visionaries. The Army Air Forces, soon to become the independent U.S. Air Force, argued that nuclear-armed heavy bombers would render both sprawling armies and mighty fleets obsolete; air power alone, they claimed, would decide the next great conflict, and thus, all strategic air should be under the control of the new Air Force.

The Navy, unwilling to surrender the oceans or the skies above them, answered with conviction and innovation. Their answer was the A3D Skywarrior, an aircraft that would become synonymous with versatility and endurance at sea.

In 1947, the Navy issued a challenge: design a jet-powered bomber capable of delivering a 10,000-pound atomic weapon over 2,000 nautical miles, launched from the decks of the planned super carrier United States. Douglas Aircraft, led by the legendary Ed Heinemann, took up the call.

Heinemann’s team engineered an aircraft with an impressive gross weight of 68,000 pounds (significantly lighter than rival proposals), powered by twin jet engines tucked into nacelles beneath high-mounted wings, leaving ample space for a cavernous internal bomb bay.

Though the super carrier United States was abruptly canceled just weeks after Douglas received the contract for two prototypes, the Skywarrior project pressed on. In its final form, the A3D boasted a pair of Pratt & Whitney J57-P-6 engines, each producing 9,700 pounds of static thrust and pushing the bomber to speeds exceeding 600 miles per hour.

Heinemann’s relentless focus on weight reduction meant the Skywarrior could launch from modified Essex-class carriers, relics of World War II reworked for the jet age. But the quest for lighter flight came with a price: no ejection seats. Instead, the crew relied on an escape chute—a risky prospect that led to the aircraft’s unforgettable nickname among aviators: “All Three Dead.”

31 March 1956 marked a new era as the first production A3D-1s joined the fleet, just months after the USS Forrestal, the Navy’s first jet carrier, was commissioned. The Skywarrior wasted no time proving its worth. On July 31, 1956, one of these bombers flew nonstop from Hawaii to New Mexico; a staggering 3,200 miles in just 5 hours and 40 minutes, without a single refueling.

The following year, a pair of A3Ds made history with a carrier-to-carrier transcontinental flight, launching from the Bon Homme Richard off California and landing on the Saratoga steaming off Florida, cementing the Skywarrior’s place in the legend of naval aviation.

Under the Hood of the Skywarrior

Dimensions: Length: 74 ft, 5 in.; Height: 22 ft., 8 in.; Wingspan: 72 ft., 5 in.

Weights: Empty: 35,999 lb.; Gross: 70,000 lb.

Power Plant: Two 9,700 lb. static thrust Pratt & Whitney J57-P-6 turbojets

Performance: Maximum Speed: 621 M.P.H.; Service Ceiling: 39,000 ft.; Range: 2,990 miles

Armament: Two 20mm cannon in tail and provision for 8,700 lb. of ordnance, including nuclear weapons

Crew: Pilot, bombardier/navigator, gunner (attack configuration)

Skywarrior: An Enduring Callsign

The Douglas A-3 Skywarrior redefined what a naval aircraft could be. Conceived in the tense dawn of the Cold War, it gave the U.S. Navy a jet bomber capable of hauling big payloads over long distances. All from the moving deck of an aircraft carrier. For its day, that was an engineering marvel, the result of Ed Heinemann’s team stripping away every ounce they could, creating the heaviest bird to ever launch regularly from a carrier.

But the Skywarrior’s legacy soared well beyond dropping bombs. As strategy shifted and new threats emerged, the Whale adapted. It became a tanker, a reconnaissance platform, an electronic warfare workhorse, and a testbed for the Navy’s changing technology.

The National Naval Aviation Museum pays special tribute to the KA-3B’s vital refueling missions and credits later EA-3B and NEA-3B variants with keeping the Skywarrior relevant deep into the late Cold War.

That kind of adaptability is rare. The Skywarrior wasn’t just a bomber; it was a bridge from the Navy’s early nuclear ambitions to the modern age of versatile, multi-role carrier aviation.

Even after its attack days were over, the A-3 found new missions; proving that the greatest warplanes aren’t just built for one fight, but for every challenge that follows as the world and the mission change.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

U.S. Central Command is aware of the loss of a U.S. KC-135 refueling aircraft. The incident occurred in friendly airspace during Operation Epic Fury, and rescue efforts are ongoing. Two aircraft were involved in the incident. One of the aircraft went down in western Iraq, and the second landed safely.

This was not due to hostile fire or friendly fire.

—US Central Command

Mission Briefing

They say the KC-135 met its fate not in hostile skies, but after a fateful encounter with another bird in friendly airspace. While the second aircraft made it home without a scratch, the tanker did not. It was during Operation Epic Fury—the news came down from U.S. Central Command on 12 March 2026—a reminder that even familiar skies can hold dangers of their own.

The Stratotanker Went Down in Western Iraq During the Epic Fury

Operation Epic Fury has summoned the services of many KC-135 Stratotankers. Those steadfast giants of the sky that keep our fighting force fueled and ready. In recent days, several of these tankers have been spotted weaving their way through Israeli airspace, some flashing the emergency squawk code 7700; a distress beacon every aviator knows well.

For those watching the digital trails from afar, questions immediately began to swirl: were any of these tankers in distress tied to the grim incident that soon followed off the Israeli coast? The fog of war, as always, makes details elusive.

This loss marks the first time in nearly thirteen years that a Stratotanker has failed to return home. The last time tragedy struck was on May 3, 2013, when KC-135R 63-8877 of the 22nd Air Refueling Wing left McConnell Air Force Base for the skies over Kyrgyzstan, only to meet disaster near the village of Chaldovar, a hundred miles from its point of departure. The echoes of that loss still linger in the minds of those who have worn the uniform.

This time, according to reports, it was another KC-135 that found itself entangled in the incident; a midair encounter that ended in catastrophe. Official statements have ruled out enemy or friendly fire, but the rumor mill, stoked by social media, has been quick to suggest otherwise.

As speculation spread, U.S. Central Command issued steady updates, confirming what every aviator dreads: all six crew members aboard the tanker perished. Their names now join the honored roll: Maj. John A. Klinner, Capt. Ariana G. Savino, Tech. Sgt. Ashley B. Pruitt, Capt. Seth R. Koval, Capt. Curtis J. Angst, and Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons—a team drawn from the 6th Air Refueling Wing at MacDill and the 121st at Rickenbacker, united in service and sacrifice.

Their loss brings the toll of U.S. lives claimed since the conflict with Iran ignited to thirteen: six in an Iranian strike on Kuwait, one in Saudi Arabia, and now these six souls lost in the skies. The investigation is ongoing, but officials believe a midair collision may be at the heart of the tragedy.

On the ground, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s words cut through the uncertainty: “War is hell, war is chaos, and as we saw yesterday with the tragic crash of our KC-135 tanker, bad things can happen. American heroes, all of them.”

Even as details trickle out—confirmation that a second KC-135 returned safely after sustaining damage, that another tanker declared an emergency before landing in Tel Aviv. The loss is keenly felt. In the world of aviation, every scar in the sky tells a story. This one will be remembered.

The Tanker’s Anatomy

The KC-135 Stratotanker is the quiet powerhouse of the U.S. Air Force. It is the legend that has faithfully fueled America’s global reach for more than six decades. If you picture the heart of an aerial fleet, think of the KC-135: its silhouette cutting across the sky, wings swept back at a sharp 35 degrees, four turbofans rumbling as it hauls up to 322,500 pounds into the blue.

This is no ordinary aircraft. It’s the lifeline that keeps fighters and bombers on station, that stretches the boundaries of possibility for the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and even allied squadrons around the world.

But the KC-135 is more than a tanker. Its cargo deck can be pressed into service for passengers or freight. When the mission calls for it, the Stratotanker transforms into a flying hospital, ferrying wounded warriors to safety with patient support pallets strapped securely in place.

At the heart of its refueling magic is the flying boom: a marvel of midair engineering, controlled by a dedicated boom operator lying prone at the rear, guiding the fuel-laden probe into thirsty receivers.

Some KC-135s are fitted with a drogue for probe-equipped aircraft, and a few can even refuel two aircraft at once with their wingtip pods. In the world of aviation, the KC-135 is the unsung hero—steady, reliable, and always ready to answer the call.

General Characteristics

Primary Function: Aerial refueling and airlift

Prime Contractor: The Boeing Company

Power Plant: CFM International CFM-56 turbofan engines

Thrust: 21,634 pounds each engine

Wingspan: 130 feet, 10 inches (39.88 meters)

Length: 136 feet, 3 inches (41.53 meters)

Height: 41 feet, 8 inches (12.7 meters)

Speed: 530 miles per hour at 30,000 feet (9,144 meters)

Ceiling: 50,000 feet (15,240 meters)

Range: 1,500 miles (2,419 kilometers) with 150,000 pounds (68,039 kilograms) of transfer fuel; ferry mission, up to 11,015 miles (17,766 kilometers)

Maximum Takeoff Weight: 322,500 pounds (146,285 kilograms)

Maximum Transfer Fuel Load: 200,000 pounds (90,719 kilograms)

Maximum Cargo Capability: 83,000 pounds (37,648 kilograms), 37 passengers

Pallet Positions: 6

Crew: Three: pilot, co-pilot and boom operator. Some KC-135 missions require the addition of a navigator. The Air Force has a limited number of navigator suites that can be installed for unique missions.

Aeromedical Evacuation Crew: A basic crew of five (two flight nurses and three medical technicians) is added for aeromedical evacuation missions. Medical crew may be altered as required by the needs of patients.

Unit Cost: $39.6 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)

Date Deployed: August 1956

When the Tanker Falls, the Mission Trembles

For the United States and its allies, the loss of a KC-135 in western Iraq is a sobering reminder: modern air campaigns soar not just on the wings of fighters and bombers, but on the backs of the support fleet that keeps the whole machine in motion. The reports are clear: a combat mission, two tankers in the air, and a tragedy unfolding over friendly territory, untouched by hostile fire.

Strategically, the stakes are immense. A KC-135 isn’t just a number in the inventory; it’s the lifeline that extends the reach of airpower, lets strike packages linger, and sustains the relentless tempo demanded by coalition operations.

Its loss doesn’t just echo through squadrons. It sends a signal from Washington to NATO to Gulf allies: even outside the shadow of enemy missiles, the logistics lifeblood of air war is vulnerable to chaos, chance, and the fog of conflict.

Then, there’s the human toll. All six crew members lost, raising the war’s toll and reminding us that behind every sortie is a cost measured in lives, not just flight hours. For every ally, the lesson is crystal clear: winning the skies isn’t just about sharp fighters, but about resilient command and support. The next crisis may hinge not on the flashiest jet, but on the quiet giants that keep them aloft.

This Week in Aviation History

26 March 1967: Colonel Robert Ray Scott led twenty F-105 Thunderchiefs from Takhli, Thailand, on a daring strike near Hanoi. Flying his F-105D, call sign “Leech 01,” Scott wasn’t just guiding the attack; he became part of the legend. As bombs fell and flak blossomed, he spotted a MiG-17 closing in. With a cool hand and the roar of his 20mm Vulcan cannon, Scott downed the enemy fighter, etching his name into the annals of air combat and proving once more the mettle of America’s aviators.

Colonel Robert Ray Shot Down a MiG using F-105

The 355th Tactical Fighter Wing, led by Colonel Robert Ray Scott, staked its claim in the skies over North Vietnam. The mission was routine at first: a strike near Hoa Lac airfield, F-105 Thunderchiefs thundering into enemy territory. But as any aviator knows, routine can turn legendary in a flash.

Colonel Scott caught sight of a MiG-17 launching from Hoa Loc airfield. With the instincts of a seasoned hunter, he banked left, ready to pursue. Three more MiGs soon revealed themselves, circling the airfield in single-ship trail; silver flashes marked with the unmistakable red star.

Scott fixed his gaze on the closest, pressed the attack, and closed the distance as the MiG tried to shake him. He fired, watching rounds tear into the left wing, debris spinning away. The MiG rolled into a desperate, low escape, but Scott pulled away, having done what few could claim: he’d bested a MiG in its own backyard. The pilot, Second Lieutenant Vũ Huy Lượng of the 923rd Fighter Regiment, did not survive.

This victory was more than a tally mark. For Scott, it was a bridge across eras. He’d flown the Northrop P-61 Black Widow in World War II, hunting in the dark skies over India and China. He’d already claimed two victories back then, and now, decades later, he joined the rarest company; becoming only the second U.S. Air Force pilot, after the renowned Colonel Robin Olds, to score kills in both World War II and Vietnam.

Scott’s own story began in Des Moines, Iowa, in 1920, the son of a railroad worker. He found his wings early, trading college for the cockpit when he enlisted as an Aviation Cadet just before America entered World War II. By the war’s end, he’d earned both the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal, his courage proven in combat.

After WWII, Scott returned home, finished his degree, and didn’t stop learning, earning two master’s degrees before returning to the sky. In 1952, he graduated from the Air Force’s test pilot school at Edwards, flying the cutting-edge North American F-86D.

But combat was never far, and Scott would eventually fly 305 missions across three wars—a career marked by valor, with four Silver Stars, three Legions of Merit, six Distinguished Flying Crosses, and sixteen Air Medals. He passed away in California in 2006, his legacy resting among heroes at Arlington.

Even the machines that carried these men found their fate in the crucible of war. Scott’s F-105D, serial number 59-1772, would claim one more victory; a month after Scott’s triumph, Major Harry E. Higgins downed another MiG-17 with its cannon. But by 1970, the Thunderchief itself was lost to anti-aircraft fire over Laos; the pilot, a testament to the skill and luck that defines aviators, was rescued.

Some stories in aviation are written in contrails and thunder, in moments where history and heroism meet. Colonel Scott’s was one of them, a reminder that every sortie has the potential to become legend.

What Made the Thud stand out?

Back in 1951, Republic Aviation set out to craft a supersonic tactical fighter-bomber that would outpace the aging F-84F. Their answer was the F-105 Thunderchief—known to those who flew her as the “Thud.”

The first prototype, the YF-105A, took to the skies in October 1955, but it wasn’t until June 1959 that the F-105D made its debut. Over the years, 833 Thunderchiefs would roll off the line, with 610 of them built as the D-model, each bearing the ambition of Republic’s engineers and the hopes of every young pilot who strapped in.

When the Gulf of Tonkin incident thrust Southeast Asia into the world’s spotlight in 1964, the Air Force called upon the F-105 for its speed and muscle. The Thud played a starring role in Operation Rolling Thunder, delivering more than 12,000 pounds of conventional bombs per mission; a payload that even eclipsed the legendary B-17 of World War II.

Though born for nuclear strike, the Thunderchief proved itself a brawler in the jungles and skies of Vietnam, flying hard and hitting harder. Eventually, the F-4 Phantom took over the Thunderchief’s mantle, and by July 1980, the last F-105D had flown its final Air Force sortie.

One of these storied birds now sits on display, painted as she looked with the 357th Tactical Fighter Squadron at Takhli Royal Thai Air Base. Her name, Memphis Belle II, pays homage to the iconic B-17F and those two red stars beneath the cockpit?

They mark the MiGs she brought down in combat over Southeast Asia, a quiet testament to her legacy before she landed for good at the museum in April 1990.

TECHNICAL NOTES:
Armament: One M61 Vulcan 20mm cannon and more than 12,000 lbs. of ordnance
Engine: One Pratt & Whitney J75-P-19W of 24,500 lbs thrust
Maximum speed: 1,390 mph
Cruising speed: 778 mph
Range: 2,206 miles
Ceiling: 51,000 ft.
Span: 34 ft. 11 in.
Length: 64 ft. 5 in.
Height: 19 ft. 8 in.
Weight: 52,838 lbs. maximum

The Thud: A Call Sign That Endures

The F-105 Thunderchief—known to every pilot and crew chief as the “Thud”—earned its legend in the crucible of speed, power, and sacrifice. Born in 1951 to outrun and outgun the aging F-84F, the Thunderchief grew into much more than its designers ever imagined.

It became the workhorse of the early air war over North Vietnam, the Cold War’s answer to an urgent call for reach and muscle. Though conceived as a nuclear strike jet, the Thud carried over 12,000 pounds of bombs—more than the famed B-17s of World War II—and bore the brunt of Rolling Thunder when the conflict in Southeast Asia erupted in 1964.

But the Thud’s real story is written in the nerves of those who flew it. Take March 26, 1967: Colonel Robert Ray Scott, leading a flight of 20 Thunderchiefs from Takhli, carved a piece of history near Hanoi.

Coming off the target, he tangled with a MiG-17, downing it with the F-105’s Vulcan cannon; a weapon never meant for dogfights, but fearsome in the right hands. The Thud would notch 27 MiG kills during the war, most with the Vulcan, a fighter-bomber forced to fight as a warrior in the most contested skies of the era.

Yet every legend bears a cost. Of 833 Thunderchiefs built, a staggering 395 were lost in Vietnam; a somber testament to the danger faced by their crews.

Today, as airpower evolves into new shapes and technologies, the Thud’s story endures: in the end, range, speed, payload, and the courage of those at the controls are still what get a mission in, and hopefully, bring it home.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like. If you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog

I believe I captured a “first” today.

—Jarold Hamilton, Director of Photography CALLSIGN Magazine

Mission Briefing

10 March 2026—high over the rugged stretches of Eastern California, the future of American airpower slipped into view. The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider, still more rumor than routine, was seen tucked in behind a KC-135 Stratotanker, dancing through a five-and-a-half-hour aerial refueling mission.

For those lucky enough to be watching and quick enough with a camera, this was history in the making: the first Raider prototype, ghostly and poised, trailing the specially outfitted tanker from Edwards Air Force Base. Each frame captured by those photographers is more than a photo; it’s a glimpse of tomorrow’s legend, as the next generation of long-range strike quietly proves its mettle against the endless California sky.

Stealth Meets the Boom

Early spring over the Mojave Desert, and the horizon is alive with the drama of flight testing. In a moment that will linger in the memory of aviation enthusiasts, photographers caught the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider refueling from a KC-135. Each frame a glimpse into the future of American airpower.

Among those behind the lens were Jarod Hamilton and Ian Recchio, their images capturing not just the legendary B-21, but the full tapestry of the mission: the ever-present F-16 chase plane, and a rare sight: a modified Douglas NC9D business jet, callsign N879AD, used by Raytheon as a testbed, weaving its own story into the day’s events.

The photos, taken at altitude over the Mojave, reveal striking details. Even with the compression of long lenses, the B-21’s size stands out alongside the tanker, hinting that this stealth bomber may be more imposing than earlier estimates suggested.

The KC-135, serial number #61-0320, wore the special NKC-135 designation—equipped for unique test support, and trackable online throughout the mission. Public data confirmed the refueling took place at FL230, or 23,000 feet, a stage set for over five hours of formation flying and fuel transfer.

This flight is more than a test. It’s a signal of rapid progress. The Air Force and Northrop Grumman are accelerating B-21 production, with Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota preparing to welcome its first Raiders in 2027.

Construction crews are busy at Ellsworth, expanding runways and building the infrastructure that will support a new era of stealth. The work is so extensive, the base’s B-1B Lancers have temporarily relocated to Grand Forks.

Final assembly of the B-21 takes place in Palmdale, California, where its predecessor, the B-2 Spirit, first took shape. Multiple airframes are in production, and the program’s second prototype arrived at Edwards AFB in September 2025; stripped of the distinctive air data probe and trailing cone used on the first.

That orange-tipped probe is visible in the images from Hamilton and Recchio, confirming that the aircraft refueling over the Mojave was indeed the very first prototype, still wearing the tools of a test article.

For those watching the skies, these images are more than snapshots. They are a front-row seat to history in motion. A new stealth legend taking shape, one flight, one test, one refueling at a time.

What is the B-21 Raider?

Step into the future of American airpower, and you’ll find the B-21 Raider waiting at the vanguard. This isn’t just another stealth bomber. It’s a dual-capable, penetrating strike aircraft, designed to slip through the world’s most sophisticated defenses and deliver either conventional or nuclear munitions.

When tomorrow’s threat environment demands the impossible, the Raider will answer, forming the backbone of an Air Force bomber fleet built on the enduring partnership of B-21s and B-52s.

But the B-21 is more than a bomber. It’s the centerpiece of a new family of long-range strike systems, seamlessly integrating intelligence, surveillance, electronic warfare, and advanced communications into its mission set.

Built to adapt, the Raider will accommodate both manned and unmanned operations, and wield a formidable arsenal of stand-off and direct-attack munitions.

At its core, the Raider is engineered for evolution. Its open systems architecture means future upgrades can be integrated with less risk; ensuring this aircraft will keep pace as adversaries adapt and the nature of conflict changes.

Guided by the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office and developed by Northrop Grumman and a team of industry partners, the B-21’s journey began with the award of its engineering and manufacturing contract in October 2015.

Names like Pratt & Whitney, Collins Aerospace, and BAE Systems have all played a part in forging this next-generation bomber.

Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, will be the first to greet the Raider, its runways and training facilities already being prepared for the arrival of the fleet. The name itself is a tribute; an echo of the legendary Doolittle Raiders, who launched a daring strike against Japan in 1942, shifting the course of history and lifting Allied morale.

The B-21 carries that legacy forward as the first bomber of the 21st century, ready to write the next chapter in airpower’s story.

General Characteristics
Primary Function: Nuclear-capable, penetrating strike stealth bomber
Lead Command: Air Force Global Strike Command
Inventory: Minimum of 100 aircraft
Average Unit Procurement Cost (APUC): $550 million (base year 2010 dollars) / $639 million (base year 2019 dollars) / $692 million (base year 2022 dollars)
*APUC is the total costs of all procurement funding to include, aircraft flyaway costs, support equipment, training, spares, and engineering change orders divided by a minimum of 100 aircraft.
*Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates directed B-21 Average Procurement Unit Cost as a key performance parameter as the best means to control costs.
Munitions: Nuclear and conventional
Operational: Mid-2020s

Beyond the Horizon: The B-21’s Refueled Promise

Aerial refueling is what transforms the B-21 from a promising stealth platform into a true strategic game-changer. On March 10, the Raider proved its mettle, taking on fuel from a specially modified KC-135 over California during a marathon five-and-a-half-hour sortie.

But this was more than just a technical milestone. The Air Force and Northrop Grumman are racing to deliver the first operational B-21 to Ellsworth AFB by 2027, signaling that the U.S. isn’t just fielding a new bomber, but is building the support network to let that bomber fly farther, loiter longer, and arrive with a menu of options.

For America, this is a message of credible reach. Each successful refueling brings the next-generation bomber force closer to true operational range.

For allies, it’s reassurance: American long-range strike is still anchored in survivability, robust logistics, and the power to project force across oceans and into the world’s toughest neighborhoods. A proven refueling envelope means missions can launch from safer distances, holding adversaries at risk even when the forward edge is under threat.

With conflict spreading in the Middle East—war with Iran, attacks on shipping, and worries over energy and trade; the symbolism of a refuelable B-21 grows sharper. It doesn’t mean escalation, but it does mean America has credible options, even if bases, ports, or sea lanes are pinched. That’s a signal allies in Europe, the Gulf, and Asia need as instability ripples through oil markets and alliance planning.

The deeper truth is this: the bombers that matter most will be the ones with range, stealth, and endurance woven together. In a world where crises leap borders, the aircraft that can launch from afar, survive, and keep allied reach alive. Those are the tools that shape tomorrow’s battlespace.

This Week in Aviation History

22 March 1979—a date when the cold expanse above the ocean welcomed a new sentinel. That day, the Lockheed CP-140 Aurora soared into the sky for the first time, charting a course that would define decades of maritime patrol excellence.

Born from the proven bones of the P-3 Orion yet outfitted with cutting-edge electronics, the Aurora quickly earned its reputation as a watchful guardian. With a reach of 5,000 nautical miles and a belly ready for a broad arsenal, this aircraft became the long-range eyes and striking arm of maritime operations, patrolling distant waters with quiet confidence and relentless purpose.

Aurora’s Maiden Flight

The CP-140 Aurora stands as a mainstay of the Royal Canadian Air Force’s maritime patrol fleet, a close cousin to the famed Lockheed P-3 Orion that has long served American squadrons.

Though their frames are nearly twins, the Aurora’s soul is different. Its nerves and senses drawn from the S-3 Viking, an aircraft whose advanced electronics suite gave it an edge in the hunt, long after the Viking’s own retirement from U.S. Navy and NASA service.

Beneath its wings and inside its belly, the Aurora carries more than just promise. Its internal weapons bay can host up to eight weapons, maxing out at a hefty 4,800 pounds, while ten wing-mounted hardpoints add another 2,450 pounds of punch.

The Aurora is as comfortable dropping Mk 46 Mod V torpedoes as it is unleashing conventional bombs, and with a minor tweak, it can even fire air-to-surface rockets. Add in flares, smoke markers, and signal chargers, and you’ve got an aircraft ready for any twist the mission throws its way.

Born for the Cold War, the Aurora was Canada’s answer to prowling Soviet submarines; an eye in the sky with teeth to match. Decades later, even as sleeker, jet-powered patrol planes join the world’s fleets, the Aurora keeps flying, loyal and effective.

When its watch finally ends, the CP-140 will be remembered for dogged reliability and the quiet confidence it brought to every patrol over restless seas.

Under the Hood of the Aurora

Step onto the flight line at Greenwood or Comox and you’ll meet a machine built for long-haul vigilance: the CP-140 Aurora. Crewed by two pilots, a flight engineer, and a team of up to ten mission specialists, the Aurora is purpose-built for the demands of extended patrol.

Its long fuselage stretches 116 feet, nearly 100 feet of wingspan reaching out to the horizon, every angle and twist of its NACA airfoils tuned for stability and endurance. This bird’s no lightweight: empty, she tips the scales at over 61,000 pounds, and when fully loaded for a mission, she can reach a mighty 142,000 pounds.

Power comes from four Allison T56-A-14 turboprops, each churning out over 4,500 horsepower and spinning broad, four-bladed Hamilton-Standard propellers.

These engines, a symphony of compressors and turbines, keep the Aurora flying at up to 395 knots, with a ceiling above 35,000 feet. With 9,200 gallons of fuel in her tanks, the Aurora can stretch her legs across 5,100 nautical miles; enough range to cross continents or patrol the remotest seas. Stationed 1,000 nautical miles from base, she can keep watch for more than eight hours at a time, a tireless sentinel above the waves.

Beneath that long fuselage, the Aurora carries eight Mark 46 Mod V torpedoes in her weapons bay, with ten underwing hardpoints for extra punch. Sonobuoys spill from her belly, hunting for hidden submarines, while the MAD boom on her tail sniffs out magnetic signatures lurking below.

Decades of upgrades, from the AIMP modernization to the ASLEP structural overhaul, have kept the Aurora sharp and ready, with service assured into the next decade.

From her first flight to her enduring watch, the Aurora remains a testament to Canadian ingenuity and aerial endurance; a cold warrior turned timeless guardian.

Aurora’s Legacy

The legacy of the CP-140 Aurora isn’t just measured in flight hours or decades of service. It’s the story of an aircraft that became the backbone of Canada’s airborne watch. First taking wing in 1979, the Aurora arrived as a Cold War sentinel, tasked with guarding the vast maritime approaches and asserting Canadian sovereignty from the Arctic to the Pacific.

But the Aurora’s true mark came from its ability to evolve. No longer just a sub hunter, it grew into Canada’s primary airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform, supporting missions at sea, along the coasts, and deep inland—both at home and far abroad.

Through incremental modernization and structural renewal, the Aurora gained cutting-edge sensors, communications, and avionics, extending its relevance well into the 21st century.

This transformation allowed the Aurora to step far beyond its original brief, flying ISR missions over the Middle East and supporting international coalitions, while still keeping a vigilant eye on Canada’s own frontiers. In the end, the Aurora’s legacy is one of resilience and adaptation—a Cold War patrol aircraft reborn as a modern sentinel, bridging eras and missions with quiet confidence and enduring Canadian resolve.

In Case You Missed It

Photo Outlet

Every issue of Hangar Flying with Tog gets you a free image that I’ve taken at airshows:

Feel free to use these photos however you like, if you choose to tag me, I am @pilotphotog on all social platforms. Thanks!

Post Flight Debrief

Like what you’re reading? Stay in the loop by signing up below—it’s quick, easy, and always free.
This newsletter will always be free for everyone, but if you want to go further, support the mission, and unlock bonus content like the Midweek Sortie, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Your support keeps this flight crew flying—and I couldn’t do it without you.

– Tog